Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2014

01.08.2014 | Original Article

Perioperative Outcome After Pancreatic Head Resection: a 10-Year Series of a Specialized Surgeon in a University Hospital and a Community Hospital

verfasst von: Hartwig Riediger, Ulrich Adam, Stefan Utzolino, Hannes P. Neeff, Ulrich T. Hopt, Frank Makowiec

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Hospital and surgeon volume are potential factors influencing postoperative mortality and morbidity after pancreatic resection. Data on perioperative outcome of individual surgeons in different institutions, however, are scarce. We evaluated the perioperative outcome after pancreatic head resections (PHR) performed by a high-volume pancreatic surgeon in a high-volume university department and (later) in a community hospital with low prior experience in major pancreatic surgery.

Methods

We compared the results after PHR were performed by a single experienced surgeon between 2001 and October 2006 in a specialized unit of a German university hospital (n = 83; group A) with the results after PHR were performed in a community hospital between November 2006 and 2011 (n = 145; group B). Before the study period (−2001), the surgeon already had a personal caseload of >200 PHR. In addition to the 228 PHR analyzed here, the surgeon also had taught further >150 PHR to residents and consulting surgeons. Comparable surgical and perioperative techniques were applied in both series (e.g., types of resection and reconstruction, abdominal drains, early enteral feeding). The data of both series were prospectively recorded in SPSS databases.

Results

The median age of the patients was lower in group A (58 vs. 66 years in B; p < 0.01). Indications for PHR were pancreatic cancer (A 39 % vs. B 45 %), other periampullary cancer (A 18 % vs. B 12 %), chronic pancreatitis (A 33 % vs. B 28 %), and others (A 10 % vs. B 15 %). Most PHR were pylorus preserving (64 vs. 75 %), with oncologically indicated portal vein resections in 24 % (A) or 33 % (B). The percentage of duodenum-preserving PHR was lower in group B (14 vs. 26 % in A). Mortality of PHR was 3.6 % in group A and 2.8 % in B (p = 0.72). Overall morbidity rate was 49 % (A) or 57 % (B; p = 0.25). Using the expanded Accordion classification, complications classified as grade 4 or higher occurred in 9 % (A) and 11 % (B; p = 0.74). Postoperative pancreatic leak (any grade) was documented in 26 % (A) and 25 % (B; p = 0.87).

