Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2015

01.09.2015 | Original Article

Oncological outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a multiracial Asian population

verfasst von: Low Wei Xiang Alvin, Sim Hong Gee, Huang Hong Hong, Cheng Wai Sam Christopher, Ho Sien Sun Henry, Lau Kam On Weber, Tan Puay Hoon, Lee Lui Shiong

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study evaluates the oncological outcomes of RARP in a multiracial Asian population from a single institution. All suitable patients from 1st January 2003–30th June 2013 were identified from a prospectively maintained cancer registry. Peri-operative and oncological outcomes were analysed. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. There were n = 725 patients identified with a mean follow-up duration 28 months. The mean operative time, EBL and LOS were 186 min, 215 ml and 3 days, respectively. The pathological stage was pT2 in 68.6 % (n = 497/725), pT3 in 31.3 % (n = 227/725) and n = 1 patient with pT4 disease. The pathological Gleason scores (GS) were 6 in 27.9 % (n = 202/725), GS 7 in 63.6 % (n = 461/725) and GS ≥ 8 in 8.0 % (n = 58/725). The node positivity rate was 5.8 % (n = 21/360). The positive margin rates were 31.0 % (n = 154/497) and 70.9 % (n = 161/227) for pT2 and pT3, respectively, and decreasing PSM rates are observed with surgical maturity. The biochemical recurrence rates were 9.7 % (n = 48/497) and 34.2 % (n = 78/228) for pT2 and pT3/T4, respectively. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of BCR were pathological T stage and pathological Gleason score. Post-operatively, 78.5 % (n = 569/725) of patients had no complications and 17.7 % (n = 128/725) had minor (Clavien grade I–II) complications. This series, representing the largest from Southeast Asia, suggests that RARP can be a safe and oncologically feasible treatment for localised prostate cancer in an institution with moderate workload.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Matveev VB, Schmid HP et al (2008) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 53(1):68–80CrossRefPubMed Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, Joniau S, Matveev VB, Schmid HP et al (2008) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 53(1):68–80CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, Cookson MS et al (2007) Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol 177(6):2106–2131CrossRefPubMed Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, Cookson MS et al (2007) Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol 177(6):2106–2131CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sim HG, Lim KH, Tay MH, Chong KT, Chiong E (2013) Guidelines on management of prostate cancer. Ann Acad Med Singapore 42(4):190–199PubMed Sim HG, Lim KH, Tay MH, Chong KT, Chiong E (2013) Guidelines on management of prostate cancer. Ann Acad Med Singapore 42(4):190–199PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams S, Chiong E, Lojanapiwat B, Umbas R, Akaza H (2013) Management of prostate cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines from the Asian Oncology Summit 2013. Lancet Oncol 14(12):e524–e534CrossRefPubMed Williams S, Chiong E, Lojanapiwat B, Umbas R, Akaza H (2013) Management of prostate cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines from the Asian Oncology Summit 2013. Lancet Oncol 14(12):e524–e534CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sim HG, Yip SK, Lau WK, Tan JK, Cheng CW (2004) Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian J Surg 27(4):321–325CrossRefPubMed Sim HG, Yip SK, Lau WK, Tan JK, Cheng CW (2004) Early experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian J Surg 27(4):321–325CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yip KH, Yee CH, Ng CF, Lam NY, Ho KL, Ma WK et al (2012) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Hong Kong: a review of 235 cases. J Endourol 26(3):258–263CrossRefPubMed Yip KH, Yee CH, Ng CF, Lam NY, Ho KL, Ma WK et al (2012) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Hong Kong: a review of 235 cases. J Endourol 26(3):258–263CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KH, Lim SK, Shin TY, Chung BH, Hong SJ, Rha KH (2013) Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years. Asian J Androl 15(3):404–408PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kim KH, Lim SK, Shin TY, Chung BH, Hong SJ, Rha KH (2013) Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years. Asian J Androl 15(3):404–408PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashimoto T, Yoshioka K, Gondo T, Kamoda N, Satake N, Ozu C et al (2013) Learning curve and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 200 initial Japanese cases by a single surgeon. J Endourol 27(10):1218–1223CrossRefPubMed Hashimoto T, Yoshioka K, Gondo T, Kamoda N, Satake N, Ozu C et al (2013) Learning curve and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 200 initial Japanese cases by a single surgeon. J Endourol 27(10):1218–1223CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ou YC, Yang CK, Chang KS, Wang J, Hung SW, Tung MC et al (2014) The surgical learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single surgeon with 500 cases in Taiwan, China. Asian J Androl 16(5):728–734PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ou YC, Yang CK, Chang KS, Wang J, Hung SW, Tung MC et al (2014) The surgical learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single surgeon with 500 cases in Taiwan, China. Asian J Androl 16(5):728–734PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, Lane Z, Peabody JO, Rogers CG et al (2010) Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol 58(6):838–846CrossRefPubMed Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, Lane Z, Peabody JO, Rogers CG et al (2010) Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol 58(6):838–846CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sooriakumaran P, Haendler L, Nyberg T, Gronberg H, Nilsson A, Carlsson S et al (2012) Biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a European single-centre cohort with a minimum follow-up time of 