Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2014

01.06.2014

Safety of new oral anticoagulants for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation

verfasst von: Gevorg Stepanyan, Nitish Badhwar, Randall J. Lee, Gregory M. Marcus, Byron K. Lee, Zian H. Tseng, Vasanth Vedantham, Jeffrey Olgin, Melvin Scheinman, Edward P. Gerstenfeld

Erschienen in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The new oral anticoagulants (NOAC), dabigatran and rivaroxaban, have been demonstrated to be at least equivalent to warfarin for preventing cardiac thromboembolism (TE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is limited data regarding use around catheter ablation (CA) procedures.

Objective

We evaluated the risk of bleeding and TE complications associated with NOAC use during AF ablation.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation between January 2011 and 6 September 2013 were grouped based on peri-procedural anticoagulation regimen: (1) uninterrupted warfarin with therapeutic INR (WARF), n = 114, (2) dabigatran, n = 89, or (3) rivaroxaban, n = 98. NOACs were held for 24 h (dabigatran) or 36 h (rivaroxaban) prior to the procedure. Heparin infusion was initiated 6 h post-procedure for the NOAC groups; NOACs were resumed the morning after the procedure. Antral PVI was performed with activated clotting time (ACT) maintained >300 s. TE or bleeding complications during ablation and through 30 days were compared.

Results

Three hundred and one patients underwent ablation for paroxysmal (71 %) or persistent (29 %) AF. International Normalization Ratio (INR) for the WARF group was 2.0 ± 0.5. Baseline characteristics were similar among the groups. There were two TE events (asymptomatic cerebral emboli and TIA), and there were 17 bleeding events (large hematoma n = 4; pericardial effusion n = 6; persistent hematuria n = 1; pseudoaneurism/AV fistula n = 6). Of the six pericardial effusions, three required drainage. There was no significant difference in combined TE/bleeding risk among the groups (WARF vs. dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban; 6.2 % vs. 6.7 % vs. 6.0 %; p = 0.82)

Conclusions

In this group of AF patients undergoing CA, use of peri-procedure dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared to uninterrupted warfarin did not lead to an increase in bleeding or TE complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kannel, W. B., Wolf, P. A., Benjamin, E. J., & Levy, D. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. The American Journal of Cardiology, 82, 2N–9N.PubMedCrossRef Kannel, W. B., Wolf, P. A., Benjamin, E. J., & Levy, D. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. The American Journal of Cardiology, 82, 2N–9N.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wann, L., Curtis, A., January, C. T., Ellenbogen, K., Lowe, J., Estes, M., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (updating the 2006 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57(2), 223–242.PubMedCrossRef Wann, L., Curtis, A., January, C. T., Ellenbogen, K., Lowe, J., Estes, M., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (updating the 2006 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57(2), 223–242.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Coppens, M., Eikelboom, J., Hart, R., Yusuf, S., Lip, G., Dorian, P., et al. (2013). The CHA2DS2-VASc score identifies those patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score of 1 who are unlikely to benefit from oral anticoagulant therapy. European Heart Journal, 34(3), 170–176.PubMedCrossRef Coppens, M., Eikelboom, J., Hart, R., Yusuf, S., Lip, G., Dorian, P., et al. (2013). The CHA2DS2-VASc score identifies those patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score of 1 who are unlikely to benefit from oral anticoagulant therapy. European Heart Journal, 34(3), 170–176.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Connolly, S. J., Ezekowitz, M. D., Yusuf, S., Eikelboom, J., Oldgren, J., Parekh, A., et al. (2009). Dabigitran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1139–1151.PubMedCrossRef Connolly, S. J., Ezekowitz, M. D., Yusuf, S., Eikelboom, J., Oldgren, J., Parekh, A., et al. (2009). Dabigitran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1139–1151.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel, M. R., Mahaffey, K. W., Garg, J., the ROCKET AF Steering Committee, for the ROCKET AF Investigators, et al. (2011). Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 385(10), 883–891.CrossRef Patel, M. R., Mahaffey, K. W., Garg, J., the ROCKET AF Steering Committee, for the ROCKET AF Investigators, et al. (2011). Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 385(10), 883–891.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Calkins, H., Kuck, K., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, J., Chen, S., et al. (2012). 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 33, 171–257. Calkins, H., Kuck, K., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, J., Chen, S., et al. (2012). 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 33, 171–257.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussein, A. A., Martin, D. O., Saliba, W., Patel, D., Karim, S., Batal, O., et al. (2009 Oct). Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation under therapeutic international normalized ratio: a safe and efficacious periprocedural anticoagulation strategy. Heart Rhythm, 6(10), 1425–1429. Hussein, A. A., Martin, D. O., Saliba, W., Patel, D., Karim, S., Batal, O., et al. (2009 Oct). Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation under therapeutic international normalized ratio: a safe and efficacious periprocedural anticoagulation strategy. Heart Rhythm, 6(10), 1425–1429.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuster, V., Ryden, L., Cannom, D., Crijns, H., Curtis, A., Ellenbogen, K., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 123, e269–e36.PubMedCrossRef Fuster, V., Ryden, L., Cannom, D., Crijns, H., Curtis, A., Ellenbogen, K., et al. (2011). 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 123, e269–e36.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, Y. M., Di Biase, L., et al. (2012). Feasibility and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59, 956–967.CrossRef Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, Y. M., Di Biase, L., et al. (2012). Feasibility and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for peri-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59, 956–967.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Winkle, R. A., Mead, R. H., Engel, G., Kong, M. H., & Patrawala, R. A. (2012). The use of dabigatran immediately after atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23, 264–268.PubMedCrossRef Winkle, R. A., Mead, R. H., Engel, G., Kong, M. H., & Patrawala, R. A. (2012). The use of dabigatran immediately after atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23, 264–268.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Snipelisky, D., Kauffman, C., Prussak, K., Johns, G., Venkatachalam, K., & Kusumoto, F. (2012 Oct). A comparison of bleeding complications post-ablation between warfarin and dabigatran. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 35(1), 29–33. Snipelisky, D., Kauffman, C., Prussak, K., Johns, G., Venkatachalam, K., & Kusumoto, F. (2012 Oct). A comparison of bleeding complications post-ablation between warfarin and dabigatran. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 35(1), 29–33.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim, J. S., She, F., Jongnarangsin, K., Chugh, A., Latchamsetty, R., Ghanbari, H., et al. (2013). Dabigatran vs warfarin for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 10(4), 483–489.PubMedCrossRef Kim, J. S., She, F., Jongnarangsin, K., Chugh, A., Latchamsetty, R., Ghanbari, H., et al. (2013). Dabigatran vs warfarin for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 10(4), 483–489.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaiser, D. W., Streur, M. M., Nagarakanti, R., Whalen, S. P., & Ellis, C. R. (2013). Continuous warfarin versus periprocedural dabigatran to reduce stroke and systemic embolism in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 37(3), 241–247.PubMedCrossRef Kaiser, D. W., Streur, M. M., Nagarakanti, R., Whalen, S. P., & Ellis, C. R. (2013). Continuous warfarin versus periprocedural dabigatran to reduce stroke and systemic embolism in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or left atrial flutter. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 37(3), 241–247.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nin, T., Sairaku, A., Yoshida, Y., Kamiya, H., et al. (2013). A randomized controlled trail of dabigatran versus warfarin for periablation anticoagulation in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. PACE, 36, 172–179.PubMedCrossRef Nin, T., Sairaku, A., Yoshida, Y., Kamiya, H., et al. (2013). A randomized controlled trail of dabigatran versus warfarin for periablation anticoagulation in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. PACE, 36, 172–179.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Maddox, W., Kay, G. N., Yamada, T., et al. (2013). Dabigatran versus warfarin therapy for uninterrupted oral anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 24, 861–865.PubMedCrossRef Maddox, W., Kay, G. N., Yamada, T., et al. (2013). Dabigatran versus warfarin therapy for uninterrupted oral anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 24, 861–865.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassiouny, M., Saliba, W., Rickard, J., et al. (2013). Use of dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 460–466.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bassiouny, M., Saliba, W., Rickard, J., et al. (2013). Use of dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 460–466.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Eitel, C., Koch, J., Sommer, P., John, S., Kircher, S., Bollmann, A., Arya, A., Piorkowski, C., Hindricks, G., (2013).Novel oral anticoagulants in a real-world cohort of patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace May 22. (Epub ahead of print). Eitel, C., Koch, J., Sommer, P., John, S., Kircher, S., Bollmann, A., Arya, A., Piorkowski, C., Hindricks, G., (2013).Novel oral anticoagulants in a real-world cohort of patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace May 22. (Epub ahead of print).
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, M., Swarup, V., Baqdunes, M., Mansour, M., Chaloub, F., Ruskin, J., DiBiase, L., Vallakatti, A., Janga, P., Umbarger, L., Sanchez, J., Burkhardt, D., Horton, R., Reddy, V. A, D’Avila, Atkins, D., Bommana, S., Natale, A., (2013) Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. May ;10(5)S240. (Abstract). Lakkireddy, D., Reddy, M., Swarup, V., Baqdunes, M., Mansour, M., Chaloub, F., Ruskin, J., DiBiase, L., Vallakatti, A., Janga, P., Umbarger, L., Sanchez, J., Burkhardt, D., Horton, R., Reddy, V. A, D’Avila, Atkins, D., Bommana, S., Natale, A., (2013) Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. May ;10(5)S240. (Abstract).
Metadaten
Titel
Safety of new oral anticoagulants for patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation
verfasst von
Gevorg Stepanyan
Nitish Badhwar
Randall J. Lee
Gregory M. Marcus
Byron K. Lee
Zian H. Tseng
Vasanth Vedantham
Jeffrey Olgin
Melvin Scheinman
Edward P. Gerstenfeld
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9888-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

10.05.2024 Hypercholesterinämie Nachrichten

Patienten mit Arteriosklerose-bedingten kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, die trotz Statineinnahme zu hohe Triglyzeridspiegel haben, profitieren von einer Behandlung mit Icosapent-Ethyl, und zwar unabhängig vom individuellen Risikoprofil.

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

In den USA ist erstmals eine bioresorbierbare Gefäßstütze – auch Scaffold genannt – zur Rekanalisation infrapoplitealer Arterien bei schwerer PAVK zugelassen worden. Das markiert einen Wendepunkt in der Geschichte dieser speziellen Gefäßstützen.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.