Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2015

01.09.2015 | Original Article

Pancreatectomy with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: Pattern of Nodal Metastasis Spread and Analysis of Prognostic Factors

verfasst von: Salvatore Paiella, Giuseppe Malleo, Laura Maggino, Claudio Bassi, Roberto Salvia, Giovanni Butturini

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This study investigated the prognostic impact of the exact location of nodal metastases in a subgroup of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for head adenocarcinoma, with a special focus on station 16b1.

Methods

Clinical, pathologic, and follow-up details were extracted from our database and analyzed retrospectively. Survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate models. We also performed a matched case-control analysis with resected patients who did not receive extended lymphadenectomy and with locally advanced patients.

Results

The study population consisted of 67 patients. The rate of station 16b1 metastases was 20.9 %. Station 14a-b metastases (OR = 4.28), G3 tumors (OR = 4.03), and number of PLN ≥ 8 (OR = 4.46) were independently associated with station 16b1 involvement. Among pN1 patients, station 14a-b (HR = 2.60) and station 16b1 metastases (HR = 2.40) were predictors of survival. The median disease-specific survival of 16b1+ patients was 17 months (95 % CI 8.47–25.52). In the matched case-control analysis, the survival rates of resected 16b1+ patients was in between pN1/16b1− patients and locally advanced patients.

