This study used data from the California Cancer Registry to comprehensively examine first primary central nervous system tumors (PCNST) by the International Classification of Childhood Cancers (ICCC) diagnostic groups and to compare their incidence by age groups, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status and tumor behavior. The study period, 2001–2005, represents the first 5 years of benign PCNST data collection in the state. The age-adjusted incidence rates were 2.1 for malignant and 1.3 for benign per 100,000. Children younger than 5 years old had the highest incidence of malignant PCNST (2.6 per 100,000). Teens aged 15–19 had the highest incidence of benign PCNST (1.8 per 100,000). Age-specific incidence rates were nearly the same for Hispanics, non-Hispanic whites, and Asian/Pacific Islanders for malignant PCNST among children younger than 5 (2.6–2.7 per 100,000); non-Hispanic whites had the highest rates in the 5–14 year-old age group (2.5 per 100,000) and Asian/Pacific Islanders the highest among the 15–19 year old age group (2.3 per 100,000). We found no statistically significant differences in the incidence of malignant PCNST by race/ethnicity in any age group. Astrocytoma had the highest incidence for both malignant and benign histology in most age groups.
Introduction
Primary tumors of the central nervous system (PCNST) among children, adolescents, and teens differ from those in adults in frequency, histological appearance, and clinical behavior [1]. PCNST are the second most common form of cancer among children aged 15 years and younger and the third most common among those 15–19 years old in California. While PCNST represent only 1.3% of incident cancers among adults 20 years and older, they represent from 26.4% (5–9 year olds) to 9.5% (15–19 year olds) of incident cancers among persons younger than 20 years old [2]. PCNST are the second leading cause of cancer deaths among children younger than 15 years old; they cause 32% (5–9 year olds) and 12.1% (15–19 year olds) of cancer deaths in children compared to 3% of cancer deaths for adults 20 years and older [2]. PCNST among children, adolescents, and teens tend to have short latent periods, often grow rapidly, and are aggressively invasive [1]. PCNST are a significant public health problem, they have a far more devastating effect on society, communities and considering the potential years of productive life lost [3].
This study examined the incidence of malignant and benign first PCNST among children, adolescents, and teens using the population-based California Cancer Registry (CCR) from 2001 to 2005. This population is a subset of the population described in the authors’ companion publication in this edition. Since 1988, California state law mandates the reporting of all newly diagnosed malignant cancers in California [4]. An amendment to this law enacted January 2001 provides for the additional reporting of benign and borderline behavior PCNST [5]. The 2001–2005 study period represents the first 5 years of complete PCNST data collection in California. The CCR provides a robust source of epidemiologic data for a densely populous geographic area. California can be viewed as a microcosm of United States reflecting the influence of its racial, ethnic and sociodemographic diversity on overall cancer incidence. Although pediatric PCNST incidence has been relatively well studied, this is the first study to comprehensively examine PCNST incidence by patient demographics and tumor behavior among children, adolescents and teens according to the International Classification of Childhood Cancers (ICCC).
Anzeige
Materials and methods
Materials and methods, including case identification, inclusion/exclusion criteria and tumor behavior assignment used in this study were identical to those described in the authors’ companion publication in this edition. For these analyses, we divided cases into 4 age groups. Patients younger than 5 and patients 5–9 years old are referred to as children, those aged 10–14 years as adolescents, and those 15–19 years old as teens. Diagnostic groups were organized using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program’s site/histology modification to the ICCC [6, 7]. Table 1 lists ICCC diagnostic groups by International Classification Diseases, Oncology, 3rd edition’s (ICD-O-3) morphology and topography codes.
Table 1
SEER recode of ICCC diagnostic groups and ICD-O-3 codes for California cases, 2001–2005
ICCC International Classification of Childhood Cancers, 3rd edition
ICD International Classification of Diseases, Oncology, 3rd edition
Results
There were 2,096 cases of PCNST among children, adolescents, and teens (from birth to 19 years old) in California from 2001 to 2005. Of those cases, 1,114 (53.1%) were malignant, 698 (33.3%) were benign, and 284 (13.6%) were of uncertain behavior. The resultant AAIR per 100,000 was 2.1 (CI: 2.0–2.2) for malignant, 1.3 (CI: 1.2–1.4) for benign, and 0.5 (CI: 0.5–0.6) for tumors of uncertain behavior.
