Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2014

01.10.2014 | Original Article

Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort

verfasst von: Yoji Takeuchi, Hiroyasu Iishi, Shinji Tanaka, Yutaka Saito, Hiroaki Ikematsu, Shin-ei Kudo, Yasushi Sano, Takashi Hisabe, Naohisa Yahagi, Yusuke Saitoh, Masahiro Igarashi, Kiyonori Kobayashi, Hiroo Yamano, Seiji Shimizu, Osamu Tsuruta, Yuji Inoue, Toshiaki Watanabe, Hisashi Nakamura, Takahiro Fujii, Noriya Uedo, Toshio Shimokawa, Hideki Ishikawa, Kenichi Sugihara

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 10/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) is a promising but challenging procedure. We aimed to evaluate the factors associated with technical difficulties (failure of en bloc resection and procedure time, ≥2 h) and adverse events (perforation and bleeding) of C-ESD.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a prospectively collected cohort in 15 institutions. Eight-hundred sixteen colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm from patients who underwent C-ESD were included. We assessed the outcomes of C-ESD and risk factors for technical difficulties and adverse events.

Results

Of the 816 lesions, 767 (94 %) were resected en bloc, with a median procedure time of 78 min. Perforation occurred in 2.1 % and bleeding in 2.2 %. Independent factors associated with failure of en bloc resection were low-volume center (<30 neoplasms), snare use, and poor lifting after submucosal injection. Factors significantly associated with long procedure time (≥2 h) were large tumor size (≥4 cm), low-volume center, less-experienced endoscopist, CO2 insufflation, and use of two or more endoknives. Poor lifting was the only factor significantly associated with perforation, whereas rectal lesion and lack of a thin-type endoscope were factors significantly associated with bleeding. Poor lifting after submucosal injection occurred more frequently for nongranular-type laterally spreading tumors (LST) and for protruding and recurrent lesions than for granular-type LST (LST-G).

