nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.01.2021 | COMPUTER APPLICATION

Artificial intelligence: radiologists’ expectations and opinions gleaned from a nationwide online survey

verfasst von: Francesca Coppola, Lorenzo Faggioni, Daniele Regge, Andrea Giovagnoni, Rita Golfieri, Corrado Bibbolino, Vittorio Miele, Emanuele Neri, Roberto Grassi

Erschienen in: La radiologia medica | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To report the results of a nationwide online survey on artificial intelligence (AI) among radiologist members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM).

Methods and materials

All members were invited to the survey as an initiative by the Imaging Informatics Chapter of SIRM. The survey consisted of 13 questions about the participants’ demographic information, perceived advantages and issues related to AI implementation in radiological practice, and their overall opinion about AI.

Results

In total, 1032 radiologists (equaling 9.5% of active SIRM members for the year 2019) joined the survey. Perceived AI advantages included a lower diagnostic error rate (750/1027, 73.0%) and optimization of radiologists’ work (697/1027, 67.9%). The risk of a poorer professional reputation of radiologists compared with non-radiologists (617/1024, 60.3%), and increased costs and workload due to AI system maintenance and data analysis (399/1024, 39.0%) were seen as potential issues. Most radiologists stated that specific policies should regulate the use of AI (933/1032, 90.4%) and were not afraid of losing their job due to it (917/1032, 88.9%). Overall, 77.0% of respondents (794/1032) were favorable to the adoption of AI, whereas 18.0% (186/1032) were uncertain and 5.0% (52/1032) were unfavorable.

Conclusions

Radiologists had a mostly positive attitude toward the implementation of AI in their working practice. They were not concerned that AI will replace them, but rather that it might diminish their professional reputation.

Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS (2018) Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng 2:719–731. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0305-zCrossRefPubMed

Chartrand G, Cheng PM, Vorontsov E, Drozdzal M, Turcotte S, Pal CJ, Kadoury S, Tang A (2017) Deep learning: a primer for radiologists. Radiographics 37:2113–2131. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017170077CrossRefPubMed

Kohli M, Prevedello LM, Filice RW, Geis JR (2017) Implementing machine learning in radiology practice and research. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:754–760. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17224CrossRefPubMed

European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2019) What the radiologist should know about artificial intelligence—an ESR white paper. Insights Imaging 10:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0738-2CrossRef

Pesapane F, Codari M, Sardanelli F (2018) Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine. Eur Radiol Exp 2:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0061-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Coppola F, Bibbolino C, Grassi R, Pierotti L, Silverio R, Lassandro F, Neri E, Regge D (2016) Results of an Italian survey on teleradiology. Radiol Med 121(8):652–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0640-7CrossRefPubMed

Faggioni L, Coppola F, Ferrari R, Neri E, Regge D (2017) Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: results from an Italian online survey. Eur Radiol 27:1934–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4553-6CrossRefPubMed

Coppola F, Faggioni L, Grassi R, Bibbolino C, Rizzo A, Gandolfo N, Calvisi A, Cametti CA, Benea G, Giovagnoni A, Privitera C, Regge D (2019) Dematerialisation of patient’s informed consent in radiology: insights on current status and radiologists’ opinion from an Italian online survey. Radiol Med 124:846–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01033-9CrossRefPubMed

European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2019) Impact of artificial intelligence on radiology: a EuroAIM survey among members of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 31(10):105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0798-3CrossRef

10.

van Hoek J, Huber A, Leichtle A, Härmä K, Hilt D, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Heverhagen J, Poellinger A (2019) A survey on the future of radiology among radiologists, medical students and surgeons: students and surgeons tend to be more skeptical about artificial intelligence and radiologists may fear that other disciplines take over. Eur J Radiol 121:108742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108742CrossRefPubMed

11.

Goldberg JE, Rosenkrantz AB (2019) Artificial intelligence and radiology: a social media perspective. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 48:308–311. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.07.005CrossRefPubMed

12.

Waymel Q, Badr S, Demondion X, Cotten A, Jacques T (2019) Impact of the rise of artificial intelligence in radiology: what do radiologists think? Diagn Interv Imaging 100:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2019.03.015CrossRefPubMed

13.

