Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Obesity Surgery
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 5/2015

01.05.2015 | Review Article

Inequity to the Utilization of Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

verfasst von: Sanjit K. Bhogal, Jacinta I. Reddigan, Ori D. Rotstein, Ashley Cohen, Dresden Glockler, Andrea C. Tricco, Janet K. Smylie, Stephen A. Glazer, Jason Pennington, Lesley Gotlib Conn, Timothy D. Jackson

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This systematic review explores the sociodemographic factors associated with the utilization of bariatric surgery among eligible patients. Electronic databases were searched for population-based studies that explored the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics of patients eligible for bariatric surgery to those who actually received the procedure. Twelve retrospective cohort studies were retrieved, of which the results of 9 studies were pooled using a random effects model. Patients who received bariatric surgery were significantly more likely to be white versus non-white (OR 1.54; 95 % CI 1.08, 2.19), female versus male (OR 2.80; 95 % CI 2.46, 3.22), and have private versus government or public insurance (OR 2.51; 95 % CI 1.04, 6.05). Prospective cohort studies are warranted to further determine the relative effect of these factors, adjusting for confounding factors.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
McGuire S, Shields M, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. Adult obesity prevalence in Canada and the United States. NCHS data brief no. 56, Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2011. Adv Nutr. 2011;2(4):368–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
2.
3.
Sturm R, Hattori A. Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(6):889–91.CrossRef
4.
Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, Westfall AO, Allison DB. Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA. 2003;289(2):187–93.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Chang SH, Pollack LM, Colditz GA. Life years lost associated with obesity-related diseases for U.S. non-smoking adults. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66550.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
Lau DC, Douketis JD, Morrison KM, Hramiak IM, Sharma AM, Ur E. 2006 Canadian clinical practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children [summary]. CMAJ. 2007;176(8):S1–S13.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, Wahed AS, Berk P, Chapman W, et al. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):445–54.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, Ko CY, Cohen ME, Merkow RP, et al. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410–20.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
Finks JF, Kole KL, Yenumula PR, English WJ, Krause KR, Carlin AM, et al. Predicting risk for serious complications with bariatric surgery: results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):633–40.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Encinosa WE, Bernard DM, Du D, Steiner CA. Recent improvements in bariatric surgery outcomes. Med Care. 2009;47(5):531–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Flum DR, Khan TV, Dellinger EP. Toward the rational and equitable use of bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2007;298(12):1442–4.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429–45.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Martin M, Beekley A, Kjorstad R, Sebesta J. Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: a national population-based analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):8–15.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294(15):1909–17.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Wallace AE, Young-Xu Y, Hartley D, Weeks WB. Racial, socioeconomic, and rural–urban disparities in obesity-related bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010;20(10):1354–60.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Padwal RS, Chang H-J, Klarenbach S, Sharma AM, Majumdar SR. Characteristics of the population eligible for and receiving publicly funded bariatric surgery in Canada. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11(1):54.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
Evans T, Brown H. Road traffic crashes: operationalizing equity in the context of health sector reform. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003;10(1–2):11–2.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberti A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart L. Reporting guidelines for systematic reiew protocols. In Madrid; 2011.
21.
22.
Jackson TD, Zhang R, Glockler D, Pennington J, Reddigan JI, Rotstein OD, et al. Health inequity in access to bariatric surgery: a protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2014;3:15.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):944–52.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Methodology checklist 3: cohort studies. In: SIGN 50: a guideline developers’ handbook. Edinburgh: The Network; 2004.
25.
Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, Shamliyan T, Sedrakyan A, Wilt TJ, et al. Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(11):1187–97.CrossRefPubMed
26.
R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.
27.
Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. 2010;36(3):1–48.
28.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Birkmeyer NJ, Gu N. Race, socioeconomic status, and the use of bariatric surgery in Michigan. Obes Surg. 2012;22(2):259–65.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Old OJ, Egan RJ, Norton SA, Morgan JDT. Ethnic minorities have equal access to bariatric surgery in the UK and Ireland. Obes Surg. 2013;23:727–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Korda RJ, Joshy G, Jorm LR, Butler JR, Banks E. Inequalities in bariatric surgery in Australia: findings from 49,364 obese participants in a prospective cohort study. Med J Aust. 2012;197(11):631–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Livingston EH, Ko CY. Socioeconomic characteristics of the population eligible for obesity surgery. Surgery. 2004;135(3):288–96.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Mainous AG, Johnson SP, Saxena SK, Wright RU. Inpatient bariatric surgery among eligible black and white men and women in the United States, 1999–2010. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1218–23.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Poulose BK, Holzman MD, Zhu Y, Smalley W, Richards WO, Wright JK, et al. National variations in morbid obesity and bariatric surgery use. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:77–84.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Ells LJ, Macknight N, Wilkinson JR. Obesity surgery in England: an examination of the health episode statistics 1996–2005. Obes Surg. 2007;17(3):400–5.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Flum DR, Dellinger EP. Impact of gastric bypass operation on survival: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(4):543–51.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Worni M, Guller U, MacIejewski ML, Curtis LH, Gandhi M, Pietrobon R, et al. Racial differences among patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a population-based trend analysis from 2002 to 2008. Obes Surg. 2013;23:226–33.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Groman R, Ginsburg J. Racial and ethnic disparities in health care: a position paper of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(3):226–32.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Farjah F, Wood DE, Yanez III ND, Vaughan TL, Symons RG, Krishnadasan B, et al. Racial disparities among patients with lung cancer who were recommended operative therapy. Arch Surg. 2009;144(1):14–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
40.
Haider AH, Scott VK, Rehman KA, Velopulos C, Bentley JM, Cornwell III EE, et al. Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: a comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(3):482–92.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR., editors. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: 2003. Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care.
42.
Dorsey RR, Eberhardt MS, Ogden CL. Racial and ethnic differences in weight management behavior by weight perception status. Ethn Dis. 2010;20(3):244–50.PubMed
43.
White MA, O’Neil PM, Kolotkin RL, Byrne TK. Gender, race, and obesity-related quality of life at extreme levels of obesity. Obes Res. 2004;12(6):949–55.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Lynch CS, Chang JC, Ford AF, Ibrahim SA. Obese African-American women’s perspectives on weight loss and bariatric surgery. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(7):908–14.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
45.
Hoffman RM, Harlan LC, Klabunde CN, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Hunt WC, et al. Racial differences in initial treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. Results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(10):845–53.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
46.
McCann J, Artinian V, Duhaime L, Lewis Jr JW, Kvale PA, DiGiovine B. Evaluation of the causes for racial disparity in surgical treatment of early stage lung cancer. Chest. 2005;128(5):3440–6.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Armstrong K, Ravenell KL, McMurphy S, Putt M. Racial/ethnic differences in physician distrust in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(7):1283–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
48.
Fiscella K, Meldrum S, Franks P, Shields CG, Duberstein P, McDaniel SH, et al. Patient trust: is it related to patient-centered behavior of primary care physicians? Med Care. 2004;42(11):1049–55.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Gordon HS, Street Jr RL, Sharf BF, Kelly PA, Souchek J. Racial differences in trust and lung cancer patients’ perceptions of physician communication. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(6):904–9.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Thom DH, Ribisl KM, Stewart AL, Luke DA. Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians. Med Care. 1999;37(5):510–7.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(3):213–20.PubMed
52.
Ashton CM, Haidet P, Paterniti DA, Collins TC, Gordon HS, O’Malley K, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of health services: bias, preferences, or poor communication? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(2):146–52.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
53.
Shavers VL, Fagan P, Jones D, Klein WM, Boyington J, Moten C, et al. The state of research on racial/ethnic discrimination in the receipt of health care. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(5):953–66.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
54.
Iceland J, Wilkes R. Does socioeconomic status matter? Race, class and residential segregation. Soc Probl. 2006;53(2):248–73.CrossRef
55.
Bleich SN, Thorpe Jr RJ, Sharif-Harris H, Fesahazion R, Laveist TA. Social context explains race disparities in obesity among women. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(5):465–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
56.
Kirby JB, Kaneda T. Unhealthy and uninsured: exploring racial differences in health and health insurance coverage using a life table approach. Demography. 2010;47(4):1035–51.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
57.
Dayaratna KD. Studies show: Medicaid patients have worse access and outcomes than privately insured. [2740]. 2012. Washington DC, Center for Health Policy Studies; The Heritage Foundation. Ref Type: Generic.
58.
Halloran K, Padwal RS, Johnson-Stoklossa C, Sharma AM, Birch DW. Income status and approval for bariatric surgery in a publicly funded regional obesity program. Obes Surg. 2011;21:373–8.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Farinholt GN, Carr AD, Chang EJ, Ali MR. A call to arms: obese men with more severe comorbid disease and underutilization of bariatric operations. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(12):4556–63.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Ferrante JM, Piasecki AK, Ohman-Strickland PA, Crabtree BF. Family physicians’ practices and attitudes regarding care of extremely obese patients. Obesity. 2009;17(9):1710–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
61.
Wee CC, Huskey KW, Bolcic-Jankovic D, Colten ME, Davis RB, Hamel M. Sex, race, and consideration of bariatric surgery among primary care patients with moderate to severe obesity. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(1):68–75.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
62.
Santry HP, Lauderdale DS, Cagney KA, Rathouz PJ, Alverdy JC, Chin MH. Predictors of patient selection in bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):59–67.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
63.
Bai A, Shukla VK, Bak G, Wells G. Quality assessment tools project report. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2012.
Metadaten
Titel
Inequity to the Utilization of Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
verfasst von
Sanjit K. Bhogal
Jacinta I. Reddigan
Ori D. Rotstein
Ashley Cohen
Dresden Glockler
Andrea C. Tricco
Janet K. Smylie
Stephen A. Glazer
Jason Pennington
Lesley Gotlib Conn
Timothy D. Jackson
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1595-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Obesity Surgery 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Positioning Trocars for Performing Sleeve Gastrectomy. Points of Controversy

Original Contributions

Diagnostic Accuracy of Home-Based Monitoring System in Morbidly Obese Patients with High Risk for Sleep Apnea

New Concept

Outcomes of Revisional Treatment Modalities in Non-Complicated Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Patients with Weight Regain

Original Contributions

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: Comparison of Primary Versus Revisional Bypass by Using the BAROS Score

Letter to the Editor

Emerging Markers of Atherosclerosis Before and After Bariatric Surgery

Letter to the Editor

A Useful Tip for Resected Stomach After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.