Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Pediatric Radiology
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2004

01.02.2004 | Review

Intussusception

Part 2: An update on the evolution of management

verfasst von: Alan Daneman, Oscar Navarro

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Children with symptomatic ileocolic or ileo-ileocolic intussusceptions can be successfully managed in one of a number of different ways. The nonoperative enema reduction technique has major advantages over surgical reduction and high success rates can be achieved using pneumatic or hydrostatic reduction techniques under fluoroscopic or sonographic guidance. This article highlights current concepts and some controversial issues related to management of intussusception, including patient selection for attempted enema reduction, the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, complications, the value of delayed, repeated reduction attempts, the role of imaging after attempted enema reduction, and recurrence of intussusception.
Literatur
1.
McDermott VGM (1994) Childhood intussusception and approaches to treatment: a historical review. Pediatr Radiol 24:153–155PubMed
2.
Markowitz RI, Meyer JS (1992) Pneumatic versus hydrostatic reduction of intussusception. Radiology 183:1–2PubMed
3.
Del-Pozo G, Albillos JC, Tejedor D, et al (1999) Intussusception in children: current concepts in diagnosis and enema reduction. Radiographics 19:299–319PubMed
4.
Gu L, Alton DJ, Daneman A, et al (1988) Intussusception reduction in children by rectal insufflation of air. AJR 150:1345–1348
5.
Peh WCG, Khong PL, Lam C, et al (1999) Reduction of intussusception in children using sonographic guidance. AJR 173:985–988
6.
Gu LL, Zhu HY, Wang S, et al (2000) Sonographic guidance of air enema for intussusception reduction in children. Pediatr Radiol 30:339–342CrossRefPubMed
7.
Bruce J, Huh YS, Cooney DR, et al (1987) Intussusception: evolution of current management. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 6:663–674PubMed
8.
Olsson G, Pallin G (1927) Uber das Bild der akuten Darminvagination mit hilfe von Kontrastlavements. Acta Chir Scand 61:371–383
9.
Pouliquier M (1927) Indication du lavement bismuthe dans certaines formes d’invaginations intestinales. Bull Mem Soc Nat Chir 53:1016–1021
10.
Retan GM (1927) Nonoperative treatment of intussusception. Am J Dis Child 33:765–770
11.
Stephenson CA, Seibert JJ, Strain JD, et al (1989) Intussusception: clinical and radiographic factors influencing reducibility. Pediatr Radiol 20:57–60PubMed
12.
Barr LL, Stansberry SD, Swischuk LE (1990) Significance of age, duration, obstruction, and the dissection sign in intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 20:454–456PubMed
13.
Katz M, Phelan E, Carlin JB, et al (1993) Gas enema for the reduction of intussusception: relationship between clinical signs and symptoms and outcome. AJR 160:363–366
14.
McDermott VG, Taylor T, Mackenzie S, et al (1994) Pneumatic reduction of intussusception: clinical experience and factors affecting outcome. Clin Radiol 49:30–34PubMed
15.
Gorenstein A, Raucher A, Serour F, et al (1998) Intussusception in children: reduction with repeated, delayed air enema. Radiology 206:721–724PubMed
16.
Meier DE, Coln CD, Rescorla FJ, et al (1996) Intussusception in children: international perspective. World J Surg 20:1035–1040CrossRefPubMed
17.
Van Heek NT, Aronson DC, Halimun EM, et al (1999) Intussusception in a tropical country: comparison among patient populations in Jakarta, Jogyakarta, and Amsterdam. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 29:402–405CrossRefPubMed
18.
Phelan E, de Campo JF, Malecky G (1988) Comparison of oxygen and barium reduction of ileocolic intussusception. AJR 150:1349–1352
19.