Conclusions

Poor lifting after submucosal injection was the risk factor most frequently associated with technical difficulties and adverse events on C-ESD. Less experienced endoscopists should start by performing C-ESDs on LST-G lesions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Soetikno RM, Gotoda T, Nakanishi Y et al (2003) Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 57:567–579PubMedCrossRef Soetikno RM, Gotoda T, Nakanishi Y et al (2003) Endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 57:567–579PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2009) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. Second English Edition. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co Ltd Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2009) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. Second English Edition. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co Ltd
3.
Zurück zum Zitat The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58:S3–S43 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58:S3–S43
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Iseki K et al (2000) Endoscopic piecemeal resection with submucosal saline injection of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 51:697–700PubMedCrossRef Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Iseki K et al (2000) Endoscopic piecemeal resection with submucosal saline injection of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 51:697–700PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al (2011) Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 140:1909–1918PubMedCrossRef Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al (2011) Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 140:1909–1918PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Terasaki M, Tanaka S, Oka S et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:734–740PubMedCrossRef Terasaki M, Tanaka S, Oka S et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:734–740PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hotta K, Fujii T, Saito Y et al (2009) Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:225–230PubMedCrossRef Hotta K, Fujii T, Saito Y et al (2009) Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:225–230PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito Y, Kawano H, Takeuchi Y et al (2012) Current status of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and other Asian countries: progressing towards technical standardization. Dig Endosc 24(Suppl 1):67–72PubMedCrossRef Saito Y, Kawano H, Takeuchi Y et al (2012) Current status of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and other Asian countries: progressing towards technical standardization. Dig Endosc 24(Suppl 1):67–72PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Yahagi N (2012) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and Western countries. Dig Endosc 24:80–83PubMedCrossRef Uraoka T, Parra-Blanco A, Yahagi N (2012) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan and Western countries. Dig Endosc 24:80–83PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N et al (2007) Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:678–683PubMedCrossRef Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N et al (2007) Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:678–683PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors–1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute’s experiences. Surg Endosc 27:31–39PubMedCrossRef Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH et al (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors–1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute’s experiences. Surg Endosc 27:31–39PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1225PubMedCrossRef Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1225PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakajima T, Saito Y, Tanaka S et al (2013) Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan. Surg Endosc 27:3262–3270PubMedCrossRef Nakajima T, Saito Y, Tanaka S et al (2013) Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan. Surg Endosc 27:3262–3270PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y et al. Multicenter prospective study on local recurrence after endoscopic resection of large colorectal neoplasia conducted by the colorectal endoscopic resection standardization implementation working group of Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum. Endoscopy 2012;44:A70 [abstract] Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y et al. Multicenter prospective study on local recurrence after endoscopic resection of large colorectal neoplasia conducted by the colorectal endoscopic resection standardization implementation working group of Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum. Endoscopy 2012;44:A70 [abstract]
15.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K (2008) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 43:641–651PubMedCrossRef Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K (2008) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 43:641–651PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Kanao H et al (2012) Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 24(Suppl 1):73–79PubMedCrossRef Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Kanao H et al (2012) Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 24(Suppl 1):73–79PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Moss A, Bourke MJ, Tran K et al (2010) Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40-mm colonic lesions. Endoscopy 42:400–404PubMedCrossRef Moss A, Bourke MJ, Tran K et al (2010) Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40-mm colonic lesions. Endoscopy 42:400–404PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen JI et al (2008) Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 68:S3–S47PubMedCrossRef Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen JI et al (2008) Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 68:S3–S47PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto A, Tanaka S, Oba S et al (2010) Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors accompanied by fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 45:1329–1337PubMedCrossRef Matsumoto A, Tanaka S, Oba S et al (2010) Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors accompanied by fibrosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 45:1329–1337PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71:446–454PubMedCrossRef Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71:446–454PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M et al (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy 44:660–667PubMedCrossRef Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M et al (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy 44:660–667PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim ES, Cho KB, Park KS et al (2011) Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 43:573–578PubMedCrossRef Kim ES, Cho KB, Park KS et al (2011) Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 43:573–578PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee EJ, Lee JB, Choi YS et al (2012) Clinical risk factors for perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large-sized, nonpedunculated colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 26:1587–1594PubMedCrossRef Lee EJ, Lee JB, Choi YS et al (2012) Clinical risk factors for perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large-sized, nonpedunculated colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc 26:1587–1594PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Metz AJ, Bourke MJ, Moss A et al (2011) Factors that predict bleeding following endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions. Endoscopy 43:506–511PubMedCrossRef Metz AJ, Bourke MJ, Moss A et al (2011) Factors that predict bleeding following endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions. Endoscopy 43:506–511PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Takizawa K, Oda I, Gotoda T et al (2008) Routine coagulation of visible vessels may prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection—an analysis of risk factors. Endoscopy 40:179–183PubMedCrossRef Takizawa K, Oda I, Gotoda T et al (2008) Routine coagulation of visible vessels may prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection—an analysis of risk factors. Endoscopy 40:179–183PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T et al (2007) A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with the patient under conscious sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 65:537–542PubMedCrossRef Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T et al (2007) A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with the patient under conscious sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 65:537–542PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort
verfasst von
Yoji Takeuchi
Hiroyasu Iishi
Shinji Tanaka
Yutaka Saito
Hiroaki Ikematsu
Shin-ei Kudo
Yasushi Sano
Takashi Hisabe
Naohisa Yahagi
Yusuke Saitoh
Masahiro Igarashi
Kiyonori Kobayashi
Hiroo Yamano
Seiji Shimizu
Osamu Tsuruta
Yuji Inoue
Toshiaki Watanabe
Hisashi Nakamura
Takahiro Fujii
Noriya Uedo
Toshio Shimokawa
Hideki Ishikawa
Kenichi Sugihara
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1947-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2014

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.