As seen in Table 2, there was an increase in the proportion of cases by year for tumors of uncertain behavior for adolescents and teens, whereas the proportion of cases among the two groups of children, for both malignant and benign PCNST, appears to be stable over the study period. The ASIR for malignant PCNST decreased as age increased, starting from 2.6 per 100,000 among those younger than 5 years to 1.7 per 100,000 among 15 to 19-year olds. To compare with other studies, we calculated the AAIR per 100,000 for children and adolescents to be 2.2 for malignant and 1.2 for benign PCNST. The ASIR for benign PCNST fluctuated by age groups, ranging from 1.8 to 1.1 per 100,000. The incidence of tumors of uncertain behavior was very low. The pattern seen for malignant PCNST by age group was opposite that for tumors of uncertain behavior. Incident rates increased slightly as age group increased.
Table 2
Number of cases, percent and age-specific incidence rate* (ASIR) of first primary central nervous system tumors by age group, tumor behavior and year of diagnosis, California, 2001–2005
Age group
Behavior
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Total
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
ASIR 95%CI
<5 years
Malignant
65
19.2
73
21.5
67
19.8
58
17.1
76
22.4
339
100.0
2.6 (2.4, 2.9)
Benign
34
22.1
29
18.8
34
22.1
33
21.4
24
15.6
154
100.0
1.2 (1.0, 1.4)
Uncertain
11
20.4
14
25.9
7
13.0
11
20.4
11
20.4
54
100.0
0.4 (0.3, 0.5)
Total
110
20.1
116
21.2
108
19.7
102
18.6
111
20.3
547
100.0
4.2 (3.9, 4.6)
5–9 years
Malignant
70
23.6
59
19.9
61
20.5
53
17.8
54
18.2
297
100.0
2.3 (2.0, 2.5)
Benign
28
18.9
30
20.3
37
25.0
30
20.3
23
15.5
148
100.0
1.1 (1.0, 1.3)
Uncertain
7
10.8
13
20.0
15
23.1
14
21.5
16
24.6
65
100.0
0.5 (0.4, 0.6)
Total
105
20.6
102
20.0
113
22.2
97
19.0
93
18.2
510
100.0
3.9 (3.6, 4.3)
10–14 years
Malignant
49
19.2
60
23.5
46
18.0
53
20.8
47
18.4
255
100.0
1.9 (1.6, 2.1)
Benign
23
14.4
34
21.3
33
20.6
29
18.1
41
25.6
160
100.0
1.2 (1.0, 1.4)
Uncertain
15
19.7
11
14.5
14
18.4
12
15.8
24
31.6
76
100.0
0.6 (0.4, 0.7)
Total
87
17.7
105
21.4
93
18.9
94
19.1
112
22.8
491
100.0
3.6 (3.3, 3.9)
15–19 years
Malignant
37
16.6
45
20.2
34
15.2
60
26.9
47
21.1
223
100.0
1.7 (1.5, 2.0)
Benign
41
17.4
46
19.5
45
19.1
50
21.2
54
22.9
236
100.0
1.8 (1.6, 2.1)
Uncertain
14
15.7
17
19.1
18
20.2
20
22.5
20
22.5
89
100.0
0.7 (0.6, 0.8)
Total
92
16.8
108
19.7
97
17.7
130
23.7
121
22.1
548
100.0
4.2 (3.9, 4.6)
* Age-specific incidence rates are per 100,000 population. Rates are standardized to the 2000 US population
The highest incidence of PCNST was for malignant tumors in children and adolescents (Fig. 1). This pattern changed for teens, where incidence of benign PCNST was similar to that of malignant PCNST. The lowest incidence, at every age group, was for tumors of uncertain behavior. The ASIR for boys for malignant and uncertain behavior PCNST were higher than that for girls at all age groups. Incidence rates for girls with benign PCNST were higher than that for boys until adolescence, where they appeared to be same; later ASIRs increased among teen girls, where they exceed the malignant PCNST rate in boys. Adolescents showed the widest sex-specific gulf for malignant PCNST. The ASIR among girls starts to decline dramatically from 5 to 14 years old; incidence rates for boys declined as well but not as dramatically. When PCNST incidence rates were compared by age group, sex, and tumor behavior, we found that there were no significant differences except among adolescents. The ASIR for malignant PCNST for adolescent boys was 2.2 (CI: 1.9–2.6) and for adolescent girls was 1.5 (CI: 1.2–1.8). Malignant PCNST incidence among teen boys and girls was 2.1 (CI: 1.7–2.5) and 1.4 (CI: 1.1–1.7), respectively. Benign PCNST among teen boys and girls was 1.5 (CI: 1.2–1.8) and 2.2 (CI: 1.8–2.6), respectively.
×
Anzeige
Table 3 shows the study population by age groups, demographic characteristics, and tumor behavior. For nearly all age groups, boys were more often diagnosed with malignant PCNST and tumors of uncertain behavior; girls, proportionally, had more benign PCNST. The exception was for adolescents, where boys were proportionally diagnosed more often with benign PCNST.
Table 3
Number of cases and percent of first primary central nervous system tumors, by age group, population demographic characteristics and tumor behavior, California, 2001–2005
Shaded cells categories with less than 5 cases were omitted
Hispanic children, younger than 5, had proportionally more PCNST. Non-Hispanic white adolescents and teens had proportionally more PCNST. In the 5–9 age group, Hispanic children had more malignant and uncertain behavior PCNST while non-Hispanic white children had more benign PCNST.
Among children younger than 5, more cases were from lower socioeconomic status (SES) regardless of tumor behavior. For children 5–9, more cases of malignant and uncertain PCNST were in low SES, while benign cases were from high SES. For adolescents and teens, all cases of malignant PCNST were from high SES. For adolescents, more benign cases were from high SES while uncertain cases were from low SES. For teens, the opposite was seen—more uncertain cases were from high SES while more benign cases were from low SES. Lastly, overwhelmingly, more cases, regardless of tumor behavior were from urban areas of California than from rural.
Incidence rates were calculated for race/ethnic groups by tumor behavior in Table 4. For many subgroups by age, race/ethnicity, or tumor behavior, incidence rates could not be calculated due to the small number of cases. Where incidence rates could be calculated and compared, we found no statistically significant differences by race/ethnicity for any age group by tumor behavior. Incidence rates for all tumor behaviors were highest in non-Hispanic white children aged 5–9 years and in adolescents with the exception of malignant tumors, which were highest in Asian/Pacific Islander children younger than 5 and teens.
Table 4
Age-specific incidence ratea (ASIR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of first primary central nervous system tumors by age group, tumor behavior and race/ethnicity, California, 2001–2005
aAge-specific incidence rates are per 100,000 population. Rates are standardized to the 2000 US population
Shaded cells rates could not be calculated if number of cases were less than 15 and/or the underlying population was less than 100,000
At every age group, astrocytomas (IIIB), ependymomas, and choroid plexus (IIIA) predominated (Table 5). For both malignant and benign PCNST, at nearly every age group, astrocytoma had the highest incidence. Among children younger than 5 years old, the primary malignant diagnoses were ependymomas and choroid plexus (IIIA), while for children 5–9 years old, other gliomas (IIID) was ranked first only slightly ahead of astrocytomas (IIIB), which was followed closely by medulloblastomas (IIIC1). For adolescents, germ cell tumors (XA) ranked a close second to astrocytomas (IIIB). Among teens, benign PCNST classified as other specified intracranial and intraspinal tumors (IIIE) were ranked first; the majority of patients in that sub-category were diagnosed specifically with pituitary adenoma (66.7%). Overall, pituitary adenoma comprised 20.1% of all diagnoses in teens. In all age groups, the majority of tumors of uncertain behavior were classified as other specified intracranial and intraspinal tumors (IIIE) classification. In nearly every age group, the majority of those patients were diagnosed specifically with gangliogliomas, representing between 37.0% (5–9 year olds) and 47.8% (10–14 year olds) of those cases. Among children younger than 5 years old, nearly an equal number of patients were diagnosed with craniophargiomas and gangliogliomas (36.1 and 38.9%, respectively).
