Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2013

01.07.2013

Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-centre UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy

verfasst von: Mohammed Abu Hilal, Francesco Di Fabio, Shareef Syed, Robert Wiltshire, Eleonora Dimovska, David Turner, John N. Primrose, Neil W. Pearce

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic hepatectomy is progressively gaining popularity. However, it is still unclear whether the laparoscopic approach offers cost advantages compared with the open approach, especially when major hepatectomies are required. Data providing useful insights into the costs of the laparoscopic approach for clinicians and hospitals are needed. The aim of this study is to assess the financial implications of the laparoscopic approach for two standardized minor and major hepatectomies: left lateral sectionectomy and right hepatectomy.

Methods

A cost comparison analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) and laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) versus the open counterparts was performed. Data considered for the comparison analysis were operative costs (theatre cost, consumables and surgeon/anaesthetic labour cost), postoperative costs (hospital stay, complication management and readmissions) and overall costs.

Results

A total of 149 patients were included: 38 patients underwent LRH and 46 open right hepatectomy (ORH); 46 patients underwent LLLS and 19 open left lateral sectionectomy (OLLS). For LRH the mean operative, postoperative and overall costs were £10,181, £4,037 and £14,218; for ORH the mean operative, postoperative and overall costs were £6,483 (p < 0.0001), £10,304 (p < 0.0001) and £16,787 (p = 0.886). Regarding LLLS, the mean operative, postoperative and overall costs were £5,460, £2,599 and £8,059; for OLLS the mean operative, postoperative and overall costs were £5,841 (p = 0.874), £5,796 (p < 0.0001) and £11,637 (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Our data support the cost advantage of the laparoscopic approach for left lateral sectionectomy and the cost neutrality for right hepatectomy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: An updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145:1109–1118PubMedCrossRef Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: An updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145:1109–1118PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356PubMedCrossRef Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A, Steel JJ, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146:348–356PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841PubMedCrossRef Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–392PubMedCrossRef Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–392PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, Marvin M, Nagubandi R, Ravindra KV, Brock G, McMasters KM (2008) Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg 248:475–486PubMed Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, Marvin M, Nagubandi R, Ravindra KV, Brock G, McMasters KM (2008) Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg 248:475–486PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC, Lainas P, Laurent A, Nguyen KT, Marvin MR, Thomas M, Ravindra K, Fielding G, Franco D, Buell JF (2009) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg 250:856–860PubMedCrossRef Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC, Lainas P, Laurent A, Nguyen KT, Marvin MR, Thomas M, Ravindra K, Fielding G, Franco D, Buell JF (2009) Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg 250:856–860PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Abu Salameh M, Pearce NW (2012) Oncological efficiency analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for primary and metastatic cancer: a single-center UK experience. Arch Surg 147:42–48PubMedCrossRef Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Abu Salameh M, Pearce NW (2012) Oncological efficiency analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for primary and metastatic cancer: a single-center UK experience. Arch Surg 147:42–48PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Lykoudis P, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15:818–823PubMedCrossRef Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Lykoudis P, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Single-centre comparative study of laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15:818–823PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowe AJ, Meneghetti AT, Schumacher PA, Buczkowski AK, Scudamore CH, Panton ON, Chung SW (2009) Perioperative analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Surg Endosc 23:1198–1203PubMedCrossRef Rowe AJ, Meneghetti AT, Schumacher PA, Buczkowski AK, Scudamore CH, Panton ON, Chung SW (2009) Perioperative analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Surg Endosc 23:1198–1203PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Gamblin TC (2010) Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 17:998–1009PubMedCrossRef Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Gamblin TC (2010) Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 17:998–1009PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS, Henderson NA, Kulli C, Tait IS (2008) Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 22:2564–2570PubMedCrossRef Polignano FM, Quyn AJ, de Figueiredo RS, Henderson NA, Kulli C, Tait IS (2008) Laparoscopic versus open liver segmentectomy: prospective, case-matched, intention-to-treat analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 22:2564–2570PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhojani FD, Fox A, Pitzul K, Gallinger S, Wei A, Moulton CA, Okrainec A, Cleary SP (2012) Clinical and economic comparison of laparoscopic to open liver resections using a 2-to-1 matched pair analysis: an institutional experience. J Am Coll Surg 214:184–195PubMedCrossRef Bhojani FD, Fox A, Pitzul K, Gallinger S, Wei A, Moulton CA, Okrainec A, Cleary SP (2012) Clinical and economic comparison of laparoscopic to open liver resections using a 2-to-1 matched pair analysis: an institutional experience. J Am Coll Surg 214:184–195PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRef Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Godfrey DA, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Surgical management of benign and indeterminate hepatic lesions in the era of laparoscopic liver surgery. Dig Surg 28:232–236PubMedCrossRef Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Godfrey DA, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2011) Surgical management of benign and indeterminate hepatic lesions in the era of laparoscopic liver surgery. Dig Surg 28:232–236PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:351–355PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:351–355PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, McPhail MJ, Zeidan B, Zeidan S, Hallam MJ, Armstrong T, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2008) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:1285–1288PubMedCrossRef Abu Hilal M, McPhail MJ, Zeidan B, Zeidan S, Hallam MJ, Armstrong T, Primrose JN, Pearce NW (2008) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: a comparative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:1285–1288PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Syed S, Primrose JN, Abu Hilal M (2011) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure. Am J Surg 202:e8–e52CrossRef Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Teng MJ, Syed S, Primrose JN, Abu Hilal M (2011) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: a challenging, but feasible, safe and efficient procedure. Am J Surg 202:e8–e52CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Taylor MG, Hamdan K, Elberm H, Pearce NW (2010) Bleeding and hemostasis in laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 24:572–577PubMedCrossRef Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Taylor MG, Hamdan K, Elberm H, Pearce NW (2010) Bleeding and hemostasis in laparoscopic liver surgery. Surg Endosc 24:572–577PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Reddy SK, Tsung A, Geller DA (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection. World J Surg 35:1478–1486PubMedCrossRef Reddy SK, Tsung A, Geller DA (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection. World J Surg 35:1478–1486PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Rourke N, Fielding G (2004) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: surgical technique. J Gastrointest Surg 8:213–216PubMedCrossRef O’Rourke N, Fielding G (2004) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: surgical technique. J Gastrointest Surg 8:213–216PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Abu Hilal M (2011) Laparoscopic left hepatectomy with extraparenchymal inflow control. J Am Coll Surg 213:e23–e27PubMedCrossRef Pearce NW, Di Fabio F, Abu Hilal M (2011) Laparoscopic left hepatectomy with extraparenchymal inflow control. J Am Coll Surg 213:e23–e27PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kazaryan AM, Røsok BI, Marangos IP, Rosseland AR, Edwin B (2011) Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surg Endosc 25:3881–3889PubMedCrossRef Kazaryan AM, Røsok BI, Marangos IP, Rosseland AR, Edwin B (2011) Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surg Endosc 25:3881–3889PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Badran A, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW (2011) Pure laparoscopic en bloc left hemihepatectomy and caudate lobe resection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:845–849PubMedCrossRef Abu Hilal M, Badran A, Di Fabio F, Pearce NW (2011) Pure laparoscopic en bloc left hemihepatectomy and caudate lobe resection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:845–849PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain G, Parmar J, Mohammed MM, Bryant T, Kitteringham L, Pearce N, Abu Hilal M (2010) “Stretching the limits of laparoscopic surgery”: two-stage laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:51–54PubMedCrossRef Jain G, Parmar J, Mohammed MM, Bryant T, Kitteringham L, Pearce N, Abu Hilal M (2010) “Stretching the limits of laparoscopic surgery”: two-stage laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:51–54PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Dam RM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Breukelen GJ, Stoot JH, van der Vorst JR, Bemelmans MH, Olde Damink SW, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Study Group OI (2012) Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS(R) programme (ORANGE II – Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 13:54PubMedCrossRef Van Dam RM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Breukelen GJ, Stoot JH, van der Vorst JR, Bemelmans MH, Olde Damink SW, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Study Group OI (2012) Open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery ERAS(R) programme (ORANGE II – Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 13:54PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM, Bemelmans MH, Lassen K, Revhaug A, Fearon KC, Garden OJ, Dejong CH (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95:969–975PubMedCrossRef Van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM, Bemelmans MH, Lassen K, Revhaug A, Fearon KC, Garden OJ, Dejong CH (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95:969–975PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-centre UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy
verfasst von
Mohammed Abu Hilal
Francesco Di Fabio
Shareef Syed
Robert Wiltshire
Eleonora Dimovska
David Turner
John N. Primrose
Neil W. Pearce
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2779-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.