Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2009

01.06.2009 | Original Article

Perioperative fluid retention and clinical outcome in elective, high-risk colorectal surgery

verfasst von: Axel Kleespies, Manfred Thiel, Karl-Walter Jauch, Wolfgang H. Hartl

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 6/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Backgrounds and aims

There is some controversy regarding concepts currently propagated for an optimal perioperative fluid management in colorectal surgery. We wanted to analyze the association of net intraoperative and postoperative fluid balances with postoperative morbidity and length of stay.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively from March 1993 through February 2005. A subgroup from 4,658 patients was studied who had undergone major elective colorectal surgery during that time. This subgroup included 198 patients with a particularly high preoperative risk profile requiring immediate postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Fluid therapy was guided by established clinical end points. Results were adjusted for various confounding variables (extent of the operative trauma, individual response to the injury, type of analgesia, underlying disease, treatment era).

Results/findings

After adjustment for relevant covariates, the magnitude of fluid balance was unimportant for morbidity and postoperative hospital length of stay. A high Apache II score after ICU admission, an increased perioperative blood loss, and palliative surgical procedures were associated with a significantly higher complication rate, whereas use of epidural analgesia improved morbidity and shortened hospital stay.

Interpretation/conclusion

If guided by established standards, even large perioperative fluid retentions do not appear to be associated with a worse outcome after extended colorectal surgery. Epidural analgesia may provide a significant benefit in those high-risk patients.
Literatur
1.
2.
Holte K, Kehlet H (2006) Fluid therapy and surgical outcomes in elective surgery: a need for reassessment in fast-track surgery. J Am Coll Surg 202(6):971–989PubMedCrossRef
3.
Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J, Valentiner L, Lund C, Bie P, Kehlet H (2007) Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth 99(4):500–508PubMedCrossRef
4.
Moretti EW, Robertson KM, El-Moalem H, Gan TJ (2003) Intraoperative colloid administration reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting and improves postoperative outcomes compared with crystalloid administration. Anesth Analg 96(2):611–617PubMedCrossRef
5.
Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsø E, Ørding H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F (2003) Danish study group on perioperative fluid therapy. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238(5):641–648PubMedCrossRef
6.
Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I (2005) Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 103(1):25–32PubMedCrossRef
7.
Lobo DN, Bostock KA, Neal KR, Perkins AC, Rowlands BJ, Allison SP (2002) Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9320):1812–1818PubMedCrossRef
8.
MacKay G, Fearon K, McConnachie A, Serpell MG, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93(12):1469–1474PubMedCrossRef
9.
Kabon B, Akça O, Taguchi A, Nagele A, Jebadurai R, Arkilic CF, Sharma N, Ahluwalia A, Galandiuk S, Fleshman J, Sessler DI, Kurz A (2005) Supplemental intravenous crystalloid administration does not reduce the risk of surgical wound infection. Anesth Analg 101(5):1546–1553PubMedCrossRef
10.
Abbas SM, Hill AG (2008) Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 63(1):44–51PubMedCrossRef
11.
Watanabe E, Hirasawa H, Oda S, Shiga H, Matsuda K, Nakamura M, Abe R, Nakada T (2005) Cytokine-related genotypic differences in peak interleukin-6 blood levels of patients with SIRS and septic complications. J Trauma 59(5):1181–1189PubMedCrossRef
12.
Watanabe E, Hirasawa H, Oda S, Matsuda K, Hatano M, Tokuhisa T (2005) Extremely high interleukin-6 blood levels and outcome in the critically ill are associated with tumor necrosis factor- and interleukin-1-related gene polymorphisms. Crit Care Med 33(1):89–97PubMedCrossRef
13.
Müller M, Moubarak P, Wolf H, Küchenhoff H, Jauch KW, Hartl WH (2008) Independent determinants of early death in critically ill surgical patients. Shock 30(1):11–16PubMedCrossRef
14.
Hartl WH, Wolf H, Schneider CP, Küchenhoff H, Jauch KW (2007) Secular trends in mortality associated with new therapeutic strategies in surgical critical illness. Am J Surg 194:535–541PubMedCrossRef
15.
Schneider CP, Wolf H, Küchenhoff H, Jauch KW, Hartl WH (2006) Trends in der chirurgischen Intensivmedizin. 12 Jahre Erfahrung an einer einzelnen Institution. Chirurg 77:700–708PubMedCrossRef
16.
Heiss MM, Mempel W, Delanoff C, Jauch KW, Gabka C, Mempel M, Dieterich HJ, Eissner HJ, Schildberg FW (1994) Blood transfusion-modulated tumor recurrence: first results of a randomized study of autologous versus allogeneic blood transfusion in colorectal cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 12(9):1859–1867PubMed
17.
Götz E (1998) New formulations in the guidelines and their importance for anesthesiologists. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 33(10):666–669PubMedCrossRef
18.
Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H et al (2004) Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 32:858–873PubMedCrossRef
19.
Wolfe RA, Strawderman RL (1996) Logical and statistical fallacies in the use of Cox regression models. Am J Kidney Dis 27:124–129PubMedCrossRef
20.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1999) Applied survival analysis. Wiley, New York, p 158
21.
Klein JP, Moeschberger ML (2003) Survival analysis. Techniques for censored and truncated data. Springer, New York, p 295
22.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York, p 84
23.
Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49(11):1719–1725PubMedCrossRef
