Randomized-controlled trials comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and resection alone have been conducted since the 1990s, mainly in Europe and Japan (Table
3). In the CONKO-001 trial conducted in Germany and Austria, 354 patients who had undergone resection for pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine alone or resection alone [
28,
29]. The results showed a significantly prolonged recurrence-free survival in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm. While no significant prolongation of the OS was noted initially (
p = 0.06) [
28], a subsequent analysis performed after long-term follow-up revealed significant prolongation of not only the recurrence-free survival, but also of the OS [
29]. In the JSAP-02 study conducted in Japan, 118 patients who had undergone resection for pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine alone or resection alone [
30]. Consistent with the initial results of the CONKO-001 trial, significant prolongation of the recurrence-free survival was observed in the gemcitabine-alone arm. The European Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) conducted the ESPAC-3 Study in Europe, Australia, Japan, and Canada, in which 1088 patients who had undergone resection for pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with either fluorouracil plus folinate calcium or gemcitabine alone [
31]. Although there was no significant difference in the OS between the two groups, the incidence of serious adverse events was significantly lower in the gemcitabine-alone arm than in the fluorouracil plus folinate calcium arm. These results indicate that patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine show significantly better survival outcomes than those undergoing resection alone; in addition, since serious adverse events were also less frequent in the gemcitabine arm than in the fluorouracil plus folinate calcium arm, gemcitabine could be regarded as the global standard treatment agent for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.
Table 3
Pivotal phase III trials of adjuvant treatments for pancreatic cancer
ESPAC-1 2004 | Chemoradiotherapy | 73 | NR | NR | 13.9 | p = 0.009* p = 0.05+ |
5-FU/folinic acid | 75 | NR | 21.6 |
Chemoradiotherapy + 5-FU/folinic acid | 72 | NR | 19.9 |
Observation | 69 | NR | 16.9 |
CONKO-001 2007 | Gemcitabine | 179 | 13.4 | 0.001 | 22.1 | 0.06 |
Observation | 175 | 6.9 | 20.2 |
ESPAC-3 2010 | Gemcitabine | 537 | 14.3 | 0.53 | 23.6 | 0.39 |
5-FU/folinic acid | 551 | 14.1 | 23.0 |
JASPAC-01 2016 | S-1 | 192 | 22.9 | 0.0001 | 46.5 | 0.0001 |
Gemcitabine | 193 | 11.3 | 25.5 |
ESPAC-4 2017 | Gemcitabine plus capecitabine | 364 | 13.9 | 0.082 | 28.0 | 0.032 |
Gemcitabine | 366 | 13.1 | 25.5 |
CONKO-005 2017 | Gemcitabine plus erlotinib | 219 | 11.4 | 0.26 | 24.5 | 0.61 |
Gemcitabine | 215 | 11.4 | 26.5 |
Unicancer GI PRODIGE 24/CCTG PA.6 2018 | Modified FOLFIRINOX | 247 | 21.6 | 0.001 | 54.4 | 0.003 |
Gemcitabine | 246 | 12.8 | 35.0 |
APACT 2019 | Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel | 432 | 19.4 | 0.182 | 40.5 | 0.045 |
Gemcitabine | 434 | 18.8 | 36.2 |
In Japan, the Japan Adjuvant Study Group of Pancreatic Center (JASPAC) conducted a phase III comparative study (JASPAC 01) of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine alone versus S-1 alone in patients who had undergone resection for pancreatic cancer [
32]. A total of 385 patients were enrolled, and the 5-year survival rate and median survival time were 44.1% and 46.5 months, respectively, in the S-1 group, and 24.4% and 25.5 months, respectively, in the gemcitabine group. The results demonstrated that postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 as compared to that with gemcitabine was associated with a significantly improved OS after resection of pancreatic cancer (HR 0.57,
p < 0.0001). The ESPAC conducted the ESPAC-4 study, in which 730 patients who had undergone resection for pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine alone or combined gemcitabine plus capecitabine therapy in England, Scotland, Wales, Germany, France, and Sweden [
33]. The median survival time was 25.5 months in the gemcitabine monotherapy arm and 28.0 months in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine arm. The results demonstrated that the combined gemcitabine plus capecitabine regimen yielded a significantly prolonged OS after pancreatic cancer resection as compared to gemcitabine monotherapy (HR: 0.82,
p = 0.032). The results of the PRODIGE 24-ACCORD 24/CCTG PA 6 study, conducted in France and Canada, have also been reported; in this study, the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen was compared with gemcitabine alone as adjuvant therapy [
34]. A total of 493 patients were enrolled, and the median disease-free survival, which was the primary endpoint, was 21.6 months in the modified FOLFIRINOX arm and 12.8 months in the gemcitabine monotherapy arm, demonstrating superior outcomes in the modified FOLFIRINOX arm (HR 0.58,
p < 0.0001). In terms of the OS also, better results were obtained in the modified FOLFIRINOX arm (the median survival time was 54.4 months in the modified FOLFIRINOX arm and 35.0 months in the gemcitabine monotherapy arm; HR 0.64,
p = 0.003). Since no clinical study has been conducted to compare S-1 alone with the combined gemcitabine plus capecitabine regimen and modified FOLFIRINOX regimen, and it is still not clear as to which of the three above regimes might be the optimal one for adjuvant therapy. In Japan and China, S-1 is frequently used as the standard treatment agent [
13,
15,
16] because of its higher efficacy as compared to gemcitabine monotherapy (as suggested by the superior HR of 0.57) [
32], its milder adverse effects in Asians, and its availability as an oral formulation, which can be expected to reduce the burden on the patients. On the other hand, S-1 has not been tested as adjuvant therapy in Western populations [
12,
17]. Therefore, in countries including Europe and the US, the gemcitabine plus capecitabine regimen or modified FOLFIRINOX regimen is preferred and regarded as the standard [
11,
12,
14]. Thus, this is another difference in the treatment practice for pancreatic cancer between Asian and Western countries.