Ravitch MM, McCune RM Jr (1948) Reduction of intussusception by barium enema: A clinical and experimental study. Ann Surg 128:904–917
20.
Meyer JS (1992) The current radiologic management of intussusception: a survey and review. Pediatr Radiol 22:323–325PubMed
21.
Schmit P, Rohrschneider WK, Christmann D (1999) Intestinal intussusception survey about diagnostic and nonsurgical therapeutic procedures. Pediatr Radiol 29:752–761CrossRefPubMed
22.
Yoon CH, Kim HJ, Goo HW (2001) Intussusception in children: US-guided pneumatic reduction—initial experience. Radiology 218:85–88PubMed
23.
Jewell FM, Roobottom C, Duncan A (1995) Variations in the radiological management of intussusception: results of a postal survey. Br J Radiol 68:13–18PubMed
24.
Rosenfeld K, McHugh K (1999) Survey of intussusception reduction in England, Scotland and Wales: how and why we could do better. Clin Radiol 54:452–458PubMed
25.
Calder FR, Tan S, Kitteringham L, Dykes EH (2001) Patterns of management of intussusception outside tertiary centres. J Pediatr Surg 36:312–315CrossRefPubMed
26.
Shiels WE II, Maves CK, Hedlund GL, et al (1991) Air enema for diagnosis and reduction of intussusception: clinical experiences and pressure correlates. Radiology 181:169–172PubMed
27.
Meyer JS, Dangman BC, Buonomo C, et al (1993) Air and liquid contrast agents in the management of intussusception: a controlled, randomized trial. Radiology 188:507–511PubMed
28.
Eshel G, Barr J, Heyman E, et al (1997) Intussusception: a 9-year survey (1986–1995). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 24:253–256CrossRefPubMed
29.
Chan KL, Saing H, Peh WC, et al (1997) Childhood intussusception: ultrasound-guided Hartmann’s solution hydrostatic reduction or barium enema reduction? J Pediatr Surg 32:3-6PubMed
30.
Hadidi AT, El Shal N (1999) Childhood intussusception: a comparative study of nonsurgical management. J Pediatr Surg 34:304–307PubMed
31.
Navarro O, Dugougeat F, Kornecki A, et al (2000) The impact of imaging in the management of intussusception owing to pathologic lead points in children. A review of 43 cases. Pediatr Radiol 30:594–603CrossRefPubMed
32.
Rohrschneider W, Tröger J, Betsch B (1994) The postreduction donut sign. Pediatr Radiol 24:156–160
33.
Dugougeat F, Navarro O, Daneman A (2000) The role of sonography in children with abdominal pain after recent successful reduction of intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 30:654CrossRefPubMed
34.
Todani T, Sato Y, Watanabe Y, et al (1990) Air reduction for intussusception in infancy and childhood: ultrasonographic diagnosis and management without X-ray exposure. Z Kinderchir 45:222–226PubMed
35.
Wang G, Liu XG, Zitsman JL (1995) Nonfluoroscopic reduction of intussusception by air enema. World J Surg 19:435–438PubMed
36.
Poznanski AK (1995) Why I still use barium for intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 25:92–93PubMed
37.
Swischuk LE (1992) The current radiologic management of intussusception: a survey and review. Pediatr Radiol 22:317PubMed
38.
Shiels WE II, Kirks DR, Keller GL, et al (1993) Colonic perforation by air and liquid enemas: comparison study in young pigs. AJR 160:931–935
39.
Daneman A, Alton DJ, Ein S, et al (1995) Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children—a comparison of perforation with barium and air. Pediatr Radiol 25:81–88PubMed
40.
Campbell J (1989) Contrast media in intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 19:293–296PubMed
41.
Bisset GS III, Kirks DR (1988) Intussusception in infants and children: diagnosis and therapy. Radiology 168:141–145PubMed
42.
Hernanz-Schulman M, Foster C, Maxa R, et al (2000) Experimental study of mortality and morbidity of contrast media and standardized fecal dose in the peritoneal cavity. Pediatr Radiol 30:369–378CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zheng JY, Frush DP, Guo JZ (1994) Review of pneumatic reduction of intussusception: evolution not revolution. J Pediatr Surg 29:93–97PubMed
