nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2012 | Study protocol

A convenient method for determining the concentration of hydrogen in water: use of methylene blue with colloidal platinum

verfasst von: Tomoki Seo, Ryosuke Kurokawa, Bunpei Sato

Erschienen in: Medical Gas Research | Ausgabe 1/2012

Abstract

A simple titration (oxidimetry) method using a methylene blue-platinum colloid reagent is effective in determining the concentration of hydrogen gas in an aqueous solution. The method performs as effectively as the more complex and expensive electrochemical method.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Authors’ original file for figure 4

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2045-9912-2-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

This study protocol was funded by MiZ Company. Tomoki Seo, Ryosuke Kurokawa and Bunpei Sato are all employees of MiZ Company.

Authors' contributions

The authors equally contributed to the production of this article and have read and approved the final manuscript.

dissolved hydrogen

dissolved oxygen

H₂

molecular hydrogen

methylene blue

MB-Pt

methylene blue-platinum colloid

platinum.

Background

Molecular hydrogen is useful for various novel medical and therapeutic applications. In air, hydrogen gas is potentially explosive, whereas, in an aqueous solution, it is safe and convenient to use. Recent biomedical studies have shown that hydrogen is a physiological regulatory factor that has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic protective effects on cells and organs [1‐5]. As a result, several aqueous solutions of hydrogen have been developed for use in medical applications as well as in health drinks.

A method for determining the concentration of hydrogen in water is very desirable, particularly if it is simpler and more inexpensive than the current state-of-the-art method involving expensive electrochemical gas sensors. Accordingly, we investigated a simple oxidimetry method that involves a redox reaction of methylene blue (MB) oxidant in the presence of a colloidal platinum (Pt) catalyst. MB is well known to react with an equimolar amount of hydrogen in the presence of Pt or palladium to produce colorless reduced MB (leucomethylene blue, leucoMB), as follows:

MB (blue) + 2 H^{+} + 2 e^{-} \to leucoMB (colorless)

On the basis of the above equation, we used a volumetric analysis method called oxidimetry to determine the concentration of hydrogen in water by a titration by using the MB-Pt reagent (Figure 1).

Methods/Design

Preparation of MB-Pt reagent

MB (0.3 g) (Waldeck-Gmbh & Co KG, Munster, Germany) was dissolved in 98% ethanol (98.9 g) to give a solution of MB (99.2 g) in ethanol. An aqueous suspension of 2% colloidal Pt (0.8 g) (Tanaka Kikinzoku Group Company) was added to the solution and the mixture was stirred to give 100 g of MB-Pt reagent (MiZ Company, Kanagawa, Japan). The reagent was distributed in small plastic bottles, from each of which one drop of the reagent (17 mg or 0.02 mL) was drawn.

Preparation of hydrogen-rich water samples

Hydrogen-saturated water (0.8 mM) was prepared by bubbling hydrogen gas through purified water. Three concentrations of hydrogen-rich water (0.3, 0.2, and 0.1 mM) were prepared by diluting hydrogen-saturated water with purified water.

Determination of hydrogen concentrations

Electrochemical determination of the hydrogen concentration was performed using an electrochemical gas sensor (model DHD1-1, DKK-TOA Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Oxidimetry determination of the hydrogen concentration was performed by a redox titration. The MB-Pt reagent was added dropwise to 20-mL samples of hydrogen-rich water until the solution changed from blue to colorless (Figure 2).

Results/Discussion

One drop of the MB-Pt reagent provides 17 mg of the reagent. When the reagent is added to a hydrogen-rich water sample, the molar concentration of hydrogen in a sample is determined as follows:

Moles of H_{2} per sample = 0.017 \times (0.3 / 100) / 319.85 \times (number of drops consumed by titration)

From this relationship, we infer that one drop (17 mg) of the reagent contains 0.16 μmol of MB. If the MB-Pt reagent is added dropwise to 20 mL of hydrogen-saturated water (0.8 mmol/L), approximately 100 drops of the reagent are required to reach the titration endpoint (when the solution turns from blue to colorless), as follows:

\begin{gathered} 0.8 mmol / (1000 mL / 20 mL) = 16 μ mol \\ 16 μ mol / 0.16 μ mol / drop = 100 drops \end{gathered}

However, when we added the MB-Pt reagent to 20 mL of hydrogen water (0.8 mmol/L), only 55 drops of the reagent were required to reach the titration endpoint. The difference between the calculated and actual values is attributed to the evaporation of hydrogen during the measurement time and the quantity difference between MB and hydrogen in water. Thus, we estimate that one drop of the MB-Pt reagent in 20 mL of hydrogen water is actually reduced by 0.29 μmol of hydrogen, as follows:

16 μ mol / 55 drops = 0.29 μ mol / drop

In other words, if 20 ml of hydrogen water reduces one drop of the MB-Pt reagent, the concentration of dissolved hydrogen (DH) is 14.5 μmol/L or 0.03 mg/L, as follows:

0.29 μ mol / drop \times (1000 mL / 20 mL) = 14.5 μ mol / Lor 0.03 mg / L

Similarly, if 20 ml of hydrogen water reduces three drops of the MB-Pt reagent, the concentration of DH is 43.6 μmol/L or 0.09 mg/L.

Table 1 lists the DH concentrations determined by both the known electrochemical method and our oxidimetry method. The two methods yield approximately equivalent results.

Table 1

Concentrations of Dissolved Hydrogen in Hydrogen Water, Determined by Electrochemical and Oxidimetry Methods

HW	DH (mg/l)	MB-Pt	MB→DH (mg/l)	DO (mg/l)	T (centigrade)
0.8 mM	1.60	55	1.65	0.54	24.8
	1.60	55	1.65	0.54	24.8
	1.62	56	1.68	0.45	23.7
	1.58	54	1.62	0.43	23.8
0.3 mM	0.62	19	0.57	1.6	25.3
	0.62	20	0.6	1.6	25.3
	0.60	18	0.54	2.1	23.5
	0.62	19	0.57	2.3	23.8
0.2 mM	0.41	12	0.36	2.1	25.1
	0.42	13	0.39	2.3	25.1
	0.41	13	0.39	2.4	23.6
	0.39	12	0.36	2.4	23.7
0.1 mM	0.22	5	0.15	3.0	24.8
	0.22	5	0.15	3.4	24.8
	0.20	4	0.12	4.3	23.8
	0.19	4	0.12	4.4	23.7

HW: hydrogen water, DH: dissolved hydrogen, MB-Pt: number of drops of methylene blue with colloidal platinum at the titration endpoint, MB→DH: calculated value of DH from MB-Pt, DO: dissolved oxygen, T: water temperature. DO was measured by a DO meter (model D-25 DO meter, Horiba).

Although DO was degassed through the process of hydrogen bubbling for hydrogen-saturated water (0.8 mmol/L), DO in purified water used for dilution was mixed with hydrogen-saturated water, which caused an increase in DO in hydrogen water with dilution magnification. This seemed to cause a deviation in the DH values obtained using the oxidimetry method from those using electrochemical method at a lower concentration of DH.

To study the influence of DO in hydrogen-rich water, we also measured DO-regulated hydrogen water prepared by diluting hydrogen-saturated water with DO-regulated purified water, where DO was degassed by bubbling inert N₂ gas through purified water (Table 2).

Table 2

Concentrations of Dissolved Hydrogen in DO-Regulated Hydrogen water, Determined by Electrochemical and Oxidimetry Methods

HW	DH (mg/l)	MB	MB→DH (mg/l)	DO (mg/l)	T (centigrade)
0.8 mM	1.60	55	1.65	0.54	24.8
	1.60	55	1.65	0.54	24.8
	1.62	56	1.68	0.45	23.7
	1.58	54	1.62	0.43	23.8
0.3 mM	0.61	21	0.63	0.62	23.7
	0.61	21	0.63	0.62	23.7
	0.61	21	0.63	0.87	25.2
	0.62	20	0.6	0.88	25.3
0.2 mM	0.41	14	0.42	0.68	23.8
	0.41	13	0.39	0.68	23.7
	0.40	13	0.39	0.89	25.1
	0.41	13	0.39	0.87	25.1
0.1 mM	0.19	6	0.18	0.81	23.5
	0.19	6	0.18	0.81	23.5
	0.20	6	0.18	0.88	25.1
	0.19	6	0.18	0.91	25.1

The values of hydrogen water for 0.8 mM are quoted from Table 1.

The DH values obtained from the oxidimetry method approached those obtained using the electrochemical method. DO as an oxidant would compete with MB when molecular hydrogen reduces MB on the surface of Pt.

•Statistical analysis

Sixteen respective observed values obtained using the electrochemical and the oxidimetry methods were analyzed, premising that these values correspond to each another.

A linear relationship between the values obtained using the oxidimetry method and those obtained using the electrochemical method was shown. This relationship was found using a regression model (linear regression model) having regression coefficients, in which the values obtained using the oxidimetry method were regarded as response variables and those obtained using the electrochemical method were regarded as explanatory variables. The amount of information that can be explained by the straight line was indicated by the coefficient of determination (R²).

Moreover, a second-order component was added to the regression model to determine whether it deviates from linearity. In addition, the influence of DO and water temperature on the oxidimetry method was also determined.

•Analysis results

1. Linear relation equation

The linear regression equation for the electrochemical and the oxidimetry methods for DO-regulated hydrogen water is given below. Here, the correlation coefficient r was 0.9998, the coefficient of determination R² was 0.9995, suggesting that the linear line indicated 99.95% of the information, and the deviation from the linear line or the standard deviation (error standard deviation) was 0.0129 (Table 3 and Figure 3).

Table 3

Linear regression equation for the electrochemical and the oxidimetry methods for DO-regulated hydrogen water

Parameter	Regression coefficient	Standard error	t value	p value
Intercept	-0.0229	0.0053	-4.33	0.0007
Electrochemical method	1.0459	0.0060	175.38	< 0.0001
Coefficient of determination	Correlation coefficient	Error standard deviation
0.9995	0.9998	0.0129

Value obtained by the oxidimetry method = - 0.0229 + 1.0459 \times value obtained by the electrochemical method

The linear regression equation for DO-unregulated hydrogen water is given below. Here, the correlation coefficient r was 0.9997, the coefficient of determination R² was 0.9993, suggesting that the linear line indicated 99.93% of the information, and the deviation from the linear line or the standard deviation (error standard deviation) was 0.0158 (Table 4 and Figure 4).

Table 4

Linear regression equation for the electrochemical and the oxidimetry methods for DO-unregulated hydrogen water

Parameter	Regression coefficient	Standard error	t value	p value
Intercept	-0.0837	0.0066	-12.75	< 0.0001
Electrochemical method	1.0829	0.0074	146.47	< 0.0001
Coefficient of determination	Correlation coefficient	Error standard deviation
0.9993	0.9997	0.0158

Value obtained by the oxidimetry method = - 0.0837 + 1.0829 \times value obtained by the electrochemical method

2. Examination of linearity

To examine linearity between the electrochemical and the oxidimetry methods, a second-order term b2 was added to the linear regression model as 'y = b0 + b1 × × + b2 × x²', and the significance level was determined (where b2 is regarded as significant if there is curvature with a second- or a higher-order term).

As a result, the second-order components for DO-regulated hydrogen water (p = 0.8974) and DO-unregulated hydrogen water (p = 0.7429) were not statistically significant, and the relationship between the electrochemical and the oxidimetry methods was linear in both cases (Tables 5 and 6, respectively).

Table 5

Examination of curvature in the electrochemical and the oxidimetry methods for DO-regulated hydrogen water

Parameter	Regression coefficient	Standard error	t value	p value
Intercept	-0.0243	0.0120	-2.02	0.0647
Electrochemical method: first-order component	1.0508	0.0377	27.84	< 0.0001
Electrochemical method: second-order component	-0.0026	0.0197	-0.13	0.8974

Table 6

Examination of curvature in the electrochemical and the oxidimetry methods for DO-unregulated hydrogen water

Parameter	Regression coefficient	Standard error	t value	p value
Intercept	-0.0790	0.0156	-5.07	0.0002
Electrochemical method: first-order component	1.0669	0.0483	22.08	< 0.0001
Electrochemical method: second-order component	0.0084	0.0251	0.34	0.7429

3. Influence of DO and water temperature on the oxidimetry method

The influence of DO and water temperature on the oxidimetry method was studied using a multiple regression model having values measured by the oxidimetry method as response variables and the values measured by the electrochemical method, values measured by the DO meter (mg/L), water temperature (degree Celsius), and the interaction between the electrochemical method and DO as explanatory variables. The result showed that water temperature is not statistically significant (Table 7).

