nach oben

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Erschienen in:

20.04.2022 | HIP

Hip microinstability diagnosis and management: a systematic review

verfasst von: Dan Cohen, Pierre-Olivier Jean, Milin Patel, Neveadan Aravinthan, Nicole Simunovic, Andrew Duong, Marc R. Safran, Vikas Khanduja, Olufemi R. Ayeni

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 1/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic review is to present the most common causes, diagnostic features, treatment options and outcomes of patients with hip micro-instability.

Methods

Three online databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed) were searched from database inception March 2022, for literature addressing the diagnosis and management of patients with hip micro-instability. Given the lack of consistent reporting of patient outcomes across studies, the results are presented in a descriptive summary fashion.

Results

Overall, there were a total of 9 studies including 189 patients (193 hips) included in this review of which 89% were female. All studies were level IV evidence with a mean MINORS score of 12 (range: 10–13). The most commonly used features for diagnosis of micro-instability on history were anterior pain in 146 (78%) patients and a subjective feeling of instability with gait in 143 (81%) patients, while the most common feature on physical examination was the presence of anterior apprehension with combined hip extension and external rotation in 123 (65%) patients. The most common causes of micro-instability were iatrogenic instability secondary to either capsular insufficiency or cam over-resection in 76 (62%) patients and soft tissue laxity in 38 (31%) patients.

Conclusion

The most common symptom of micro-instability on history was anterior hip pain and on physical exam was pain with hip extension and external rotation. There are many treatment options and when managed appropriately based on the precise cause of micro-instability, patients may demonstrate improved outcomes.

Level of evidence

IV.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Arner JW, Ruzbarsky JJ, Soares R, Briggs K, Philippon MJ (2021) Salvage revision hip arthroscopy including remplissage improves patient-reported outcomes after cam over-resection. Arthroscopy 37:2809–2816CrossRef

Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry J-Y, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L (2006) Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1755–1763CrossRef

Curtis DM, Murray IR, Money AJ, Pullen WM, Safran MR (2022) Hip microinstability: understanding a newly defined hip pathology in young athletes. Arthroscopy 38:211–213CrossRef

Curtis DM, Pullen WM, Murray IR, Money AJ, Segovia N, Safran MR (2022) Female gender, decreased lateral center edge angle and a positive hyperextension-external rotation test are associated with ease of hip distractability at time of hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06925-4CrossRef

Dierckman BD, Guanche CA (2014) Anterior hip capsuloligamentous reconstruction for recurrent instability after hip arthroscopy. Am J Orthop 43:E319-323

Duchman KR, Westermann RW, Glass NA, Bedard NA, Mather RC, Amendola A (2017) Who is performing hip arthroscopy? An analysis of the american board of orthopaedic surgery part-II database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:2103–2109CrossRef

Fagotti L, Soares E, Bolia IK, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ (2019) Early outcomes after arthroscopic hip capsular reconstruction using iliotibial band allograft versus dermal allograft. Arthroscopy 35:778–786CrossRef

Gehrman M, Cornell M, Seeley M (2019) Iatrogenic hip instability after hip arthroscopy: is there a role for open capsular reconstruction? A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect 9:e0091

Han S, Alexander JW, Thomas VS, Choi J, Harris JD, Doherty DB, Jeffers JRT, Noble PC (2018) Does capsular laxity lead to microinstability of the native hip? Am J Sports Med 46:1315–1323CrossRef

10.

Hoppe DJ, Truntzer JN, Shapiro LM, Abrams GD, Safran MR (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of 3 physical examination tests in the assessment of hip microinstability. Orthop J Sports Med 5:2325967117740121

11.

Hoshino H, Furuhashi H, Shimizu Y, Matsuyama Y (2021) Deviation of the centre of rotation of the femoral head in dysplastic hip joints. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31:603–609CrossRef

12.

Johannsen AM, Behn AW, Shibata K, Ejnisman L, Thio T, Safran MR (2019) The role of anterior capsular laxity in hip microinstability: a novel biomechanical model. Am J Sports Med 47:1151–1158CrossRef

13.

Johannsen AM, Ejnisman L, Behn AW, Shibata K, Thio T, Safran MR (2019) Contributions of the capsule and labrum to hip mechanics in the context of hip microinstability. Orthop J Sports Med 7:2325967119890846

14.

Kalisvaart MM, Safran MR (2015) Microinstability of the hip-it does exist: etiology, diagnosis and treatment. J Hip Preserv Surg 2:123–135CrossRef

15.

Kalisvaart MM, Safran MR (2017) Hip instability treated with arthroscopic capsular plication. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:24–30CrossRef

16.

Kim S-J, Choi CH, Lee S-K, Lee W, An H, Jung M (2018) Minimum two-year follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:278–287CrossRef

17.

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef

18.

Larson CM, Stone RM, Grossi EF, Giveans MR, Cornelsen GD (2015) Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: arthroscopic management for extreme soft-tissue hip instability. Arthroscopy 31:2287–2294CrossRef

19.

Locks R, Bolia I, Utsunomiya H, Briggs K, Philippon MJ (2018) Current concepts in revision hip arthroscopy. Hip Int 28:343–351CrossRef

20.

Maldonado DR, Chen JW, Yelton MJ, Rosinsky PJ, Shapira J, Brayboy C, Lall AC, Domb BG (2020) Achieving successful outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the setting of generalized ligamentous laxity with labral preservation and appropriate capsular management: a propensity matched controlled study. Am J Sports Med 48:1625–1635CrossRef

21.

Maradit Kremers H, Schilz SR, Van Houten HK, Herrin J, Koenig KM, Bozic KJ, Berry DJ (2017) Trends in utilization and outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the United States between 2005 and 2013. J Arthroplasty 32:750–755CrossRef

22.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1CrossRef

23.

