01.08.2008 | Led to the Editor
Absence of CHEK2 1100delC mutation in familial breast cancer cases from a South American population
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 3/2008
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenExcerpt
The most widely accepted model proposes that familial breast cancer susceptibility is a consequence of a small number of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) and a much higher proportion of mutations in ethnic-specific genes of moderate and/or low penetrance [1]. CHEK2 gene, involved in DNA damage and replication checkpoints, has been pointed out as a good candidate. Moreover, a specific variant in this gene, 1100delC, has been found to increase breast cancer susceptibility among familial breast cancer cases not attributable to mutations in BRCA1/2 [2]. Most of the studies evaluating this mutation as a female breast cancer susceptibility allele have been conducted in European populations, where the prevalence of the variant in controls ranged from 0 out of 400 controls in Spain to 2.8% in the Netherlands (Table 1). This variant has been detected in a considerable higher proportion (4–11%) in patients with a positive family history of breast cancer (usually known to be BRCA1/2 mutation-negative) from Northern Europe (Table 1) This variant has been estimated to be associated with an approximately 1.5–2.0 fold increased risk in female breast cancer cases with a positive family history [4‐6]. CHEK2 has not been well studied in other ethnic groups.
Population
|
Controls (n)
|
Female Breast cancer cases (n)
|
Reference
|
---|---|---|---|
The Netherlands
|
2.8% (212)
|
11.4% (237)b, c
|
[3]
|
1.3% (460)
|
2.5% (79)b, c
|
[4]
|
|
1.6% (184)
|
3.8% (1706)a
|
[5]
|
|
Finland
|
1.4% (1885)
|
5.5% (507)b, c
|
[6]
|
1.1% (447)
|
2.9% (464)
|
[5]
|
|
Denmark
|
0.5% (4643)
|
1.2% (1088)a, d
|
[7]
|
Russia
|
0.2% (448)
|
5.2% (155)e
|
[8]
|
Germany
|
–
|
4.0% (380)b, c
|
[9]
|
0.5% (1315)
|
1.6% (516)b, c
|
[10]
|
|
0.7% (651)
|
1.4% (71)b, c
|
[11]
|
|
–
|
2.3% (86)f
|
[11]
|
|
0.25% (401)
|
1.1% (985)a
|
[5]
|
|
Czech Republic
|
0.3% (730)
|
0.3% (358)b, c
|
[12]
|
Basque Country
|
0.0% (120)
|
0.9% (214)a, d
|
[13]
|
Spain
|
0.0 (400)
|
0.0% (400)b, c
|
[14]
|
Italy
|
0.0% (334)
|
0.1% (939)b
|
[15]
|
UK
|
0.0% (300)
|
4.0% (68)b, d
|
[16]
|
USA
|
0.5% (859)
|
1.1% (829)b, d
|
[17]
|
USA (New York)
|
0.4% (569)
|
0.0% (67)b, c
|
[18]
|
USA (California)
|
–
|
0.4% (1112)a, d
|
[19]
|
Canada
|
0.2% (496)
|
1.4% (1199)a, d
|
[19]
|
Australia
|
–
|
0.6% (300)b, c
|
[20]
|
0.14% (736)
|
0.7% (1474)a
|
[5]
|
|
Ashkenazi
|
0.3% (1096)
|
3.0% (33)b, c
|
[18]
|
Chile
|
0.0% (1024)
|
0.0% (196)b, c
|
Present study
|