nach oben

Surgical Endoscopy

Erschienen in:

01.04.2014

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer: the influence of hospital volume on complications and length of stay

verfasst von: Atsuhiko Murata, Kohji Okamoto, Keiji Muramatsu, Shinya Matsuda

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Little information is available about the relationship between hospital volume and the clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of hospital volume on clinical outcomes of ESD using a national administrative database.

Methods

A total of 27,385 patients treated with ESD for gastric cancer were referred to 867 hospitals between 2009 and 2011 in Japan. We collected patients’ data from the administrative database to compare ESD-related complications and length of stay (LOS) in relation to hospital volume. Hospital volume was categorized into three groups based on the number of cases treated over the study period: low-volume hospitals (LVHs, <50 cases), medium-volume hospitals (MVHs, 50–100 cases), and high-volume hospitals (HVHs, >100 cases). These analyses were performed for each location of gastric cancer [upper (cardia and fundus), middle (body), and lower third (antrum and pylorus)].

Results

Significant differences in ESD-related complications among the three hospital volume categories were observed for upper gastric cancer (6.5 % in LVHs vs. 5.2 % in MVHs vs. 3.4 % in HVHs; p = 0.017). Multiple logistic regression revealed that HVHs were significantly associated with decreased relative risk of ESD-related complications in upper gastric cancer (odds ratio for HVHs 0.51; 95 % confidence interval, 0.31–0.83, p = 0.007). However, no significant differences for ESD-related complications were seen for middle and lower gastric cancers among the different hospital volume categories (p > 0.05). Additionally, hospital volume was significantly associated with a decreasing LOS for all locations of gastric cancers (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The present study has demonstrated that hospital volume was mainly associated with clinical outcome in patients with ESD for upper gastric cancer. Further studies for successive monitoring of outcomes of ESD should be conducted in the near future.

Inoue M, Tsugane S (2005) Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Japan. Postgrad Med J 81:419–424CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Lin Y, Ueda J, Kikuchi S, Totsuka Y, Wei WQ, Qiao YL, Inoue M (2011) Comparative epidemiology of gastric cancer between Japan and China. World J Gastroenterol 17:4421–4428CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I, Mouri R, Hirata M, Kawamura T, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2006) Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 64:877–883CrossRefPubMed

Kim M, Jeon SW, Cho KB, Park KS, Kim ES, Park CK, Seo HE, Chung YJ, Kwon JG, Jung JT, Kim EY, Jang BI, Lee SH, Kim KO, Yang CH; Daegu-Kyungpook Gastrointestinal Study Group (DGSG) (2013) Predictive risk factors of perforation in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 27:1372–1378CrossRef

Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Ono S, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2007) Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:678–683CrossRefPubMed

Repici A, Hassan C, Carlino A, Pagano N, Zullo A, Rando G, Strangio G, Romeo F, Nicita R, Rosati R, Malesci A (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a prospective Western series. Gastrointest Endosc 71:715–721CrossRefPubMed

Oda I, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H, Eguchi T, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Bhandari P, Emura F, Saito D, Ono H (2005) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: technical feasibility, operation time and complications from large consecutive series. Dig Endosc 17:54–58CrossRef

Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH, Kim SJ, Cho JY, Cho WY, Hwangbo Y, Keum BR, Park JJ, Chun HJ, Kim HJ, Kim JJ, Ji SR, Seol SY (2009) Therapeutic outcomes in 1,000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 69:1228–1235CrossRefPubMed

Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F (2009) Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 41:751–757CrossRefPubMed

10.

Gotoda T, Friedland S, Hamanaka H, Soetikno R (2005) A learning curve for advanced endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 62:866–867CrossRefPubMed

11.

Oda I, Odagaki T, Suzuki H, Nonaka S, Yoshinaga S (2012) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer based on trainee experience. Dig Endosc 24:129–132CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kato M, Gromski M, Jung Y, Chuttani R, Matthes K (2013) The learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection in an established experimental setting. Surg Endosc 27:154–161CrossRefPubMed

13.

Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T, Yokoe M, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2011) A descriptive study evaluating the circumstances of medical treatment for acute pancreatitis before publication of the new JPN guidelines based on the Japanese administrative database associated with the Diagnosis Procedure Combination system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:678–683CrossRefPubMed

14.

Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T, Yokoe M, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2011) Effect of hospital volume on clinical outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis, based on a national administrative database. Pancreas 40:1018–1023CrossRefPubMed

15.

Murata A, Matsuda S, Kuwabara K, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2011) An observational study using a national administrative database to determine the impact of hospital volume on compliance with clinical practice guidelines. Med Care 49:313–320CrossRefPubMed

16.

Murata A, Matsuda S, Mayumi T, Okamoto K, Kuwabara K, Ichimiya Y, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2012) Multivariate analysis of factors influencing medical costs of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations based on a national administrative database. Dig Liver Dis 44:143–148CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bouvier AM, Esteve J, Mitry E, Clinard F, Bonithon-Kopp C, Faivre J (2002) Trends in gastric cancer incidence in a well-defined French population by time period and birth cohort. Eur J Cancer Prev 11:221–227CrossRefPubMed

18.

Inoue M, Sasazuki S, Wakai K, Suzuki T, Matsuo K, Shimazu T, Tsuji I, Tanaka K, Mizoue T, Nagata C, Tamakoshi A, Sawada N, Tsugane S; Research Group for the Development and Evaluation of Cancer Prevention Strategies in Japan (2009) Green tea consumption and gastric cancer in Japanese: a pooled analysis of six cohort studies. Gut 58:1323–1332CrossRef

19.

Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA (2004) New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 57:1288–1294CrossRefPubMed

20.

Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno RM (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 41:929–942CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kim YJ, Park DK (2011) Management of complications following endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Endosc 3:67–70CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

23.

Lian J, Chen S, Zhang Y, Qiu F (2012) A meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 76:763–770CrossRefPubMed

24.

Durairaj L, Torner JC, Chrischilles EA, Vaughan Sarrazin MS, Yankey J, Rosenthal GE (2005) Hospital volume-outcome relationships among medical admissions to ICUs. Chest 128:1682–1689CrossRefPubMed

25.

Osler M, Iversen LH, Borglykke A, Mårtensson S, Daugbjerg S, Harling H, Jørgensen T, Frederiksen B (2011) Hospital variation in 30-day mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in Denmark: the contribution of hospital volume and patient characteristics. Ann Surg 253:733–738CrossRefPubMed

26.

Sugihara M (2010) Survival analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighted methods based on the generalized propensity score. Pharm Stat 9:21–34CrossRefPubMed

27.

Feng P, Zhou XH, Zou QM, Fan MY, Li XS (2012) Generalized propensity score for estimating the average treatment effect of multiple treatments. Stat Med 31:681–697PubMed

28.

Gilligan MA, Neuner J, Zhang X, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Nattinger AB (2007) Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Public Health 97:539–544CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

29.

Lecuyer L, Chevret S, Guidet B, Aegerter P, Martel P, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E (2008) Case volume and mortality in haematological patients with acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 32:748–754CrossRefPubMed

30.

Cudnik MT, Sasson C, Rea TD, Sayre MR, Zhang J, Bobrow BJ, Spaite DW, McNally B, Denninghoff K, Stolz U (2012) Increasing hospital volume is not associated with improved survival in out of hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac etiology. Resuscitation 83:862–868CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

31.

Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub DA, Dunn RL, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Montie JE, Underwood W 3rd, Wei JT (2006) The effects of adjusting for case mix on mortality and length of stay following radical cystectomy. J Urol 176:1363–1368CrossRefPubMed

32.

Csikesz NG, Singla A, Murphy MM, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2010) Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 55:2398–2405CrossRefPubMed

33.

Hotta K, Oyama T, Akamatsu T, Tomori A, Hasebe O, Nakamura N, Kojima E, Suga T, Miyabayashi H, Ohta H (2010) A comparison of outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasms between high-volume and low-volume centers: multi-center retrospective questionnaire study conducted by the Nagano ESD Study Group. Intern Med 49:253–259CrossRefPubMed

34.

Williams SC, Koss RG, Morton DJ, Schmaltz SP, Loeb JM (2008) Case volume and hospital compliance with evidence-based processes of care. Int J Qual Health Care 20:79–87CrossRefPubMed

35.

Toyonaga T, Nishino E, Hirooka T, Ueda C, Noda K (2006) Intraoperative bleeding in endoscopic submucosal dissection in the stomach and strategy for prevention and treatment. Dig Endosc 18:123–127CrossRef

36.

Yoshinaga S, Gotoda T, Kusano C, Oda I, Nakamura K, Takayanagi R (2008) Clinical impact of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial adenocarcinoma located at the esophagogastric junction. Gastrointest Endosc 67:202–209CrossRefPubMed

37.

Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong SK, Sung JJ, Lau JY, Ng EK (2010) Difficulties and outcomes in starting endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 24:1049–1054CrossRefPubMed

38.

Sugimoto T, Okamoto M, Mitsuno Y, Kondo S, Ogura K, Ohmae T, Mizuno H, Yoshida S, Isomura Y, Yamaji Y, Kawabe T, Omata M, Koike K (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and safe therapy for early gastric neoplasms: a multicenter feasible study. J Clin Gastroenterol 46:124–129CrossRefPubMed

39.

Provenzale D, Ofman J, Gralnek I, Rabeneck L, Koff R, McCrory D (2003) Gastroenterologist specialist care and care provided by generalists—an evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency. Am J Gastroenterol 98:21–28PubMedCrossRef

40.

Murata A, Matsuda S, Kuwabara K, Fujino Y, Kubo T, Fujimori K, Horiguchi H (2010) Impact of hospital volume on clinical outcomes of endoscopic biliary drainage for acute cholangitis based on the Japanese administrative database associated with the Diagnosis Procedure Combination system. J Gastroenterol 45:1090–1096CrossRefPubMed

41.

Yamamoto Y, Fujisaki J, Ishiyama A, Hirasawa T, Igarashi M (2012) Current status of training for endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm at cancer institute hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, a famous Japanese hospital. Dig Endosc 24:148–153CrossRefPubMed

42.

Ahn JY, Choi KD, Choi JY, Kim MY, Lee JH, Choi KS, Kim do H, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY, Kim JH (2011) Procedure time of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to the size and location of early gastric cancers: analysis of 916 dissections performed by 4 experts. Gastrointest Endosc 73:911–916CrossRefPubMed

43.

Gotoda T (2007) Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 10:1–11CrossRefPubMed

44.

Ohta T, Ishihara R, Uedo N, Takeuchi Y, Nagai K, Matsui F, Kawada N, Yamashina T, Kanzaki H, Hanafusa M, Yamamoto S, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Iishi H (2012) Factors predicting perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 75:1159–1165CrossRefPubMed

45.

Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N et al (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut 58:331–336CrossRefPubMed

46.

Kusano C, Iwasaki M, Kaltenbach T, Conlin A, Oda I, Gotoda T (2011) Should elderly patients undergo additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer? Long-term comparative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1064–1069CrossRefPubMed

47.

Okada K, Fujisaki J, Yoshida T, Ishikawa H, Suganuma T, Kasuga A, Omae M, Kubota M, Ishiyama A, Hirasawa T, Chino A, Inamori M, Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto N, Tsuchida T, Tamegai Y, Nakajima A, Hoshino E, Igarashi M (2012) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 44:122–127CrossRefPubMed

48.

Isomoto H (2010) Global dissemination of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Intern Med 49:251–252CrossRefPubMed

49.

Goda K, Fujishiro M, Hirasawa K, Kakushima N, Morita Y, Oda I, Takeuchi M, Yamamoto Y, Uedo N (2012) How to teach and learn endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal neoplasm in Japan. Dig Endosc 24:136–142CrossRefPubMed

50.

Fujishiro M, Jung HY, Goda K, Hirasawa K, Kakushima N, Lee IL, Morita Y, Oda I, Takeuchi M, Yamamoto Y, Zhou PH, Uedo N (2012) Desirable training and roles of Japanese endoscopists towards the further penetration of endoscopic submucosal dissection in Asia. Dig Endosc 24:121–123CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer: the influence of hospital volume on complications and length of stay
verfasst von: Atsuhiko Murata
Kohji Okamoto
Keiji Muramatsu
Shinya Matsuda
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3326-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Minimally invasive surgery training using multiple port sites to improve performance

A prospective, randomized, controlled, trial comparing occult-scar incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and classic three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia

Surgical completeness of robotic thyroidectomy: a prospective comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients

The ergonomics of women in surgery

Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case–control comparison

Update Chirurgie