Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2007

01.04.2007

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: surgical phases and complications

verfasst von: F. Lovisetto, S. Zonta, E. Rota, L. Bottero, G. Faillace, G. Turra, A. Fantini, M. Longoni

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to determine the nature of complications after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair, and to evaluate possible links to intraoperative factors in an effort to reduce the incidence of complications.

Methods

The TAPP procedures for inguinal/femoral hernias performed between 1992 and 2004 at a single center were analyzed retrospectively. Complications were categorized according to severity and stage of the surgical procedure at which they occurred. Individual surgeon performances were examined to determine whether the rates of complications were related to surgeon experience.

Results

A total of 1,973 TAPP procedures were reviewed, and 81% of the patients completed 5 years of follow-up evaluation. The 74 complications (3.7%) reported were categorized as follows: 33 major (1.7%) versus 41 minor (2.0%), 66 hernia-related (3.4%) versus 8 laparoscopy-related (0.5%) complications, and 12 recurrences (0.6%). Risk factors for complications included inguinoscrotal hernia (p ≤ 0.001), dissection/reduction of the sac (p = 0.02), and surgeon experience (<50 TAPP procedures; odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval, 4.2–11.9).

Conclusions

Accuracy in dissection/reduction of the sac improves the outcome of TAPP hernia repair. This effect is related to the experience of the surgeon. Experience performing more than 75 procedures is required for optimal results.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander LK, Leijonmark CE, Wingren U, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Wickbom G, Montgomery A (2002) Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 6: 56–61PubMedCrossRef Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander LK, Leijonmark CE, Wingren U, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Wickbom G, Montgomery A (2002) Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 6: 56–61PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bringman S, Blomqvist P (2005) Intestinal obstruction after inguinal and femoral hernia repair: a study of 33,275 operations during 1992–2000 in Sweden. Hernia 9: 178–183PubMedCrossRef Bringman S, Blomqvist P (2005) Intestinal obstruction after inguinal and femoral hernia repair: a study of 33,275 operations during 1992–2000 in Sweden. Hernia 9: 178–183PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bueno J, Serralta A, Planells M, Rodero D (2004) Inguinodynia after two inguinal herniorrhaphy methods. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 210–214PubMedCrossRef Bueno J, Serralta A, Planells M, Rodero D (2004) Inguinodynia after two inguinal herniorrhaphy methods. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 210–214PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E (2001) Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum: a multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc 15: 566–569PubMedCrossRef Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E (2001) Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum: a multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc 15: 566–569PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Duron J-J, Hay JM, Msika S, Gashard D, Domergue J, Gainant A, Fingerhut A (2000) Prevalence and mechanisms of small intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 135: 208–212PubMedCrossRef Duron J-J, Hay JM, Msika S, Gashard D, Domergue J, Gainant A, Fingerhut A (2000) Prevalence and mechanisms of small intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 135: 208–212PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B, Geis P, Duncan T, Sewell R, McKernan B (1998) Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 12: 226–231PubMedCrossRef Felix E, Scott S, Crafton B, Geis P, Duncan T, Sewell R, McKernan B (1998) Causes of recurrence after laparoscopic hernioplasty: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 12: 226–231PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Ulrich M, Bittner R (2000) Scrotal hernias: a contraindication for an endoscopic procedure? Results of a single-institution experience in transabdominal preperitoneal repair. Surg Endosc 14: 289–292PubMedCrossRef Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Ulrich M, Bittner R (2000) Scrotal hernias: a contraindication for an endoscopic procedure? Results of a single-institution experience in transabdominal preperitoneal repair. Surg Endosc 14: 289–292PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahon D, Decadt B, Rhodes M (2003) Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17: 1386–1390PubMedCrossRef Mahon D, Decadt B, Rhodes M (2003) Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17: 1386–1390PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9: 1–203PubMed McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9: 1–203PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirilas P, Colborn GL, McClusky DA III, Skandalakis LJ, Skandalakis PN, Skandalakis JE (2005) The history of anatomy and surgery of the preperitoneal space. Arch Surg 140: 90–94PubMedCrossRef Mirilas P, Colborn GL, McClusky DA III, Skandalakis LJ, Skandalakis PN, Skandalakis JE (2005) The history of anatomy and surgery of the preperitoneal space. Arch Surg 140: 90–94PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350: 1819–1827PubMedCrossRef Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350: 1819–1827PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Onofrio L, Cafaro D, Manzo F, Cristiano SF, Sgromo B, Ussia G. (2004) Tension-free laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Minerva Chir 59: 369–377PubMed Onofrio L, Cafaro D, Manzo F, Cristiano SF, Sgromo B, Ussia G. (2004) Tension-free laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Minerva Chir 59: 369–377PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WC (2001) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 88: 1122–1126PubMedCrossRef Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WC (2001) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 88: 1122–1126PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Quilici PJ, Greaney EM Jr, Quilici J, Anderson S (2000) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: optimal technical variations and results in 1,700 cases. Am Surg 66: 848–852PubMed Quilici PJ, Greaney EM Jr, Quilici J, Anderson S (2000) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: optimal technical variations and results in 1,700 cases. Am Surg 66: 848–852PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramshaw B, Shuler FW, Jones HB, Duncan TD, White J, Wilson R, Lucas GW, Mason EM (2001) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned after 1,224 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 15: 50–54PubMedCrossRef Ramshaw B, Shuler FW, Jones HB, Duncan TD, White J, Wilson R, Lucas GW, Mason EM (2001) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned after 1,224 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 15: 50–54PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg RJ, Loeweneck H, Meyer G (2000) The cutaneous nerves encountered during laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: new anatomical findings for the surgeon. Surg Endosc 14: 731–735CrossRef Rosenberg RJ, Loeweneck H, Meyer G (2000) The cutaneous nerves encountered during laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: new anatomical findings for the surgeon. Surg Endosc 14: 731–735CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A (2002) Major vascular injuries in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1192–1196PubMedCrossRef Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A (2002) Major vascular injuries in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1192–1196PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schäfer M, Lauper M, Krähenbühl L (2001) Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 15: 275–280PubMedCrossRef Schäfer M, Lauper M, Krähenbühl L (2001) Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 15: 275–280PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JR, Demers ML, Pollack R, Gregory S (2001) Prospective comparison between laparoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy and open mesh herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 67: 115–117PubMed Smith JR, Demers ML, Pollack R, Gregory S (2001) Prospective comparison between laparoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy and open mesh herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 67: 115–117PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuvela M, Milicevic M, Galun D, Lekic N, Basaric D, Tomic D, Petrovic M, Palibrk I (2005) Infection in hernia surgery. Acta Chir Iugosl 52: 9–26PubMedCrossRef Zuvela M, Milicevic M, Galun D, Lekic N, Basaric D, Tomic D, Petrovic M, Palibrk I (2005) Infection in hernia surgery. Acta Chir Iugosl 52: 9–26PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: surgical phases and complications
verfasst von
F. Lovisetto
S. Zonta
E. Rota
L. Bottero
G. Faillace
G. Turra
A. Fantini
M. Longoni
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9031-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.