Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2005

01.03.2005 | Original Article

Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing

verfasst von: Qian-Jie Fu, Geraldine Nogaki

Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Ausgabe 1/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The latest-generation cochlear implant devices provide many deaf patients with good speech recognition in quiet listening conditions. However, speech recognition deteriorates rapidly as the level of background noise increases. Previous studies have shown that, for cochlear implant users, the absence of fine spectro-temporal cues may contribute to poorer performance in noise, especially when the noise is dynamic (e.g., competing speaker or modulated noise). Here we report on sentence recognition by cochlear implant users and by normal-hearing subjects listening to an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant, in the presence of steady or square-wave modulated speech-shaped noise. Implant users were tested using their everyday, clinically assigned speech processors. In the acoustic simulation, normal-hearing listeners were tested for different degrees of spectral resolution (16, eight, or four channels) and spectral smearing (carrier filter slopes of −24 or −6 dB/octave). For modulated noise, normal-hearing listeners experienced significant release from masking when the original, unprocessed speech was presented (which preserved the spectro-temporal fine structure), while cochlear implant users experienced no release from masking. As the spectral resolution was reduced, normal-hearing listeners’ release from masking gradually diminished. Release from masking was further reduced as the degree of spectral smearing increased. Interestingly, the mean speech recognition thresholds of implant users were very close to those of normal-hearing subjects listening to four-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. Also, the best cochlear implant listeners performed like normal-hearing subjects listening to eight- to 16-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. These findings suggest that implant users’ susceptibility to noise may be caused by the reduced spectral resolution and the high degree of spectral smearing associated with channel interaction. Efforts to improve the effective number of spectral channels as well as reduce channel interactions may improve implant performance in noise, especially for temporally modulated noise.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bacon, SP, Opie, JM, Montoya, DY 1998The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgroundsJ. Speech Hear. Res.41549563 Bacon, SP, Opie, JM, Montoya, DY 1998The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgroundsJ. Speech Hear. Res.41549563
Zurück zum Zitat Baer, T, Moore, BCJ 1993Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noiseJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9412291241 Baer, T, Moore, BCJ 1993Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noiseJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9412291241
Zurück zum Zitat Baer, T, Moore, BCJ 1994Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speechJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9522772280PubMed Baer, T, Moore, BCJ 1994Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speechJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9522772280PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Boothroyd, A, Mulhearn, B, Gong, J, Ostroff, J 1996Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognitionJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10018071818PubMed Boothroyd, A, Mulhearn, B, Gong, J, Ostroff, J 1996Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognitionJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10018071818PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Dowell, RC, Seligman, PM, Blamey, PJ, Clark, GM 1987Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noiseActa Otolaryngol. (Stockh.)104439446CrossRef Dowell, RC, Seligman, PM, Blamey, PJ, Clark, GM 1987Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noiseActa Otolaryngol. (Stockh.)104439446CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenberg, LS, Dirks, DD, Bell, TS 1995Speech recognition in amplitude modulated noise of listeners with normal and impaired hearingJ. Speech Hear. Res.38222233PubMed Eisenberg, LS, Dirks, DD, Bell, TS 1995Speech recognition in amplitude modulated noise of listeners with normal and impaired hearingJ. Speech Hear. Res.38222233PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Festen, JM, Plomp, R 1990Effects of fluctuation noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearingJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.8817251736PubMed Festen, JM, Plomp, R 1990Effects of fluctuation noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearingJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.8817251736PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Fu, Q-J, Shannon, RV, Wang, X 1998Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearingJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10435863596PubMed Fu, Q-J, Shannon, RV, Wang, X 1998Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearingJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.10435863596PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson, HA, Arlinger, SD 1994Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noiseJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.95518529PubMed Gustafsson, HA, Arlinger, SD 1994Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noiseJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.95518529PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hall, JW, Grose, JH 1991Some effects of auditory grouping factors on modulation detection interference (MDI)J. Acoust. Soc. Am.9030283035PubMed Hall, JW, Grose, JH 1991Some effects of auditory grouping factors on modulation detection interference (MDI)J. Acoust. Soc. Am.9030283035PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hochberg, I, Boothroyd, A, Weiss, M, Hellman, S 1992Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant usersEar Hear.13263271PubMed Hochberg, I, Boothroyd, A, Weiss, M, Hellman, S 1992Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant usersEar Hear.13263271PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Horst, JW 