Conclusions

Surgeon volume and a high individual experience, respectively, contribute to acceptable complication rates and low mortality rates after pancreatic head resection. An experienced surgeon can provide a good perioperative outcome after pancreatic resection even after a change of hospital or medical staff.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117–2127.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117–2127.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA. High volume and outcome after liver resection: surgeon or center? J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1709–1716.PubMedCrossRef Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA. High volume and outcome after liver resection: surgeon or center? J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1709–1716.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 2005;242:540–544.PubMedCentralPubMed Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 2005;242:540–544.PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, Dougherty J, Brennan MF. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 2002;131:6–15.PubMedCrossRef Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, Dougherty J, Brennan MF. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 2002;131:6–15.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, Cramer LD, Guillem JG, Bach PB, Begg CB. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 2002;236:583–592.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, Cramer LD, Guillem JG, Bach PB, Begg CB. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 2002;236:583–592.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Simunovic M, To T, Langer B. Influence of hospital volume on mortality following major cancer surgery. JAMA 1999;281:1374–1375.PubMedCrossRef Simunovic M, To T, Langer B. Influence of hospital volume on mortality following major cancer surgery. JAMA 1999;281:1374–1375.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, McPhee JT, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 2009;249:635–640.PubMedCrossRef Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, McPhee JT, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Surgeon volume impacts hospital mortality for pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 2009;249:635–640.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouma DJ and Obertop H. Centralization of surgery for periampullary malignancy. Br J Surg 1999;86:1361–1362.PubMedCrossRef Gouma DJ and Obertop H. Centralization of surgery for periampullary malignancy. Br J Surg 1999;86:1361–1362.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G, Zerbi A, Di CV, Braga M. Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:518–523.PubMedCrossRef Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G, Zerbi A, Di CV, Braga M. Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:518–523.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Bass EB, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 1998;228:429–438.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Bass EB, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 1998;228:429–438.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, Sharp SM, Warshaw AL, Fisher ES. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999;125:250–256.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, Sharp SM, Warshaw AL, Fisher ES. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999;125:250–256.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005; 242:781–8. discussion.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 2005; 242:781–8. discussion.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Boudourakis LD, Wang TS, Roman SA, Desai R, Sosa JA. Evolution of the surgeon-volume, patient-outcome relationship. Ann Surg 2009;250:159–165.PubMedCrossRef Boudourakis LD, Wang TS, Roman SA, Desai R, Sosa JA. Evolution of the surgeon-volume, patient-outcome relationship. Ann Surg 2009;250:159–165.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Maa J, Gosnell JE, Gibbs VC, Harris HW. Exporting excellence for Whipple resection to refine the Leapfrog Initiative. J Surg Res 2007;138:189–197.PubMedCrossRef Maa J, Gosnell JE, Gibbs VC, Harris HW. Exporting excellence for Whipple resection to refine the Leapfrog Initiative. J Surg Res 2007;138:189–197.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Schareck WD, Benz S, Hopt UT. Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection. Am J Surg 2004;187:201–208.PubMedCrossRef Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Schareck WD, Benz S, Hopt UT. Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection. Am J Surg 2004;187:201–208.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Riediger H, Makowiec F, Fischer E, Adam U, Hopt UT. Postoperative morbidity and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenterico-portal vein resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1106–1115.PubMedCrossRef Riediger H, Makowiec F, Fischer E, Adam U, Hopt UT. Postoperative morbidity and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenterico-portal vein resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1106–1115.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Makowiec F, Post S, Saeger HD, Senninger N, Becker H, Betzler M, Buhr HJ, Hopt UT. Current Practice Patterns in Pancreatic Surgery: Results of a Multi-institutional Analysis of Seven Large Surgical Departments in Germany With 1454 Pancreatic Head Resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group). J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:1080–1087.PubMedCrossRef Makowiec F, Post S, Saeger HD, Senninger N, Becker H, Betzler M, Buhr HJ, Hopt UT. Current Practice Patterns in Pancreatic Surgery: Results of a Multi-institutional Analysis of Seven Large Surgical Departments in Germany With 1454 Pancreatic Head Resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group). J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:1080–1087.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Keck T, Wellner UF, Riediger H, Adam U, Sick O, Hopt UT, Makowiec F. Long-term outcome after 92 duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections for chronic pancreatitis: comparison of Beger and Frey procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:549–556.PubMedCrossRef Keck T, Wellner UF, Riediger H, Adam U, Sick O, Hopt UT, Makowiec F. Long-term outcome after 92 duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections for chronic pancreatitis: comparison of Beger and Frey procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:549–556.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 2009;250:177–186.PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 2009;250:177–186.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Keck T, Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Wellner U, Tittelbach-Helmrich D, Hopt UT. Short- and long-term results of duodenum preservation versus resection for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized study. Surgery 2012;152:S95-S102.PubMedCrossRef Keck T, Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Wellner U, Tittelbach-Helmrich D, Hopt UT. Short- and long-term results of duodenum preservation versus resection for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized study. Surgery 2012;152:S95-S102.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim CG, Jo S, Kim JS. Impact of surgical volume on nationwide hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:4175–4181.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kim CG, Jo S, Kim JS. Impact of surgical volume on nationwide hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:4175–4181.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordback L, Parviainen M, Raty S, Kuivanen H, Sand J. Resection of the head of the pancreas in Finland: effects of hospital and surgeon on short-term and long-term results. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:1454–1460.PubMedCrossRef Nordback L, Parviainen M, Raty S, Kuivanen H, Sand J. Resection of the head of the pancreas in Finland: effects of hospital and surgeon on short-term and long-term results. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:1454–1460.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg 2003;138:721–725.PubMedCrossRef Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg 2003;138:721–725.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark W, Hernandez J, McKeon BA, Kahn A, Morton C, Toomey P, Mullinax J, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Surgery residency training programmes have greater impact on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy than hospital volume or surgeon frequency. HPB (Oxford) 2010;12:68–72.CrossRef Clark W, Hernandez J, McKeon BA, Kahn A, Morton C, Toomey P, Mullinax J, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Surgery residency training programmes have greater impact on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy than hospital volume or surgeon frequency. HPB (Oxford) 2010;12:68–72.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schell MT, Barcia A, Spitzer AL, Harris HW. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: volume is not associated with outcome within an academic health care system. HPB Surg 2008; 2008:825940PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schell MT, Barcia A, Spitzer AL, Harris HW. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: volume is not associated with outcome within an academic health care system. HPB Surg 2008; 2008:825940PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat DiCarlo V, Balzano G, Zerbi A, Villa E. Pancreatic cancer resection in elderly patients. Br J Surg 1998;85:607–610.PubMedCrossRef DiCarlo V, Balzano G, Zerbi A, Villa E. Pancreatic cancer resection in elderly patients. Br J Surg 1998;85:607–610.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Ord SE, Grochow LB, Abrams RA, Pitt HA. Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:207–216.PubMedCrossRef Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Ord SE, Grochow LB, Abrams RA, Pitt HA. Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:207–216.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Perioperative Outcome After Pancreatic Head Resection: a 10-Year Series of a Specialized Surgeon in a University Hospital and a Community Hospital
verfasst von
Hartwig Riediger
Ulrich Adam
Stefan Utzolino
Hannes P. Neeff
Ulrich T. Hopt
Frank Makowiec
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2555-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.