nach oben

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Erschienen in:

04.04.2019 | Original Article

3D preoperative planning for humeral head selection in total shoulder arthroplasty

verfasst von: D. J. L. Lima, J. Markel, J. P. Yawman, J. D. Whaley, V. J. Sabesan

Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Recreation of glenohumeral biomechanics and humeral anatomy has been shown to improve outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty. Recent research has focused on utilizing simulation software and intraoperative instrumentation to improve glenoid implant selection and positioning, but no study had evaluated the reliability of new features in 3D preoperative planning software for humeral planning in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Materials and methods

Preoperative plans were created for 26 patients using three different simulation software programs: an independent preoperative planning simulation (IPPS) software (OrthoVis) and two automated manufacturers preoperative simulation systems: ArthrexVIP™ (AMPS I) and Tornier Blueprint™ 3D Planning (AMPS II). Preoperative plans were compared for reliability and consistency among different software systems based on available variables including humeral head diameter (HD) and head height (HH).

Results

The measured HD was consistent between the three systems with a maximum mean difference of 0.2 mm for HD among IPPS, AMPS I, and AMPS II (p = 0.964). There was a significant difference in measured humeral HH with 1.7 mm difference between IPPS and AMPS II (p ≤ 0.001). The strongest correlation when comparing humeral head measurements (diameter or height) obtained from all systems was seen between IPPS and AMPS I for humeral HD (r = 0.8; p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

There was a high level of consistency between independent and manufacturer preoperative planning software for humeral head measurements. These preoperative planning systems can improve efficiency and workflow during surgery by guiding surgeons on implant size selection to optimally reconstruct the glenohumeral kinematics, in order to improve patient outcomes.

Level of evidence

Level III, study of nonconsecutive patients and without a universally applied “gold” standard study of diagnostic test.

Menge TJ, Boykin RE, Byram IR, Bushnell BD (2014) A comprehensive approach to glenohumeral arthritis. South Med J 107(9):567–573. https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000166 CrossRefPubMed

Iannotti JP, Greeson C, Downing D, Sabesan V, Bryan JA (2012) Effect of glenoid deformity on glenoid component placement in primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.02.011 CrossRefPubMed

Sabesan V, Callanan M, Sharma V, Iannotti JP (2014) Correction of acquired glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis with a standard versus an augmented glenoid component. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(7):964–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.019 CrossRefPubMed

Sabesan VJ, Callanan M, Youderian A, Iannotti JP (2014) 3D CT assessment of the relationship between humeral head alignment and glenoid retroversion in glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(8):e64. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00856 CrossRefPubMed

Hendel MD, Bryan JA, Barsoum WK, Rodriguez EJ, Brems JJ, Evans PJ, Iannotti JP (2012) Comparison of patient-specific instruments with standard surgical instruments in determining glenoid component position: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(23):2167–2175. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01209 CrossRefPubMed

Hoenecke HR Jr, Hermida JC, Flores-Hernandez C, D’Lima DD (2010) Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(2):166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.08.009 CrossRefPubMed

Iannotti JP, Weiner S, Rodriguez E, Subhas N, Patterson TE, Jun BJ, Ricchetti ET (2015) Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(8):651–658. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00493 CrossRefPubMed

Levy JC, Everding NG, Frankle MA, Keppler LJ (2014) Accuracy of patient-specific guided glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(10):1563–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.051 CrossRefPubMed

Lewis GS, Bryce CD, Davison AC, Hollenbeak CS, Piazza SJ, Armstrong AD (2010) Location of the optimized centerline of the glenoid vault: a comparison of two operative techniques with use of three-dimensional computer modeling. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(5):1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00131 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Sabesan V, Callanan M, Sharma V (2014) Guidelines for the selection of optimal glenoid augment size for moderate to severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(7):974–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.022 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Franta AK, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Neradilek B, Matsen FA III (2007) The complex characteristics of 282 unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(5):555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.11.004 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Hasan SS, Leith JM, Campbell B, Kapil R, Smith KL, Matsen FA III (2002) Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):431–441CrossRef

13.

Iannotti JP, Spencer EE, Winter U, Deffenbaugh D, Williams G (2005) Prosthetic positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(1 Suppl S):111S–121S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.026 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Verborgt O, De Smedt T, Vanhees M, Clockaerts S, Parizel PM, Van Glabbeek F (2011) Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(1):21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.014 CrossRefPubMed

15.

von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Muller-Gerbl M, Wiedemann E, Englmeier KH, Graichen H (2008) Functional malcentering of the humeral head and asymmetric long-term stress on the glenoid: potential reasons for glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(5):695–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.008 CrossRef

16.

Gutierrez S, Levy JC, Frankle MA, Cuff D, Keller TS, Pupello DR, Lee WE III (2008) Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(4):608–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.010 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Herrmann S (2016) Shoulder biomechanics. In: Frankle M, Marberry S, Pupello D (eds) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanics, clinical techniques, and current technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20840-4_2 CrossRef

18.

Keener JD, Chalmers PN, Yamaguchi K (2017) The humeral implant in shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 25(6):427–438. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00682 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Kircher J, Wiedemann M, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P (2009) Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: a prospective-randomized clinical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(4):515–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.014 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Nguyen D, Ferreira LM, Brownhill JR, King GJ, Drosdowech DS, Faber KJ, Johnson JA (2009) Improved accuracy of computer assisted glenoid implantation in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in-vitro randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(6):907–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.022 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Sabesan VJ, Ackerman J, Sharma V, Baker KC, Kurdziel MD, Wiater JM (2015) Glenohumeral mismatch affects micromotion of cemented glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(5):814–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.004 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Youderian AR, Ricchetti ET, Drews M, Iannotti JP (2014) Determination of humeral head size in anatomic shoulder replacement for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(7):955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.005 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Savin DD, Piponov H, Goldstein J, Youderian AR (2017) Humeral head sizing using extra-articular landmarks on conventional radiographs. Surg Radiol Anat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1833-z CrossRefPubMed

24.

Lee CS, Davis SM, Lane CJ, Koonce RC, Hartman AP, Ball K, Esch JC (2015) Reliability and accuracy of digital templating for the humeral component of total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow 7(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573214550838 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Verborgt O, Vanhees M, Heylen S, Hardy P, Declercq G, Bicknell R (2014) Computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty. Sports Med Arthrosc 22(4):e42–e49. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0000000000000045 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Parsons IMT, Weldon EJ III, Titelman RM, Smith KL (2004) Glenohumeral arthritis and its management. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 15(2):447–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2003.12.001 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Bellanova L, Paul L, Docquier PL (2013) Surgical guides (patient-specific instruments) for pediatric tibial bone sarcoma resection and allograft reconstruction. Sarcoma 2013:787653. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/787653 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Dai KR, Yan MN, Zhu ZA, Sun YH (2007) Computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis used in extensive pelvic lesions. J Arthroplasty 22(7):981–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.002 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Deshmukh TR, Kuthe AM, Vaibhav B (2010) Preplanning and simulation of surgery using rapid modelling. J Med Eng Technol 34(4):291–294. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091901003753058 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Guarino J, Tennyson S, McCain G, Bond L, Shea K, King H (2007) Rapid prototyping technology for surgeries of the pediatric spine and pelvis: benefits analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 27(8):955–960. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0b013e3181594ced CrossRefPubMed

31.

Hananouchi T, Saito M, Koyama T, Hagio K, Murase T, Sugano N, Yoshikawa H (2009) Tailor-made surgical guide based on rapid prototyping technique for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty. Int J Med Robot 5(2):164–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.243 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Izatt MT, Thorpe PL, Thompson RG, D’Urso PS, Adam CJ, Earwaker JW, Labrom RD, Askin GN (2007) The use of physical biomodelling in complex spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16(9):1507–1518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0289-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Martelli N, Serrano C, van den Brink H, Pineau J, Prognon P, Borget I, El Batti S (2016) Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 159(6):1485–1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.12.017 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Yamazaki M, Akazawa T, Okawa A, Koda M (2007) Usefulness of three-dimensional full-scale modeling of surgery for a giant cell tumor of the cervical spine. Spinal Cord 45(3):250–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101959 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Yang JC, Ma XY, Lin J, Wu ZH, Zhang K, Yin QS (2011) Personalised modified osteotomy using computer-aided design-rapid prototyping to correct thoracic deformities. Int Orthop 35(12):1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1155-9 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Yang M, Li C, Li Y, Zhao Y, Wei X, Zhang G, Fan J, Ni H, Chen Z, Bai Y, Li M (2015) Application of 3D rapid prototyping technology in posterior corrective surgery for Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Medicine 94(8):e582. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000582 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Zhang YZ, Chen B, Lu S, Yang Y, Zhao JM, Liu R, Li YB, Pei GX (2011) Preliminary application of computer-assisted patient-specific acetabular navigational template for total hip arthroplasty in adult single development dysplasia of the hip. Int J Med Robot 7(4):469–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.423 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: 3D preoperative planning for humeral head selection in total shoulder arthroplasty
verfasst von: D. J. L. Lima
J. Markel
J. P. Yawman
J. D. Whaley
V. J. Sabesan
Publikationsdatum: 04.04.2019
Verlag: Springer Milan
Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 2035-5106
Elektronische ISSN: 2035-5114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-019-00602-5

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Periprosthetic fractures about total knee arthroplasty

Management of ramp lesions of the knee: a systematic review of the literature

Arthroscopic anatomic complete versus non-anatomic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of comparative trials

Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study

The subacromial balloon spacer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: approximately 3 years of prospective follow-up