Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.04.2012 | Original Article
Quality of life after laparoscopic resection rectopexy
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 4/2012
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
This study evaluated continence, constipation, and quality of life (QoL) after laparoscopic resection rectopexy (LRR) for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Results were compared with existing data after perineal rectosigmoidectomy (PRS).
Methods
From May 2003 to February 2008, consecutive patients suffering from full-thickness rectal prolapse undergoing LRR were retrospectively studied. A standardized questionnaire including the Cleveland Clinic Constipation and Incontinence Scores (CCCS and CCIS) as well as general and constipation-related QoL scores (EQ-5D and PAC-QOL) was administered. Results were compared with those after PRS. For statistic analysis, the Wilcoxon test (EQ-5D and EQ-VAS) and two-sample Student’s t test (CCCS, CCIS, and PAC-QOL) were used for LRR, for the comparison of both procedures Mann–Whitney test (EQ-5D) and two-sample Student’s t test (EQ-VAS, CCCS, CCIS, and PAC-QOL).
Results
Eighteen patients, 15 female, aged 58.1 (±20.2) years underwent LRR. Eleven patients completed follow-up. Postoperatively, neither functional outcome nor QoL improved. Two recurrences occurred, morbidity was n = 2, and mortality n = 1. In comparison, patients after PRS benefit from improved constipation, general QoL measures, status of health, and all dimensions of constipation-related QoL.
Conclusions
Patients after LRR do not benefit from improved general nor constipation-related QoL nor improved functional results compared to PRS.