nach oben

Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Erschienen in:

04.09.2017

Examining the accessibility of high-quality physical activity behaviour change support freely available online for men with prostate cancer

verfasst von: Camille E. Short, Charlotte Gelder, Lena Binnewerg, Megan McIntosh, Deborah Turnbull

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

While the internet is considered a promising avenue for providing physical activity support to prostate cancer survivors, little is known about the accessibility of quality websites in the real world.

Purpose

This work aimed to explore what websites prostate cancer survivors are likely to find when seeking physical activity support online and to evaluate their quality using evidenced-based criteria.

Method

A search strategy was developed in consultation with prostate cancer survivors (n = 44) to reflect the most common ways they are likely to search the internet. The search was then conducted by a single reviewer, and identified websites were assessed for quality by two reviewers using an evidence-based quality assessment tool developed for this study. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer.

Results

Of the 45 identified websites, 13 (29%) received a high quality rating, 22 (49%) received a moderate rating and 10 (22%) received a low quality rating. Higher-quality websites tended to have a .org or .gov domain and tended to be located using searches specific to prostate cancer or prostate cancer and exercise. Very few websites contained complete information regarding the physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors, and no websites provided comprehensive behaviour change support.

Conclusion

There are some good-quality physical activity websites accessible to men with prostate cancer. However, they may be difficult to find and/or require updating to include complete recommendations and more behaviour change support.

Implications for cancer survivors

Efforts to improve physical activity information online and strategies to direct prostate cancer survivors to higher-quality websites and support services are needed to ensure safety and efficacy.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210.

Smith DP, King MT, Egger S, Berry MP, Stricker PD, Cozzi P, et al. Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2009;339 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4817.

Prabhu V, Lee T, McClintock TR, Lepor H. Short-, intermediate-, and long-term quality of life outcomes following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Reviews in Urology. 2013;15(4):161–77.PubMedPubMedCentral

Bernat JK, Wittman DA, Hawley ST, Hamstra DA, Helfand AM, Haggstrom DA, et al. Symptom burden and information needs in prostate cancer survivors: a case for tailored long-term survivorship care. BJU Int. 2016;118(3):372–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13329.CrossRefPubMed

Baade PD, Fritschi L, Eakin E. Non-cancer mortality among people diagnosed with cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17:287–97.CrossRefPubMed

Doyle-Lindrud S. Prostate cancer: a chronic illness. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11(6):857–61. https://doi.org/10.1188/07.cjon.857-861.CrossRefPubMed

Guttilla A, Bortolami A, Evangelista L. Prostate cancer as a chronic disease: cost-effectiveness and proper follow-up. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;59(4):439–45.PubMed

King AJ, Evans M, Moore TH, Paterson C, Sharp D, Persad R, et al. Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015;24(5):618–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12286.CrossRef

Moore THM, King AJL, Evans M, Sharp D, Persad R, Huntley AL. Supportive care for men with prostate cancer: why are the trials not working? A systematic review and recommendations for future trials. Cancer Med. 2015;4(8):1240–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Baumann FT, Zopf EM, Bloch W. Clinical exercise interventions in prostate cancer patients--a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(2):221–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1271-0.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Bourke L, Smith D, Steed L, Hooper R, Carter A, Catto J, et al. Exercise for men with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(4):693–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.047.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, Chan JM. Physical activity and survival after prostate cancer diagnosis in the health professionals follow-up study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):726–32. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.31.5226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Friedenreich CM, Wang Q, Neilson HK, Kopciuk KA, McGregor SE, Courneya KS. Physical activity and survival after prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.032.

14.

Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL et al. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2012;62(4):243–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21142.

15.

Hayes SC, Spence RR, Galvao DA, Newton RU. Australian Association for Exercise and Sport Science position stand: optimising cancer outcomes through exercise. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(4):428–34.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Schmitz K, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvao DA, Pinto BM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(7):1409–26. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Buffart LM, Galvão DA, Brug J, Chinapaw MJM, Newton RU. Evidence-based physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors: current guidelines, knowledge gaps and future research directions. Cancer Treat Rev. 40(2):327–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.06.007.

18.

Emery J. Cancer survivorship—the role of the GP. Aust Fam Physician. 2014;43:521–5.PubMed

19.

Galvão DA, Newton RU, Gardiner RA, Girgis A, Lepore SJ, Stiller A, et al. Compliance to exercise-oncology guidelines in prostate cancer survivors and associations with psychological distress, unmet supportive care needs, and quality of life. Psycho-Oncology. 2015;24(10):1241–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3882.CrossRef

20.

Demark-Wahnefried W, Rogers LQ, Alfano CM, Thomson CA, Courneya KS, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Practical clinical interventions for diet, physical activity, and weight control in cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(3):167–89. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21265.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Short CE, Vandelanotte C, Dixon MW, Rosenkranz R, Caperchione C, Hooker C, et al. Examining participant engagement in an information technology-based physical activity and nutrition intervention for men: the manup randomized controlled trial. JMIR research protocols. 2014;3(1):e2. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.2776.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Huntley A. Prostate cancer: online support reduces distress in men with prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(1):9–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.267.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Martin EC, Basen-Engquist K, Cox MG, Lyons EJ, Carmack CL, Blalock JA, et al. Interest in health behavior intervention delivery modalities among cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study. JMIR Cancer. 2016;2(1):e1. https://doi.org/10.2196/cancer.5247.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Craike MJ, Livingston PM, Botti M. An exploratory study of the factors that influence physical activity for prostate cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(7):1019–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0929-3.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Keogh JWL, Patel A, MacLeod RD, Masters J. Perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity in men with prostate cancer: possible influence of androgen deprivation therapy. Eur J Cancer Care. 2014;23(2):263–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12141.CrossRef

26.

Smith JA, Braunack-Mayer A, Wittert G. What do we know about men’s help-seeking and health service use? Med J Aust. 2006;184(2):81–3.PubMed

27.

Samoocha D, Bruinvels DJ, Elbers NA, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):e23. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries KN, Brug J, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e2. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1639.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Webb T, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Lustria ML, Noar SM, Cortese J, Van Stee SK, Glueckauf RL, Lee J. A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun. 2013;18(9):1039–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.768727.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kanera IM, Willems RA, Bolman CAW, Mesters I, Zambon V, Gijsen BC, et al. Use and appreciation of a tailored self-management eHealth intervention for early cancer survivors: process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(8):e229. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5975.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Gokani SA, Kerry G, Sharma E, Ash J, Zargaran AK, Rasasingam DS, et al. Response to “older cancer patients’ user experiences with web-based health information tools: a think-aloud study”. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(11):e273. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Galiano-Castillo N, Cantarero-Villanueva I, Fernández-Lao C, Ariza-García A, Díaz-Rodríguez L, Del-Moral-Ávila R, et al. Telehealth system: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of an internet-based exercise intervention on quality of life, pain, muscle strength, and fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2016;122(20):3166–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30172.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Vandelanotte C, Kirwan M, Rebar A, Alley S, Short C, Fallon L, et al. Examining the use of evidence-based and social media supported tools in freely accessible physical activity intervention websites. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0105-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Zhang Y, Sun Y, Xie B. Quality of health information for consumers on the web: a systematic review of indicators, criteria, tools, and evaluation results. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015;66(10):2071–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23311.CrossRef

36.

Bonnar-Kidd KK, Black DR, Mattson M, Coster D. Online physical activity information: will typical users find quality information? Health Commun. 2009;24(2):165–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230802676763.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Buote RD, Malone SD, Bélanger LJ, McGowan EL. Quality and accuracy of publicly accessible cancer-related physical activity information on the Internet: a cross-sectional assessment. Eur J Cancer Care. 2016;25(5):795–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12518.CrossRef

38.

Pautler SE, Tan JK, Dugas GR, Pus N, Ferri M, Hardie WR, et al. Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. Urology. 2001;57(2):230–3.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Voigt K-I, Buliga O, Michl K. Beyond the search engine: the case of Google. Business model pioneers: how innovators successfully implement new business models. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2017; 81–94.

41.

Williams S, French D. What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour-and are they the same? Health Educ Res. 2011;26:308–22.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Ashford S, Edmunds J, French DP. What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(2):265–88.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Latimer AE, Brawley LR, Bassett RL. A systematic review of three approaches for constructing physical activity messages: what messages work and what improvements are needed? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-7-36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Olander E, Fletcher H, Williams S, Atkinson L, Turner A, French D. What are the most effective techniques in changing obese individuals’ physical activity self-efficacy and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(1):29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

O'Brien N, McDonald S, Araujo-Soares V, Lara J, Errington L, Godfrey A, et al. The features of interventions associated with long-term effectiveness of physical activity interventions in adults aged 55-70 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(4):417–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1012177.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Cox DJ, Kovatchev BP, Gonder-Frederick LA. A behavior change model for internet interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9133-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015;3(1):e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.3422.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Devine T, Broderick J, Harris LM, Wu H, Hilfiker SW. Making quality health websites a National Public Health Priority: toward quality standards. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(8):e211. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5999.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Kelders MS, Kok NR, Ossebaard CH, Van Gemert-Pijnen EWCJ. Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(6):e152. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Laranjo L, Arguel A, Neves AL, Gallagher AM, Kaplan R, Mortimer N, et al. The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(1):243–56. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002841.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Short CE, Rebar AL, Plotnikoff RC, Vandelanotte C. Designing engaging online behaviour change interventions: a proposed model of user engagement. The European Health Psychologist. 2015;17(1):32–8.

52.

Short CE, Vandelanotte C, Duncan MJ. Individual characteristics associated with physical activity intervention delivery mode preferences among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-25.

53.

Quinn EM, Corrigan MA, McHugh SM, Murphy D, O'Mullane J, Hill AD, et al. Breast cancer information on the internet: analysis of accessibility and accuracy. Breast. 2012;21(4):514–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2012.01.020.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Sharit J, Taha J, Berkowsky RW, Profita H, Czaja SJ. Online information search performance and search strategies in a health problem-solving scenario. J Cogn Eng Decis Making. 2015;9(3):211–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343415583747.CrossRef

55.

Hoffman-Goetz L, Friedman DB, Celestine A. Evaluation of a public library workshop. Teaching older adults how to search the internet for reliable cancer information. J Consum Health Internet. 2006;10(3):29–43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J381v10n03_03.CrossRef

56.

Xie B, Bugg JM. Public library computer training for older adults to access high-quality internet health information. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2009;31(3):155–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.03.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Nikoloudakis IA, Rebar AL, Schoeppe S, Alley S, Duncan MJ, Vandelanotte C et al. Examining the correlates of online health information seeking behaviour among men compared with women. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316650625.

58.

Haucap J, Heimeshoff U. Google, Facebook, Amazon, eBay: is the Internet driving competition or market monopolization? IEEP. 2014;11(1):49–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6.CrossRef

59.

Hanson C, Thackeray R, Barnes M, Neiger B, McIntyre E. Integrating web 2.0 in health education preparation and practice. Am J Health Educ. 2008;39(3):157–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2008.10599032.CrossRef

Titel: Examining the accessibility of high-quality physical activity behaviour change support freely available online for men with prostate cancer
verfasst von: Camille E. Short
Charlotte Gelder
Lena Binnewerg
Megan McIntosh
Deborah Turnbull
Publikationsdatum: 04.09.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Elektronische ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0638-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Springer Medizin

Examining the accessibility of high-quality physical activity behaviour change support freely available online for men with prostate cancer

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Implications for cancer survivors

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Implications for cancer survivors

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Identifying the subtypes of cancer-related fatigue: results from the population-based PROFILES registry

Changes in cerebellar functional connectivity and autonomic regulation in cancer patients treated with the Neuro Emotional Technique for traumatic stress symptoms

Agreement between self-reported and register-based cardiovascular events among Danish breast cancer survivors

The Pathways fertility preservation decision aid website for women with cancer: development and field testing

Sexual function in adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer: A systematic review

An international review and meta-analysis of prehabilitation compared to usual care for cancer patients

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie