Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Surgery Today
Erschienen in: Surgery Today 8/2015

01.08.2015 | Review Article

Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel

verfasst von: Kae Okoshi, Katsutoshi Kobayashi, Koichi Kinoshita, Yasuko Tomizawa, Suguru Hasegawa, Yoshiharu Sakai

Erschienen in: Surgery Today | Ausgabe 8/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Although surgical smoke contains potentially hazardous substances, such as cellular material, blood fragments, microorganisms, toxic gases and vapors, many operating rooms (ORs) do not provide protection from exposure to it. This article reviews the hazards of surgical smoke and the means of protecting OR personnel. Our objectives are to promote surgeons’ acceptance to adopt measures to minimize the hazards. Depending on its components, surgical smoke can increase the risk of acute and chronic pulmonary conditions, cause acute headaches; irritation and soreness of the eyes, nose and throat; dermatitis and colic. Transmission of infectious disease may occur if bacterial or viral fragments present in the smoke are inhaled. The presence of carcinogens in surgical smoke and their mutagenic effects are also of concern. This review summarizes previously published reports and data regarding the toxic components of surgical smoke, the possible adverse effects on the health of operating room personnel and measures that can be used to minimize exposure to prevent respiratory problems. To reduce the hazards, surgical smoke should be removed by an evacuation system. Surgeons should assess the potential dangers of surgical smoke and encourage the use of evacuation devices to minimize potential health hazards to both themselves and other OR personnel.
Literatur
1.
Cushing H. Electro-surgery as an aid to the removal of intracranial tumors. With a preliminary note on a new surgical-current generator by W.T. Bovie, Ph.D., Chicago. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1928;47:751–84.
2.
NIOSH, Health Hazard Evaluation Report. HETA 85-126-1932, 1988. p. 2.
3.
Hensman C, Baty D, Willis RG, Cuschieri A. Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery in a closed gaseous environment: an in vitro study. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1017–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Beebe DS, Swica H, Carlson N, Palahniuk RJ, Goodale RL. High levels of carbon monoxide are produced by electro-cautery of tissue during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:338–41.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Hensman C, Newman EL, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A. Cytotoxicity of electro-surgical smoke produced in an anoxic environment. Am J Surg. 1998;175:240–1.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Brüske-Hohlfeld I, Preissler G, Jauch KW, Pitz M, Nowak D, Peters A, et al. Surgical smoke and ultrafine particles. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008;3.
7.
Hill DS, O’Neill JK, Powell RJ, Oliver DW. Surgical smoke—a health hazard in the operating theatre: a study to quantify exposure and a survey of the use of smoke extractor systems in UK plastic surgery units. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:911–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Fletcher JN, Mew D, DesCoteaux JG. Dissemination of melanoma cells within electrocautery plume. Am J Surg. 1999;178:57–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Nduka CC, Poland N, Kennedy M, Dye J, Darzi A. Does the ultrasonically activated scalpel release viable airborne cancer cells? Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1031–4.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Ott DE, Moss E, Martinez K. Aerosol exposure from an ultrasonically activated (Harmonic) device. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998;5:29–32.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zhao C, Kim MK, Kim HJ, Lee SK, Chung YJ, Park JK. Comparative safety analysis of surgical smoke from transurethral resection of the bladder tumors and transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology. 2013;82(744):e9–14.PubMed
12.
Takahashi H, Yamasaki M, Hirota M, Miyazaki Y, Moon JH, Souma Y, et al. Automatic smoke evacuation in laparoscopic surgery: a simplified method for objective evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2980–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Al Sahaf OS, Vega-Carrascal I, Cunningham FO, McGrath JP, Bloomfield FJ. Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery. Ir J Med Sci. 2007;176:229–32.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Lin YW, Fan SZ, Chang KH, Huang CS, Tang CS. A novel inspection protocol to detect volatile compounds in breast surgery electrocautery smoke. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010;109:511–6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Gianella M, Hahnloser D, Rey JM, Sigrist MW. Quantitative Chemical analysis of surgical smoke generated during laparoscopic surgery with a vessel-sealing device. Surg Innov. 2013. doi:10.​1177/​1553350613492025​.PubMed
16.
Gatti JE, Bryant CJ, Noone RB, Murphy JB. The mutagenicity of electrocautery smoke. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:781–4.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Tomita Y, Mihashi S, Nagata K, Ueda S, Fujiki M, Hirano M, et al. Mutagenicity of smoke condensates induced by CO2-laser irradiation and electrocauterization. Mutat Res. 1981;89:145–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
McKinley IB Jr, Ludlow MO. Hazards of laser smoke during endodontic therapy. J Endod. 1994;20:558–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Capizzi PJ, Clay RP, Battey MJ. Microbiologic activity in laser resurfacing plume and debris. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;23:172–4.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Ferenczy A, Bergeron C, Richart RM. Human papillomavirus DNA in CO2 laser-generated plume of smoke and its consequences to the surgeon. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:114–8.PubMed
21.
Nicola JH, Nicola EM, Vieira R, Braile DM, Tanabe MM, Baldin DH. Speed of particles ejected from animal skin by CO2 laser pulses, measured by laser Doppler velocimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:847–56.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Gloster HM Jr, Roenigk RK. Risk of acquiring human papillomavirus from the plume produced by the carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of warts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32:436–41.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Taravella MJ, Weinberg A, May M, Stepp P. Live virus survives excimer laser ablation. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1498–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
26.
Garden JM, O’Banion MK, Shelnitz LS, Pinski KS, Bakus AD, Reichmann ME, et al. Papillomavirus in the vapor of carbon dioxide laser-treated verrucae. JAMA. 1988;259:1199–202.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Baggish MS, Poiesz BJ, Joret D, Williamson P, Refai A. Presence of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in laser smoke. Lasers Surg Med. 1991;11:197–203.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Fitzgerald JE, Malik M, Ahmed I. A single-blind controlled study of electrocautery and ultrasonic scalpel smoke plumes in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:337–42.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Baggish MS, Elbakry M. The effects of laser smoke on the lungs of rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:1260–5.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Ball K. Update for nurse anesthetists. Part 1. The hazards of surgical smoke. AANA J. 2001;69:125–32.PubMed
