nach oben

Surgical Endoscopy

Erschienen in:

04.03.2016

Impact of totally laparoscopic combined management of colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases on severity of complications: a propensity-score-based analysis

verfasst von: Francesca Ratti, Marco Catena, Saverio Di Palo, Carlo Staudacher, Luca Aldrighetti

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Thanks to widespread diffusion of minimally invasive approach in the setting of both colorectal and hepatic surgeries, the interest in combined resections for colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases (SCLM) by totally laparoscopic approach (TLA) has increased. Aim of this study was to compare outcome of combined resections for SCLM performed by TLA or by open approach, in a propensity-score-based study.

Study design

All 25 patients undergoing combined TLA for SCLM at San Raffaele Hospital in Milano were compared in a case-matched analysis with 25 out of 91 patients undergoing totally open approach (TOA group). Groups were matched with 1:2 ratio using propensity scores based on covariates representing disease severity. Main endpoints were postoperative morbidity and long-term outcome. The Modified Accordion Severity Grading System was used to quantify complications.

Results

The groups resulted comparable in terms of patients and disease characteristics. The TLA group, as compared to the TOA group, had lower blood loss (350 vs 600 mL), shorter postoperative stay (9 vs 12 days), lower postoperative morbidity index (0.14 vs 0.20) and severity score for complicated patients (0.60 vs 0.85). Colonic anastomosis leakage had the highest fractional complication burden in both groups. In spite of comparable long-term overall survival, the TLA group had better recurrence-free survival.

Conclusion

TLA for combined resections is feasible, and its indications can be widened to encompass a larger population of patients, provided its benefits in terms of reduced overall risk and severity of complications, rapid functional recovery and favorable long-term outcomes.

WHO (2003) World Cancer Report 2003

Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH (1999) Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 230(3):309–318CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pulitanò C, Castillo F, Aldrighetti L, Bodingbauer M, Parks RW, Ferla G, Wigmore SJ, Garden OJ (2010) What defines ‘cure’ after liver resection for colorectal metastases? Results after 10 years of follow-up. HPB (Oxford) 12(4):244–249CrossRef

Leporrier J, Maurel J, Chiche L, Bara S, Segol P, Launoy G (2006) A population-based study of the incidence, management and prognosis of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93(4):465–474CrossRefPubMed

Garden OJ, Rees M, Poston GJ, Mirza D, Saunders M, Ledermann J, Primrose JN, Parks RW (2006) Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Gut 55(Suppl 3):iii1–iii8PubMedPubMedCentral

Lykoudis PM, O’Reilly D, Nastos K, Fusai G (2014) Systematic review of surgical management of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 101(6):605–612CrossRefPubMed

Slesser AA, Simillis C, Goldin R, Brown G, Mudan S, Tekkis PP (2013) A meta-analysis comparing simultaneous versus delayed resections in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Surg Oncol 22(1):36–47CrossRefPubMed

Yin Z, Liu C, Chen Y, Shang C, Yin R, Yin D, Wang J (2013) Timing of hepatectomy in resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM): simultaneous or delayed? Hepatology 57(6):2346–2357CrossRefPubMed

Feng Q, Wei Y, Zhu D, Ye L, Lin Q, Li W, Qin X, Lyu M, Xu J (2014) Timing of hepatectomy for resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases: for whom simultaneous resection is more suitable—a meta-analysis. PLoS one 9(8):e104348CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Mayo SC, Pulitanò C, Margues H, Lamelas J, Wolfgang CL, de Saussure W, Choti MA, Gindrat I, Aldrighetti L, Barroso E, Mentha G, Pawlik TM (2013) Surgical management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a multicenter international analysis. J Am Coll Surg 216(4):707–716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Viganò L, Ribero D, Lo Tesoriere R, Polastri R (2007) Major liver resections synchronous with colorectal surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14(1):195–201CrossRefPubMed

12.

