Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 2/2017

21.05.2016 | Review Article

Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review

verfasst von: Dorit Paz-Levy, David Yohay, Joerg Neymeyer, Ranit Hizkiyahu, Adi Y. Weintraub

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Central descent due to a level 1 defect is a main component in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) reconstructive surgery, whether for symptomatic apical prolapse or for the prolapse repair of other compartments. A recent growth in the rate of native tissue repair procedures for POP, following the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings regarding the safety and efficacy of synthetic meshes, requires a re-evaluation of these procedures. The safety, efficacy, and determination of the optimal surgical approach should be the center of attention. Functional outcome measures and patient-centered results have lately gained importance and received focus. A comprehensive literature review was performed to evaluate objective and subjective outcomes of apical prolapse native tissue repair, with a special focus on studies reporting impact on patients’ functional outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction. We performed a MEDLINE search for articles in the English language by using the following key words: apical prolapse, sacrospinous ligament fixation, uterosacral ligament suspension, sacral colpopexy, McCall culdoplasty, iliococcygeus vaginal fixation, and functional outcomes. We reviewed references as well. Despite a prominent shortage of studies reporting standardized prospective outcomes for native tissue repair interventions, we noted a high rate of safety and efficacy, with a low complication rate for most procedures and low recurrence or re-treatment rates. The objective and subjective results of different procedures are reviewed. Functional outcomes of native tissue repair procedures have not been studied sufficiently, though existing data present those procedures as favorable and not categorically inferior to sacrocolpopexy. Apical compartment prolapse repair using native tissue is not a compromise. Functional outcomes of native tissue repair procedures are favorable, have a high rate of success, improve women’s quality of life (QoL), and result in high rates of patient satisfaction. This subject requires further long-term, standardized prospective studies following the International Continence Society/International Urogynecologists Association guidelines for surgical outcomes report, with the focus on patient-centered functional outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A, Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–78CrossRefPubMed Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A, Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–78CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, DeLancey JO (2006) The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1438–43CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, DeLancey JO (2006) The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194:1438–43CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V (2009) Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 113(3):609–16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V (2009) Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 113(3):609–16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L (2006) Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1837–40CrossRefPubMed Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, FitzGerald MP, Brubaker L (2006) Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1837–40CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW (2011) Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:230.e1–230.e5CrossRef Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW (2011) Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:230.e1–230.e5CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, de Tayrac R, Dietz V, Guldberg R, Mascarenhas T, Nussler E, Ballard E, Ankardal M, Boudemaghe T, Wu JM, Maher CF (2015) Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the organization for economic cooperation and development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:755.e1–755.e27CrossRef Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, de Tayrac R, Dietz V, Guldberg R, Mascarenhas T, Nussler E, Ballard E, Ankardal M, Boudemaghe T, Wu JM, Maher CF (2015) Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the organization for economic cooperation and development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:755.e1–755.e27CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapsed. Int Urogynecol J 24:1783–90CrossRefPubMed Barber MD, Maher C (2013) Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapsed. Int Urogynecol J 24:1783–90CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014 Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Adams EJ, Hagen S, Glazener CM (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee on Gynecologic Practice (2012) Vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18:5–9 Committee on Gynecologic Practice (2012) Vaginal placement of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18:5–9