31.
32.
Edwards BE, Reiman RE. Comparison of current and past surgical smoke control practices. AORN J. 2012;95:337–50.PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
35.
36.
Kubo H. Medical engineering, electrical instruments and medical gas, guideline for surgical practice (in Japanese). Nihon Shujutsu Igaku Kaishi. 2013;34:s98–113.
37.
Alp E, Bijl D, Bleichrodt RP, Hansson B, Voss A. Surgical smoke and infection control. J Hosp Infect. 2006;62:1–5.PubMedCrossRef
38.
American College of Chest Physicians. Aerosol consensus statement. Consensus conference on aerosol delivery. Chest. 1991;100:1106–9.CrossRef
39.
Gates MA, Feskanich D, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE. Operating room nursing and lung cancer risk in a cohort of female registered nurses. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007;33:140–7.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Pukkala E, Martinsen JI, Lynge E, Gunnarsdottir HK, Sparen P, Tryggvadottir L, et al. Occupation and cancer—follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries. Acta Oncol. 2009;48:646–790.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Navarro-Meza MC, Gonzalez-Baltazar R, Aldrete-Rodriguez MG, Carmona-Navarro DE, Lopez-Cardona MG. Respiratory symptoms caused by the use of electrocautery in physicians being trained in surgery in a Mexican hospital. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2013;30:41–4.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Ball K. Compliance with surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: implications for practice. AORN J. 2010;92:142–9.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Ball K. Surgical smoke evacuation guidelines: Compliance among perioperative nurses. AORN J. 2010;92:e1–23.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Le Moual N, Varraso R, Zock JP, Henneberger P, Speizer FE, Kauffmann F, et al. Are operating room nurses at higher risk of severe persistent asthma? The nurses’ health study. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55:973–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
45.
Hallmo P, Naess O. Laryngeal papillomatosis with human papillomavirus DNA contracted by a laser surgeon. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1991;248:425–7.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Weld KJ, Dryer S, Ames CD, Cho K, Hogan C, Lee M, et al. Analysis of surgical smoke produced by various energy-based instruments and effect on laparoscopic visibility. J Endourol. 2007;21:347–51.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Heinsohn PA, Jewett DL, Balzer L, Bennett CH, Seipel P, Rosen A. Aerosols created by some surgical power tools: particle size distribution and qualitative hemoglobin content. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1991;6:773–6.CrossRef
48.
Nezhat C, Winer WK, Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Forrest D, Reeves WG. Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard? Lasers Surg Med. 1987;7:376–82.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Wisniewski PM, Warhol MJ, Rando RF, Sedlacek TV, Kemp JE, Fisher JC. Studies on the transmission of viral disease via the CO2 laser plume and ejecta. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:1117–23.PubMed
50.
Barrett WL, Garber SM. Surgical smoke—a review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air? Surg Endosc. 2003;17:979–87.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Pierce JS, Lacey SE, Lippert JF, Lopez R, Franke JE. Laser-generated air contaminants from medical laser applications: a state-of-the-science review of exposure characterization, health effects, and control. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011;8:447–66.PubMedCrossRef
52.
53.
54.
Wu JS, Luttmann DR, Meininger TA, Soper NJ. Production and systemic absorption of toxic byproducts of tissue combustion during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1075–9.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Sagar PM, Meagher A, Sobczak S, Wolff BG. Chemical composition and potential hazards of electrocautery smoke. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1792.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Tseng HS, Liu SP, Uang SN, Yang LR, Lee SC, Liu YJ, et al. Cancer risk of incremental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in electrocautery smoke for mastectomy personnel. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:31.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
57.
58.
Ferenczy A, Bergeron C, Richart RM. Carbon dioxide laser energy disperses human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid onto treatment fields. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:1271–4.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Ikramuddin S, Lucus J, Ellison EC, Schirmer WJ, Melvin WS. Detection of aerosolized cells during carbon dioxide laparoscopy. J Gastrointest Surg. 1998;2:580–83; discussion 84.
60.
Reymond MA, Schneider C, Kastl S, Hohenberger W, Kockerling F. The pathogenesis of port-site recurrences. J Gastrointest Surg. 1998;2:406–14.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Sawchuk WS, Weber PJ, Lowy DR, Dzubow LM. Infectious papillomavirus in the vapor of warts treated with carbon dioxide laser or electrocoagulation: detection and protection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21:41–9.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Armstrong DN, Ambroze WL, Schertzer ME, Orangio GR. Harmonic Scalpel vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:558–64.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Amaral JF. The experimental development of an ultrasonically activated scalpel for laparoscopic use. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4:92–9.PubMed
64.
Kokosa JM, Eugene J. Chemical composition of laser-tissue interaction smoke plume. J Laser Appl. 1989;3:59–63.CrossRef
65.
Brandon HJ, Young VL. Characterization and removal of electrosurgical smoke. Surg Serv Manag. 1997;3:14–6.
66.
Hirata S. Building equipment of surgical room, guideline for surgical practice (in Japanese). Nihon Shujutsu Igaku Kaishi. 2013;34:s131–6.
67.
Schultz L. An analysis of surgical smoke plume components, capture, and evacuation. AORN J. 2014;99:289–98.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Coia JE, Ritchie L, Adisesh A, Makison Booth C, Bradley C, Bunyan D, et al. Guidance on the use of respiratory and facial protection equipment. J Hosp Infect. 2013;85:170–82.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Benson SM, Novak DA, Ogg MJ. Proper use of surgical n95 respirators and surgical masks in the OR. AORN J. 2013;97:457–67.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Metadaten
Titel
Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel
verfasst von
Kae Okoshi
Katsutoshi Kobayashi
Koichi Kinoshita
Yasuko Tomizawa
Suguru Hasegawa
Yoshiharu Sakai
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Surgery Today / Ausgabe 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1085-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2015

Surgery Today 8/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Case Report

A persistent sciatic artery aneurysm containing a free-floating thrombus: report of a case

Erratum

Erratum to: Impact of Surgical Infection Society/Infectious Disease Society of America-recommended antibiotics on postoperative intra-abdominal abscess with image-guided percutaneous abscess drainage following gastrointestinal surgery

Original Article

Effects of ghrelin administration on the early postoperative inflammatory response after esophagectomy

Original Article

Efficacy of intraoperative HyperEye Medical System angiography for coronary artery bypass grafting

Original Article

Optimal changes in portal hemodynamics induced by splenectomy during living donor liver transplantation

Original Article

Risk factors for initial surgery in patients with Crohn’s disease in Central China

Leitlinien kompakt für die Allgemeinmedizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Facharzt-Training Allgemeinmedizin

Die ideale Vorbereitung zur anstehenden Prüfung mit den ersten 24 von 100 klinischen Fallbeispielen verschiedener Themenfelder

Mehr erfahren

Neu im Fachgebiet Allgemeinmedizin

Strenge Blutdruckeinstellung lohnt auch im Alter noch

30.04.2024 Arterielle Hypertonie Nachrichten

Ältere Frauen, die von chronischen Erkrankungen weitgehend verschont sind, haben offenbar die besten Chancen, ihren 90. Geburtstag zu erleben, wenn ihr systolischer Blutdruck < 130 mmHg liegt. Das scheint selbst für 80-Jährige noch zu gelten.

Dihydropyridin-Kalziumantagonisten können auf die Nieren gehen

30.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Im Vergleich zu anderen Blutdrucksenkern sind Kalziumantagonisten vom Diyhdropyridin-Typ mit einem erhöhten Risiko für eine Mikroalbuminurie und in Abwesenheit eines RAS-Blockers auch für ein terminales Nierenversagen verbunden.

Frauen bekommen seltener eine intensive Statintherapie

30.04.2024 Statine Nachrichten

Frauen in den Niederlanden erhalten bei vergleichbarem kardiovaskulärem Risiko seltener eine intensive Statintherapie als Männer. Ihre LDL-Zielwerte erreichen sie aber fast ähnlich oft.

Reizdarmsyndrom: Diäten wirksamer als Medikamente

29.04.2024 Reizdarmsyndrom Nachrichten

Bei Reizdarmsyndrom scheinen Diäten, wie etwa die FODMAP-arme oder die kohlenhydratreduzierte Ernährung, effektiver als eine medikamentöse Therapie zu sein. Das hat eine Studie aus Schweden ergeben, die die drei Therapieoptionen im direkten Vergleich analysierte.

Update Allgemeinmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise