nach oben

Journal of Urban Health

Erschienen in:

01.07.2008

Marketing Breastfeeding—Reversing Corporate Influence on Infant Feeding Practices

verfasst von: Deborah L. Kaplan, Kristina M. Graff

Erschienen in: Journal of Urban Health | Ausgabe 4/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Breast milk is the gold standard for infant nutrition and the only necessary food for the first 6 months of an infant’s life. Infant formula is deficient and inferior to breast milk in meeting infants’ nutritional needs. The infant formula industry has contributed to low rates of breastfeeding through various methods of marketing and advertising infant formula. Today, in New York City, although the majority of mothers initiate breastfeeding (~85%), a minority of infants is breastfed exclusively at 8 weeks postpartum (~25%). The article reviews the practices of the formula industry and the impact of these practices. It then presents the strategic approach taken by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and its partners to change hospital practices and educate health care providers and the public on the benefits of breast milk, and provides lessons learned from these efforts to make breastfeeding the normative and usual method of infant feeding in New York City.

Wiessinger D. Watch Your Language! Journal of Human Lactation. 1996;12(1):1–4.PubMedCrossRef

Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, et al. Section on Breastfeeding: Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):496–506.PubMedCrossRef

United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2005 National Immunization Survey. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/NIS_data/2005/age.htm. Accessed July 16, 2007.

Karpati A, Kerker B, Mostashari F, et al. Health Disparities in New York City. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2004.

Bureau of Maternal, Infant and Reproductive Health. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). New York, NY: NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2004, 2005.

Apple RD. Advertised by our loving friends: the infant formula industry and the creation of new pharmaceutical markets, 1870–1910. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1986;41(1):3–23.PubMedCrossRef

Greer FR, Apple RD. Physicians, formula companies, and advertising. A historical perspective. Am J Dis Child. 1991;145(3):282–6.PubMed

Gartner LM, Moser RH. The “fourth part” of Pediatrics: fifty years of display advertising. Pediatrics. 1998;102(1):177–185.PubMed

Jelliffe DB, Jelliffe EF. The infant food industry and international child health. Int J Health Serv. 1977;7(2):249–54.PubMed

10.

Parashar UD, Bresee JS, Glass RI. The global burden of diarrhoeal disease in children. Bul WHO. 2003;81(4):236.

11.

León-Cava N, Lutter C, Ross J, Martin L. Quantifying the Benefits of Breastfeeding: A Summary of the Evidence. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization (PAHO); 2002.

12.

Victora CG, Smith PG, Vaughan JP, et al. Infant feeding and deaths due to diarrhea: a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(5):1032–41.PubMed

13.

The International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN). What Is the International Code? Available at: http://www.ibfan.org/english/issue/code01.html. Accessed March 30, 2007.

14.

International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. World Health Organization, Geneva; 1981.

15.

Wise J. Companies still breaking milk marketing code. BMJ. 1998;316:1111 Available at: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/7138/1111/k. Accessed July 10, 2007.

16.

Mayor S. Report warns of continuing violations of code on breast milk substitute marketing. BMJ. 2004;328:1218 Available at: http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7450/1218-b. Accessed July 10, 2007.PubMedCrossRef

17.

The International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN). The State of the Code by Country 2006. Available at: http://www.ibfan.org/site2005/abm/paginas/articles/arch_art/298–11.pdf. Accessed January 4, 2008.

18.

Oski FA. Heating up the bottle battle. The Nation. 1989;249(19):665–7.

19.

United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). Breastfeeding: Some Strategies Used to Market Infant Formula May Discourage Breastfeeding; State Contracts Should Better Protect Against Misuse of WIC Name. Report to Congressional Addresses. GAO-06–282, February 2006. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06282.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2007.

20.

Howard CR, Howard FM, Lawrence R, Andresen E, DeBlieck E, Weitzman M. Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding patterns. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(2):296–303.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Howard CR, Howard FM, Weitzman ML. Infant formula distribution and advertising in pregnancy: A hospital survey. Birth. 1994;21(1):14–9.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Howard CR, Schaffer SJ, Lawrence RA. Attitudes, practices and recommendations by obstetricians about infant feeding. Birth. 1997;24(4):240–6.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Oliveira V, Prell M, Smallwood D, Frazao E. Infant Formula Prices and Availability: Final Report to Congress. Washington, D.C.: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture; 2001.

24.

Kent G. WIC’s promotion of infant formula in the United States. Int Breastfeed J. 2006;1(1):8 April, Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1481608&blobtype=pdf. Accessed July 13, 2007.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Tuttle CR. An open letter to the WIC program: the time has come to commit to breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 2000;16(2):99–103.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Winikoff B, Baer EC. The obstetrician’s opportunity: translating “breast is best” from theory to practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138(1):105–17.PubMed

27.

Valaitis RK, Shea E. An evaluation of breastfeeding promotion literature: does it really promote breastfeeding? Revue Canadienne de santé publique. 1992;84(1):24–7.

28.

Howard F. Clinical commentary, The physician as advertiser: the unintentional discouragement of breast-feeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(6):1048–51.PubMed

29.

Rosenberg KD, Eastham C, Kasenhagen L, Sandoval AP. Infant Formula Marketing Through Hospitals: the Impact of Commercial Hospital Discharge Packs on Breastfeeding. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(2):290–295.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Frank DA, Wirtz SJ, Sorenson JR, Heeren T. Commercial discharge packs and breastfeeding counseling: effects on infant-feeding practices in a randomized trail. Pediatrics. 1987;80(6):845–54.PubMed

31.

Casado J. A cultural perspective on breastfeeding: results from community focus groups in the Bronx. Presented at: Annual NYC Breastfeeding Conference; May 26, 2007; New York, NY.

32.

Lipkind HS, Boyd LC. Encouraging and Supporting Breastfeeding. City Health Information. 2008;27(3):17–24.

33.

Nurse-Family Partnership. Summary Tables for New York – New York City. Data through December 31, 2007. Prepared by National Center for Children, Families and Communities. UCDHS.

34.

Feinstein JM, Berkelhamer JE, Gruszka ME, Wong CA, Carey AE. Factors Related to Early Termination of Breast-Feeding in an Urban Population. Pediatrics. 1986;78(2):210–215.PubMed

35.

Bliss MC, et al. The Effect of Discharge Pack Formula and Breast Pumps on Breastfeeding Duration and Choice of Infant Feeding Method. Birth. 1997;24(2):90–97.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Caulfield LE, Gross SM, Bentley ME, et al. WIC-Based Interventions to Promote Breastfeeding Among African-American women in Baltimore: Effects on Breastfeeding Initiation and Continuation. J Hum Lact. 1998;14(1):15–22.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Snell BJ, Krantz M, Keeton R, Delgado K, Peckham C. The Association of Formula Samples Given at Hospital Discharge With the Early Duration of Breastfeeding. J Hum Lact. 1992;8(2):67–72.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Wright A, Rice S, Wells S. Changing Hospital Practices to Increase the Duration of Breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 1996;97(5):660–75.

39.

Romero-Gwynn E. Breastfeeding Pattern Among Indochinese Immigrants in Northern California. AJDC. 1989;143:804–8.PubMed

40.

Dungy CL. Hospital Infant Formula Discharge Packages: Do they Affect the Duration of Breastfeeding? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:724–9.PubMed

41.

Neifert M, Gray J, Gary N, Camp B. Effect of two types of hospital feeding gift packs on duration of breast-feeding among adolescent mothers. J Adolesc Health Care. 1988;9(5):411–3.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Ryan AS, Wysong JL, Martinez GA, Simon SD. Duration of breast-feeding patterns established in the hospital: influencing factors. Clinical Pediatrics. 1990;29(2):99–107.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Evans CJ, Lyons NB, Killien MG. The Effect of Infant Formula Samples on Breastfeeding Practice. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1986;15(5):401–5.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Marketing Breastfeeding—Reversing Corporate Influence on Infant Feeding Practices
verfasst von: Deborah L. Kaplan
Kristina M. Graff
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2008
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Urban Health / Ausgabe 4/2008
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Elektronische ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9279-6

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Marketing Breastfeeding—Reversing Corporate Influence on Infant Feeding Practices

Abstract

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2008

Recidivism in HIV-Infected Incarcerated Adults: Influence of the Lack of a High School Education

Social Determinants, Suboptimal Health Behavior, and Morbidity in Urban Slum Population: An Indian Perspective

Early Onset of Overweight and Obesity among Low-Income 1- to 5-Year Olds in New York City

Corporation-induced Diseases, Upstream Epidemiologic Surveillance, and Urban Health

“Coming to Town”: The Impact of Urbanicity, Cigarette Advertising, and Network Norms on the Smoking Attitudes of Black Women in Cape Town, South Africa

Holes in the Safety Net: A Case Study of Access to Prescription Drugs and Specialty Care