Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2011

01.02.2011

Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery?

verfasst von: Pascal Bucher, François Pugin, Sandrine Ostermann, Frederic Ris, Michael Chilcott, Philippe Morel

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 2/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) are prospected as the future of minimally invasive surgery. While scarless surgery (NOTES and LESS) is gaining increasing popularity, perception of these approaches should be investigated.

Methods

An anonymous questionnaire describing laparoscopy, LESS, and NOTES was given to medical staff (n = 120), paramedical staff (n = 100), surgical patients (n = 100), and the general population (n = 100). The survey participants (median age, 37 years; range, 18–81 years) were queried about their expectations for surgical treatment and their approach preference.

Results

The first concern of the survey responders was the risk of surgical complications (92%). When asked about the respective importance of surgical safety, cure, and cosmetics, cure was placed first by 74%, safety by 33%, and cosmetics by 3%. These results were not influenced by sex, age, prior surgery or endoscopy, or education. When operative risk was similar, 90% of the participants preferred a scarless approach (75% preferred LESS and 15% preferred NOTES) to laparoscopy. The scarless approach preference was significantly higher among the younger participants (age <40 years; p = 0.026), whereas sex showed no influence. The LESS preference was significantly higher among patients and the general population (86%) than among medical (67%) and paramedical (70%) staffs (p < 0.001). A decreasing trend of preference for LESS and NOTES was observed with increased procedural risks.

Conclusion

Although cure and safety remain the main concern, the population has a favorable perception of scarless surgery, even in the case of increased procedural risk, with LESS favored over NOTES. Such a popular adoption of scarless surgery should warrant the promotion of further research, technological innovations, and the establishment of surgeon training to improve its safety.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gettman M, Box G, Averch T, Caddedu JA, Cherullo E, Clayman RV, Desai M, Frank I, Gill I, Gupta M, Haber GP, Humphreys M, Kaouk J (2008) Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology. Eur Urol 53:1117–1120CrossRefPubMed Gettman M, Box G, Averch T, Caddedu JA, Cherullo E, Clayman RV, Desai M, Frank I, Gill I, Gupta M, Haber GP, Humphreys M, Kaouk J (2008) Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology. Eur Urol 53:1117–1120CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelley W (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopy Today 7:5–6 Kelley W (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopy Today 7:5–6
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne D, Alexander G, Boe B, Zervos E (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: past, present, and future. Surg Technol Int 15:81–85PubMed Osborne D, Alexander G, Boe B, Zervos E (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: past, present, and future. Surg Technol Int 15:81–85PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Périssat J (1999) Laparoscopic surgery: a pioneer’s point of view. World J Surg 23:863–868CrossRefPubMed Périssat J (1999) Laparoscopic surgery: a pioneer’s point of view. World J Surg 23:863–868CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R (2006) Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guideline of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 20:14–29CrossRefPubMed Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R (2006) Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guideline of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 20:14–29CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease. Colorectal Dis 12(1):61–65CrossRefPubMed Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease. Colorectal Dis 12(1):61–65CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas C, Champion A, Secor D (2008) Motivating factors for seeking cosmetic surgery: a synthesis of the literature. Plast Surg Nurs 28:177–182PubMed Haas C, Champion A, Secor D (2008) Motivating factors for seeking cosmetic surgery: a synthesis of the literature. Plast Surg Nurs 28:177–182PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Frederick D, Lever J, Peplau L (2007) Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: views of men and women across the life span. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1407–1415CrossRefPubMed Frederick D, Lever J, Peplau L (2007) Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: views of men and women across the life span. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1407–1415CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P, Hagen M (2008) Scarless surgery: myth or reality through NOTES? Rev Med Suisse 4:1550–1552PubMed Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P, Hagen M (2008) Scarless surgery: myth or reality through NOTES? Rev Med Suisse 4:1550–1552PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Otten A (1992) The influence of the mass media on health policy. Health Aff 11:111–118CrossRef Otten A (1992) The influence of the mass media on health policy. Health Aff 11:111–118CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Swanstrom L, Volkmann E, Hungness E, Soper N (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(7):1519-1525CrossRefPubMed Swanstrom L, Volkmann E, Hungness E, Soper N (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(7):1519-1525CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N, Ostermann S, Morel P (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). World J Surg 33:1015–1018CrossRefPubMed Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N, Ostermann S, Morel P (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). World J Surg 33:1015–1018CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Archer S, Brown D, Smith C et al (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–558CrossRefPubMed Archer S, Brown D, Smith C et al (2001) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 234:549–558CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gigot J (2007) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Chir 144:383–384CrossRef Gigot J (2007) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Chir 144:383–384CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Csikesz N, Ricciardi R, Tseng J, Shah S (2008) Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States. World J Surg 32:2230–2236CrossRefPubMed Csikesz N, Ricciardi R, Tseng J, Shah S (2008) Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States. World J Surg 32:2230–2236CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagen M, Wagner O, Christen D, Morel P (2008) Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach. Endoscopy 4:1550–1552 Hagen M, Wagner O, Christen D, Morel P (2008) Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach. Endoscopy 4:1550–1552
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) Scarless Surgery: reality through umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Rev Med Suisse 5(209):1412–1415PubMed Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) Scarless Surgery: reality through umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Rev Med Suisse 5(209):1412–1415PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman E (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67:560–854 Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman E (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67:560–854
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson C, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B (2008) Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print 5 December Peterson C, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B (2008) Women’s positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print 5 December
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Buess G, Cuschieri A (2007) Raising our heads above the parapet: ES not NOTES. Surg Endosc 21:835–837CrossRefPubMed Buess G, Cuschieri A (2007) Raising our heads above the parapet: ES not NOTES. Surg Endosc 21:835–837CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat ASGE SAGES (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199–203 ASGE SAGES (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199–203
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) E-NOTES Appendectomy versus transvaginal appendectomy: similar cosmetic results but shorter complete recovery? Surg Endosc 23:916–917CrossRefPubMed Bucher P, Ostermann S, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) E-NOTES Appendectomy versus transvaginal appendectomy: similar cosmetic results but shorter complete recovery? Surg Endosc 23:916–917CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Wuthrich P, Pugin F, Gervaz P, Morel P (2008) Totally intracorporeal laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using circular stapler. Surg Endosc 22:1278–1282CrossRefPubMed Bucher P, Wuthrich P, Pugin F, Gervaz P, Morel P (2008) Totally intracorporeal laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using circular stapler. Surg Endosc 22:1278–1282CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma: a plea for scarless surgery?
verfasst von
Pascal Bucher
François Pugin
Sandrine Ostermann
Frederic Ris
Michael Chilcott
Philippe Morel
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1180-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.