Conclusions

Metastases to station 16b1 are associated with a decreased survival in comparison with pN1/16b1− patients, yet longer than in matched locally advanced patients. Station 14 can be considered as a “junctional node” to station 16b1.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:567-579.CrossRefPubMed Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:567-579.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1189-1200.CrossRefPubMed Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1189-1200.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Malleo G, Maggino L, Capelli P, Gulino F, Segattini S, Scarpa A, Bassi C, Butturini G, Salvia R, Reappraisal of nodal staging and study of lymph node station involvement in pancreaticoduodenectomy with the standard international study group of pancreatic surgery definition of lymphadenectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2015, doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.019 Malleo G, Maggino L, Capelli P, Gulino F, Segattini S, Scarpa A, Bassi C, Butturini G, Salvia R, Reappraisal of nodal staging and study of lymph node station involvement in pancreaticoduodenectomy with the standard international study group of pancreatic surgery definition of lymphadenectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2015, doi:10.​1016/​j.​jamcollsurg.​2015.​02.​019
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, Klöppel G, Dhaene K, Michelassi F. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 1998;228:508-517.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, Klöppel G, Dhaene K, Michelassi F. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 1998;228:508-517.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Coleman J, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome. Ann Surg 1999;229:613-622. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Coleman J, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: comparison of morbidity and mortality and short-term outcome. Ann Surg 1999;229:613-622.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, DiMagno EP, Burgart LJ, Dahl TR, Foster N, Sargent DJ; Pancreas Cancer Working Group. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 2005;138:618-628. Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG, DiMagno EP, Burgart LJ, Dahl TR, Foster N, Sargent DJ; Pancreas Cancer Working Group. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 2005;138:618-628.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nimura Y, Nagino M, Takao S, Takada T, Miyazaki K, Kawarada Y, Miyagawa S, Yamaguchi A, Ishiyama S, Takeda Y, Sakoda K, Kinoshita T, Yasui K, Shimada H, Katoh H. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2012;19:230-241. Nimura Y, Nagino M, Takao S, Takada T, Miyazaki K, Kawarada Y, Miyagawa S, Yamaguchi A, Ishiyama S, Takeda Y, Sakoda K, Kinoshita T, Yasui K, Shimada H, Katoh H. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2012;19:230-241.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jang JY, Kang MJ, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Park SJ, Han SS, Yoon DS, Yu HC, Kang KJ, Kim SG, Kim SW. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of standard resection and extended resection, including dissection of the nerve plexus and various lymph nodes, in patients with pancreatic head cancer. Ann Surg 2014;259:656-664.CrossRefPubMed Jang JY, Kang MJ, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Park SJ, Han SS, Yoon DS, Yu HC, Kang KJ, Kim SG, Kim SW. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of standard resection and extended resection, including dissection of the nerve plexus and various lymph nodes, in patients with pancreatic head cancer. Ann Surg 2014;259:656-664.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Montorsi M, Adham M, Andrén-Sandberg A, Asbun HJ, Bockhorn M, Büchler MW, Conlon KC, Fernández-Cruz L, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Hartwig W, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Milicevic MN, Neoptolemos JP, Shrikhande SV, Vollmer CM, Yeo CJ, Charnley RM; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2014;156:591-600.CrossRefPubMed Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Montorsi M, Adham M, Andrén-Sandberg A, Asbun HJ, Bockhorn M, Büchler MW, Conlon KC, Fernández-Cruz L, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Hartwig W, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Milicevic MN, Neoptolemos JP, Shrikhande SV, Vollmer CM, Yeo CJ, Charnley RM; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2014;156:591-600.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanda M, Fujii T, Nagai S, Kodera Y, Kanzaki A, Sahin TT, Hayashi M, Yamada S, Sugimoto H, Nomoto S, Takeda S, Morita S, Nakao A. Pattern of lymph node metastasis spread in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2011;40:951-955.CrossRefPubMed Kanda M, Fujii T, Nagai S, Kodera Y, Kanzaki A, Sahin TT, Hayashi M, Yamada S, Sugimoto H, Nomoto S, Takeda S, Morita S, Nakao A. Pattern of lymph node metastasis spread in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 2011;40:951-955.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirono S, Tani M, Kawai M, Okada K, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, Uchiyama K, Yamaue H. Identification of the lymphatic drainage pathways from the pancreatic head guided by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 2012;29:132–139.CrossRefPubMed Hirono S, Tani M, Kawai M, Okada K, Miyazawa M, Shimizu A, Uchiyama K, Yamaue H. Identification of the lymphatic drainage pathways from the pancreatic head guided by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 2012;29:132–139.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Doi R, Kami K, Ito D, Fujimoto K, Kawaguchi Y, Wada M, et al. Prognostic implication of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 2007;31:147-154.CrossRefPubMed Doi R, Kami K, Ito D, Fujimoto K, Kawaguchi Y, Wada M, et al. Prognostic implication of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in resectable pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 2007;31:147-154.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of pancreatic carcinoma. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd; 2003. Japan Pancreas Society. Classification of pancreatic carcinoma. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co. Ltd; 2003.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakai M, Nakao A, Kaneko T, Takeda S, Inoue S, Kodera Y, Nomoto S, Kanazumi N, Sugimoto H. Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Surgery 2005;137:606-611.CrossRefPubMed Sakai M, Nakao A, Kaneko T, Takeda S, Inoue S, Kodera Y, Nomoto S, Kanazumi N, Sugimoto H. Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Surgery 2005;137:606-611.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sho M, Murakami Y, Motoi F, Satoi S, Matsumoto I, Kawai M, Honda G, Uemura K, Yanagimoto H, Kurata M, Fukumoto T, Akahori T, Kinoshita S, Nagai M, Nishiwada S, Unno M, Yamaue H, Nakajima Y. Postoperative prognosis of pancreatic cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a multicenter study on 822 patients. J Gastroenterol 2015;50:694-702.CrossRefPubMed Sho M, Murakami Y, Motoi F, Satoi S, Matsumoto I, Kawai M, Honda G, Uemura K, Yanagimoto H, Kurata M, Fukumoto T, Akahori T, Kinoshita S, Nagai M, Nishiwada S, Unno M, Yamaue H, Nakajima Y. Postoperative prognosis of pancreatic cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a multicenter study on 822 patients. J Gastroenterol 2015;50:694-702.