Vignali A, Ghirardelli L, Di Palo S, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2013) Laparoscopic treatment of advanced colonic cancer: a case-matched control with open surgery. Colorectal Dis 15(8):944–948CrossRefPubMed

13.

Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani V, Civelli V, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2217–2223CrossRefPubMed

14.

Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726CrossRefPubMed

15.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef

16.

Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2804 patients. Ann Surg 250(5):831–841CrossRefPubMed

17.

Aldrighetti L, Belli G, Boni L, Cillo U, Ettorre G, De Carlis L, Pinna A, Casciola L, Calise F, Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery (I GO MILS) (2015) Italian experience in minimally invasive liver surgery: a National Survey. Updates Surg 67(2):129–140CrossRefPubMed

18.

Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS; World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery (2009). The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830

19.

Fretland ÅA, Kazaryan AM, Bjørnbeth BA, Flatmark K, Andersen MH, Tønnessen TI, Bjornelv GM, Fagerland MW, Kristiansen R, Oyri K, Edwin B (2015) Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 16(1):73CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Abu Hilal M, Underwood T, Zuccaro M, Primrose J, Pearce N (2010) Short- and medium-term results of totally laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 97(6):927–933CrossRefPubMed

21.

Ferretti S, Tranchart H, Buell JF, Eretta C, Patriti A, Spampinato MG, Huh JW, Vigano L, Han HS, Ettorre GM, Jovine E, Gamblin TC, Belli G, Wakabayashi G, Gayet B, Dagher I (2015) Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumor and liver metastases: results of a Multicenter International Study. World J Surg 39(8):2052–2060CrossRefPubMed

22.

Jung KU, Kim HC, Cho YB, Kwon CH, Yun SH, Heo JS, Lee WY, Chun HK (2014) Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic resection for patients with colorectal cancers: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24(4):229–235CrossRefPubMed

23.

Lupinacci RM, Andraus W, De Paiva Haddad LB, Carneiro D’ Albuquerque LA, Herman P (2014) Simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and associated liver metastases: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 18(2):129–135CrossRefPubMed

24.

Spampinato MG, Mandalá L, Quarta G, Del Medico P, Baldazzi G (2013) One-stage, totally laparoscopic major hepatectomy and colectomy for colorectal neoplasm with synchronous liver metastasis: safety, feasibility and short-term outcome. Surgery 153(6):861–865CrossRefPubMed

25.

Porembka MR, Hall BL, Hirbe M, Strasberg SM (2010) Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210:286–298CrossRefPubMed

26.

Lam VW, Laurence JM, Pang T, Johnston E, Hollands MJ, Pleass HC, Richardson AJ (2014) A systematic review of a liver-first approach in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. HPB 16(2):101–108CrossRefPubMed

27.

Nordlinger B, Van Cutsem E, Gruenberger T, Glimelius B, Poston G, Rougier P, Sobrero A, Ychou M, European Colorectal Metastases treatment group, Sixth international colorectal liver metastases workshop (2009) Combination of surgery and chemotherapy and the role of targeted agents in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases: recommendation from an expert panel. Ann Oncol 20(6):985–992CrossRefPubMed

28.

Arru M, Aldrighetti L, Castoldi R, Di Palo S, Orsenigo E, Stella M, Pulitanò C, Gavazzi F, Ferla G, Di Carlo V, Staudacher C (2008) Analysis of prognostic factors influencing long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Surg 32(1):93–103CrossRefPubMed

29.

Belghiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev E (2000) The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2:333–339

30.

Staudacher C, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Vignali A, Orsenigo E (2007) Total mesorectal excision (TME) with laparoscopic approach: 226 consecutive cases. Surg Oncol 16(Suppl 1):S113–S116CrossRefPubMed

31.

Aldrighetti L, Pulitanò C, Arru M, Catena M, Finazzi R, Ferla G (2006) “Technological” approach versus clamp crushing technique for hepatic parenchymal transection: a comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg 10(7):974–979CrossRefPubMed

32.

