Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2012

01.08.2012 | Original Article

Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

verfasst von: Xiangsong Wu, Yong Yang, Ping Dong, Jun Gu, Jianhua Lu, Maolan Li, Jiasheng Mu, Wenguang Wu, Jiahua Yang, Lin Zhang, Qichen Ding, Yingbin Liu

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the safety and effectiveness of primary closure with those of T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for choledocholithiasis.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library databases. Only randomized controlled trials comparing primary closure with T-tube drainage in LCBDE were considered eligible for this meta-analysis. The analyzed outcome variables included postoperative mortality, overall morbidity, biliary complication rate, biliary leak rate, reoperation, operating time, postoperative hospital stay, time to abdominal drain removal, and retained stone. All calculations and statistical tests were performed using ReviewerManager 5.1.2 software.

Results

A total of 295 patients (148 patients with primary closure and 147 patients with T-tube drainage) from three trials were identified and analyzed. No deaths occurred in any of the trials. Primary closure showed significantly better results in terms of morbidity (risk ratio (RR), 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30 to 0.88), biliary complication without a combination of retained stone (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.97), reoperation (RR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.87), operating time (mean difference (MD), −20.72; 95% CI, −29.59 to −11.85), postoperative hospital stay (MD, −3.24; 95% CI, −3.96 to −2.52), and time to abdominal drainage removal (MD, −0.45; 95% CI, −0.86 to −0.04). Statistically significant differences were not found between the two methods in terms of biliary leak, biliary complication, and retained stones.

Conclusion

The current meta-analysis indicates that primary closure of the common bile duct is safer and more effective than T-tube drainage for LCBDE. Therefore, we do not recommend routine performance of T-tube drainage in LCBDE.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ponsky JL, Heniford BT, Gersin K (2000) Choledocholithiasis: evolving intraoperative strategies. Am Surg 66:262PubMed Ponsky JL, Heniford BT, Gersin K (2000) Choledocholithiasis: evolving intraoperative strategies. Am Surg 66:262PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hungness ES, Soper NJ (2006) Management of common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 10:612PubMedCrossRef Hungness ES, Soper NJ (2006) Management of common bile duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 10:612PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbesey JE, Birkett DH (2008) Common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin N Am 88:1315–1328, ixPubMedCrossRef Verbesey JE, Birkett DH (2008) Common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin N Am 88:1315–1328, ixPubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L et al (1998) Randomized trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351:159–161PubMedCrossRef Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L et al (1998) Randomized trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351:159–161PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T et al (2009) A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:713–720PubMedCrossRef Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T et al (2009) A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:713–720PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK et al (2010) Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 145:28–33PubMedCrossRef Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK et al (2010) Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 145:28–33PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wills VL, Gibson K, Karihaloo C et al (2002) Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 72:177–180PubMedCrossRef Wills VL, Gibson K, Karihaloo C et al (2002) Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 72:177–180PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Geidie AA (2010) Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy? J Gastrointest Surg 14:844–848PubMedCrossRef El-Geidie AA (2010) Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy? J Gastrointest Surg 14:844–848PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Bie P, Wang S et al (2008) A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 22:1595–1600PubMedCrossRef Zhang L, Bie P, Wang S et al (2008) A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 22:1595–1600PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Perez G, Escalona A, Jarufe N et al (2005) Prospective randomized study of T-tube versus biliary stent for common bile duct decompression after open choledocotomy. World J Surg 29:869–872PubMedCrossRef Perez G, Escalona A, Jarufe N et al (2005) Prospective randomized study of T-tube versus biliary stent for common bile duct decompression after open choledocotomy. World J Surg 29:869–872PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24(1):CD005640 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24(1):CD005640
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ambreen M, Shaikh AR, Jamal A et al (2009) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy. Asian J Surg 32:21–25PubMedCrossRef Ambreen M, Shaikh AR, Jamal A et al (2009) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy. Asian J Surg 32:21–25PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J (2011) Chapter 6: searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J (2011) Chapter 6: searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, Available from www.​cochrane-handbook.​org
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (eds) (2011) Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (eds) (2011) Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.​cochrane-handbook.​org
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (eds) (2011) Chapter 9: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (eds) (2011) Chapter 9: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.​cochrane-handbook.​org
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Wu GZ et al (2009) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Res 157:e1–e5PubMedCrossRef Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Wu GZ et al (2009) Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial. J Surg Res 157:e1–e5PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Rourke NA, Askew AR, Cowen AE et al (1993) The role of ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg 63:3–7CrossRef O’Rourke NA, Askew AR, Cowen AE et al (1993) The role of ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg 63:3–7CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka M, Konomi H, Matsunaga H et al (1997) Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: impact of recent technical refinements. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 4:16–19CrossRef Tanaka M, Konomi H, Matsunaga H et al (1997) Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: impact of recent technical refinements. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 4:16–19CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Binmoeller KF, Schafer TW (2001) Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol 32:106–118PubMedCrossRef Binmoeller KF, Schafer TW (2001) Endoscopic management of bile duct stones. J Clin Gastroenterol 32:106–118PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Coppola R, Riccioni ME, Ciletti S et al (1997) Analysis of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary stones in a consecutive series of 546 patients. Surg Endosc 11:129–132PubMedCrossRef Coppola R, Riccioni ME, Ciletti S et al (1997) Analysis of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary stones in a consecutive series of 546 patients. Surg Endosc 11:129–132PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M et al (2003) Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 238:97–102PubMed Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M et al (2003) Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 238:97–102PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003327 Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003327
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Holdsworth RJ, Sadek SA, Ambikar S et al (1989) Dynamics of bile flow through the human choledochal sphincter following exploration of the common bile duct. World J Surg 13:300–306PubMedCrossRef Holdsworth RJ, Sadek SA, Ambikar S et al (1989) Dynamics of bile flow through the human choledochal sphincter following exploration of the common bile duct. World J Surg 13:300–306PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat De Roover D, Vanderveken M, Gerard Y (1989) Choledochotomy: primary closure versus T-tube: a prospective trial. Acta Chir Belg 89:320–324PubMed De Roover D, Vanderveken M, Gerard Y (1989) Choledochotomy: primary closure versus T-tube: a prospective trial. Acta Chir Belg 89:320–324PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M et al (1998) Towards T-tube-free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodological evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29PubMedCrossRef Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M et al (1998) Towards T-tube-free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodological evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A et al (1996) WEAES ductal stone study. Preliminary findings of multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management. Surg Endosc 10:1130PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A et al (1996) WEAES ductal stone study. Preliminary findings of multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management. Surg Endosc 10:1130PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wills VL, Gibson K, Karihaloot C et al (2002) Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 72:177–180PubMedCrossRef Wills VL, Gibson K, Karihaloot C et al (2002) Complications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy. ANZ J Surg 72:177–180PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lezoche E, Paganini AM, Guerrieri M (1996) A new T-tube applier in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 10:445–448PubMedCrossRef Lezoche E, Paganini AM, Guerrieri M (1996) A new T-tube applier in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 10:445–448PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar P, Orizu M, Leung E (2009) Laparoscopic T-tube placement after common bile duct exploration: a simple technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:e36–e37PubMedCrossRef Kumar P, Orizu M, Leung E (2009) Laparoscopic T-tube placement after common bile duct exploration: a simple technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:e36–e37PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005641 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2007) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005641
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ha JP, Tang CN, Siu WT et al (2004) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1605–1608PubMed Ha JP, Tang CN, Siu WT et al (2004) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1605–1608PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Jameel M, Darmas B, Baker AL (2008) Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:29–35PubMedCrossRef Jameel M, Darmas B, Baker AL (2008) Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:29–35PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu QD, Tao CL, Zhou MT et al (2011) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:53–62PubMedCrossRef Zhu QD, Tao CL, Zhou MT et al (2011) Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:53–62PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688PubMedCrossRef Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688PubMedCrossRef
35.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMedCrossRef Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Primary closure versus T-tube drainage in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
verfasst von
Xiangsong Wu
Yong Yang
Ping Dong
Jun Gu
Jianhua Lu
Maolan Li
Jiasheng Mu
Wenguang Wu
Jiahua Yang
Lin Zhang
Qichen Ding
Yingbin Liu
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0962-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.