24.
Morris AM, Baldwin LM, Matthews B, Dominitz JA, Barlow WE, Dobie SA, Billingsley KG (2007) Reoperation as a quality indicator in colorectal surgery: a population based analysis. Ann Surg 245(1):73–79PubMedCrossRef
25.
Birkmeyer JD, Hamby LS, Birkmeyer CM, Decker MV, Karon NM, Dow RW (2001) Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery? Arch Surg 136(4):405–411PubMedCrossRef
26.
Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G, Makin G (2007) The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 9(1):71–79PubMedCrossRef
27.
Veyrie N, Ata T, Muscari F, Couchard AC, Msika S, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Dziri C, French Associations for Surgical Research (2007) Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg 205:785–793PubMedCrossRef
28.
Blumetti J, Luu M, Sarosi G, Hartless K, McFarlin J, Parker B, Dineen S, Huerta S, Asolati M, Varela E, Anthony T (2007) Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: do risk factors vary depending on the type of infection considered? Surgery 142(5):704–711PubMedCrossRef
29.
Miki C, Inoue Y, Mohri Y, Kobayashi M, Kusunoki M (2006) Site-specific patterns of surgical site infections and their early indicators after elective colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(10 Suppl):S45–S52PubMedCrossRef
30.
Chiappa A, Zbar AP, Bertani E, Biella F, Audisio RA, Staudacher C (2001) Surgical outcomes for colorectal cancer patients including the elderly. Hepatogastroenterology 48(38):440–444PubMed
31.
Sitges-Serra A, Insenser JJ, Membrilla E (2006) Blood transfusions and postoperative infections in patients undergoing elective surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 7(Suppl 2):S33–S35
32.
Brandstrup B (2006) Fluid therapy for the surgical patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 20(2):265–283PubMedCrossRef
33.
Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA, Laparoscopy and/or Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) Study Group, Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93(7):800–809PubMedCrossRef
34.
Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, Vinall NS, Eyre-Brook IA (2007) A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg 245(6):867–872PubMedCrossRef
35.
Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Holte K, Secher NH, Kehlet H (2007) Monitoring of peri-operative fluid administration by individualized goal directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51(3):331–340PubMedCrossRef
36.
Walz JM, Paterson CA, Seligowski JM, Heard SO (2006) Surgical site infection following bowel surgery: a retrospective analysis of 1446 patients. Arch Surg 141(10):1014–1018PubMedCrossRef
37.
Bufalari A, Giustozzi G, Burattini MF, Servili S, Bussotti C, Lucaroni E, Ricci E, Sciannameo F (2006) Rectal cancer surgery in the elderly: a multivariate analysis of outcome risk factors. J Surg Oncol 93(3):173–180PubMedCrossRef
38.
Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):439–444.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13(10):818–829PubMedCrossRef
40.
Oberholzer A, Souza SM, Tschoeke SK, Oberholzer C, Abouhamze A, Pribble JP, Moldawer LL (2005) Plasma cytokine measurements augment prognostic scores as indicators of outcome in patients with severe sepsis. Shock 23(6):488–493PubMed
41.
Chawla LS, Seneff MG, Nelson DR, Williams M, Levy H, Kimmel PL, Macias WL (2007) Elevated plasma concentrations of IL-6 and elevated APACHE II score predict acute kidney injury in patients with severe sepsis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2(1):22–30PubMedCrossRef
42.
Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S (2000) Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 321(7275):1493PubMedCrossRef
43.
Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL (2003) Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 290(18):2455–2463PubMedCrossRef
44.
Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Peyton PJ, Parsons RW, Collins KS, MASTER Anaethesia Trial Study Group (2002) Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9314):1276–1282PubMedCrossRef
45.
Park WY, Thompson JS, Lee KK (2001) Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Ann Surg 234(4):560–569PubMedCrossRef
46.
Gendall KA, Kennedy RR, Watson AJ, Frizelle FA (2007) The effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative outcome after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 9(7):584–598PubMedCrossRef
47.
Marret E, Remy C, Bonnet F, Postoperative Pain Forum Group (2007) Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94(6):665–673PubMedCrossRef
48.
Gogarten W, Van Aken H, Büttner J, Riess H, Wulf H, Bürkle H (2007) Rückenmarksnahe Regionalanästhesien und Thrombo-embolieprophylaxe/antithrombotische Medikation. 2. überarbeitete Empfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin. Anästh Intensivmed 48:S109–S124
Metadaten
Titel
Perioperative fluid retention and clinical outcome in elective, high-risk colorectal surgery
verfasst von
Axel Kleespies
Manfred Thiel
Karl-Walter Jauch
Wolfgang H. Hartl
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0659-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2009

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 6/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with chemotherapy alone in metastatic colorectal cancer

Letter to the Editor

Colonic manifestation of mantle cell lymphoma with multiple lymphomatous polyposis

Letter to the Editor

Colonic conduit for esophageal bypass in Celphos-induced tracheoesophageal fistula: our experience of two cases

Original Article

The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases

Original Article

Mitochondrial D-loop mutation is a common event in colorectal cancers with p53 mutations

Original Article

Genetic polymorphisms in the cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 genes and risk of colorectal adenoma

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.