Table 5
Number of cases, percent and age-specific incidence ratea (ASIR) of first primary central nervous system tumors by diagnositic group, age group and tumor behavior, California, 2001–2005
aAge-specific incidence rates are per 100,000 population. Rates are standardized to the 2000 US population
PNET Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors
Shaded cells rates could not be calculated if number of cases were less than 15 and/or the underlying population was less than 100,000
Table 6 shows the distribution of astrocytomas; both malignant and benign numbered nearly the same for boys and girls younger than 15 years old, while among teens, they predominated in boys. Further, boys had the most ependymomas and choroid plexis tumors, medulloblastomas, and PNET. Although astrocytomas and PNET tumors were distributed nearly equally among non-Hispanic white and Hispanic children; all other histologies were more frequently seen in adolescent and teen non-Hispanic whites. In the low SES group, ependymomas and choroid plexis tumors, medulloblastomas, and PNET were found most often among children younger than 10 years old. Astrocytomas were found mostly among low SES children younger than 5, with a near even distribution among those 5–9 and among high SES adolescents and teens. Furthermore, benign astrocytomas were found mainly in the low SES group for children younger than 5 and in teens. In high SES groups however astrocytoma were found mainly among those 5–14 years old.
Table 6
Number of cases and percent of first primary malignant and benign central nervous system tumors by age group, population demographics and diagnostic group, California, 2001–2005
PNET Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors
Shaded cells categories with less than 5 cases; age groups that represented less than 25 of a histology group and/or no meaningful information could be gleaned due to small case numbers, were omitted
Discussion
This is the first study to examine both malignant and benign PCNST among children, adolescents, and teens in California. Fifty-three percent of PCNST among those younger than 20 years old were malignant, 33.3% benign, and the remainder was of uncertain behavior. The AAIR of malignant PCNST in this age group was 2.1 cases per 100,000 persons and for benign PCNST, 1.3 per 100,000. Among children and adolescents younger than 15 years old, the malignant PCNST was 2.2 per 100,000 and for benign PCNST, 1.2 per 100,000.
In the present study, the incidence of malignant tumors decreased with increasing age. The highest incidence for malignant PCNST was found among children younger than 5 years old [8‐11], whereas teens had the highest incidence of benign and uncertain behavior PCNST. Post-mortem studies on younger brains have found a higher relative concentration of neural stem cells [12, 13], which suggests that the immature brain might possess an increased capacity to generate malignant neuroepithelial tumors through increased populations of neural stem and progenitor cell types, supporting the stem cell hypothesis for tumor formation [14].
Anzeige
Consistent with results found for adults, boys at every age group had a higher incidence of malignant tumors, while girls generally had a higher incidence of benign tumors [11, 15]. Significant sex-specific differences were not found for malignant PCNST in the 5–9 year age group or for benign PCNST among adolescents. The incidence of malignant PCNST in girls dropped sharply starting in the 5–9 year old age group while the incidence of benign PCNST rose just as dramatically starting in the adolescence. Age- and sex-specific tumor frequency and tumor behavior transition are postulated to be hormone-related, coinciding with the onset of puberty, although the specific mechanism has yet to be determined [16]. For example, in a case report, the growth and regression of a pilocytic astrocytoma was found to be related to exogenous human growth hormone (hGH) [17].
In our study, astrocytomas were the prominent diagnoses for malignant PCNST in most age groups, which is consistent with other national and international studies [8, 10, 11, 15, 18‐29]. Ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors were highest among children younger than 5 years old [19, 20, 26, 27], while other gliomas and medulloblastomas had a similar incidence to astrocytomas in the 5–9 age group [11, 20]. We noted a surge in germ cell tumors for adolescents, which declined for teens concurrent with an increase in pituitary tumors [16, 30, 31]. The proportional incidence of pituitary adenomas in our study population was similar to that reported by CBTRUS, although our methods varied [21].
