nach oben

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Erschienen in:

07.05.2020 | Review

Efficacy of Dexamethasone for Reducing Edema and Ecchymosis After Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

verfasst von: Xi Bian, Hu Liu, Jing Sun, Xipeng Zhang, Ning Li, Meng Chen

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Rhinoplasty is one of the most challenging cosmetic surgical operations. The procedure has been known to precipitate higher levels of edema and ecchymosis in the periorbital and paranasal regions. The literature recommends the use of corticosteroids such as dexamethasone to alleviate these postoperative morbidities. In this review, we aim to provide a current state of evidence concerning the influence of dexamethasone together with rhinoplasty on intraoperative and postoperative morbidities.

Methods

A systematic identification of the literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on four academic databases: MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and CENTRAL. A meta-analysis compared the influence of dexamethasone and normal saline administered during rhinoplasty on the amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative edema and ecchymosis.

Results

Out of 1045 records, ten articles including 374 participants (mean age: 25.8 ± 2.5 years) were included in this review. This systematic review presents a 1b level of evidence supporting the use of dexamethasone during rhinoplasty to reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss, edema and ecchymosis as compared to normal saline. The meta-analysis reveals beneficial effects for dexamethasone interventions by demonstrating medium to large effect reduction of the amount of intraoperative blood loss (Hedge’s g: − 0.69), mean edema score (− 1.09) and mean ecchymosis score (− 1.03) as compared to placebo groups using normal saline.

Conclusion

The current systematic review and meta-analysis recommend the administration of dexamethasone with rhinoplasty. The review reports beneficial effects of dexamethasone’s administration as compared to normal saline for reducing the amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative edema and ecchymosis.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Angelos PC, Been MJ, Toriumi DM (2012) Contemporary review of rhinoplasty. Arch Fac Plast Surg 14:238–247. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2012.577CrossRef

Lee MR, Unger JG, Rohrich RJ (2011) Management of the nasal dorsum in rhinoplasty: a systematic review of the literature regarding technique, outcomes, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:538e–550e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6a82CrossRefPubMed

Rhee JS, Arganbright JM, McMullin BT, Hannley M (2008) Evidence supporting functional rhinoplasty or nasal valve repair: a 25-year systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.007CrossRefPubMed

Burget GC (1985) Aesthetic restoration of the nose. Clin Plast Surg 12:463–480CrossRefPubMed

Dayan S, Kanodia R (2009) Has the pendulum swung too far? Trends in the teaching of endonasal rhinoplasty. Arch Fac Plast Surg 11:414–416. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2009.70CrossRef

Millard DR (1981) Aesthetic reconstructive rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 8:169–175CrossRefPubMed

Toriumi DM, Mueller RA, Grosch T et al (1996) Vascular anatomy of the nose and the external rhinoplasty approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1996.01890130020003CrossRefPubMed

Cochran CS, Landecker A (2008) Prevention and management of rhinoplasty complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:60e–67e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d53deCrossRefPubMed

Lawson W, Kessler S, Biller HF (1983) Unusual and fatal complications of rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 109:164–169. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1983.00800170030008CrossRefPubMed

10.

Rettinger G (2007) Risks and complications in rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 6:Doc08PubMed

11.

Eftekharian HR, Rajabzadeh Z (2016) The efficacy of preoperative oral tranexamic acid on intraoperative bleeding during rhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 27:97–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002273CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kargi E, Hoşnuter M, Babucçu O et al (2003) Effect of steroids on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:570–574. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000095652.35806.c5CrossRefPubMed

13.

Gurlek A, Fariz A, Aydogan H et al (2006) Effects of different corticosteroids on edema and ecchymosis in open rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:150–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-005-0158-1CrossRefPubMed

14.

Hatef DA, Ellsworth WA, Allen JN et al (2011) Perioperative steroids for minimizing edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 31:648–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11416110CrossRefPubMed

15.

Coroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Cook DJ et al (2016) Perioperative corticosteroids reduce short-term edema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 36:136–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Abraham SM, Lawrence T, Kleiman A et al (2006) Antiinflammatory effects of dexamethasone are partly dependent on induction of dual specificity phosphatase 1. J Exp Med 203:1883–1889. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20060336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Tsurufuji S, Sugio K, Takemasa F (1979) The role of glucocorticoid receptor and gene expression in the anti-inflammatory action of dexamethasone. Nature 280:408–410. https://doi.org/10.1038/280408a0CrossRefPubMed

18.

Griffies WS, Kennedy K, Gasser C et al (1989) Steroids in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 99:1161–1164. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198911000-00010CrossRefPubMed

19.

Alajmi MA, Al-Abdulhadi KA, Al-Noumas HS, Kavitha G (2009) Results of intravenous steroid injection on reduction of postoperative edema in rhinoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 61:266–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-009-0080-yCrossRefPubMed

20.

Mehdizadeh M, Ghassemi A, Khakzad M et al (2018) Comparison of the effect of dexamethasone and tranexamic acid, separately or in combination on post-rhinoplasty edema and ecchymosis. Aesthet Plast Surg 42:246–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0969-xCrossRef

21.

Goodman LS, Gilman A, Brunton LL et al (2006) Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 11th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

22.

Hwang SH, Lee JH, Kim BG et al (2015) The efficacy of steroids for edema and ecchymosis after rhinoplasty: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 125:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24883CrossRefPubMed

23.

Youssef TA, Elibiary H, Amish KF (2013) Role of steroids in reducing postoperative edema in rhinoplasty: a meta-analytic study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:1189–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2144-yCrossRefPubMed

24.

Gutierrez S, Wuesthoff C (2014) Testing the effects of long-acting steroids in edema and ecchymosis after closed rhinoplasty. Plast Surg (Oakv) 22:83–87CrossRef

25.

Valente DS, Steffen N, Carvalho LA et al (2015) Preoperative use of dexamethasone in rhinoplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. JAMA Fac Plast Surg 17:169–173. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2014.1574CrossRef

26.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Jørgensen L, Paludan-Müller AS, Laursen DRT et al (2016) Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0259-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND et al (2008) Assessing the risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions. In: Kronick R, Slutsky J, Chang S (eds) Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville (MD)

29.

Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC (2011) The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:305–310. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Bax L, Yu L-M, Ikeda N, Moons KG (2007) A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-40CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ (2009) A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 172:137–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Rosenthal R (1994) Parametric measures of effect size. The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 231–244

33.

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186CrossRefPubMed

34.

Petitti DB (2001) Approaches to heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med 20:3625–3633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1091CrossRefPubMed

35.

Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.xCrossRefPubMed

36.

Hoffmann DF, Cook TA, Quatela VC et al (1991) Steroids and rhinoplasty. A double-blind study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:990–993. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1991.01870210062009discussion 994CrossRefPubMed

37.

Kara CO, Gökalan I (1999) Effects of single-dose steroid usage on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2213–2218. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199912000-00041CrossRefPubMed

38.

Ozdel O, Kara CO, Kara IG et al (2006) Does corticosteroid usage in rhinoplasty cause mood changes? Adv Ther 23:809–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02850322CrossRefPubMed

39.

Tuncel U, Turan A, Bayraktar MA et al (2013) Efficacy of dexamethasone with controlled hypotension on intraoperative bleeding, postoperative oedema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41:124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.06.003CrossRefPubMed

40.

Bagheri SC, Khan HA, Jahangirnia A et al (2012) An analysis of 101 primary cosmetic rhinoplasties. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:902–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.075CrossRefPubMed

41.

Foda HMT (2005) Rhinoplasty for the multiply revised nose. Am J Otolaryngol 26:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2004.06.014CrossRefPubMed

42.

Lam SM, Williams EF (2002) Anatomic considerations in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Fac Plast Surg 18:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-36488CrossRef

43.

Bhattacherjee P, Williams RN, Eakins KE (1983) A comparison of the ocular anti-inflammatory activity of steroidal and nonsteroidal compounds in the rat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:1143–1146PubMed

44.

Leung YF, Tam POS, Lee WS et al (2003) The dual role of dexamethasone on anti-inflammation and outflow resistance demonstrated in cultured human trabecular meshwork cells. Mol Vis 9:425–439PubMed

45.

Rosenbaum RB (2014) Chapter 50: connective tissue diseases, vasculitis, and the nervous system. In: Aminoff MJ, Josephson SA (eds) Aminoff’s neurology and general medicine, 5th edn. Academic Press, Boston, pp 1003–1029CrossRef

46.

Cronin J, Kennedy U, McCoy S et al (2012) Single dose oral dexamethasone versus multi-dose prednisolone in the treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma in children who attend the emergency department: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 13:141. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Saukko P, Knight B, Knight B (2015) Knight’s forensic pathology. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRef

48.

PLoS Medicine Editors (2011) Best practice in systematic reviews: the importance of protocols and registration. PLoS Med 8:e1001009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009CrossRef

49.

Harmon LJ, Losos JB (2005) The effect of intraspecific sample size on type I and type II error rates in comparative studies. Evolution 59:2705–2710. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00981.xCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Efficacy of Dexamethasone for Reducing Edema and Ecchymosis After Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
verfasst von: Xi Bian
Hu Liu
Jing Sun
Xipeng Zhang
Ning Li
Meng Chen
Publikationsdatum: 07.05.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01743-w

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Gegen postoperative Darmmotilitätsstörung: Erster Kaffee schon im Aufwachraum

30.04.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Nach einer Operation kann es zu einer vorübergehenden Störung der Darmmotilität kommen, ohne dass es eine mechanische Ursache gibt. Auf eine postoperative Darmmotilitätsstörung weist besonders hin, wenn Nahrung oral nicht toleriert wird.

Welche Übungen helfen gegen Diastase recti abdominis?

30.04.2024 Schwangerenvorsorge Nachrichten

Die Autorinnen und Autoren einer aktuellen Studie aus Griechenland sind sich einig, dass Bewegungstherapie, einschließlich Übungen zur Stärkung der Bauchmuskulatur und zur Stabilisierung des Rumpfes, eine Diastase recti abdominis postpartum wirksam reduzieren kann. Doch vieles ist noch nicht eindeutig belegt.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of Evidence III

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Clinical Results of Ear Elevations in Patients with Microtia Using Skin Grafts from Three Donor Sites: A Retrospective Study

Comparison of Rapid Absorbable Sutures with Nonabsorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Septorhinoplasty: Short-term Outcomes

Correction to: Can Cosmetics’ Advertisements Be An Indicator of Different Perceptions of Beauty Amongst Countries?

Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional Triamcinolone Versus Combination of Triamcinolone with 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Evaluation of Residual Neuro-Muscular Integrity in the Orbicularis Oculi Muscle After Lower Eyelid Transcutaneous Blepharoplasty According to Reidy Adamson-s Flap

Subfascial Breast Augmentation with Crossed Fascial Sling, Under Tumescent Anaesthesia With or Without Sedation and Lower Periareolar Access

Update Chirurgie