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Davila GW, Baessler K, Cosson M, Cardozo L (2012) Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:s7–14CrossRefPubMed Davila GW, Baessler K, Cosson M, Cardozo L (2012) Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23:s7–14CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller D, Milani AL, Sutherland SE, Navin B, Rogers RG (2012) Informed surgical consent for a mesh/graft-augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23(Suppl 1):S33–42CrossRefPubMed Miller D, Milani AL, Sutherland SE, Navin B, Rogers RG (2012) Informed surgical consent for a mesh/graft-augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 23(Suppl 1):S33–42CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD (2002) Patient centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:88–92CrossRefPubMed Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD (2002) Patient centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:88–92CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L (2003) Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1551–8CrossRefPubMed Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L (2003) Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:1551–8CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovac SR, Zimmerman CW, Vaginal hysterectomy (2007) In: Kovac SR, Zimmerman CW (eds) Advances in reconstructive vaginal surgery. Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 103–22 Kovac SR, Zimmerman CW, Vaginal hysterectomy (2007) In: Kovac SR, Zimmerman CW (eds) Advances in reconstructive vaginal surgery. Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 103–22
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Colombo M, Milani R (1998) Sacrospinous ligament fixation andmodified McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179(1):13–20CrossRefPubMed Colombo M, Milani R (1998) Sacrospinous ligament fixation andmodified McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179(1):13–20CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cam C, Karateke A, Asoglu MR, Selcuk S, Namazov A, Aran T, Celik C, Tug N (2011) Possible cause of failure after McCall culdoplasty. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283:791–4CrossRefPubMed Cam C, Karateke A, Asoglu MR, Selcuk S, Namazov A, Aran T, Celik C, Tug N (2011) Possible cause of failure after McCall culdoplasty. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283:791–4CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb MJ, Aronson MP, Ferguson LK, Lee RA (1998) Posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: primary repair in 693 patients. Obstet Gynecol 92(2):281–5PubMed Webb MJ, Aronson MP, Ferguson LK, Lee RA (1998) Posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: primary repair in 693 patients. Obstet Gynecol 92(2):281–5PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Occhino JA, Trabuco EC, Heisler CA, Klingele CJ, Gebhart JB (2011) Changes in vaginal anatomy and sexual function after vaginal surgery. Int Urogynecol J 22:799–804CrossRefPubMed Occhino JA, Trabuco EC, Heisler CA, Klingele CJ, Gebhart JB (2011) Changes in vaginal anatomy and sexual function after vaginal surgery. Int Urogynecol J 22:799–804CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–73CrossRefPubMed Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–73CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Margulies RU, Rogers MA, Morgan DM (2010) Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(2):124–34CrossRefPubMed Margulies RU, Rogers MA, Morgan DM (2010) Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(2):124–34CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva WA, Pauls RN, Segal JL, Rooney CM, Kleeman SD, Karram MM (2006) Uterosacral ligament vault suspension: five-year outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 108:255–63CrossRefPubMed Silva WA, Pauls RN, Segal JL, Rooney CM, Kleeman SD, Karram MM (2006) Uterosacral ligament vault suspension: five-year outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 108:255–63CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthew D, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL (2014) Factorial comparison of two transvaginal surgical approaches and of perioperative behavioral therapy for women with apical vaginal prolapse: The OPTIMAL Randomized Trial. JAMA 311(10):1023–34CrossRef Matthew D, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL (2014) Factorial comparison of two transvaginal surgical approaches and of perioperative behavioral therapy for women with apical vaginal prolapse: The OPTIMAL Randomized Trial. JAMA 311(10):1023–34CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Filmar GA, Fisher HW, Aranda E, Lotze PM (2014) Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications. Int Urogynecol J 25:1645–53CrossRefPubMed Filmar GA, Fisher HW, Aranda E, Lotze PM (2014) Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications. Int Urogynecol J 25:1645–53CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Edenfield AL, Amundsen CL, Weidner AC, Wu JM, George A, Siddiqui NY (2013) Vaginal prolapse recurrence after uterosacral