California’s unique race/ethnic population allows analyses of the distribution of cancer incidence in groups that might otherwise be overlooked or inaccurately counted. California’s younger population (<20 years old) is predominantly Hispanic (45.8%). Hispanics represent 50.2% of children younger than 5 years old, 47.8% of those in the 5–9 age group, and 44.3% of the adolescent group. However, in the teen group, the Hispanic population is nearly equal to the non-Hispanic white population (40.9 and 39.5%, respectively) [32]. Therefore not surprisingly, in our study the highest proportional incidence of malignant PCNST was among Hispanic children younger than 10 years old; non-Hispanic whites had the highest incidence among 10–19 year olds. The ASIR reported for malignant PCNST for children younger than 5 (2.6–2.7 per 100,000) was nearly the same for Hispanics, non-Hispanic whites, and Asian/Pacific Islanders. Non-Hispanic whites had the highest incidence among 5–14 year olds (2.5 per 100,000) and Asian/Pacific Islanders had the highest incidence among teens (2.3 per 100,000). The differences in these incidence rates were not statistically significant.
This is the first study to examine the proportions of PCNST incidence by SES in this age group. We found that children younger than 10 years old in the lowest SES group had a higher proportional incidence of malignant PCNST, while children and adolescents 5–19 years old in the highest SES group had a higher incidence of benign PCNST compared to other SES groups. This finding may be related to unique class level exposures or indirectly related to race/ethnicity population distribution, specifically those groups that are more likely at the lower SES levels and/or differential healthcare coverage [33]. Cancer incidence has been found to be highest among those with more education, greater income, and with private insurance [34, 35]. Reasons for this are unclear. Some have advanced the theory, least in childhood leukemia, that higher SES groups are immunologically shielded by hyperhygienic environments, leading to naïve immune systems which are more prone to cancer development [36, 37].
Anzeige
Common causes for differences in CNS tumor incidence statistics between epidemiologic studies were discussed at length in the authors’ companion publication in this edition. Unique to comparisons of pediatric CNS tumor incidence statistics is the variation in the selection of age groupings across sources and the use of the ICCC. The ICCC was designed specifically for childhood cancers and is based on tumor morphology in conjunction with primary anatomical site, rather than histology and anatomical site separately as is common [6, 7]. Additionally, SEER created a recode system for the ICCC [6, 7], as it did for the ICD-O [38]. The ICCC SEER site recode is used by the CCR, all North American central cancer registries, NPCR and SEER to organize histologies but not by CBTRUS or in international studies. Even when the ICCC was used, valid comparisons between studies and statistical sources could not be made because many of those studies used cases from a single institution or if population-based, did not calculate incidence rates [39‐41]. When rates were available, the detail necessary for valid comparison was not the same [18, 42]. We found the use of the ICCC to have limitations. Although appropriate for showing transitioning tumor occurrence by age groups, the ICCC was inadequate for delineating PCNST among teens. For example, 20% of benign PCNST among teens were pituitary adenomas, which were otherwise hidden in the category of “other intracranial and intraspinal”, since they are nearly nonexistent among children and adolescents younger than 15 years old.
Our study’s strengths and weakness have been discussed in the authors’ companion publication in this edition. Specific to this study, even though 5 years of benign data had been collected, due to the small numbers of cases, stable and accurate incidence rates could not be calculated for many sex-race/ethnic-age group combinations among children, adolescents, and teens.
Primary central nervous system tumors are a major source of cancer morbidity and mortality among children, adolescents, and teens. While PCNST incidence has been relatively well-researched, this is the first study to comprehensively examine benign PCNST by ICCC diagnostic groups and age groups, and to compare them to malignant PCNST. In addition, this is one of the few studies to examine PCNST among adolescents [22, 24, 30, 43]. This study of California PCNST among children, adolescents, and teens provides a basis for future basic, translational and clinical brain tumor research and for both healthcare and public health in California.
Acknowledgements and disclaimer
The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Sect. 103885; the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Northern California Cancer Center, contract N01-PC-35139 awarded to the University of Southern California, and contract N01-PC-54404 awarded to the Public Health Institute; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries, under agreement 1U58DP00807-01 awarded to the Public Health Institute. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and endorsement by the State of California, Department of Public Health the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or their Contractors and Subcontractors is not intended nor should be inferred.” The authors would like to thank Mark Allen, Research Scientist II and Winny Roshala, CTR, Quality Control Specialist II of the California Cancer Registry for their technical support; and Dr. Erica Whitney of the University of California, Davis and Cynthia Klutznick for their editorial guidance.
Anzeige
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Mit e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Mit e.Med Neurologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes, den Premium-Inhalten der neurologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Neurologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.
Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.
Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.
Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.
Update Neurologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.