Ooi SKG, Makmur A, Fook-Chong S, Liew C, Sia SY, Ting YH, Lim CY (2019) Attitudes toward artificial intelligence in radiology with learner needs assessment within radiology residency programmes: a national multi-programme survey. Singapore Med J. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2019141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

SFR-IA Group; CERF; French Radiology Community (2018) Artificial intelligence and medical imaging 2018: French Radiology Community white paper. Diagn Interv Imaging 99:727–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2018.10.003CrossRef

15.

Duong MT, Rauschecker AM, Rudie JD, Chen PH, Cook TS, Bryan RN, Mohan S (2019) Artificial intelligence for precision education in radiology. Br J Radiol 92:20190389. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190389CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL (2018) Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer 18:500–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Kim TJ, Kim CH, Lee HY, Chung MJ, Shin SH, Lee KJ, Lee KS (2020) Management of incidental pulmonary nodules: current strategies and future perspectives. Expert Rev Respir Med 14:173–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2020.1697853CrossRefPubMed

18.

Curtis C, Liu C, Bollerman TJ, Pianykh OS (2018) Machine learning for predicting patient wait times and appointment delays. J Am Coll Radiol 15:1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.021CrossRefPubMed

19.

Savadjiev P, Chong J, Dohan A, Vakalopoulou M, Reinhold C, Paragios N, Gallix B (2019) Demystification of AI-driven medical image interpretation: past, present and future. Eur Radiol 29:1616–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5674-xCrossRefPubMed

20.

Kobayashi Y, Ishibashi M, Kobayashi H (2019) How will “democratization of artificial intelligence” change the future of radiologists? Jpn J Radiol 37:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0793-5CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mazurowski MA (2019) Artificial intelligence may cause a significant disruption to the radiology workforce. J Am Coll Radiol 16:1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.026CrossRefPubMed

22.

Sogani J, Allen B Jr, Dreyer K, McGinty G (2020) Artificial intelligence in radiology: the ecosystem essential to improving patient care. Clin Imaging 59:A3–A6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.08.001CrossRefPubMed

23.

Jarrett D, Stride E, Vallis K, Gooding MJ (2019) Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology. Br J Radiol 92:20190001. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Dilsizian SE, Siegel EL (2014) Artificial intelligence in medicine and cardiac imaging: harnessing big data and advanced computing to provide personalized medical diagnosis and treatment. Curr Cardiol Rep 16:441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-013-0441-8CrossRefPubMed

25.

Krittanawong C, Zhang H, Wang Z, Aydar M, Kitai T (2017) Artificial intelligence in precision cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:2657–2664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.571CrossRefPubMed

26.

Patel UK, Anwar A, Saleem S, Malik P, Rasul B, Patel K, Yao R, Seshadri A, Yousufuddin M, Arumaithurai K (2019) Artificial intelligence as an emerging technology in the current care of neurological disorders. J Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09518-3CrossRefPubMed

27.

Gong B, Nugent JP, Guest W, Parker W, Chang PJ, Khosa F, Nicolaou S (2019) Influence of artificial intelligence on Canadian medical students’ preference for radiology specialty: a national survey study. Acad Radiol 26:566–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.007CrossRefPubMed

28.

Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, Spencer J, Ranschaert E, Jaremko JL, Langer SG, Borondy Kitts A, Birch J, Shields WF et al (2019) Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement. Radiology 293:436–440. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019191586CrossRefPubMed

29.

Neri E, Coppola F, Miele V, Bibbolino C, Grassi R (2020) Artificial intelligence: who is responsible for the diagnosis? Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01135-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Eltorai AEM, Bratt AK, Guo HH (2019) Thoracic radiologists’ versus computer scientists’ perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in radiology. J Thorac Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000453CrossRef

Titel: Artificial intelligence: radiologists’ expectations and opinions gleaned from a nationwide online survey
verfasst von: Francesca Coppola
Lorenzo Faggioni
Daniele Regge
Andrea Giovagnoni
Rita Golfieri
Corrado Bibbolino
Vittorio Miele
Emanuele Neri
Roberto Grassi
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Milan
Erschienen in: La radiologia medica / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0033-8362
Elektronische ISSN: 1826-6983
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01205-y

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Artificial intelligence: radiologists’ expectations and opinions gleaned from a nationwide online survey