The global phase III APACT trial evaluated adjuvant treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with resected pancreatic cancer [
35]. Results of the study were reported at ASCO 2019. The primary endpoint, disease-free survival by independent review, was not met. The median disease-free survival was 19.4 months with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus 18.8 months with gemcitabine monotherapy (HR = 0.88;
p = 0.1824). However, the prespecified sensitivity analysis of investigator-assessed disease-free survival and interim OS were improved with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone (HR 0.82 for both). Additional OS follow-up may better support nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as an option in the adjuvant setting.
Chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
Locally advanced pancreatic cancer, defined as locally invasive pancreatic cancer without obvious distant metastases, is difficult to resect because of invasion of the major arteries. Both in Japan and other countries, guidelines recommend chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, although there is no consensus yet on which of the two might be preferable [
11‐
16].
In regard to chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, in western countries, induction chemotherapy is undertaken prior to chemoradiotherapy, and is recommended by guidelines as the standard treatment option [
11,
12]. The aims of induction chemotherapy are to select patients who are more likely to benefit from chemoradiotherapy and to prevent distant metastases. However, there have been no randomized-controlled trials examining the clinical benefits of induction chemotherapy, except for the JCOG1106 trial, which was a randomized phase II trial conducted in Japan [
36]. In this study, the median survival time and 2-year OS in the induction chemotherapy arm receiving gemcitabine monotherapy for 12 weeks before the start of radiotherapy combined with S-1 were 17.2 months and 18.9%, respectively; no statistically significant differences were observed as compared to the corresponding values (19.0 months and 36.9%) in the group that did not receive induction chemotherapy, although a trend towards poorer outcomes was observed in the induction chemotherapy arm. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions observed either between the two groups. This study, which is the only trial of induction chemotherapy conducted to date, failed to demonstrate any clinical benefits of induction chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy is not a common practice in Japan. Therefore, Japanese guidelines do not recommend induction chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer [
15,
16].
Historically, in clinical trials of systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer, both patients with locally advanced disease and patients with distant metastases have been enrolled under the umbrella term, “unresectable pancreatic cancer,” and treatments that were found to be of survival benefit in these studies have been regarded as the standard treatments for both categories of patients. However, in recent years, these two categories of patients have been classified into separate group in trials, and many phase III studies for systemic chemotherapy are now being conducted in only patients with distant metastases (Table
4). On the other hand, no definitive conclusions have been reached yet as to the standard therapy for this population; chemotherapies demonstrated to show survival benefit in patients with distant metastases are also considered highly likely to be effective in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. FOLFIRINOX and the combined gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimen have been shown to prolong the survival, as compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, in patients with distant metastases [
37,
38], and are, therefore, also the most highly recommended regimens in both Japanese [
15,
16] and overseas guidelines [
11‐
13] for locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients with a good performance status (PS) except British guidelines [
14]. In Japan, a randomized phase II study (JCOG1407) is under way to compare the efficacy and safety of the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen and combined gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimen for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, to determine the most promising chemotherapy regimen for this stage of disease [
39]. This study was the world’s first randomized-controlled study comparing the two regimens, and a subsequent phase III study is being planned to compare the chemotherapy regimen that is suggested to be promising by this phase II study with chemoradiotherapy, which is also a standard treatment strategy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, this study is expected to contribute greatly to the establishment of evidence-based standard treatment for pancreatic cancer patients with locally advanced disease.
Table 4
Pivotal phase III trials evaluating first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer
Gemcitabine vs. 5-FU 1997 | Gemcitabine | LA M | 63 | 5.4 | 9 weeks | 0.0002 | 5.65 | NR | 0.0025 |
5-FU | 63 | 0 | 4 weeks | 4.41 |
NCIC CTG PA.3 2007 | Gemcitabine plus erlotinib | LA M | 285 | 8.6 | 3.75 | 0.004 | 6.24 | 0.82 | 0.038 |
Gemcitabine | 284 | 8.0 | 3.55 | 5.9 |
GEST 2013 | Gemcitabine plus S-1 | LA M | 275 | 29.3 | 5.7 | < 0.001* | 10.1 | 0.88 | 0.15* |
S-1 | 280 | 21.0 | 3.8 | 0.02+ | 9.7 | 1.0 | 0.001+ |
Gemcitabine | 277 | 13.3 | 4.1 | | 8.8 | | |
PRODIGE 4/ ACCORD 11 2011 | FOLFIRINOX | M | 171 | 31.8 | 6.4 | < 0.001 | 11.1 | 0.57 | < 0.001 |
Gemcitabine | 171 | 11.3 | 3.3 | 6.8 |
MPACT 2019 | Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel | M | 431 | 23 | 5.5 | < 0.001 | 8.5 | 0.7 | < 0.001 |
Gemcitabine | 430 | 7 | 3.7 | 6.7 |