44.
Hedlund GL, Johnson JF, Strife JL (1990) Ileocolic intussusception: extensive reflux of air preceding pneumatic reduction. Radiology 174:187–189PubMed
45.
Murakami JW, Winters WD, Weinberger E, et al (1998) Extensive reflux of air during enema for intussusception without reduction: case report. Can Assoc Radiol J 49:334–335PubMed
46.
Mortensson W, Eklöf O, Laurin S (1984) Hydrostatic reduction of childhood intussusception. The role of adjuvant glucagon mediation. Acta Radiol Diagn 25:261–264
47.
Liu KW, MacCarthy J, Guiney EJ, et al (1986) Intussusception—current trends in management. Arch Dis Child 61:75–77PubMed
48.
Allan RA, Heenan S, Given-Wilson R, et al (2000) Re: K. Rosenfeld, K. McHugh. Survey of intussusception reduction in England, Scotland and Wales: how and why we could do better. Clin Radiol 55:895CrossRef
49.
Franken EA Jr, Smith WL, Chernish SM, et al (1983) The use of glucagon in hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: a double-blind study of 30 patients. Radiology 146:687–689PubMed
50.
Hsiao JY, Kao HA, Shih SL (1988) Intravenous glucagon in hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: a controlled study of 63 patients. Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi (Acta Paediatr Sinensis) 29:242–247
51.
52.
Grasso SN, Katz ME, Presberg HJ, et al (1994) Transabdominal manually assisted reduction of pediatric intussusception: reappraisal of this historical technique. Radiology 191:777–779PubMed
53.
Guo JZ, Ma XY, Zhou QH (1986) Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6396 cases in 13 years. J Pediatr Surg 21:1201–1203PubMed
54.
Zhang JZ, Wang YX, Wei LC (1986) Rectal inflation of intussusception in infants. J Pediatr Surg 21:30–32PubMed
55.
Stein M, Alton DJ, Daneman A (1992) Pneumatic reduction of intussusception: 5-year experience. Radiology 183:681–684PubMed
56.
Menor F, Cortina H, Marco A, et al (1992) Effectiveness of pneumatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception in children. Gastrointest Radiol 17:339–343PubMed
57.
Margarit Mallol J, Ribo Cruz JM, Martín Hortiguela ME, et al (1993) Invaginación intestinal aguda: Reducción hidrostática versus reducción neumática. An Esp Pediatr 38:17–19PubMed
58.
Gu L, Wong S, Gu A (1993) Perforations during attempted intussusception reduction: 14 patients from 9,028 examinations over a 20-year period. J Intervent Radiol (China) 2:36–38
59.
Lim HK, Bae SH, Lee KH, et al (1994) Assessment of reducibility of ileocolic intussusception in children: usefulness of color Doppler sonography. Radiology 191:622–623PubMed
60.
Wong HF, Kong MS, Ng SH, et al (1995) Pneumatic reduction of intussusception in children. J Formos Med Assoc 94:702–704PubMed
61.
Sanz N, Sánchez M, García Aroca J, et al (1996) Intussusception: barium vs. pneumatic reduction. Cir Pediatr 9:21–24PubMed
62.
Ein SH, Alton D, Palder SB, et al (1997) Intussusception in the 1990s; has 25 years made a difference? Pediatr Surg Int 12:374–376CrossRefPubMed
63.
Lui KW, Wong HF, Cheung YC, et al (2001) Air enema for diagnosis and reduction of intussusception in children: clinical experience and fluoroscopy time correlation. J Pediatr Surg 36:479–481CrossRefPubMed
64.
Collins DL, Pinckney LE, Miller KE, et al (1989) Hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception: a second attempt in the operating room with general anesthesia. J Pediatr115:204–207
65.
Saxton V, Katz M, Phelan E, et al (1994) Intussusception: a repeat delayed gas enema increases the nonoperative reduction rate. J Pediatr Surg 29:588–589PubMed
66.
Connolly B, Alton DJ, Ein SH, et al (1995) Partially reduced intussusception: when are repeated delayed reduction attempts appropriate? Pediatr Radiol 25:104–107PubMed
67.