1987Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.82874885PubMed Horst, JW 1987Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjectsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.82874885PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kiefer, J, Müller, J, Pfennigdorf, T, Schön, F, Helms, J, Ilberg, C, Gstöttner, W, Ehrenberger, K, Arnold, W, Stephan, K, Thumfart, W, Baur, S 1996Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (Med-El Combi-40) compared to the Multipeak and Spectral peak strategies (Nucleus)ORL58127135PubMedCrossRef Kiefer, J, Müller, J, Pfennigdorf, T, Schön, F, Helms, J, Ilberg, C, Gstöttner, W, Ehrenberger, K, Arnold, W, Stephan, K, Thumfart, W, Baur, S 1996Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (Med-El Combi-40) compared to the Multipeak and Spectral peak strategies (Nucleus)ORL58127135PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Müller-Deiler, J, Schmidt, BJ, Rudert, H 1995Effects of noise on speech discrimination in cochlear implant patientsAnn. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.166303306 Müller-Deiler, J, Schmidt, BJ, Rudert, H 1995Effects of noise on speech discrimination in cochlear implant patientsAnn. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.166303306
Zurück zum Zitat Nejime, Y, Moore, BCJ 1997Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noiseJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.102603615PubMed Nejime, Y, Moore, BCJ 1997Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noiseJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.102603615PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, PB, Jin, S-H 2004Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listenersJ Acoust. Soc. Am.11522862294PubMed Nelson, PB, Jin, S-H 2004Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listenersJ Acoust. Soc. Am.11522862294PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, PB, Jin, S-H, Carney, AE, Nelson, DA 2003Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listenersJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.113961968PubMed Nelson, PB, Jin, S-H, Carney, AE, Nelson, DA 2003Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listenersJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.113961968PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Nilsson, MJ, Soli, SD, Sullivan, J 1994Development of a hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholdJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9519851999 Nilsson, MJ, Soli, SD, Sullivan, J 1994Development of a hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholdJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9519851999
Zurück zum Zitat Plomp, R 1986A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech reception threshold of the hearing impairedJ. Speech Hear. Res.29146154PubMed Plomp, R 1986A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech reception threshold of the hearing impairedJ. Speech Hear. Res.29146154PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Qin, MK, Oxenham, AJ 2003Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskersJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.114446454PubMed Qin, MK, Oxenham, AJ 2003Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskersJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.114446454PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Skinner, MW, Clark, GM, Whitford, LA, et al. 1994Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus-22 channel cochlear implant systemAm. J. Otol.151527PubMed Skinner, MW, Clark, GM, Whitford, LA,  et al. 1994Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus-22 channel cochlear implant systemAm. J. Otol.151527PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi, GA, Bacon, SP 1992Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderlyJ. Speech Hear. Res.3514101421PubMed Takahashi, GA, Bacon, SP 1992Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderlyJ. Speech Hear. Res.3514101421PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Keurs, M, Festen, JM, Plomp, R 1992Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. IJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9128722880PubMed Keurs, M, Festen, JM, Plomp, R 1992Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. IJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9128722880PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Keurs, M, Festen, JM, Plomp, R 1993Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. IIJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9315471552PubMed Keurs, M, Festen, JM, Plomp, R 1993Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. IIJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.9315471552PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Yost, WA 1992Auditory image perception and amplitude modulation: frequency and intensity discrimination of individual components for amplitude-modulated two-tone complexesCazals, YDemany, LHorner, K eds. Auditory Physiology and PerceptionPergamonOxford487493 Yost, WA 1992Auditory image perception and amplitude modulation: frequency and intensity discrimination of individual components for amplitude-modulated two-tone complexesCazals, YDemany, LHorner, K eds. Auditory Physiology and PerceptionPergamonOxford487493
Metadaten
Titel
Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing
verfasst von
Qian-Jie Fu
Geraldine Nogaki
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2005
Erschienen in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Ausgabe 1/2005
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-004-5024-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2005

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Erratum

Erratum

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 HNO-Chirurgie Nachrichten

Mit Blick auf das Risiko für Komplikationen nach elektiven Eingriffen im HNO-Bereich scheint das Alter der Patienten kein ausschlaggebender Faktor zu sein. Entscheidend ist offenbar, wie fit die Betroffenen tatsächlich sind.

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

16.04.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

Gegenüber der vollständigen Entfernung der Gaumenmandeln hat die intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie einige Vorteile, wie HNO-Fachleute aus den USA hervorheben. Sie haben die aktuelle Literatur zu dem Verfahren gesichtet.

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.