Kirchhoff P, Dincler S, Buchmann P (2008) A multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for intra-and post-operative complications in 1316 elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Ann Surg 248:259–265CrossRefPubMed

33.

Strasberg SM, Hall BL (2011) Postoperative morbidity index: a quantitative measure of severity of postoperative complications. J Am Coll Surg 213:616–626CrossRefPubMed

34.

Berti S, Francone E, Minuto M, Bonfante P, Sagnelli C, Bianchi C, Tognoni A, Falco E (2015) Synchronous totally laparoscopic management of colorectal cancer and resectable liver metastases: a single center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 400(4):495–503CrossRefPubMed

35.

Inoue A, Uemura M, Yamamoto H, Hiraki M, Naito A, Ogino T, Nonaka R, Nishimura J, Wada H, Hata T, Takemasa I, Eguchi H, Mizushima T, Nagano H, Doki Y, Mori M (2014) Short-term outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic colectomy and hepatectomy for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. Int Surg 99(4):338–343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Cheung TT, Poon RT (2013) Synchronous resections of primary colorectal tumor and liver metastasis by laparoscopic approach. World J Hepatol 5(6):298–301PubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Hoekstra LT, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, van Gulik TM, Tanis PJ (2012) Initial experiences of simultaneous laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. HPB Surg 2012:893956CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Wang L, Tan HM, Tan JW, Chu Y, Ding XM, Dong JH (2013) Laparoscopic approach for simultaneous treatment of rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: indications and initial experience. Hepatogastroenterology 60(122):217–221PubMed

39.

Hatwell C, Bretagnol F, Farges O, Belghiti J, Panis Y (2013) Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer facilitates simultaneous surgery of synchronous liver metastases. Colorectal Dis 15(1):e21–e28CrossRefPubMed

40.

Elias D, Detroz B, Lasser P, Plaud B, Jerbi G (1995) Is simultaneous hepatectomy and intestinal anastomosis safe? Am J Surg 169(2):254–260CrossRefPubMed

41.

Kimura F, Miyazaki M, Suwa T, Kakizaki S, Itoh H, Kaiho T, Ambiru S, Shimizu H (1996) Reduced hepatic acute-phase response after simultaneous resection for gastrointestinal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. Br J Surg 83(7):1002–1006CrossRefPubMed

42.

Pulitanò C, Arru M, Bellio L, Rossini S, Ferla G, Aldrighetti L (2007) A risk score for predicting perioperative blood transfusion in liver surgery. Br J Surg 94(7):860–865CrossRefPubMed

43.

Delis SG, Madariaga J, Bakoyiannis A, Dervenis Ch (2007) Current role of bloodless liver resection. World J Gastroenterol 13(6):826–829CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Di Fabio F, Barkhatov L, Bonadio I, Dimovska E, Fretland ÅA, Pearce NW, Troisi RI, Edwin B, Abu Hilal M (2015) The impact of laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery on subsequent laparoscopic resection of liver metastases: a multicenter study. Surgery 157(6):1046–1054CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Impact of totally laparoscopic combined management of colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases on severity of complications: a propensity-score-based analysis
verfasst von: Francesca Ratti
Marco Catena
Saverio Di Palo
Carlo Staudacher
Luca Aldrighetti
Publikationsdatum: 04.03.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4835-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Study design

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Endoluminal vacuum therapy for gastrojejunal anastomotic leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a pilot study in a swine model

Hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux: Study of collagen in the phrenoesophageal ligament

The effect of intermittent intraabdominal pressure elevations and low cardiac output on the femoral to carotid arterial blood pressure difference in piglets

The comparative costs of laparoscopic and open liver resection: a report for the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection

Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision

The ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery: a quantitative study of the time and motion of laparoscopic surgeons in live surgical environments

Update Chirurgie