Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Rheumatology 3/2009

01.03.2009 | Brief Report

Preference for weekly and monthly bisphosphonates among patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the Croatian PROMO Study

verfasst von: Darko Kastelan, Petar Lozo, Doris Stamenkovic, Blazenka Miskic, Tonko Vlak, Zeljka Kolak, Jasminka Milas Ahic, Velimir Altabas, Zeljka Crncevic Orlic, Mirko Korsic

Erschienen in: Clinical Rheumatology | Ausgabe 3/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The PROMO (preference for once monthly bisphosphonate) Study, conducted in seven hospital centres in Croatia between June 2007 and June 2008, was designed to analyse patient preference for weekly and monthly bisphosphonates in everyday clinical practice where the significant proportion of patients are not completely satisfied with the current osteoporosis treatment. Eligible participants were women with postmenopausal osteoporosis taking weekly bisphosphonates for the last 6 months. Those who agreed to be enrolled were transferred from weekly to monthly ibandronate for the next 6 months. There was no washout period between the two treatment regimens. At the baseline, patients expressed their satisfaction with the weekly treatment. At the end of the study, all patients were asked to complete the five-question survey specially designed for this study. Study population comprised 258 participants. Among 248 patients who completed the study, 244 (98.4%) declared their preference for one of the regimens or they had no preference. Once-monthly regimen was preferred by 231 patients (94.7%), whereas once-weekly regimen was preferred by five patients (2.0%). Eight patients (3.3%) indicated no preference. Furthermore, 93.0% of patients thought that monthly dosing was more convenient. Compared to weekly regimen, monthly dosing was associated with significantly higher satisfaction with the treatment and with significantly less adverse events. In line with these data, 85.9% of patients stated improved quality of life with monthly ibandronate. In summary, the PROMO Study demonstrated strong patient preference for monthly over weekly dosing which is expected to improve suboptimal adherence to weekly bisphosphonates.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Reginster J-Y, Minne HW, Sorensen OH et al (2000) Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11:83–91PubMedCrossRef Reginster J-Y, Minne HW, Sorensen OH et al (2000) Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11:83–91PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK et al (1999) Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 282:1344–1352PubMedCrossRef Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK et al (1999) Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 282:1344–1352PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chesnut CH III, Skag A, Christiansen C et al (2004) Effects of oral ibandronate administered daily or intermittently on fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 19:1241–1249CrossRef Chesnut CH III, Skag A, Christiansen C et al (2004) Effects of oral ibandronate administered daily or intermittently on fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 19:1241–1249CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris ST, Blumentals WA, Miller PD (2008) Ibandronate and the risk of non-vertebral and clinical fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results of a meta-analysis of phase III studies. Curr Med Res Opin 24:237–245PubMedCrossRef Harris ST, Blumentals WA, Miller PD (2008) Ibandronate and the risk of non-vertebral and clinical fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results of a meta-analysis of phase III studies. Curr Med Res Opin 24:237–245PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stakkestad JA, Lakatos P, Lorenc R et al (2008) Monthly oral ibandronate is effective and well tolerated after 3 years: the MOBILE long term extension. Clin Rheumatol 27:955–960PubMedCrossRef Stakkestad JA, Lakatos P, Lorenc R et al (2008) Monthly oral ibandronate is effective and well tolerated after 3 years: the MOBILE long term extension. Clin Rheumatol 27:955–960PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lespessailles E (2007) A forgotten challenge when treating osteoporosis: getting patients to take their meds. Jt Bone Spine 74:7–8CrossRef Lespessailles E (2007) A forgotten challenge when treating osteoporosis: getting patients to take their meds. Jt Bone Spine 74:7–8CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI, Lewis BE, Charpentier M, Lydick E (2003) Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:965–968PubMedCrossRef Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI, Lewis BE, Charpentier M, Lydick E (2003) Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:965–968PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Eastell R, Garnero P, Vrijens B (2003) Influence of patient compliance with risedronate therapy on bone turnover marker and bone mineral density response: the IMPACT study. Calcif Tissue Int 72:408 Eastell R, Garnero P, Vrijens B (2003) Influence of patient compliance with risedronate therapy on bone turnover marker and bone mineral density response: the IMPACT study. Calcif Tissue Int 72:408
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF et al (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15:1003–1008PubMedCrossRef Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF et al (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int 15:1003–1008PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Simon JA, Lewiecki EM, Smith ME et al (2002) Patient preference for once-weekly alendronate 70 mg versus once-daily alendronate 10 mg: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study. Clin Ther 24:1871–1886PubMedCrossRef Simon JA, Lewiecki EM, Smith ME et al (2002) Patient preference for once-weekly alendronate 70 mg versus once-daily alendronate 10 mg: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study. Clin Ther 24:1871–1886PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Recker RR, Gallagher R, Amonkar M et al (2004) Medication persistence is better with weekly bisphosphonates, but it remains suboptimal. J Bone Miner Res 19(Suppl 1):SA407 Recker RR, Gallagher R, Amonkar M et al (2004) Medication persistence is better with weekly bisphosphonates, but it remains suboptimal. J Bone Miner Res 19(Suppl 1):SA407
