Erschienen in:
01.01.2010 | Original Article
Physiological determinants of Yo-Yo intermittent recovery tests in male soccer players
verfasst von:
Ermanno Rampinini, Aldo Sassi, Andrea Azzalin, Carlo Castagna, Paolo Menaspà, Domenico Carlomagno, Franco M. Impellizzeri
Erschienen in:
European Journal of Applied Physiology
|
Ausgabe 2/2010
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
The physiological determinants of performance in two Yo-Yo intermittent recovery tests (Yo-YoIR1 and Yo-YoIR2) were examined in 25 professional (n = 13) and amateur (n = 12) soccer players. The aims of the study were (1) to examine the differences in physiological responses to Yo-YoIR1 and Yo-YoIR2, (2) to determine the relationship between the aerobic and physiological responses to standardized high-intensity intermittent exercise (HIT) and Yo-Yo performance, and (3) to investigate the differences between professional and amateur players in performance and responses to these tests. All players performed six tests: two versions of the Yo-Yo tests, a test for the determination of maximum oxygen uptake (\( {\dot{\text{V}}}{\text{O}}_{{2\,{ \max }}} \)), a double test to determine \( {\dot{\text{V}}}{\text{O}}_{2} \) kinetics and a HIT evaluation during which several physiological responses were measured. The anaerobic contribution was greatest during Yo-YoIR2. \( {\dot{\text{V}}}{\text{O}}_{{2\,{ \max }}} \) was strongly correlated with Yo-YoIR1 (r = 0.74) but only moderately related to Yo-YoIR2 (r = 0.47). The time constant (τ) of \( {\dot{\text{V}}}{\text{O}}_{2} \) kinetics was largely related to both Yo-Yo tests (Yo-YoIR1: r = 0.60 and Yo-YoIR2: r = 0.65). The relationships between physiological variables measured during HIT (blood La−, H+, HCO3
− and the rate of La− accumulation) and Yo-Yo performance (in both versions) were very large (r > 0.70). The physiological responses to HIT and the τ of the \( {\dot{\text{V}}}{\text{O}}_{2} \) kinetics were significantly different between professional and amateur soccer players, whilst \( {\dot{\text{V}}}{\text{O}}_{{2\,{ \max }}} \) was not significantly different between the two groups. In conclusion, \( {\dot{\text{V}}}{\text{O}}_{{2\,{ \max }}} \) is more important for Yo-YoIR1 performance, whilst τ of the \( {\dot{\text{V}}}{\text{O}}_{2} \) kinetics and the ability to maintain acid–base balance are important physiological factors for both Yo-Yo tests.