ligament suspension in normal-weight compared with overweight and obese women. Obstet Gynecol 121:554–9CrossRefPubMed Edenfield AL, Amundsen CL, Weidner AC, Wu JM, George A, Siddiqui NY (2013) Vaginal prolapse recurrence after uterosacral ligament suspension in normal-weight compared with overweight and obese women. Obstet Gynecol 121:554–9CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson E, Bilbao JA, Vera RW, Mulla ZD, Mallett VT, Montoya TI (2015) Risk factors for ureteral occlusion during transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension. Int Urogynecol J Jackson E, Bilbao JA, Vera RW, Mulla ZD, Mallett VT, Montoya TI (2015) Risk factors for ureteral occlusion during transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension. Int Urogynecol J
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddique SA, Gutman RE, Schön Ybarra MA, Rojas F, Handa VL (2006) Relationship of the uterosacral ligament to the sacral plexus and to the pudendal nerve. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:642–5CrossRefPubMed Siddique SA, Gutman RE, Schön Ybarra MA, Rojas F, Handa VL (2006) Relationship of the uterosacral ligament to the sacral plexus and to the pudendal nerve. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:642–5CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CP, Kuehl TJ, Larsen WI, Yandell PM, Shull BL (2012) Recognition and management of nerve entrapment pain after uterosacral ligament suspension. Obstet Gynecol 120(2 Pt 1):292–5CrossRefPubMed Chung CP, Kuehl TJ, Larsen WI, Yandell PM, Shull BL (2012) Recognition and management of nerve entrapment pain after uterosacral ligament suspension. Obstet Gynecol 120(2 Pt 1):292–5CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Montoya TI, Luebbehusen HI, Schaffer JI, Wai CY, Rahn DD, Corton MM (2012) Sensory neuropathy following suspension of the vaginal apex to the proximal uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23:1735–40CrossRefPubMed Montoya TI, Luebbehusen HI, Schaffer JI, Wai CY, Rahn DD, Corton MM (2012) Sensory neuropathy following suspension of the vaginal apex to the proximal uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23:1735–40CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung CP, Kuehl TJ, Harris SK, McBride MM, Larsen WI, Yandell PM, Shull BL (2012) Incidence and risk factors of postoperative urinary tract infection after uterosacral ligament suspension. Int Urogynecol J 23:947–50CrossRefPubMed Chung CP, Kuehl TJ, Harris SK, McBride MM, Larsen WI, Yandell PM, Shull BL (2012) Incidence and risk factors of postoperative urinary tract infection after uterosacral ligament suspension. Int Urogynecol J 23:947–50CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Imparato E, Aspesi G, Rovetta E, Presti M (1992) Surgical management and prevention of vaginal vault prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175:233PubMed Imparato E, Aspesi G, Rovetta E, Presti M (1992) Surgical management and prevention of vaginal vault prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175:233PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Wang D, Li Y, Liang Z, Xu H (2011) Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases. Int Urogynecol J 22:83–9CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Wang D, Li Y, Liang Z, Xu H (2011) Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases. Int Urogynecol J 22:83–9CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancey JO (2007) Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 109(6):1424–33CrossRefPubMed Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancey JO (2007) Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 109(6):1424–33CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Petri E, Ashok K (2011) Sacrospinous vaginal fixation-current status. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:429–36CrossRefPubMed Petri E, Ashok K (2011) Sacrospinous vaginal fixation-current status. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:429–36CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(1):20–6CrossRefPubMed Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(1):20–6CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson KA, Smith T, Berger MB, Abernethy M, Mead S, Fenner DE, Delancey JO, Morgan DM (2013) Long-term patient satisfaction with Michigan four-wall sacrospinous ligament suspension for prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 122(5):967–75CrossRefPubMed Larson KA, Smith T, Berger MB, Abernethy M, Mead S, Fenner DE, Delancey JO, Morgan DM (2013) Long-term patient satisfaction with Michigan four-wall sacrospinous ligament suspension for prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 122(5):967–75CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohno MS, Richardson ML, Sokol E (2015) Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int Urogynecol J Ohno MS, Richardson ML, Sokol E (2015) Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Int Urogynecol J
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW (2015) Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial. BMJ 101h:303 Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW (2015) Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial. BMJ 101h:303
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Roshanravan SM, Wieslander CK, Schaffer JL, Corton MM (2007) Neurovascular anatomy of the sacrospinous ligament region in female cadavers: implications in sacrospinous ligament fixation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:660.e1–660.e6CrossRef Roshanravan SM, Wieslander CK, Schaffer JL, Corton MM (2007) Neurovascular anatomy of the sacrospinous ligament region in female cadavers: implications in sacrospinous ligament fixation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:660.e1–660.e6CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallner C (2008) Buttock pain after sacrospinous hysteropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1729–30 Wallner C (2008) Buttock pain after sacrospinous hysteropexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1729–30
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Milani R, Cesana MC, Spelzini F, Sicuri M, Manodoro S, Fruscio R (2014) Iliococcygeus fixation or abdominal sacral colpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: a retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 25:279–84CrossRefPubMed Milani R, Cesana MC, Spelzini F, Sicuri M, Manodoro S, Fruscio R (2014) Iliococcygeus fixation or abdominal sacral colpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: a retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 25:279–84CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Medina CA, Croce C, Candiotti K, Takacs P (2008) Comparison of vaginal length after iliococcygeus fixation and sacrospinous ligament fixation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 100(3):267–70CrossRefPubMed Medina CA, Croce C, Candiotti K, Takacs P (2008) Comparison of vaginal length after iliococcygeus fixation and sacrospinous ligament fixation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 100(3):267–70CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Serati M, Braga A, Bogani G, Roberti Maggiore UL, Sorice P, Ghezzi F, Salvatore S (2015) Iliococcygeus fixation for the treatment of apical vaginal prolapse: efficacy and safety at 5 years of follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 26:1007–12CrossRefPubMed Serati M, Braga A, Bogani G, Roberti Maggiore UL, Sorice P, Ghezzi F, Salvatore S (2015) Iliococcygeus fixation for the treatment of apical vaginal prolapse: efficacy and safety at 5 years of follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 26:1007–12CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Liebergall-Wischnitzer M, Ben-Meir A, Sarid O, Cwikel J, Lavy Y (2012) Women’s well-being after Manchester procedure for pelvic reconstruction with uterine preservation: a follow-up study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1587–92CrossRefPubMed Liebergall-Wischnitzer M, Ben-Meir A, Sarid O, Cwikel J, Lavy Y (2012) Women’s well-being after Manchester procedure for pelvic reconstruction with uterine preservation: a follow-up study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1587–92CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayhan A, Esin S, Guven S, Salman C, Ozyuncu O (2006) The Manchester operation for uterine prolapse. Int J Gynecol Obstet 92:228–33CrossRef Ayhan A, Esin S, Guven S, Salman C, Ozyuncu O (2006) The Manchester operation for uterine prolapse. Int J Gynecol Obstet 92:228–33CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Khunda A, Vashisht A, Cutner A (2013) New procedures for uterine prolapse. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27:363–79CrossRefPubMed Khunda A, Vashisht A, Cutner A (2013) New procedures for uterine prolapse. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27:363–79CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Tipton RH, Atkin PF (1970) Uterine disease after the Manchester repair operation. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 77:852–3CrossRefPubMed Tipton RH, Atkin PF (1970) Uterine disease after the Manchester repair operation. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 77:852–3CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat de Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB et al (2009) The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1313–9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB et al (2009) The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1313–9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkıs I, Karaman E, Han A, Gülaç B, Ark HC (2014) The outcome of Manchester–Fotergill operation for uterine decensus repair: a single center experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290:309–14CrossRefPubMed Alkıs I, Karaman E, Han A, Gülaç B, Ark HC (2014) The outcome of Manchester–Fotergill operation for uterine decensus repair: a single center experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290:309–14CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Thys SD, Coolen A, Martens I et al (2011) A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 22(9):1171–8CrossRef Thys SD, Coolen A, Martens I et al (2011) A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 22(9):1171–8CrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas AG, Brodman M, Dottino PR, Bodian C, Friedman F, Bogursky E (1995) Manchester procedure vs. vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse: a comparison. J Reprod Med 40:299–304PubMed Thomas AG, Brodman M, Dottino PR, Bodian C, Friedman F, Bogursky E (1995) Manchester procedure vs. vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse: a comparison. J Reprod Med 40:299–304PubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Skiadas CC, Goldstein DP, Laufer MR (2006) The Manchester-Fothergill procedure as a fertility sparing alternative for pelvic organ prolapse in young women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 19(2):89–93CrossRefPubMed Skiadas CC, Goldstein DP, Laufer MR (2006) The Manchester-Fothergill procedure as a fertility sparing alternative for pelvic organ prolapse in young women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 19(2):89–93CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Linda MD, Connolly AM, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–23CrossRefPubMed Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Linda MD, Connolly AM, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–23CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat De Gouveia De Sa M, Claydon LS, Whitlow B, Artahona MAD (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J De Gouveia De Sa M, Claydon LS, Whitlow B, Artahona MAD (2015) Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Serati M, Bogani G, Sorice P, Braga A, Torella M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Cromi A, Ghezzi F (2014) Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Euro Urol 66:303–18CrossRef Serati M, Bogani G, Sorice P, Braga A, Torella M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Cromi A, Ghezzi F (2014) Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Euro Urol 66:303–18CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Vieillefosse S, Thubert T, Dache A, Hermieu JF, Deffieux X (2015) Satisfaction, quality of life and lumbar pain following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: suture vs. tackers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 187:51–6CrossRefPubMed Vieillefosse S, Thubert T, Dache A, Hermieu JF, Deffieux X (2015) Satisfaction, quality of life and lumbar pain following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: suture vs. tackers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 187:51–6CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Stepanian AA, Miklos JR, Moore RD, Mattox TF (2008) Risk ofmesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(2):188–96CrossRefPubMed Stepanian AA, Miklos JR, Moore RD, Mattox TF (2008) Risk ofmesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(2):188–96CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Arsene E, Giraudet G, Lucot JP, Rubod C, Cosson M (2015) Sacral colpopexy: long-term mesh complications requiring reoperation(s). Int Urogynecol J 26:353–8CrossRefPubMed Arsene E, Giraudet G, Lucot JP, Rubod C, Cosson M (2015) Sacral colpopexy: long-term mesh complications requiring reoperation(s). Int Urogynecol J 26:353–8CrossRefPubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Akyol A, Akca A, Ulker V, Gedikbasi A, Kublay A, Han A, Ark HC, Numanoglu C (2014) Additional surgical risk factors and patient characteristics for mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40(5):1368–74CrossRefPubMed Akyol A, Akca A, Ulker V, Gedikbasi A, Kublay A, Han A, Ark HC, Numanoglu C (2014) Additional surgical risk factors and patient characteristics for mesh erosion after abdominal sacrocolpopexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40(5):1368–74CrossRefPubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill AJ, Barber MD (2015) Apical prolapse repair: weighing the risks and benefits. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 27(5):373–9CrossRefPubMed Hill AJ, Barber MD (2015) Apical prolapse repair: weighing the risks and benefits. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 27(5):373–9CrossRefPubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M et al (2012) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23:527–35CrossRefPubMed Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M et al (2012) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23:527–35CrossRefPubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers RG, Kammerer-Doak D, Villarreal A, Coates K, Qualls C (2001) A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:552–8CrossRefPubMed Rogers RG, Kammerer-Doak D, Villarreal A, Coates K, Qualls C (2001) A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:552–8CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J et al (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26:191–208CrossRefPubMed Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J et al (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26:191–208CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review
verfasst von
Dorit Paz-Levy
David Yohay
Joerg Neymeyer
Ranit Hizkiyahu
Adi Y. Weintraub
Publikationsdatum
21.05.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3032-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.