Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2017

20.03.2017 | Rhinology

Factors influencing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy outcome

verfasst von: Kazuhiro Nomura, Kazuya Arakawa, Mitsuru Sugawara, Hiroshi Hidaka, Jun Suzuki, Yukio Katori

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a widely accepted treatment option for epiphora and dacryocystitis. To elucidate the cause of treatment failure after surgery, we analyzed patients’ characteristics and perioperative background in association with poor outcome. We analyzed 165 patients with 213 sides who had endoscopic DCR. The influence of age, duration of symptoms, occlusion site and stent insertion were analyzed. Symptoms were completely cured in 85.0% (181/213) sides. Higher age (≥65 years) and proximal obstruction were associated with a poor prognosis while stent insertion and duration of symptoms were not. Higher age and proximal obstruction site were associated with a poor prognosis. Patients with a long history can be treated as per normal. The stent is not necessarily inserted in cases where the obstruction occurs distal to the lacrimal sac.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonogh M, Meiring JH (1989) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 103:585–587CrossRefPubMed McDonogh M, Meiring JH (1989) Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol 103:585–587CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Leong SC, MacEwen CJ, White PS (2010) A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24:81–90CrossRefPubMed Leong SC, MacEwen CJ, White PS (2010) A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24:81–90CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieberman SM, Casiano RR (2014) Is an endoscopic approach superior to external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal obstruction? Laryngoscope 125:2–4CrossRefPubMed Lieberman SM, Casiano RR (2014) Is an endoscopic approach superior to external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal obstruction? Laryngoscope 125:2–4CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S (2002) Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 86:792–794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yung MW, Hardman-Lea S (2002) Analysis of the results of surgical endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: effect of the level of obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 86:792–794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi JC, Jin H-R, Moon YE et al (2009) The Surgical Outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2:141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Choi JC, Jin H-R, Moon YE et al (2009) The Surgical Outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2:141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoğlu O, Irkeç M (2000) Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 120:319–322CrossRefPubMed Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoğlu O, Irkeç M (2000) Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol 120:319–322CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dave TV, Mohammed FA, Ali MJ, Naik MN (2016) Etiologic analysis of 100 anatomically failed dacryocystorhinostomies. Clin Ophthalmol 10:1419–1422CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dave TV, Mohammed FA, Ali MJ, Naik MN (2016) Etiologic analysis of 100 anatomically failed dacryocystorhinostomies. Clin Ophthalmol 10:1419–1422CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Okushi T, Yoshikawa M, Otori N et al (2012) Evaluation of symptoms and QOL with calcium alginate versus chitin-coated gauze for middle meatus packing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 39:31–37CrossRefPubMed Okushi T, Yoshikawa M, Otori N et al (2012) Evaluation of symptoms and QOL with calcium alginate versus chitin-coated gauze for middle meatus packing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 39:31–37CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ali MJ, Psaltis AJ, Murphy J, Wormald PJ (2015) Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a decade of experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31:219–221CrossRefPubMed Ali MJ, Psaltis AJ, Murphy J, Wormald PJ (2015) Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a decade of experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31:219–221CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Thale A, Paulsen F, Rochels R, Tillmann B (1998) Functional anatomy of the human efferent tear ducts: a new theory of tear outflow mechanism. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236:674–678CrossRefPubMed Thale A, Paulsen F, Rochels R, Tillmann B (1998) Functional anatomy of the human efferent tear ducts: a new theory of tear outflow mechanism. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236:674–678CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Paulsen FP, Thale AB, Maune S, Tillmann BN (2001) New insights into the pathophysiology of primary acquired dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology 108:2329–2336CrossRefPubMed Paulsen FP, Thale AB, Maune S, Tillmann BN (2001) New insights into the pathophysiology of primary acquired dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology 108:2329–2336CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Qahtani AS (2012) Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26:332–334CrossRefPubMed Al-Qahtani AS (2012) Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: a prospective randomized study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26:332–334CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong KK, Lai FH, Ho M et al (2013) Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 120:2139–2145CrossRefPubMed Chong KK, Lai FH, Ho M et al (2013) Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 120:2139–2145CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayers T, Dolman PJ (2016) Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 123:2255–2259CrossRefPubMed Fayers T, Dolman PJ (2016) Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 123:2255–2259CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarode D, Bari DA, Cain AC et al (2016) The benefit of silicone stents in primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. doi:10.1111/coa.12751 PubMed Sarode D, Bari DA, Cain AC et al (2016) The benefit of silicone stents in primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. doi:10.​1111/​coa.​12751 PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Longari F, Mobaraki PD, Ricci AL et al (2016) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:2079–2084CrossRefPubMed Longari F, Mobaraki PD, Ricci AL et al (2016) Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:2079–2084CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Alobid I, Tomás-Barberán M, Della Rocca DA et al (2007) Dacryocystorhinostomy surgical technique. In: Weber RK (ed) Atlas of lacrimal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 61–68CrossRef Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Alobid I, Tomás-Barberán M, Della Rocca DA et al (2007) Dacryocystorhinostomy surgical technique. In: Weber RK (ed) Atlas of lacrimal surgery. Springer, New York, pp 61–68CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Factors influencing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy outcome
verfasst von
Kazuhiro Nomura
Kazuya Arakawa
Mitsuru Sugawara
Hiroshi Hidaka
Jun Suzuki
Yukio Katori
Publikationsdatum
20.03.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4541-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.