Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 2/2014

01.06.2014 | Original Article

Pancreatico-duodenectomy and postoperative pancreatic fistula: risk factors and technical considerations in a specialized HPB center

verfasst von: Luciano De Carlis, Fabio Ferla, Stefano Di Sandro, Alessandro Giacomoni, Riccardo De Carlis, Raffaella Sguinzi

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication of pancreatic resection. Aim of this study is to identify variables related to the development of POPF, analyze their clinical significance and discuss our current approach to the pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis. A series of 129 patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) have been analyzed. Patients were divided in two groups: group F, 26 patients who have developed POPF; group NF, 103 patients who have not developed POPF. Demographic, clinical and intraoperative data were compared. Seventy-six patients had an end-to-side (ES) pancreatico-jejuno anastomosis, 53 an end-to-end (EE) anastomosis. Fifteen patients developed grade A fistulas, seven grade B, and four grade C; two patients with grade C fistula died from septic shock. Preoperative bile duct lithiasis, diameter of the pancreatic duct and consistency of the pancreatic stump were significantly different between F and NF groups at multivariate analysis. POPF has been related to clinical and biological parameters: preoperative bile duct lithiasis and challenging pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis (with small pancreatic duct and friable pancreatic stump) are the most prominent according to our experience. As the incidence of POPF seems to be related to technically demanding surgery, we presently reserve the EE anastomosis to the cases in which a friable gland or a very small duct will make a direct anastomosis on the pancreatic duct unreliable. In case of grade C fistulas a total spleen-preserving pancreatectomy should be considered an adequate treatment to prevent the onset of a multi-organ failure or a septic shock if no other treatment seems suitable.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kollmar O, Moussavian MR, Bolli M et al (2007) Pancreatojejunal leakage after pancreas head resection: anatomic and surgeon-related factors. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1699–1703PubMedCrossRef Kollmar O, Moussavian MR, Bolli M et al (2007) Pancreatojejunal leakage after pancreas head resection: anatomic and surgeon-related factors. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1699–1703PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tseng WH, Canter RJ, Bold RJ (2011) Perioperative outcomes for open distal pancreatectomy: current benchmarks for comparison. J Gastrointest Surg 15(11):2053–2058PubMedCrossRef Tseng WH, Canter RJ, Bold RJ (2011) Perioperative outcomes for open distal pancreatectomy: current benchmarks for comparison. J Gastrointest Surg 15(11):2053–2058PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nathan H, Cameron JL, Goodwin CR et al (2009) Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 250:277–281PubMedCrossRef Nathan H, Cameron JL, Goodwin CR et al (2009) Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 250:277–281PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598PubMedCrossRef Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Aranha GV, Hodul PJ, Creech S et al (2003) Zero mortality after 152 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:223–231 discussion 231–2PubMedCrossRef Aranha GV, Hodul PJ, Creech S et al (2003) Zero mortality after 152 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:223–231 discussion 231–2PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud JP, Sauvanet A, Dejong CH, Pessaux P (2013) Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 37(3):230–239PubMedCrossRef Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud JP, Sauvanet A, Dejong CH, Pessaux P (2013) Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 37(3):230–239PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Assifi MM, Lindenmeyer J, Leiby BE, Grunwald Z, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP, Yeo CJ, Berger AC (2012) Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):275–281PubMedCrossRef Assifi MM, Lindenmeyer J, Leiby BE, Grunwald Z, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP, Yeo CJ, Berger AC (2012) Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):275–281PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ (1997) Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 113:983–994PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ (1997) Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 113:983–994PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerut JP, Gianello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1984) Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients. Ann Surg 199(4):432–437PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lerut JP, Gianello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1984) Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients. Ann Surg 199(4):432–437PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsusue S, Takeda H, Nakamura Y et al (1998) A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Surg Today 28:719–726PubMedCrossRef Matsusue S, Takeda H, Nakamura Y et al (1998) A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Surg Today 28:719–726PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T (2013) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. riskfactors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg 37(6):1405–1418PubMedCrossRef El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T (2013) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. riskfactors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg 37(6):1405–1418PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcus SG, Cohen H, Ranson JH (1995) Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 221:635–645 discussion 645–8PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Marcus SG, Cohen H, Ranson JH (1995) Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 221:635–645 discussion 645–8PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt CM, Choi J, Powell ES et al (2009) Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical predictors and patient outcomes. HPB Surg 2009:404520PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schmidt CM, Choi J, Powell ES et al (2009) Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical predictors and patient outcomes. HPB Surg 2009:404520PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23PubMedCrossRef Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Srivastava S, Sikora SS, Pandey CM et al (2001) Determinants of pancreaticoenteric anastomotic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 71:511–515PubMedCrossRef Srivastava S, Sikora SS, Pandey CM et al (2001) Determinants of pancreaticoenteric anastomotic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 71:511–515PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu CK, Mazo AE, Sarmiento JM et al (2010) Impact of diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 210:463–473PubMedCrossRef Chu CK, Mazo AE, Sarmiento JM et al (2010) Impact of diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 210:463–473PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Malleo G, Mazzarella F, Malpaga A, Marchegiani G, Salvia R, Bassi C, Butturini G (2013) Diabetes mellitus does not impact on clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery 153(5):641–650PubMedCrossRef Malleo G, Mazzarella F, Malpaga A, Marchegiani G, Salvia R, Bassi C, Butturini G (2013) Diabetes mellitus does not impact on clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery 153(5):641–650PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY et al (2007) Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:692–698PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY et al (2007) Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:692–698PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:47–55PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:47–55PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnett SA, Collier NA (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does preoperative biliary drainage, method of pancreatic reconstruction or age influence perioperative outcome? A retrospective study of 104 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 76:563–568PubMedCrossRef Barnett SA, Collier NA (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does preoperative biliary drainage, method of pancreatic reconstruction or age influence perioperative outcome? A retrospective study of 104 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 76:563–568PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe F, Noda H, Kamiyama H, Kato T, Kakizawa N, Ichida K, Toyama N, Konishi F (2012) Risk factors for intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy a retrospective analysis to evaluate the significance of preoperative biliary drainage and postoperative pancreatic fistula. Hepatogastroenterology 59(116):1270–1273PubMed Watanabe F, Noda H, Kamiyama H, Kato T, Kakizawa N, Ichida K, Toyama N, Konishi F (2012) Risk factors for intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy a retrospective analysis to evaluate the significance of preoperative biliary drainage and postoperative pancreatic fistula. Hepatogastroenterology 59(116):1270–1273PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat You D, Jung K, Lee H, Heo J, Choi S, Choi D (2009) Comparison of different pancreatic anastomosis techniques using the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery: a single surgeon’s experience. Pancreas 38(8):896–902PubMedCrossRef You D, Jung K, Lee H, Heo J, Choi S, Choi D (2009) Comparison of different pancreatic anastomosis techniques using the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery: a single surgeon’s experience. Pancreas 38(8):896–902PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA et al (1992) Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: current management. Arch Surg 127:945–949PubMedCrossRef Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA et al (1992) Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: current management. Arch Surg 127:945–949PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu CC, Hwang CR, Yeh DC, Hwang YC, Liu TJ, P’eng FK (1996) Treatment for dehiscence of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: is resection of the residual pancreas necessary? Hepatogastroenterology 43(7):271–274PubMed Wu CC, Hwang CR, Yeh DC, Hwang YC, Liu TJ, P’eng FK (1996) Treatment for dehiscence of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: is resection of the residual pancreas necessary? Hepatogastroenterology 43(7):271–274PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat De Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:1117–1123PubMedCrossRef De Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:1117–1123PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Scurtu R, Lucescu I, Oshita A et al (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy as a salvage procedure to treat severe postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 143:966–970PubMedCrossRef Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Scurtu R, Lucescu I, Oshita A et al (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy as a salvage procedure to treat severe postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 143:966–970PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pancreatico-duodenectomy and postoperative pancreatic fistula: risk factors and technical considerations in a specialized HPB center
verfasst von
Luciano De Carlis
Fabio Ferla
Stefano Di Sandro
Alessandro Giacomoni
Riccardo De Carlis
Raffaella Sguinzi
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-014-0253-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Updates in Surgery 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.