Sandler AD, Ein SH, Connolly B, et al (1999) Unsuccessful air-enema reduction of intussusception: is a second attempt worthwhile? Pediatr Surg Int 15:214–216CrossRefPubMed
68.
González-Spínola J, Del Pozo G, Tejedor D, et al (1999) Intussusception: the accuracy of ultrasound-guided saline enema and the usefulness of a delayed attempt at reduction. J Pediatr Surg 34:1016–1020PubMed
69.
Bramson RT, Blickman JG (1992) Perforation during hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: proposed mechanism and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 27:589–591PubMed
70.
Maoate K, Beasley SW (1998) Perforation during gas reduction of intussusception. Pediatr Surg Int 14:168–170CrossRefPubMed
71.
Britton I, Wilkinson AG (1999) Ultrasound features of intussusception predicting outcome of air enema. Pediatr Radiol 29:705–710CrossRefPubMed
72.
Rohrschneider WK, Tröger J (1995) Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception under US guidance. Pediatr Radiol 25:530–534PubMed
73.
Wang G, Liu S (1988) Enema reduction of intussusception by hydrostatic pressure under ultrasound guidance. A report of 377 cases. J Pediatr Surg 23:814–818PubMed
74.
Hernanz-Schulman M, Vanholder R, Waterloos MA, et al (2000) Effect of radiographic contrast agents on leukocyte metabolic response. Pediatr Radiol 30:361–368CrossRefPubMed
75.
Royal SA (2001) Hypovolemic shock after air reduction intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 31:184–186CrossRefPubMed
76.
Somekh E, Serour F, Gonçalves D, et al (1996) Air enema reduction of intussusception in children: risk of bacteremia. Radiology 200:217–218PubMed
77.
Miller SF, Landes AB, Dautenhahn LW, et al (1995) Intussusception: ability of fluoroscopic images obtained during air enemas to depict lead points and other abnormalities. Radiology 197:493–496PubMed
78.
Pracros JP, Tran-Minh VA, Morin DE, et al (1987) Acute intestinal intussusception in children: contribution of ultrasonography (145 cases). Ann Radiol 30:525–530PubMed
79.
Woo SK, Kim JS, Suh SJ, et al (1992) Childhood intussusception: US-guided hydrostatic reduction. Radiology 182:77–80PubMed
80.
Ein SH (1975) Recurrent intussusception in children. J Pediatr Surg 10:751–755PubMed
81.
Fecteau A, Flageole H, Nguyen LT, et al (1996) Recurrent intussusception: safe use of hydrostatic enema. J Pediatr Surg 31:859–861PubMed
82.
West KW, Stephens B, Vane DW, et al (1987) Intussusception: current management in infants and children. Surgery 102:704–710PubMed
83.
Champoux AN, Del Beccaro MA, Nazar-Stewart V (1994) Recurrent intussusception. Risks and features. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148:474–478PubMed
84.
Yang CM, Hsu HY, Tsao PN, et al (2001) Recurrence of intussusception in childhood. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 42:158–161PubMed
85.
Riebel TW, Nasir R, Weber K (1993) US-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children. Radiology 188:513–516PubMed
86.
Choi SO, Park WH, Woo SK (1994) Ultrasound-guided water enema: an alternative method of nonoperative treatment for childhood intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 29:498–500PubMed
87.
Soun DS, Choy PC, Tok TS, et al (1996) Reduction of intussusception by ultrasound-guided enema. Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi (Acta Paediatr Sinensis) 37:257–262
88.
Crystal P, Hertzanu Y, Farber B, et al (2002) Sonographically guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children. J Clin Ultrasound 30:343–348CrossRefPubMed
89.
Daneman A, Alton DJ, Lobo E, et al (1998) Patterns of recurrence of intussusception in children: a 17-year review. Pediatr Radiol 28:913–919CrossRefPubMed
90.
Lin SL, Kong MS, Houng DS (2000) Decreasing early recurrence rate of acute intussusception by the use of dexamethasone. Eur J Pediatr 159:551–552CrossRefPubMed
91.
Tamanaha K, Wimbish K, Talwalkar YB, et al (1987) Air reduction of intussusception in infants and children. J Pediatr 111:733–736PubMed
92.
De Campo JF, Phelan E (1989) Gas reduction of intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 19:297–298PubMed
93.
Stringer MD, Pablot SM, Brereton RJ (1992) Paediatric intussusception. Br J Surg 79:867–876PubMed
94.
Paterson CA, Langer JC, Somers S, et al (1994) Pneumatic reduction of intussusception using carbon dioxide. Pediatr Radiol 24:296–297PubMed
95.
Heenan SD, Kyriou J, Fitzgerald M, et al (2000) Effective dose at pneumatic reduction of paediatric intussusception. Clin Radiol 55:811–816CrossRefPubMed
96.
Lai AHM, Phua KB, Teo ELHJ, et al (2002) Intussusception: a three-year review. Ann Acad Med Singapore 31:81–85PubMed
97.
Winstanley JHR, Doig CM, Brydon H (1987) Intussusception: the case for barium reduction. J R Coll Surg Edinb 32:285–287PubMed
98.
Mackay AJ, MacKellar A, Sprague P (1987) Intussusception in children; a review of 91 cases. Aust N Z J Surg 57:15–17PubMed
99.
Wilson-Storey D, MacKinlay GA, Prescott S, et al (1988) Intussusception: a surgical condition. J R Coll Surg Edinb 33:270–273PubMed
100.
Kim YS, Rhu JH (1989) Intussusception in infancy and childhood: analysis of 385 cases. Int Surg 74:114–118PubMed
101.
Myllylä V, Päivänsalo M, Linna O (1990) Intussusception in infancy and childhood. Rontgenblatter 43:94–98PubMed
102.
Skipper RP, Boeckman CR, Klein RL (1990) Childhood intussusception. Surg Gynecol Obstet 171:151–153PubMed
103.
Cruz Lopes MFS, Afonso Reis AM, Andrade Rolo VM, et al (1992) Invaginación intestinal – Hospital Pediátrico de Coimbra. Resultados en 13 años. An Esp Pediatr 37:200–204PubMed
104.
García C, Flores P, Zúñiga S, et al (1997) Reducción hidrostática como método terapéutico de la invaginación intestinal en el niño: experiencia en 43 pacientes. Rev Méd Chil 125:54–61
105.
Le Masne A, Lortat-Jacob S, Sayegh N, et al (1999) Intussusception in infants and children: feasibility of ambulatory management. Eur J Pediatr 158:707–710PubMed
106.
Okuyama H, Nakai H, Okada A (1999) Is barium enema reduction safe and effective in patients with a long duration of intussusception? Pediatr Surg Int 15:105–107CrossRefPubMed
107.
Mirilas P, Koumanidou C, Vakaki M, et al (2001) Sonographic features indicative of hydrostatic reducibility of intestinal intussusception in infancy and early childhood. Eur Radiol 11:2576–2580CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Intussusception
Part 2: An update on the evolution of management
verfasst von
Alan Daneman
Oscar Navarro
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2004
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2004
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-003-1082-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2004

Pediatric Radiology 2/2004 Zur Ausgabe

Case Report

Antley-Bixler syndrome with radioulnar synostosis

Commentary

Evaluating scrotal imaging: caution advocated

Question/Answer

Dose and image quality. How does the choice of kilovoltage affect patient dose, scattered radiation, and image quality in CT examinations?

Original Article

Intussusception in children: can we rely on screening sonography performed by junior residents?

Original Article

High incidence of nephrocalcinosis in extremely preterm infants treated with dexamethasone

Letter to the Editor

Unusual sonographic appearance of a Leydig cell tumor of the testis

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

23.04.2024 | Pankreaskarzinom | Nachrichten

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

13.04.2024 | Klinik aktuell | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

08.04.2024 | Andrologie | Nachrichten

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet
weitere anzeigen

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen