Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2011

01.05.2011

Endoscopic transmural drainage of pseudocysts associated with pancreatic resections or pancreatitis: a comparative study

verfasst von: Alvise Cavallini, Giovanni Butturini, Giuseppe Malleo, Francesca Bertuzzo, Gianpaolo Angelini, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Paolo Pederzoli, Claudio Bassi

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Endoscopy has been regarded as an effective modality for draining pancreatic collections, pseudocysts, and abscesses. This study analyzes our experience with endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and compares the outcomes in patients with postsurgical and pancreatitis-associated ones.

Methods

Patients who underwent endoscopic drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst from January 1999 through June 2008 were included in this retrospective analysis. The specific indication for attempting the procedure was the presence of direct contact between the pseudocyst and the gastric wall. All the drainages were carried out via a transgastric approach, and one or two straight plastic stents (10 or 11.5 French) were positioned. A comparative analysis of short- and long-term results was made between patients with postoperative pseudocysts (group A) and patients with pancreatitis-associated pseudocysts (group B).

Results

Fifty-five patients were included in the study, 25 in group A and 30 in group B. Overall, a single stent was inserted in 84.0% of patients, while two stents were needed in the remaining 16.0%. The technical success rate was 78.2%, whereas procedure-related complications were 16.4%. Complications included pseudocyst superinfection and major bleeding and were managed mainly by surgery. Mortality rate was 1.8% (1 patient). There were no significant differences in the technical success rate and procedure-related complications between the two groups (p = 0.532 and 0.159, respectively) Recurrences were 13.9% and significantly more common in group B (p = 0.021). In such cases, a second endoscopic drainage was successfully performed.

Conclusion

Transmural endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts is feasible and has a technical success rate of 78.2%, without differences related to the pseudocyst etiology. Recurrences, on the other hand, are more common in patients with pancreatitis. Given the severe complications that may occur after the procedure, we recommend that endoscopic drainage be performed in a tertiary-care center with specific expertise in pancreatic surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ (2003) Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:141–148PubMedCrossRef Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ (2003) Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:141–148PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley EL III (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the international symposium on acute pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11–13, 1992. Arch Surg 128:586–590PubMed Bradley EL III (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the international symposium on acute pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11–13, 1992. Arch Surg 128:586–590PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrén-Sandberg A, Dervenis C (2004) Pancreatic pseudocyst in the 21st century: classification, pathophysiology, anatomic consideration and treatment. JOP 5:8–24PubMed Andrén-Sandberg A, Dervenis C (2004) Pancreatic pseudocyst in the 21st century: classification, pathophysiology, anatomic consideration and treatment. JOP 5:8–24PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrén-Sandberg A, Dervenis C (2004) Pancreatic pseudocyst in the 21st century: natural history. JOP 5:64–70PubMed Andrén-Sandberg A, Dervenis C (2004) Pancreatic pseudocyst in the 21st century: natural history. JOP 5:64–70PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beckingham IJ, Krige JE, Bornman PC (1999) Long term outcome of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Gastroenterol 94:71–74PubMedCrossRef Beckingham IJ, Krige JE, Bornman PC (1999) Long term outcome of endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Gastroenterol 94:71–74PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Parks RW, Tzovaras G, Diamond T, Rowlands BJ (2000) Management of pancreatic pseudocyst. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:383–387PubMed Parks RW, Tzovaras G, Diamond T, Rowlands BJ (2000) Management of pancreatic pseudocyst. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:383–387PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley EL, Clements JL, Gonzales AC (1979) The natural history of pancreatic pseudocyst: a unified concept of management. Am J Surg 137:135–141PubMedCrossRef Bradley EL, Clements JL, Gonzales AC (1979) The natural history of pancreatic pseudocyst: a unified concept of management. Am J Surg 137:135–141PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohler H, Schafmayer A, Ludtke FE (1987) Surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg 74:813–815PubMedCrossRef Kohler H, Schafmayer A, Ludtke FE (1987) Surgical treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg 74:813–815PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Huibregtse K, Schnider B, Vrij AA (1988) Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 34:9–15PubMedCrossRef Huibregtse K, Schnider B, Vrij AA (1988) Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 34:9–15PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat De Palma GD, Galloro G, Puzziello A, Masone S, Persico G (2002) Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a long-term follow-up study of 49 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 49:1113–1115PubMed De Palma GD, Galloro G, Puzziello A, Masone S, Persico G (2002) Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a long-term follow-up study of 49 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 49:1113–1115PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma S, Bhargawa N, Govil A (2003) Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst: a long term follow-up. Endoscopy 34:203–207 Sharma S, Bhargawa N, Govil A (2003) Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst: a long term follow-up. Endoscopy 34:203–207
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Andren-Sandberg A, Ansorge C, Eiriksson K, Glomsaker T, Maleckas A (2005) Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Scand J Surg 94:165–167PubMed Andren-Sandberg A, Ansorge C, Eiriksson K, Glomsaker T, Maleckas A (2005) Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Scand J Surg 94:165–167PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Giovannini M (2007) What is the best endoscopic treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts? Gastrointest Endosc 65:620–623PubMedCrossRef Giovannini M (2007) What is the best endoscopic treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts? Gastrointest Endosc 65:620–623PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yusuf TE, Baron TH (2006) Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: results of a national and an international survey of ASGE members. Gastrointest Endosc 63:223–227PubMedCrossRef Yusuf TE, Baron TH (2006) Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: results of a national and an international survey of ASGE members. Gastrointest Endosc 63:223–227PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Heyries L, Sahel J (2007) Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 13:6127–6133PubMed Heyries L, Sahel J (2007) Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 13:6127–6133PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Testoni PA (2007) Endoscopic stenting in benign pancreatic diseases. JOP 8(1 Suppl):141–150PubMed Testoni PA (2007) Endoscopic stenting in benign pancreatic diseases. JOP 8(1 Suppl):141–150PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Monkemuller KE, Kahl S, Malfertheiner P (2004) Endoscopic therapy of chronic pancreatitis. Dig Dis 22:280–291PubMedCrossRef Monkemuller KE, Kahl S, Malfertheiner P (2004) Endoscopic therapy of chronic pancreatitis. Dig Dis 22:280–291PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE, Yates MR (2002) Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 56:7–17PubMedCrossRef Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE, Yates MR (2002) Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 56:7–17PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nealon WH, Walser E (2003) Duct drainage alone is sufficient in the operative management of pancreatic pseudocyst in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 237:614–620PubMed Nealon WH, Walser E (2003) Duct drainage alone is sufficient in the operative management of pancreatic pseudocyst in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 237:614–620PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Aghdassi A, Mayerle J, Kraft M, Sielenkämper AW, Heidecke CD, Lerch MM (2008) Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 36:105–112PubMedCrossRef Aghdassi A, Mayerle J, Kraft M, Sielenkämper AW, Heidecke CD, Lerch MM (2008) Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 36:105–112PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, Bali MA, Matos C, De Maertelaer V, Le Moine O, Devière J (2007) Pancreatic fluid-collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 65:609–619PubMedCrossRef Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, Bali MA, Matos C, De Maertelaer V, Le Moine O, Devière J (2007) Pancreatic fluid-collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 65:609–619PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sciumè C, Geraci G, Pisello F, Li Volsi F, Facella T, Modica G (2006) Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. G Chir 27:272–277PubMed Sciumè C, Geraci G, Pisello F, Li Volsi F, Facella T, Modica G (2006) Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. G Chir 27:272–277PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartoli E, Delcenserie R, Yzet T, Brazier F, Geslin G, Regimbeau JM, Dupas JL (2005) Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:515–521PubMedCrossRef Bartoli E, Delcenserie R, Yzet T, Brazier F, Geslin G, Regimbeau JM, Dupas JL (2005) Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:515–521PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Senthilkumar K, Madhankumar MV, Rajan PS, Shetty AR, Jani K, Rangarajan M, Maheshkumaar GS (2007) Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Experience from a tertiary centre. Surg Endosc 21:2262–2267PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C, Senthilkumar K, Madhankumar MV, Rajan PS, Shetty AR, Jani K, Rangarajan M, Maheshkumaar GS (2007) Management of pancreatic pseudocyst in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Experience from a tertiary centre. Surg Endosc 21:2262–2267PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Barthet M, Lamblin G, Gasmi M, Vitton V, Desjeux A, Grimaud JC (2008) Clinical usefulness of a treatment algorithm for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 67:245–252PubMedCrossRef Barthet M, Lamblin G, Gasmi M, Vitton V, Desjeux A, Grimaud JC (2008) Clinical usefulness of a treatment algorithm for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 67:245–252PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Cahen D, Rauws E, Fockens P, Weverling G, Huibregtse K, Bruno M (2005) Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: long-term outcome and procedural factors associated with safe and successful treatment. Endoscopy 37:977–983PubMedCrossRef Cahen D, Rauws E, Fockens P, Weverling G, Huibregtse K, Bruno M (2005) Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: long-term outcome and procedural factors associated with safe and successful treatment. Endoscopy 37:977–983PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Weckman L, Kylänpää ML, Puolakkainen P, Halttunen J (2006) Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc 20:603–607PubMedCrossRef Weckman L, Kylänpää ML, Puolakkainen P, Halttunen J (2006) Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc 20:603–607PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hookey LC, Debroux S, Delhaye M, Arvanitakis M, Le Moine O, Devière J (2006) Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 63:635–643PubMedCrossRef Hookey LC, Debroux S, Delhaye M, Arvanitakis M, Le Moine O, Devière J (2006) Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections in 116 patients: a comparison of etiologies, drainage techniques, and outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 63:635–643PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Subtil C, Moutardier V, Vitton V, Gasmi M, Desjeux A, Grimaud JC, Brunet C, Berdah S, Barthet M (2008) Endoscopic management of postoperative pancreatic collection. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 32:128–133PubMedCrossRef Subtil C, Moutardier V, Vitton V, Gasmi M, Desjeux A, Grimaud JC, Brunet C, Berdah S, Barthet M (2008) Endoscopic management of postoperative pancreatic collection. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 32:128–133PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Trevino JM, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S (2010) Successful stenting in ductal disruption favorably impacts treatment outcomes in patients undergoing transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:526–531PubMedCrossRef Trevino JM, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S (2010) Successful stenting in ductal disruption favorably impacts treatment outcomes in patients undergoing transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:526–531PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Freeny PC, Ryan JA, Traverso LW (1991) Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and pancreatic fluid collection. Gastroenterology 100:1362–1370PubMed Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Freeny PC, Ryan JA, Traverso LW (1991) Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and pancreatic fluid collection. Gastroenterology 100:1362–1370PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Barthet M, Bugallo M, Moreira LS, Bastid C, Sastre B, Sahel J (1993) Management of cysts and pseudocysts complicating chronic pancreatitis. A retrospective study of 143 patients. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 17:270–276PubMedCrossRef Barthet M, Bugallo M, Moreira LS, Bastid C, Sastre B, Sahel J (1993) Management of cysts and pseudocysts complicating chronic pancreatitis. A retrospective study of 143 patients. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 17:270–276PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA, Blakely J, Canon CL (2007) Role of EUS in drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections not amenable for endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1107–1119PubMedCrossRef Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA, Blakely J, Canon CL (2007) Role of EUS in drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections not amenable for endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 66:1107–1119PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Giovannini M (2005) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 15:179–188PubMedCrossRef Giovannini M (2005) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 15:179–188PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Zimmermann S, Malfertheiner P (2002) Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic diseases. Dig Dis 20:120–126PubMedCrossRef Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Zimmermann S, Malfertheiner P (2002) Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic diseases. Dig Dis 20:120–126PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER, Wilcox CM (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 68:1102–1111PubMedCrossRef Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER, Wilcox CM (2008) Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 68:1102–1111PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Park DH, Lee SS, Moon SH, Choi SY, Jung SW, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH (2009) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 41:842–848PubMedCrossRef Park DH, Lee SS, Moon SH, Choi SY, Jung SW, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH (2009) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 41:842–848PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahaleh M, Shami VM, Conaway MR, Tokar J, Rockoff T, De La Rue SA, de Lange E, Bassignani M, Gay S, Adams RB, Yeaton P (2006) Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy 38:355–359PubMedCrossRef Kahaleh M, Shami VM, Conaway MR, Tokar J, Rockoff T, De La Rue SA, de Lange E, Bassignani M, Gay S, Adams RB, Yeaton P (2006) Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage. Endoscopy 38:355–359PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Chahal P, Papachristou GI, Baron TH (2007) Endoscopic transmural entry into pancreatic fluid collections using a dedicated aspiration needle without endoscopic ultrasound guidance: success and complication rates. Surg Endosc 21:1726–1732PubMedCrossRef Chahal P, Papachristou GI, Baron TH (2007) Endoscopic transmural entry into pancreatic fluid collections using a dedicated aspiration needle without endoscopic ultrasound guidance: success and complication rates. Surg Endosc 21:1726–1732PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Endoscopic transmural drainage of pseudocysts associated with pancreatic resections or pancreatitis: a comparative study
verfasst von
Alvise Cavallini
Giovanni Butturini
Giuseppe Malleo
Francesca Bertuzzo
Gianpaolo Angelini
Mohammad Abu Hilal
Paolo Pederzoli
Claudio Bassi
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1428-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.