Naal FD, Hatzung G, Müller A, Impellizzeri F, Leunig M (2014) Validation of a self-reported Beighton score to assess hypermobility in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 38:2245–2250CrossRef

24.

Nepple JJ, Ambastha C, Abu-Amer W, Clohisy JC (2021) Mid-term outcomes of combined hip arthroscopy and limited open capsular plication in the non-dysplastic hip. Iowa Orthop J 41:133–139

25.

Nishikino S, Hoshino H, Hotta K, Furuhashi H, Koyama H, Matsuyama Y (2019) Arthroscopic capsular repair using proximal advancement for instability following hip arthroscopic surgery: a case report. J Hip Preserv Surg 6:91–96CrossRef

26.

O’Donnell J, Klaber I, Takla A (2020) Ligamentum teres reconstruction: indications, technique and minimum 1-year results in nine patients. J Hip Preserv Surg 7:140–146CrossRef

27.

O’Neill DC, Mortensen AJ, Cannamela PC, Aoki SK (2020) Clinical and radiographic presentation of capsular iatrogenic hip instability after previous hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 48:2927–2932CrossRef

28.

Ortiz-Declet V, Maldonado DR, Annin S, Yuen LC, Kyin C, Kopscik MR, Lall AC, Domb BG (2022) Nonarthritic hip pathology patterns according to sex, femoroacetabular impingement morphology, and generalized ligamentous laxity. Am J Sports Med 50:40–49CrossRef

29.

Packer JD, Cowan JB, Rebolledo BJ, Shibata KR, Riley GM, Finlay AK, Safran MR (2018) The cliff sign: a new radiographic sign of hip instability. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118807176

30.

Pontiff M, Ithurburn MP, Ellis T, Cenkus K, Stasi SD (2016) Pre- and post-operative self-reported function and quality of life in women with and without generalized joint laxity undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. Int J Sports Phys Ther 11:378–387

31.

Rosinsky PJ, Annin S, Maldonado DR, Kyin C, Meghpara MB, Shapira J, Lall AC, Domb BG (2020) Arthroscopic ligamentum teres reconstruction: minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes with subanalysis of patients with ehlers-danlos syndrome. Arthroscopy 36:2170–2182CrossRef

32.

Ruzbarsky JJ, Seiter MN, Comfort SM, Soares RW, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ (2022) Arthroscopic hip capsular reconstruction using iliotibial band allograft as a salvage option for unrepairable capsular defects demonstrates good survivorship and improved patient-reported outcomes. Arthroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.035CrossRef

33.

Saadat AA, Lall AC, Battaglia MR, Mohr MR, Maldonado DR, Domb BG (2019) Prevalence of generalized ligamentous laxity in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: a prospective study of patients’ clinical presentation, physical examination, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures. Am J Sports Med 47:885–893CrossRef

34.

Safran MR (2019) Microinstability of the Hip-Gaining Acceptance. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27:12–22CrossRef

35.

Safran MR, Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Signorelli C, Vaughn ZD, Lindsey DP, Gold G, Giordano G, Marcacci M (2013) In vitro analysis of peri-articular soft tissues passive constraining effect on hip kinematics and joint stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1655–1663CrossRef

36.

Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Suryavanshi JR, Yen Y-M, Kelly BT, Fabricant PD (2019) A shift in hip arthroscopy use by patient age and surgeon volume: a New York state-based population analysis 2004 to 2016. Arthroscopy 35:2847-2854.e1CrossRef

37.

Shah A, Kay J, Memon M, Coughlin RP, Simunovic N, Nho SJ, Ayeni OR (2019) What makes suture anchor use safe in hip arthroscopy? A systematic review of techniques and safety profile. Arthroscopy 35:1280-1293.e1CrossRef

38.

Shu B, Safran MR (2011) Hip instability: anatomic and clinical considerations of traumatic and atraumatic instability. Clin Sports Med 30:349–367CrossRef

39.

Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716CrossRef

40.

Stone AV, Mehta N, Beck EC, Waterman BR, Chahla J, Ukwuani G, Nho SJ (2019) Comparable patient-reported outcomes in females with or without joint hypermobility after hip arthroscopy and capsular plication for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg 6:33–40CrossRef

41.

Woodward RM, Vesey RM, Bacon CJ, White SG, Brick MJ, Blankenbaker DG (2020) Microinstability of the hip: a systematic review of the imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol 49:1903–1919CrossRef

42.

Wyatt M, Weidner J, Pfluger D, Beck M (2017) the femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) Index: a new measurement associated with instability in borderline hip dysplasia? Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:861–869CrossRef

43.

Wylie JD, Beckmann JT, Maak TG, Aoki SK (2016) Arthroscopic capsular repair for symptomatic hip instability after previous hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med 44:39–45CrossRef

Titel: Hip microinstability diagnosis and management: a systematic review
verfasst von: Dan Cohen
Pierre-Olivier Jean
Milin Patel
Neveadan Aravinthan
Nicole Simunovic
Andrew Duong
Marc R. Safran
Vikas Khanduja
Olufemi R. Ayeni
Publikationsdatum: 20.04.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06976-7

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

Double-bundle non-anatomic ACL revision reconstruction with allograft resulted in a low revision rate at 10 years

Multivariable regression: understanding one of medicine’s most fundamental statistical tools

International cooperation needed to improve national anterior cruciate ligament registries

The posterior cruciate ligament–posterior femoral cortex angle: a reliable and accurate MRI method to quantify the buckling phenomenon of the PCL in ACL-deficient knees

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: patients with physically demanding work have significantly worse time to return to work, level of employment, and job loss