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendler D, Kung AW, Fuleihan Gel H et al (2004) Patients with osteoporosis prefer once weekly to once daily dosing with alendronate. Maturitas 48:243–251PubMedCrossRef Kendler D, Kung AW, Fuleihan Gel H et al (2004) Patients with osteoporosis prefer once weekly to once daily dosing with alendronate. Maturitas 48:243–251PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Emkey R, Koltun W, Beusterien K et al (2005) Patient preference for once monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Bonviva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO). Curr Med Res Opin 21:1895–1903PubMedCrossRef Emkey R, Koltun W, Beusterien K et al (2005) Patient preference for once monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Bonviva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO). Curr Med Res Opin 21:1895–1903PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hadji P, Minne H, Pfeifer M et al (2008) Treatment preference for monthly oral ibandronate and weekly oral alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized, crossover study (BALTO II). Jt Bone Spine 75:303–310CrossRef Hadji P, Minne H, Pfeifer M et al (2008) Treatment preference for monthly oral ibandronate and weekly oral alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized, crossover study (BALTO II). Jt Bone Spine 75:303–310CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Grazio S, Babic-Naglic D, Kehler T et al (2008) Persistence of weekly alendronate: a real-world study in Croatia. Clin Rheumatol 27:651–653PubMedCrossRef Grazio S, Babic-Naglic D, Kehler T et al (2008) Persistence of weekly alendronate: a real-world study in Croatia. Clin Rheumatol 27:651–653PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Keen R, Jodar E, Iolascon G et al (2006) European women’s preference for osteoporosis treatment: influence of clinical effectiveness and dosing frequency. Curr Med Res Opin 22:2375–2381PubMedCrossRef Keen R, Jodar E, Iolascon G et al (2006) European women’s preference for osteoporosis treatment: influence of clinical effectiveness and dosing frequency. Curr Med Res Opin 22:2375–2381PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss TW, Gold D, Silverman S et al (2006) An evaluation of patient preferences for osteoporosis medications and their attributes: results from the PREFER-US study. Curr Med Res Opin 22:949–960PubMedCrossRef Weiss TW, Gold D, Silverman S et al (2006) An evaluation of patient preferences for osteoporosis medications and their attributes: results from the PREFER-US study. Curr Med Res Opin 22:949–960PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kastelan D, Korsic M, Vlak T (2008) Ibandronate: is there an effect on nonvertebral fractures? Clin Rheumatol 27:1313–1315PubMedCrossRef Kastelan D, Korsic M, Vlak T (2008) Ibandronate: is there an effect on nonvertebral fractures? Clin Rheumatol 27:1313–1315PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lydick E, Zimmerman SI, Yawn B et al (1997) Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL). J Bone Miner Res 12:456–463PubMedCrossRef Lydick E, Zimmerman SI, Yawn B et al (1997) Development and validation of a discriminative quality of life questionnaire for osteoporosis (the OPTQoL). J Bone Miner Res 12:456–463PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat The EruoQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef The EruoQol Group (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Flood EM, Beusterien KM, Green H et al (2006) Psychometric evaluation of the Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q), a novel measure to assess satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:42PubMedCrossRef Flood EM, Beusterien KM, Green H et al (2006) Psychometric evaluation of the Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q), a novel measure to assess satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment in postmenopausal women. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:42PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sebaldt RJ, Shane LG, Pham BZ et al (2004) impact on non-compliance and non-persistence with daily bisphosphonates on longer-term effectiveness outcomes in patients with osteoporosis treated in tertiary specialist care. J Bone Miner Res 19(Suppl 1):S445 Sebaldt RJ, Shane LG, Pham BZ et al (2004) impact on non-compliance and non-persistence with daily bisphosphonates on longer-term effectiveness outcomes in patients with osteoporosis treated in tertiary specialist care. J Bone Miner Res 19(Suppl 1):S445
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotte FE, Cortet B, Lafuma A et al (2008) A model of the public health impact of improved treatment persistence in post-menopausal osteoporosis in France. Jt Bone Spine 75:201–208CrossRef Cotte FE, Cortet B, Lafuma A et al (2008) A model of the public health impact of improved treatment persistence in post-menopausal osteoporosis in France. Jt Bone Spine 75:201–208CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Preference for weekly and monthly bisphosphonates among patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the Croatian PROMO Study
verfasst von
Darko Kastelan
Petar Lozo
Doris Stamenkovic
Blazenka Miskic
Tonko Vlak
Zeljka Kolak
Jasminka Milas Ahic
Velimir Altabas
Zeljka Crncevic Orlic
Mirko Korsic
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clinical Rheumatology / Ausgabe 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-1039-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2009

Clinical Rheumatology 3/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.