nach oben

Erschienen in:

04.01.2017 | Original Paper

Psychometric Evaluation of the Filipino Versions of the Duke University Religion Index and the Spiritual Coping Strategies Scale in Filipino Hemodialysis Patients

verfasst von: Jonas Preposi Cruz, Ralph Warren P. Reyes, Paolo C. Colet, Joel C. Estacio, Sílvia Caldeira, Luciano Magalhães Vitorino, Harold G. Koenig

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Filipino versions of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL-F) and the Spiritual Coping Strategies scale (SCS-F) for hemodialysis (HD) patients in the Philippines. A convenient sample of 162 HD patients was included in this descriptive, cross-sectional study. The DUREL-F and SCS-F exhibited acceptable internal consistency and stability reliability, as well as excellent content and construct validity. The findings confirmed the soundness of the psychometric properties of the two scales. Thus, they can be used for timely and accurate assessment of religiosity and spiritual coping utilization among Filipino patients receiving HD.

Abraham, S., Venu, A., Ramachandran, A., Chandran, P. M., & Raman, S. (2012). Assessment of quality of life in patients on hemodialysis and the impact of counseling. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, 23(5), 953.CrossRefPubMed

Al Nazly, E., Ahmad, M., Musil, C., & Nabolsi, M. (2013). Hemodialysis stressors and coping strategies among Jordanian patients on hemodialysis: A qualitative study. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 40(4), 321.PubMed

Al Zaben, F., Khalifa, D. A., Sehlo, M. G., Al, S. S., Binzaqr, S. A., Badreg, A. M., et al. (2015). Religious involvement and health in dialysis patients in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(2), 713–730.CrossRefPubMed

Amjad, F., & Bokharey, I. Z. (2014). The impact of spiritual wellbeing and coping strategies on patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 8(1), 21–38.CrossRef

Baldacchino, D. R., & Buhagiar, A. (2003). Psychometric evaluation of the Spiritual Coping Strategies scale in English, Maltese, back-translation and bilingual versions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(6), 558–570.CrossRefPubMed

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.CrossRefPubMed

Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2014). Psychological perspectives on religion and religiosity. London: Routledge.

Best, M., Butow, P., & Olver, I. (2015). Doctors discussing religion and spirituality: A systematic literature review. Palliative Medicine. doi:10.1177/0269216315600912.

Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 22(1), 85–93.CrossRefPubMed

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). London: The Guilford Press.

Chilcot, J., Davenport, A., Wellsted, D., Firth, J., & Farrington, K. (2011). An association between depressive symptoms and survival in incident dialysis patients. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 26(5), 1628–1634.CrossRefPubMed

Cinar, S., Barlas, G. U., & Alpar, S. E. (2009). Stressors and coping strategies in hemodialysis patients. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(3), 447–452.

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10. Retrieved from: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7.

Couser, W. G., Remuzzi, G., Mendis, S., & Tonelli, M. (2011). The contribution of chronic kidney disease to the global burden of major noncommunicable diseases. Kidney International, 80(12), 1258–1270.CrossRefPubMed

Crisostomo, S. (2014). DOH: Cases of kidney failure on the rise. The Philippines Star. Retrieved from http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2014/02/25/1294271/doh-cases-kidney-failure-rise.

Cruz, J. P., Alquwez, N., Alqubeilat, H., & Colet, P. C. (2016a). Psychometric evaluation of the Spiritual Coping Strategies scale Arabic version in Saudi nursing students. Journal of Holistic Nursing. doi:10.1177/0898010116651513.

Cruz, J. P., Alquwez, N., & Baldacchino, D. (2016b). Validity and reliability of the Spiritual Coping Strategies scale Arabic version in Saudi patients undergoing hemodialysis. Journal of Renal Care. doi:10.1111/jorc.12155.PubMed

Cruz, J. P., Alshammari, F., & Colet, P. C. (2016c). Psychometric evaluation of the Spiritual Care-Giving Scale Arabic version in Saudi nursing students. Journal of Holistic Nursing. doi:10.1177/0898010116647804.

Cruz, J. P., Colet, P. C., Alquwez, N., Inocian, E. P., Al-otaibi, R., & Islam, S. M. S. (2016d). Influence of religiosity and spiritual coping on health-related quality of life in Saudi hemodialysis patients. Hemodialysis International. doi:10.1111/hdi.12441.PubMed

Cruz, J. P., Colet, P. C., Qubeilat, H., Al-otaibi, J., Coronel, E. I., & Suminta, R. C. (2016e). Religiosity and health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study on Filipino Christian hemodialysis patients. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 895–908. doi:10.1007/s10943-015-0103-9.CrossRefPubMed

DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Finnegan-John, J., & Thomas, V. J. (2013). The psychosocial experience of patients with end-stage renal disease and its impact on quality of life: Findings from a needs assessment to shape a service. ISRN Nephrology. doi:10.5402/2013/308986.PubMed

Giske, T., & Cone, P. H. (2015). Discerning the healing path—How nurses assist patient spirituality in diverse health care settings. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(19–20), 2926–2935.CrossRefPubMed

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations Inc.

Hafizi, S., Memari, A. H., Pakrah, M., Mohebi, F., Saghazadeh, A., & Koenig, H. G. (2013). The Duke University Religion Index (Durel): Validation and reliability of the Farsi version 1. Psychological Reports, 112(1), 151–159.CrossRefPubMed

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.

Hawthorne, D., Youngblut, J. M., & Brooten, D. (2011). Psychometric evaluation of the Spanish and English versions of the spiritual coping strategies scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 19(1), 46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jha, V., Garcia-Garcia, G., Iseki, K., Li, Z., Naicker, S., Plattner, B., et al. (2013). Chronic kidney disease: Global dimension and perspectives. The Lancet, 382(9888), 260–272.CrossRef

Kaplan, D. B. & Berkman, B. J. (2011). Religion and spirituality in the elderly. Merck Manual. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Retrieved from http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/geriatrics/social-issues-in-the-elderly/religion-and-spirituality-in-the-elderly.

Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2008). Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy, 65, 2276–2284.CrossRefPubMed

Ko, B., Khurana, A., Spencer, J., Scott, B., Hahn, M., & Hammes, M. (2007). Religious beliefs and quality of life in an American inner-city haemodialysis population. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 22(10), 2985–2990.CrossRefPubMed

Koenig, H. G. (1995). Research on religion and aging: An annotated bibliography (No. 27). Greenwood Pub Group: Buckinghamshire.

Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 33. doi:10.5402/2012/278730.CrossRef

Koenig, H. G., & Büssing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions, 1(1), 78–85.CrossRef

Koenig, H. G., King, D. E., & Carson, V. B. (2012) A history of religion, medicine, and healthcare. In Handbook of religion and health (2nd ed., pp. 15–34). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Levin, J., Chatters, L. M., & Taylor, R. J. (2011). Theory in religion, aging, and health: An overview. Journal of Religion and Health, 50(2), 389–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lingerfelt, K. L., & Thornton, K. (2011). An educational project for patients on hemodialysis to promote self-management behaviors of end stage renal disease. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 38(6), 483.PubMed

Lucchetti, G., Lucchetti, A. L. G., Peres, M. F., Leão, F. C., Moreira-Almeida, A., & Koenig, H. G. (2012). Validation of the duke religion index: DUREL (Portuguese version). Journal of Religion and Health, 51(2), 579–586.CrossRefPubMed

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386.CrossRefPubMed

Mill, J. S. (2006). Utility of religion (pp. 420–421). Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing.

Moreira-Almeida, A., Pinsky, I., Zaleski, M., & Laranjeira, R. (2010). Envolvimento religioso e fatores sociodemográficos: resultados de um levantamento nacional no Brasil. Rev Psiq Clín, 37(1), 12–15.CrossRef

Ng, H. J., Tan, W. J., Mooppil, N., Newman, S., & Griva, K. (2015). Prevalence and patterns of depression and anxiety in hemodialysis patients: A 12-month prospective study on incident and prevalent populations. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20(2), 374–395.CrossRefPubMed

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Nurasikin, M. S., Aini, A., Syarinaz, A. A., & Ng, C. (2010). Validity and reliability of the Malay version of Duke University Religion Index (DUREL-M) among a group of nursing student. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry, 19(2), 68–72.

Parvan, K., Ahangar, R., Hosseini, F. A., Abdollahzadeh, F., Ghojazadeh, M., & Jasemi, M. (2015). Coping methods to stress among patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, 26(2), 255.CrossRefPubMed

Pecha, C., & Ruprah, I. J. (2015). Religion as an unemployment insurance and the basis of support for public safety nets: The case of Latin America and the Caribbean (No. IDB-WP-601). IDB working paper series.

Pew Research Center. (2016). The gender gap in religion around the world. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2016/03/22/the-gender-gap-in-religion-around-the-world/#fn-25285-8.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489–497.CrossRefPubMed

Saffari, M., Koenig, H. G., Ghanizadeh, G., Pakpour, A. H., & Baldacchino, D. R. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Persian spiritual coping strategies scale in hemodialysis patients. Journal of Religion and Health, 53(4), 1025–1035.CrossRefPubMed

Saffari, M., Pakpour, A. H., Naderi, M. K., Koenig, H. G., Baldacchino, D. R., & Piper, C. N. (2013a). Spiritual coping, religiosity and quality of life: A study on Muslim patients undergoing haemodialysis. Nephrology, 18(4), 269–275.CrossRefPubMed

Saffari, M., Zeidi, I. M., Pakpour, A. H., & Koenig, H. G. (2013b). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A study on Muslims. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(2), 631–641.CrossRefPubMed

Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350–353.CrossRef

Storch, E. A., Roberti, J. W., Heidgerken, A. D., Storch, J. B., Lewin, A. B., Killiany, E. M., et al. (2004). The duke religion index: A psychometric investigation. Pastoral Psychology, 53(2), 175–181.CrossRef

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Vincent, W. J. (1999). Statistics in kinesiology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetic.

Wachholtz, A., & Sambamoorthi, U. (2011). National trends in prayer use as a coping mechanism for health concerns: Changes from 2002 to 2007. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(2), 67.CrossRef

Wang, Z., Rong, Y., & Koenig, H. G. (2014). Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Duke University Religion Index in college students and community residents in China. Psychological Reports, 115(2), 427–443.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Psychometric Evaluation of the Filipino Versions of the Duke University Religion Index and the Spiritual Coping Strategies Scale in Filipino Hemodialysis Patients
verfasst von: Jonas Preposi Cruz
Ralph Warren P. Reyes
Paolo C. Colet
Joel C. Estacio
Sílvia Caldeira
Luciano Magalhães Vitorino
Harold G. Koenig
Publikationsdatum: 04.01.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0355-z

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Psychometric Evaluation of the Filipino Versions of the Duke University Religion Index and the Spiritual Coping Strategies Scale in Filipino Hemodialysis Patients

Abstract

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

A New Questionnaire (QRFPC25) Regarding the Religiosity and Spirituality in People with Life-Threatening Disease: Reliability and Validity in a Population of Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy

“No More Buzz”: A Qualitative Study of the Current Response to HIV in the Anglican Church in the Western Cape, South Africa

The Role of the Penteco/Charismatic Clergy in the Political Health Development in Ghana

Health Impacts of Religious Practices and Beliefs Associated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

The Role of Spirituality in Lifestyle Changing Among Patients with Chronic Cardiovascular Diseases: A Literature Review of Qualitative Studies

Moral Injury and Definitional Clarity: Betrayal, Spirituality and the Role of Chaplains