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge, S., Byrd, D.R., Compton, C.C., Fritz, A.G., Greene, F.L., Trotti, A. (Eds.) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7th ed. 2010, Springer-Verlag, NY, USA. Edge, S., Byrd, D.R., Compton, C.C., Fritz, A.G., Greene, F.L., Trotti, A. (Eds.) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7th ed. 2010, Springer-Verlag, NY, USA.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Li R, Tsai CL. Regularization parameter selections via generalized information criterion. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Mar 1;105(489):312-323. Zhang Y, Li R, Tsai CL. Regularization parameter selections via generalized information criterion. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Mar 1;105(489):312-323.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Iacus SM, King G, Porro G. Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J Am Stat Assoc 2011;106:345-361CrossRef Iacus SM, King G, Porro G. Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J Am Stat Assoc 2011;106:345-361CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Yuasa Y, Sueda T. Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 2010;34:1900-1907.CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Yuasa Y, Sueda T. Prognostic impact of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 2010;34:1900-1907.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T. The role of paraaortic lymph node involvement on early recurrence and survival after macroscopic curative resection with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:345-352.CrossRefPubMed Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T. The role of paraaortic lymph node involvement on early recurrence and survival after macroscopic curative resection with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:345-352.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Sasaki A, Shibata K, Aramaki M, Kitano S. Outcome of paraaortic node-positive pancreatic head and bile duct adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 2004;187:736-740.CrossRefPubMed Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Sasaki A, Shibata K, Aramaki M, Kitano S. Outcome of paraaortic node-positive pancreatic head and bile duct adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 2004;187:736-740.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarz L, Lupinacci RM, Svrcek M, Lesurtel M, Bubenheim M, Vuarnesson H, Balladur P, Paye F. Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2014;101:530-538.CrossRefPubMed Schwarz L, Lupinacci RM, Svrcek M, Lesurtel M, Bubenheim M, Vuarnesson H, Balladur P, Paye F. Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2014;101:530-538.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada S, Nakao A, Fujii T, Sugimoto H, Kanazumi N, Nomoto S, Kodera Y, Takeda S. Pancreatic cancer with paraaortic lymph node metastasis: a contraindication for radical surgery? Pancreas. 2009;38(1):e13-17.CrossRefPubMed Yamada S, Nakao A, Fujii T, Sugimoto H, Kanazumi N, Nomoto S, Kodera Y, Takeda S. Pancreatic cancer with paraaortic lymph node metastasis: a contraindication for radical surgery? Pancreas. 2009;38(1):e13-17.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Connor S, Bosonnet L, Ghaneh P, Alexakis N, Hartley M, Campbell F, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP. Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status. Br J Surg 2004;91:1592-1599.CrossRefPubMed Connor S, Bosonnet L, Ghaneh P, Alexakis N, Hartley M, Campbell F, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP. Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma is predicted by lymph node 8a but not by lymph node 16b1 status. Br J Surg 2004;91:1592-1599.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurahara H, Takao S, Shinchi H, Maemura K, Mataki Y, Sakoda M, et al. Significance of lymphangiogenesis in primary tumor and draining lymph nodes during lymphatic metastasis of pancreatic head cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(7):809-815.CrossRefPubMed Kurahara H, Takao S, Shinchi H, Maemura K, Mataki Y, Sakoda M, et al. Significance of lymphangiogenesis in primary tumor and draining lymph nodes during lymphatic metastasis of pancreatic head cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(7):809-815.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, Rougier P, Mariette C, Bouche O, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(9):1592-1599.CrossRefPubMed Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, Rougier P, Mariette C, Bouche O, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(9):1592-1599.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Loehrer PJ, Sr., Feng Y, Cardenes H, Wagner L, Brell JM, Cella D, et al. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(31):4105-4112.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Loehrer PJ, Sr., Feng Y, Cardenes H, Wagner L, Brell JM, Cella D, et al. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(31):4105-4112.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagakawa T, Kobayashi H, Ueno K, Ohta T, Kayahara M, Miyazaki I. Clinical study of lymphatic flow to the paraaortic lymph nodes in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer. 1994;73(4):1155-1162.CrossRefPubMed Nagakawa T, Kobayashi H, Ueno K, Ohta T, Kayahara M, Miyazaki I. Clinical study of lymphatic flow to the paraaortic lymph nodes in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer. 1994;73(4):1155-1162.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagai H. An anatomic and pathologic study of autopsy material on metastasis of pancreatic cancer to para-aortic lymph nodes. Jpn J Surg 1987;88:308-17. Nagai H. An anatomic and pathologic study of autopsy material on metastasis of pancreatic cancer to para-aortic lymph nodes. Jpn J Surg 1987;88:308-17.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Kobayashi H, Mori K, Nakano T, Kadoya N, et al. Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer. 1992;70(8):2061-2066.CrossRefPubMed Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Kobayashi H, Mori K, Nakano T, Kadoya N, et al. Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer. 1992;70(8):2061-2066.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Karmazanovsky G, Fedorov V, Kubyshkin V, Kotchatkov A. Pancreatic head cancer: accuracy of CT in determination of resectability. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30: 488–500.CrossRefPubMed Karmazanovsky G, Fedorov V, Kubyshkin V, Kotchatkov A. Pancreatic head cancer: accuracy of CT in determination of resectability. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30: 488–500.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pancreatectomy with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma: Pattern of Nodal Metastasis Spread and Analysis of Prognostic Factors
verfasst von
Salvatore Paiella
Giuseppe Malleo
Laura Maggino
Claudio Bassi
Roberto Salvia
Giovanni Butturini
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2882-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.