nach oben

European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Erschienen in:

01.06.2008 | POINTS OF VIEW/FORMULATION

The DSM-V initiative “deconstructing psychosis” in the context of Kraepelin’s concept on nosology

verfasst von: Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Wolfgang Gaebel, Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Jürgen Zielasek

Erschienen in: European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience | Sonderheft 2/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The revision process of the international psychiatric classification systems has started and is expected to result in new versions of the International Classification of Disorders (then ICD-11) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (then DSM-V) in approximately 2014 and 2012, respectively. In the process of developing DSM-V, several research conferences jointly sponsored by the American Psychiatric Association, the National Institutes of Health, and the World Health Organization, are currently taking place. We will here focus on the impact that the DSM-V initiative “Deconstructing Psychosis” will have on the future of diagnosing a psychotic state, and how this may be viewed from a European context of Kraepelin’s nosology of psychiatric disorders.

Allardyce J, Gaebel W, Zielasek J, Van Os J (2007) Deconstructing psychosis conference February 2006: the validity of schizophrenia and alternative approaches to the classification of psychosis. Schizophr Bull 33:863–867PubMedCrossRef

Andreasen NC (2007) DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: an example of unintended consequences. Schizophr Bull 33:108–112PubMedCrossRef

Benes FM (2007) Searching for unique endophenotypes for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder within neural circuits and their molecular regulatory mechanisms. Schizophr Bull, 33:932–936

Bentall P (2006) Madness explained. Why we must reject the Kraepelinian paradigm and replace it with a “complaint-orientated” approach to understanding mental illness. Med Hypotheses 66:220–233PubMedCrossRef

Brase CL (2002) Mental modularity, metaphors, and the marriage of evolutionary and cognitive sciences. Cogn Process 3–4:3–17

Craddock N, Owen MJ (2005) The beginning of the end for the Kraepelinian dichotomy. Br J Psychiatry 186:364–366PubMedCrossRef

Craddock N, Owen MJ (2007) Rethinking psychosis: the disadvantages of a dichotomous classification now outweigh the advantages. World Psychiatry 6:20–27

Duchaine B, Cosmides L, Tooby J (2001) Evolutionary psychology and the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:225–230PubMedCrossRef

Dutta R, Greene T, Addington J, McKenzie K, Phillips M, Murray RM (2007) Biological, life course, and cross-cultural studies all point toward the value of dimensional and developmental ratings in the classification of psychosis. Schizophr Bull, 33:868–876

10.

First MB (2006) Deconstructing psychosis. Online document at http://dsm5.org/conference5.cfm; last accessed July 1, 2007

11.

First MB, Pincus HA, Levone JB, Williams JBW, Üstün B, Peele R (2004) Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry 161:946–954PubMedCrossRef

12.

Fodor J (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge

13.

Freedman R (2007) Neuronal dysfunction and schizophrenia symptoms. Am J Psychiatry 164:385–390PubMedCrossRef

14.

Gaebel W, Wölwer W, Zielasek J (2006) From descriptive to functional psychopathology: on the way towards a modular psychiatry. Die Psychiatrie 3:221–232

15.

Ginsburg BE, Werick TM, Escobar JI, Kugelmass S, Treaner JJ, Wendtland L (1996) Molecular genetics of psychopathologies: a search for simple answers to complex problems. Behav Genet 26:325–333PubMedCrossRef

16.

Go RC, Perry RT, Wiener H, Bassett SS, Blacker D, Devlin B, Sweet RA (2005) Neuregulin-1 polymorphism in late onset Alzheimer’s disease families with psychoses. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 139:28–32

17.

Gur RE, Keshavan MS and Lawrie SM (2007) Deconstructing psychosis with human brain imaging. Schizophr Bull, 33:921–931

18.

Hallmayer JF, Kalaydjieva L, Badcock J, Dragovic M, Howell S, Michie PT, Rock D, Vile D, Williams R, Corder EH, Hollingsworth K, Jablensky A (2005) Genetic evidence for a distinct subtype of schizophrenia characterized by pervasive cognitive deficit. Am J Hum Genet 77:468–476PubMedCrossRef

19.

Hoff P (1988) Nosologische Grundpostulate bei Kraepelin. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother 36:328–336PubMed

20.

Jablensky A (1999) The nature of psychiatric classification: issues beyond ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 33:137–144PubMedCrossRef

21.

Jablensky A (2004) Resolving schizophrenia’s CATCH22. Nat Genet 36:674–675PubMedCrossRef

22.

Jablensky A (2005) Categories, dimensions and prototypes: critical issues for psychiatric classification. Psychopathology 38:201–205PubMedCrossRef

23.

Keefe RSE, Fenton WS (2007) How should DSM-V criteria for schizophrenia include cognitive impairment? Schizophr Bull, 33:912–920

24.

Kendler KS (2006) Reflections on the relationship between psychiatric genetics and psychiatric nosology. Am J Psychiatry 163:1138–1146PubMedCrossRef

25.

Kraepelin E (1920) Die Erscheinungsformen des Irreseins. Z Ges Neurol Psychiatr 62:1–29CrossRef

26.

Kupfer DJ, First MB, Regier DA (eds) (2002) A research agenda for DSM-V. American Psychiatric Association, Washington

27.

Levin T (2006) Schizophrenia should be renamed to help educate patients and the public. Int J Soc Psychiatry 52:324–331PubMedCrossRef

28.

McGorry PD (2007) Issues for DSM-V: clinical staging: a heuristic pathway to valid nosology and safer, more effective treatment in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 164:859–860PubMedCrossRef

29.

Murphy D, Stich S (2000) Darwin in the madhouse: evolutionary psychology and the classification of mental disorders. In: Carruthers P, Chamberlain A (eds) Evolution and the human mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 62–92

30.

Owen MJ, Craddock N, Jablensky A (2007) The genetic deconstruction of psychosis. Schizophr Bull, 33:905–911

31.

Peralta V, Cuesta MJ (2003) The diagnosis of schizophrenia: Old wine in new bottles. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther 3:141–152

32.

Phillips ML, Vieta E (2007) Identifying functional neuroimaging biomarkers of bipolar disorders: toward DSM-V. Schizophr Bull, 33:893–904

33.

Regier DA (2007) Time for a fresh start? Rethinking psychosis in DSM-V. Schizophr Bull, 33:843–845

34.

Regier DA, Sirovatka P, Rubio-Stipec M, Narrow WE (2007) The future of psychiatric diagnosis: the APA/WHO/NIH research planning process for DSM and ICD. Die Psychiatrie 4:98–104

35.

Ross CA, Margolis RL, Reading SA, Pletnikov M, Coyle JT (2006) Neurobiology of schizophrenia. Neuron 52:139–153PubMedCrossRef

36.

Saraceno B, Saxena S (2007) Issues around work on the classification of mental and behavioural disorders in world health organization. Die Psychiatrie 4:86–91

37.

Sartorius N (2007) Zukunftsperspektiven der Klassifikation psychischer Störungen. Die Psychiatrie 4:75–76

38.

Sato M (2006) Renaming schizophrenia: a Japanese perspective. World Psychiatry 5:53–55PubMed

39.

Schneider K (1959) Clinical pathology. Translated by Hamilton MW. Grune & Stratton, New York

40.

Thaker GK (2007) Endophenotypic studies in schizophrenia: promise and challenges. Schizophr Bull 33:1–2PubMedCrossRef

41.

Tsuang MT, Stone WS, Faraone SV (2000) Toward reformulating the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 157:1041–1050PubMedCrossRef

42.

Üstün TB, Jakob R (2007) The development of the 11th revision of the ICD: trends and challenges. Die Psychiatrie 4:77–85

43.

Wölwer W, Frommann N, Halfmann S, Piaszek A, Streit M, Gaebel W (2005) Remediations of impairments in facial affect recognition in schizophrenia: efficacy and specificity of a new training program. Schizophr Res 80:295–303PubMedCrossRef

44.

Zacher P, Kandler KS (2007) Psychiatric disorders: a conceptual taxonomy. Am J Psychiatry 164:557–565CrossRef

Titel: The DSM-V initiative “deconstructing psychosis” in the context of Kraepelin’s concept on nosology
verfasst von: Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Wolfgang Gaebel
Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Jürgen Zielasek
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2008
Verlag: D. Steinkopff-Verlag
Erschienen in: European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience / Ausgabe Sonderheft 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0940-1334
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8491
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-008-2009-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Spezielles Sportprogramm bei einer Reihe von psychischen Erkrankungen effektiv

08.05.2024 Psychotherapie Nachrichten

Sportliche Betätigung hilft nicht nur bei Depression, sondern auch in Gruppen von Patientinnen und Patienten mit unterschiedlichen psychischen Erkrankungen, wie Insomnie, Panikattacken, Agoraphobie und posttraumatischem Belastungssyndrom. Sie alle profitieren längerfristig.

Wartezeit nicht kürzer, aber Arbeit flexibler

Psychotherapie Medizin aktuell

Fünf Jahren nach der Neugestaltung der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie wurden jetzt die Effekte der vorgenommenen Änderungen ausgewertet. Das Hauptziel der Novellierung war eine kürzere Wartezeit auf Therapieplätze. Dieses Ziel wurde nicht erreicht, es gab jedoch positive Auswirkungen auf andere Bereiche.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 2/2008

Evidence for separate diseases?

Kraepelin and degeneration theory

Diagnosis and course of affective psychoses: was Kraepelin right?

Historical overview: Kraepelin’s impact on psychiatry