5 years. Eur Urol 62(5):768–774CrossRefPubMed Sooriakumaran P, Haendler L, Nyberg T, Gronberg H, Nilsson A, Carlsson S et al (2012) Biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a European single-centre cohort with a minimum follow-up time of 5 years. Eur Urol 62(5):768–774CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Suardi N, Ficarra V, Willemsen P, De Wil P, Gallina A, De Naeyer G et al (2012) Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Urology 79(1):133–138CrossRefPubMed Suardi N, Ficarra V, Willemsen P, De Wil P, Gallina A, De Naeyer G et al (2012) Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Urology 79(1):133–138CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655CrossRefPubMed Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474CrossRefPubMed Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Fondurulia J, Chen MH, Tomaszewski JE et al (1998) The combination of preoperative prostate specific antigen and postoperative pathological findings to predict prostate specific antigen outcome in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 160(6 Pt 1):2096–2101CrossRefPubMed D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Fondurulia J, Chen MH, Tomaszewski JE et al (1998) The combination of preoperative prostate specific antigen and postoperative pathological findings to predict prostate specific antigen outcome in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 160(6 Pt 1):2096–2101CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, D’Amico AV, Dmochowski RR et al (2007) Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 177(2):540–545CrossRefPubMed Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, D’Amico AV, Dmochowski RR et al (2007) Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol 177(2):540–545CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Samaratunga H, Montironi R, True L, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, Humphrey PA et al (2011) International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling. Mod Pathol 24(1):6–15CrossRefPubMed Samaratunga H, Montironi R, True L, Epstein JI, Griffiths DF, Humphrey PA et al (2011) International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling. Mod Pathol 24(1):6–15CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashimoto T, Yoshioka K, Nagao G, Nakagami Y, Ohno Y, Horiguchi Y, Namiki K, Nakashima J, Tachibana M (2014) Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients. Int J Urol 22(2):188–193. doi:10.1111/iju.12624 CrossRefPubMed Hashimoto T, Yoshioka K, Nagao G, Nakagami Y, Ohno Y, Horiguchi Y, Namiki K, Nakashima J, Tachibana M (2014) Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients. Int J Urol 22(2):188–193. doi:10.​1111/​iju.​12624 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Xylinas E, Durand X, Ploussard G, Campeggi A, Allory Y, Vordos D et al (2013) Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control. Urol Oncol 31(1):99–103CrossRefPubMed Xylinas E, Durand X, Ploussard G, Campeggi A, Allory Y, Vordos D et al (2013) Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control. Urol Oncol 31(1):99–103CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Novara G, Ficarra V, D’Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2011) Trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 107(1):100–104CrossRefPubMed Novara G, Ficarra V, D’Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2011) Trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 107(1):100–104CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL (2009) Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 74(3):619–623CrossRefPubMed Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL (2009) Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 74(3):619–623CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayram G, Decastro GJ, Large MC, Razmaria A, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL et al (2011) Robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk disease: a review of short-term outcomes from a high-volume center. J Endourol 25(3):455–457CrossRefPubMed Jayram G, Decastro GJ, Large MC, Razmaria A, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL et al (2011) Robotic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk disease: a review of short-term outcomes from a high-volume center. J Endourol 25(3):455–457CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, Burgess SV, Thomas R, Davis R (2006) Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 49(5):866–71 (discussion 871–2) Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, Burgess SV, Thomas R, Davis R (2006) Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 49(5):866–71 (discussion 871–2)
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sooriakumaran P, John M, Wiklund P, Lee D, Nilsson A, Tewari AK (2011) Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients. Minerva Urol Nefrol 63(3):191–198PubMed Sooriakumaran P, John M, Wiklund P, Lee D, Nilsson A, Tewari AK (2011) Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients. Minerva Urol Nefrol 63(3):191–198PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):431–452CrossRefPubMed Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):431–452CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sooriakumaran P, Srivastava A, Shariat SF, Stricker PD, Ahlering T, Eden CG et al (2014) A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22,393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol 66(3):450–456CrossRefPubMed Sooriakumaran P, Srivastava A, Shariat SF, Stricker PD, Ahlering T, Eden CG et al (2014) A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22,393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol 66(3):450–456CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Eastham JA, Kuroiwa K, Ohori M, Serio AM, Gorbonos A, Maru N et al (2007) Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 70(5):965–969CrossRefPubMed Eastham JA, Kuroiwa K, Ohori M, Serio AM, Gorbonos A, Maru N et al (2007) Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 70(5):965–969CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ochiai A, Sotelo T, Troncoso P, Bhadkamkar V, Babaian RJ (2008) Natural history of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy based on length of a positive margin. Urology 71(2):308–312CrossRefPubMed Ochiai A, Sotelo T, Troncoso P, Bhadkamkar V, Babaian RJ (2008) Natural history of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy based on length of a positive margin. Urology 71(2):308–312CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N et al (2008) Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 179(5 Suppl):S47–S51CrossRefPubMed Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N et al (2008) Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 179(5 Suppl):S47–S51CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mauermann J, Fradet V, Lacombe L, Dujardin T, Tiguert R, Tetu B et al (2013) The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol 64(1):19–25CrossRefPubMed Mauermann J, Fradet V, Lacombe L, Dujardin T, Tiguert R, Tetu B et al (2013) The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol 64(1):19–25CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Udo K, Cronin AM, Carlino LJ, Savage CJ, Maschino AC, Al-Ahmadie HA et al (2013) Prognostic impact of subclassification of radical prostatectomy positive margins by linear extent and Gleason grade. J Urol 189(4):1302–1307CrossRefPubMed Udo K, Cronin AM, Carlino LJ, Savage CJ, Maschino AC, Al-Ahmadie HA et al (2013) Prognostic impact of subclassification of radical prostatectomy positive margins by linear extent and Gleason grade. J Urol 189(4):1302–1307CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar R, Nayyar R, Kumar V, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Jagannathan NR et al (2008) Potential of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in predicting absence of prostate cancer in men with serum prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/ml: a follow-up study. Urology 72(4):859–863CrossRefPubMed Kumar R, Nayyar R, Kumar V, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Jagannathan NR et al (2008) Potential of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in predicting absence of prostate cancer in men with serum prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/ml: a follow-up study. Urology 72(4):859–863CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Vilanova JC, Barcelo-Vidal C, Comet J, Boada M, Barcelo J, Ferrer J et al (2011) Usefulness of prebiopsy multifunctional and morphologic MRI combined with free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in the detection of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(6):W715–W722CrossRefPubMed Vilanova JC, Barcelo-Vidal C, Comet J, Boada M, Barcelo J, Ferrer J et al (2011) Usefulness of prebiopsy multifunctional and morphologic MRI combined with free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in the detection of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(6):W715–W722CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Numao N, Yoshida S, Komai Y, Ishii C, Kagawa M, Kijima T et al (2013) Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 190(2):502–508CrossRefPubMed Numao N, Yoshida S, Komai Y, Ishii C, Kagawa M, Kijima T et al (2013) Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 190(2):502–508CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim GH, Chow KY, Lee HP (2012) Singapore cancer trends in the last decade. Singapore Med J 53(1):3–9 (quiz 10) Lim GH, Chow KY, Lee HP (2012) Singapore cancer trends in the last decade. Singapore Med J 53(1):3–9 (quiz 10)
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwii Ko Y, Jae Sung D, Gu Kang S, Ho Kang S, Gu Lee J, Jong Kim J et al (2011) The predictability of T3 disease in staging MRI following prostate biopsy decreases in patients with high initial PSA and Gleason score. Asian J Androl 13(3):487–493PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hwii Ko Y, Jae Sung D, Gu Kang S, Ho Kang S, Gu Lee J, Jong Kim J et al (2011) The predictability of T3 disease in staging MRI following prostate biopsy decreases in patients with high initial PSA and Gleason score. Asian J Androl 13(3):487–493PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Somford DM, Hamoen EH, Futterer JJ, van Basten JP, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Vreuls W et al (2013) The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190(5):1728–1734CrossRefPubMed Somford DM, Hamoen EH, Futterer JJ, van Basten JP, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Vreuls W et al (2013) The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. J Urol 190(5):1728–1734CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, Yamamoto A, Ito K (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI and its role in prostate cancer. NMR Biomed 27(1):25–38CrossRefPubMed Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, Yamamoto A, Ito K (2014) Diffusion-weighted MRI and its role in prostate cancer. NMR Biomed 27(1):25–38CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma S, Turkbey B, Muradyan N, Rajesh A, Cornud F, Haider MA et al (2012) Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(6):1277–1288CrossRefPubMed Verma S, Turkbey B, Muradyan N, Rajesh A, Cornud F, Haider MA et al (2012) Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198(6):1277–1288CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B (2010) Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T for the evaluation of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1461–1469CrossRefPubMed Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B (2010) Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T for the evaluation of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1461–1469CrossRefPubMed
42.
Metadaten
Titel
Oncological outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a multiracial Asian population
verfasst von
Low Wei Xiang Alvin
Sim Hong Gee
Huang Hong Hong
Cheng Wai Sam Christopher
Ho Sien Sun Henry
Lau Kam On Weber
Tan Puay Hoon
Lee Lui Shiong
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0516-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.