Introduction
Method
Results
Description of the studies
Authors | Subjects treated/sham, reference | Diagnosis | Location | Whole sessions/weeks | Frequency | Train duration | Intertrain- interval | Pulses per session | Motor threshold | Cognitive ratings | Cognitive domain | Cognitive effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Padberg et al. (1999) | (1) 6/6 (2) 6 | D | Left DLPFC | 5 | (1) 10 Hz (2) 0.3 Hz | (1) 5 s | (1) 30 s | 250 | 90% (n.a.) | n. a. | Verbal learning and memory, alertness/attention | (1) Improvement in verbal memory (2) No effect |
Triggs et al. (1999) | 10 | D | Left PFC | 10/2 weeks | 20 Hz | 2 s | n. a. | 2,000 | 80% (n.a.) | HVLT, WAIS-R, COWAT, Boston Naming Test | Verbal learning/memory, ExFunction/WM | Improvement in ExFunction (verbal fluency) |
Little et al. (2000) | 10 | D | Left DLPFC | 10/2 weeks | 1 Hz/20 Hz | 60 s/2 s | 5 s per 10 pulses/60 s | 800 | 80% (n.a.) | BSRT, CNB | Verbal/spatial learning/memory, ExFunction (verbal fluency/retrieval) | Improvement of word recall after 1 week in 1 Hz and 20 Hz condition; trend toward improved visuospatial memory after 2 weeks of 20 Hz stimulation |
Rollnik et al. (2000) | 12 | SZ | Left DLPFC | 10/2 weeks real + 10/2 weeks sham | 20 Hz | 2 s | 61 s | 800 | 80% (n.a.) | NCT | Psychomotor speed | No sign of improvement |
Loo et al. 2001 | 9/9 | D | Left DLPFC | 10/2 weeks min., 20/4 weeks max | 10 Hz | 5 s | 25 s | n. a. | 110% RMT | RAVLT, VPAL, Tower of London, COWAT, MMST, AMI, WMS | Visual (associative)/verbal learning/memory, ExFunction, general cognitive state, autobiographical memory, simple and complex reaction time | No sign of improvements; deterioration in RAVLT (n = 1) |
Speer et al. 2001
| 18 | D, BD | Left PFC | 10/2 weeks | 1 Hz/20 Hz | 26 min/2 s | 0/28 s | 1,600 | 100% AMT | BSRT, Colorado Neuropsychologic Battery, Verbal/Category Fluency Task, CPT, WAIS/SILS | Verbal/spatial learning/memory, ExFunction (verbal fluency, cognitive flexibility), attention/concentration, motor speed, intelligence | Tendency of improvement in verbal fluency after 20 Hz |
Moser et al. (2002) | 9/10 | D | Left DLPFC | 5 | 20 Hz | 2 s | 60 s | n. a. | 80% (n.a.) | TMT (A/B), Stroop, WAIS-R, COWAT, Boston Naming Test, RAVLT, JLO | Motor speed/attention, WM/ExFunction, visual associative learning, verbal learning/memory, visuospatial perception/analysis | Improvement in ExFunction (cognitive flexibility) |
Shajahan et al. (2002) | 15 | D | Left DLPFC | 10/2 weeks | 5, 10 or 20 Hz | 4, 2, 1 s | 60 s | 500 | 80% RMT | Verbal fluency, WMS-R, WAIS, DSST, AVLT, Test of Everyday Attention, PAG | WM/ExFunction, verbal learning/memory, attention, reaction time | No sign effect |
Höppner et al. (2003) | 20/10 | D | (1) Left DLPFC or (2) right DLPFC | 10/2 weeks | (1) 20 Hz (2) 1 Hz | (1) 2 s (2) 60 s | (1) 60 s (2) 180 s | n. a. | (1) 90% RMT (2) 110% RMT | d2-Test | Motor speed, concentration | Selective improvement in concentration performance (d2-subscore) |
Huber et al. (2003) | 12 | SZ | On the dominant DLPFC | n. a. | High-frequency | n. a. | n. a. | n. a. | n. a. | NCT | Psychomotor speed | Improvement in women, no improvement in men |
Loo et al. (2003) | 9/10 | D | Bilateral PFC | 15/3 weeks | 15 Hz | 5 s | 25 s | n. a. | 90% RMT | MMST, RAVLT, VPAL, EPAT, Tower of London, COWAT | General cognitive state, visual (associative)/verbal learning/memory, ExFunction | Trends toward improvement in ExFunction/verbal learning and associative learning; deterioration in retention; deterioration in ExFunction/planning in active and improvement in sham group |
Martis et al. (2003) | 15 | D, BD | Left PFC | 10-20/2–4 weeks | 10 Hz | 5 s | 30 s | 1,000–2,000 | 110% (n.a.) | NART, Simple and Choice Reaction Time, Stroop/WAIS/Verbal Fluency, WMS-R, Grooved Pegboard, Squire Test | Intelligence, attention, WM/ExFunction, Obj. memory, fine motor speed | Improvement in WM/ExFunction, Obj. memory and fine motor speed |
O’Connor et al. (2003) | 14 | D | Left DLPFC | 10/2 weeks | 10 Hz | 8 s | 24 s | 1,600 | 90% (n.a.) | WMSIII, RAVLT, Transient News Event Test | WM/ExFunction, verbal learning/memory, retrograde memory | Improvement in WM |
Fabre et al. (2004) | 11 | D | Left PFC | 10/2 weeks | 10 Hz | 8 s | 52 s | 1,600 | 100% RMT | CVLT, TMT (A/B), Hive Test, Digit Span Task, MMST, Verbal Fluency Task | Verbal learning/memory, motor speed, visuospatial skills, WM/ExFunction, general cognitive state | Improvement in ExFunction/verbal fluency; trend toward improvement in visuospatial memory |
Hausmann et al. (2004) | 26/13 | D | (1) left DLPFC or (2) bilateral DLPFC (3) sham | 10/2 weeks | (1) 20 Hz (2) 20 Hz left + 1 Hz right | 10 s | 90 s | (1) 2,000 (2) 2,000/2,600 | (1) 100% RMT (2) 120% RMT | TMT (A/B), Stroop, MVG, COWAT | Motor speed, attention, Short-/long-term memory, WM/ExFunction | Improvement in color naming/response inhibition (Stroop); motor Speed/cognitive flexibility (TMT); trend toward better ExFunction/verbal fluency |
Huang et al. (2004) | 24 | H | Left DLPFC | 1 real + 1 sham | 5 Hz | 8 s | 23 s | 1,600 | 100% (n.a.) | TAP (Go/NoGo-Task) | Selective attention | Neither improvement nor deterioration in cognition |
Jorge et al. (2004) | 10/10 | PStr D | Left PFC | 10/2 weeks | 10 Hz | 5 s | 60 s | 1,000 | 100% (n.a.) | Barona Equations, MMST, TMT (A/B), Stroop, COWAT, RAVLT, BVRT, Boston Naming Test, Token Test, WAIS III, Line Bisection Test | Premorbid intelligence, general cognitive state, attention, ExFunction, verbal and nonverbal learning/memory, language comprehension/repetition, visuospatial/visuoconstructive functions/neglect | Trend toward general cognitive improvement; no difference between active and sham group |
Mosimann et al. (2004) | 12/12 | D (40–90 years) | Left DLPFC | 10/2 weeks | 20 Hz | 2 s | 28 s | 1,600 | 100% (n.a.) | MMST, VLT, Stroop, TMT A/B, Verbal Fluency Task | Global cognitive function, verbal learning/memory, attention, ExFunctions (flexibility, verbal fluency) | No deterioration, no significant improvement; no difference between active and sham group |
Boggio et al. (2005) | 13/12 | PD + D | Left DLPFC | 10/2 weeks | 15 Hz | 5 s | n. a. | 3,000 | 110% (n.a.) | WCST, TMT (B), COWAT, Stroop, HVOT, CPM, Digit Span Test | WM/ExFunction, attention, visuospatial ability, reasoning | Trend toward improvement in ExFunction (WCST-perseveration and Stroop-interference); no difference between active and sham group |
Rektorova et al. (2005) | 7 | ExDys | Left DLPFC or left MC | 1 real + 1 sham | 10 Hz | 1 s | 10 s | 450 | 100% (n.a.) | TMT (A/B), WAIS-R, Stroop, VFT, Rey-Figure, WMS | Motor speed, attention, WM/ExFunction, visuoconstruction/-memory | Selective improvement in the Stroop-interference after DLPFC stimulation; improvement in digit symbols-performance independent of location of stimulation |
Sachdev et al. (2005) | 4 | SZ | Left DLPFC | 4 weeks | 15 Hz | 5 s | 25 s | 1,800 | 90% (n.a.) | MMSE, Digit Span, TMT A/B, Symbol-Digit-Coding, Verbal Fluency, WCST | General cognitive state, ExFunction/WM (WM, verbal fluency, Cogn. flexibility), psychomotor speed | No significant improvement |
Schulze-Rauschenbach et al. 2005 | 16, 14/15 | D, H | Left DLPFC | ca. 10 (2–3/week) | 10 Hz | 2 s | 5 s | 400–600 | 100% (n.a.) | AVLT, MPT, Four-Card-Task, AMI, SSMQ, MMST, TMT (A/B), WAIS-R, Letter-Number-Span-Test, LPS | Verbal learning/memory, subjective memory, motor speed, WM/ExFunction | Improvement in verbal memory and subjective memory in rTMS group |
Avery et al. (2006) | 35/33 | D | Left DLPFC | 15/4 weeks | 10 Hz | 5 s | 25–30 s | 1,600 | 110% RMT | MMST, RAVLT, WAIS-R, TMT (A/B), COWAT, Stroop, GOAT | General cognitive state, verbal learning/memory, WM/ExFunction, motor speed, attention, orientation | Improvements in cognitive functions at follow up in both groups |
Kuroda et al. (2006) | 9 | D | Left DLPFC | 10/2 weeks | 10 Hz | 5 s | 25 s | 1,000 | 100% (n.a.) | MMST, WMS-R, TMT (A/B) | Association (verbal) learning/memory, motor speed, ExFunction (cognitive flexibility) | Improvement in association (verbal) learning/memory (unrelated words, delayed recall) |
Rosa et al. (2006) | 20/15 | D | Left DLPFC | 20/4 weeks | 10 Hz | 10 s | 20 s | 2,500 | 100% (n.a.) | WAIS-R, WMS-R, RBMT | ExFunction (working memory), different components of memory | No significant improvement; trend toward improvement in RBMT in rTMS group; deterioration in ECT group after 2 weeks and 4 weeks |
Solé-Padullés et al. (2006) | 20/19 | MC | Left PFC | 1 | 5 Hz | 10 s | 20 s | 500 | 80% (n.a.) | Face-Name-Memory-Tasks, MMST | (Association) Learning/memory, general cognitive state | Improvement in Associative Memory; no difference between active and sham group |
Vanderhasselt et al. (2006) | 28 | H | Left DLPFC | 1 real + 1 sham | 10 Hz | n. a. | 26, 1 s | 1,560 | 110% (n.a.) | Stroop | Processing speed, selective attention | Improvement in processing speed, i.e. in selective attention over all trials (congruent/incongruent) |
Wagner et al. (2006) | 17 | H | Left DLPFC | 1 real + 1 sham | 20 Hz | 2 s | 28 s | 1,600 | 100% (n.a.) | Stroop, WCST, TAP (Divided Attention) | Selective/divided attention, ExFunction | Deterioration in visual reaction time (TAP) 30 min. after stimulation; no (delayed) effect in ExFunction |
Mogg et al. (2008) | 29/30 | D | Left DLPFC | 10 | 10 Hz | 5 s | 55 s | 1,000 | 110% RMT | CAMCOG, WAIS-R, Grooved Pegboard Test | General cognitive state, attention, ExFunction (working memory), motor function | No significant effect at any time point |
Vanderhasselt et al. (2009) | 15 | D | Left DLPFC | 10/2 weeks vs. 1 session (real/sham) | 10 Hz | 3, 9 s | 26, 1 s | 1,560 | 110% (n.a.) | Computerized Task-Switching-Paradigm | ExFunction (attentional control/cognitive flexibility) | After 2 weeks: improvement of initiation time in visual trials and reaction time in auditory trials (responders); after 1 session: Improvement in initiation time (responders); no effect in the motor component of switching |
Cognitive effects of high-frequency rTMS over the prefrontal cortex
Cognitive domain | Improvement | No effect (n. s.) | Deterioration |
---|---|---|---|
Attention | |||
Alertness/Simple reaction | |||
Selective/Focused attention; Response inhibition | |||
Divided attention | 1 (Wagner et al. 2006 (H)) | ||
Sustained attention/Concentration | |||
Executive functions/Working memory | |||
Working memory (Short-term storage/Manipulation/Monitoring) | |||
Cognitive flexibility | |||
Verbal fluency/Retrieval | |||
Problem solving/Planning/Reasoning | 1 (Loo et al. 2003) | ||
Learning + Memory (Intermediate-/Long-term storage) | |||
Verbal learning + Memory | |||
Spatial learning + Memory/Objective learning + Memory | 1 (Martis et al. 2003) | ||
(Visual) Associative learning + Memory | |||
Retrograde/Autobiographic memory | 1 (Schulze-Rauschenbach et al. 2005) | ||
Psychomotor speed | |||
Psychomotor speed/Processing speed |
Effect of clinical status and stimulation type on cognitive changes
Clinical versus non-clinical group
Stimulation parameters
Onset of cognitive measure
Verum versus sham stimulation
Group specific cognitive effect | Studies contrasting real and placebo stimulation |
---|---|
No significant improvement: Verum = Sham | |
Selective improvement: Verum > Sham | |
Selective improvement: Sham > Verum | n. a. |
Overall improvement (placebo-/practice effect): Verum = Sham |
High-frequency versus low-frequency stimulation
Authors | Subjects treated/sham, reference | Diagnosis | Location | Whole sessions/weeks | Frequency (Hz) | Train duration (min) | Intertrain-interval | Pulses per session | Motor threshold | Cognitive ratings | Cognitive domain | Cognitive effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fitzgerald et al. (2005) | 17/16 | SZ (auditory hallucinations) | TP3 (10-20-EEG-System) | 10/2 weeks | 1 | 15 | – | n.a. | 90% RMT | HVLT, verbal fluency, digit span (forwards, backwards/visuospatial), VSMT | Verbal learning and memory, WM/executive function | No deterioration in cognitive testing |
Fregni et al. (2006) | 12/9 | MCD, refractory epilepsy | Site of lesion | 5 | 1 | 20 | – | 1,200 | 70% max. stimulator output | Digit span (forward, backward), simple reaction, Stroop test | WM/ExFunction, simple reaction time, selective attention | Significant improvement in simple reaction time and Stroop Task; no effect in short term/working memory |
Januel et al. (2006) | 11/16 | D | Right DLPFC | 16/4 weeks: 1./2. week daily, 3./4. week every two days | 1 | 2 × 1 | 3 min | n.a. | 90% (n.a.) | Grober and Buschke’s Test, Stroop Test, TMT, WAIS-R, Cardebat’s Fluency Test | Verbal learning and memory, selective attention, psychomotor speed, ExFunction | No sign. differences (Baseline/Day 14) |
Trojano et al. (2006) | 16/8 | H | P3 (n = 8) or P4 (n = 8) (10-20-EEG-System) | 1 | 1 | 10 | – | 600 | 80% (n.a.) | Coordinate task, categorical task | Processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations | Selective deterioration of functioning in active group (immediately after rTMS and 10 min. after rTMS), progressive improvement in control group |