Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 8/2013

01.08.2013 | Pictorial Essay

Imaging of primary bone tumors: determination of tumor extent by non-contrast sequences

verfasst von: Ney Tatizawa Shiga, Filippo Del Grande, Olivia Lardo, Laura M. Fayad

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 8/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice for determining the extent of a primary bone tumor. This article will discuss the MRI techniques needed to accurately define the intramedullary extent of a bone sarcoma, emphasizing the need for non-contrast T1-weighted sequences and highlighting the role of chemical shift imaging.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Verstraete KL, Lang P (2000) Bone and soft tissue tumors: the role of contrast agents for MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 34:229–246PubMedCrossRef Verstraete KL, Lang P (2000) Bone and soft tissue tumors: the role of contrast agents for MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 34:229–246PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang S, Panicek DM (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in oncology, Part 1. Skeletal Radiol 36:913–920PubMedCrossRef Hwang S, Panicek DM (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in oncology, Part 1. Skeletal Radiol 36:913–920PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillespy T 3rd, Manfrini M, Ruggieri P et al (1988) Staging of intraosseous extent of osteosarcoma: correlation of preoperative CT and MR imaging with pathologic macroslides. Radiology 167:765–767PubMed Gillespy T 3rd, Manfrini M, Ruggieri P et al (1988) Staging of intraosseous extent of osteosarcoma: correlation of preoperative CT and MR imaging with pathologic macroslides. Radiology 167:765–767PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Onikul E, Fletcher BD, Parham DM et al (1996) Accuracy of MR imaging for estimating intraosseous extent of osteosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1211–1215PubMedCrossRef Onikul E, Fletcher BD, Parham DM et al (1996) Accuracy of MR imaging for estimating intraosseous extent of osteosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:1211–1215PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogler JB 3rd, Murphy WA (1988) Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 168:679–693PubMed Vogler JB 3rd, Murphy WA (1988) Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 168:679–693PubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kan J (2008) Major pitfalls in musculoskeletal imaging-MRI. Pediatr Radiol 38:251–255CrossRef Kan J (2008) Major pitfalls in musculoskeletal imaging-MRI. Pediatr Radiol 38:251–255CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Burdiles A, Babyn PS (2009) Pediatric bone marrow MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 17:391–409PubMedCrossRef Burdiles A, Babyn PS (2009) Pediatric bone marrow MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 17:391–409PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Alyas F, Saifuddin A, Connell D (2007) MR imaging evaluation of the bone marrow and marrow infiltrative disorders of the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:199–219, viPubMedCrossRef Alyas F, Saifuddin A, Connell D (2007) MR imaging evaluation of the bone marrow and marrow infiltrative disorders of the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:199–219, viPubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nobauer I, Uffmann M (2005) Differential diagnosis of focal and diffuse neoplastic diseases of bone marrow in MRI. Eur J Radiol 55:2–32PubMedCrossRef Nobauer I, Uffmann M (2005) Differential diagnosis of focal and diffuse neoplastic diseases of bone marrow in MRI. Eur J Radiol 55:2–32PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Seeger LL, Widoff BE, Bassett LW et al (1991) Preoperative evaluation of osteosarcoma: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:347–351PubMedCrossRef Seeger LL, Widoff BE, Bassett LW et al (1991) Preoperative evaluation of osteosarcoma: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:347–351PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Erlemann R, Reiser MF, Peters PE et al (1989) Musculoskeletal neoplasms: static and dynamic Gd-DTPA–enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 171:767–773PubMed Erlemann R, Reiser MF, Peters PE et al (1989) Musculoskeletal neoplasms: static and dynamic Gd-DTPA–enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 171:767–773PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Disler DG, McCauley TR, Ratner LM et al (1997) In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1439–1447PubMedCrossRef Disler DG, McCauley TR, Ratner LM et al (1997) In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1439–1447PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Zampa V, Cosottini M, Michelassi C et al (2002) Value of opposed-phase gradient-echo technique in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral lesions. Eur Radiol 12:1811–1818PubMedCrossRef Zampa V, Cosottini M, Michelassi C et al (2002) Value of opposed-phase gradient-echo technique in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral lesions. Eur Radiol 12:1811–1818PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Eito K, Waka S, Naoko N et al (2004) Vertebral neoplastic compression fractures: assessment by dual-phase chemical shift imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:1020–1024PubMedCrossRef Eito K, Waka S, Naoko N et al (2004) Vertebral neoplastic compression fractures: assessment by dual-phase chemical shift imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:1020–1024PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zajick DC Jr, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME et al (2005) Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology 237:590–596PubMedCrossRef Zajick DC Jr, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME et al (2005) Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology 237:590–596PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Erly WK, Oh ES, Outwater EK (2006) The utility of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging in differentiating malignancy from acute benign compression fractures of the spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1183–1188PubMed Erly WK, Oh ES, Outwater EK (2006) The utility of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging in differentiating malignancy from acute benign compression fractures of the spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1183–1188PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ragab Y, Emad Y, Gheita T et al (2009) Differentiation of osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral fractures by chemical shift in-phase and out-of phase MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 72:125–133PubMedCrossRef Ragab Y, Emad Y, Gheita T et al (2009) Differentiation of osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral fractures by chemical shift in-phase and out-of phase MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 72:125–133PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Costa FM, Canella C, Gasparetto E (2011) Advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the evaluation of musculoskeletal tumors. Radiol Clin North Am 49:1325–1358, vii–viiiPubMedCrossRef Costa FM, Canella C, Gasparetto E (2011) Advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the evaluation of musculoskeletal tumors. Radiol Clin North Am 49:1325–1358, vii–viiiPubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Teo HE, Peh WC (2004) The role of imaging in the staging and treatment planning of primary malignant bone tumors in children. Eur Radiol 14:465–475PubMedCrossRef Teo HE, Peh WC (2004) The role of imaging in the staging and treatment planning of primary malignant bone tumors in children. Eur Radiol 14:465–475PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Imaging of primary bone tumors: determination of tumor extent by non-contrast sequences
verfasst von
Ney Tatizawa Shiga
Filippo Del Grande
Olivia Lardo
Laura M. Fayad
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2605-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2013

Pediatric Radiology 8/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Hermes

Hermes

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.