Table 7

Statistical test results of the multiple regression model having values measured by the oxidimetry method as response variables, values measured by the electrochemical method, values measured by the DO meter (mg/L), water temperature (degree Celsius), and the interaction between the electrochemical method and DO as explanatory variables

		Type III
Source	Degree of freedom	Sum of squares	Mean sum of squares	F ratio	p value
Electrochemical method	1	2.5041	2.5041	12891.5	< 0.0001
DO meter (mg/L)	1	0.0018	0.0018	9.18	0.0060
Water temperature (degree Celsius)	1	0.0003	0.0003	1.67	0.2088
Interaction between electrochemical method and DO	1	0.0014	0.0014	7.46	0.0119

The influence of only DO on the oxidimetry method was then studied using a multiple regression model with the same response and explanatory variables mentioned above, except for water temperature.

The relationship between the oxidimetry method, electrochemical method, DO, and the interaction between electrochemical method and DO is given below. As DO increases by 1.0, the value obtained by the oxidimetry method drops 0.0117, and the gradient for the oxidimetry and the electrochemical methods drops 0.0358 from +1.0575 (Table 8).

Table 8

Relationship among the oxidimetry method, the electrochemical method, and DO for DO-regulated hydrogen water (multiple regression analysis)

Parameter	Regression coefficient	Standard error	t value	p value
Intercept	-0.0076	0.0074	-1.02	0.316
Electrochemical method	1.0575	0.0094	112.96	< 0.0001
DO meter (mg/L)	-0.0117	0.0041	-2.82	0.0094
Interaction between electrochemical method and DO	-0.0358	0.0126	-2.85	0.0088

\begin{gathered} Value obtained by the oxidimetry method = - 0.0076 + 1.0575 \times value obtained by theelectrochemical method - 0.0117 \\ \times DO - 0.0358 \times interaction between electrochemical method and DO \end{gathered}

•Discussion

The linear relationship between the electrochemical and the oxidimetry methods for DO-regulated hydrogen water is obtained as shown below. Here, the intercept is almost 0 (-0.0229), and the gradient of the line is 1.0459 or approximately 1. These findings indicate that the oxidimetry method reflects the numerical values obtained using the electrochemical method correctly, i.e., the accuracy is sufficient.

Value obtained by the oxidimetry method = - 0.0229 + 1.0459 \times value obtained by the electrochemical method

The correlation coefficient r is 0.9998, the coefficient of determination R² is 0.9995, suggesting that the linear line indicates 99.95% of the information, and the deviation from the linear line or the standard deviation is 0.0129, which is almost equal to the minimum displaying unit of 0.01. The results show that the oxidimetry method has sufficient precision (accuracy) and can be used as a substitute for the electrochemical method.

The linear regression equation for DO-unregulated hydrogen water is given below.

Value obtained by the oxidimetry method = - 0.0837 + 1.0829 \times value obtained by the electrochemical method

Multiple regression analysis reveals that as DO increases by 1.0, the value based on the oxidimetry method drops 0.0117, and the gradient of the oxidimetry method and the electrochemical method drops 0.0358.

The measured hydrogen concentration of the solution was approximately between 0.2 and 1.6 mg/L at this time. The oxidimetry method was practically sufficient to measure the hydrogen concentration to one decimal place within this range. The oxidimetry method is inferred to be useful for a substitute for the electrochemical method.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Toshihito Furukawa at the Biostatistical Research Corporation for statistical analysis.

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Competing interests

This study protocol was funded by MiZ Company. Tomoki Seo, Ryosuke Kurokawa and Bunpei Sato are all employees of MiZ Company.

Authors' contributions

The authors equally contributed to the production of this article and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Authors’ original file for figure 4

Ohsawa I, Ishikawa M, Takahashi K, Watanabe M, Nishimaki K, Yamagata K, Katsura K, Katayama Y, Asoh S, Ohta S: Hydrogen acts as a therapeutic antioxidant by selectively reducing cytotoxic oxygen radicals. Nat Med. 2007, 13 (6): 688-94. 10.1038/nm1577.CrossRefPubMed

Nakashima-Kamimura N, Mori T, Ohsawa I, Asoh S, Ohta S: Molecular hydrogen alleviates nephrotoxicity induced by an anti-cancer drug cisplatin without compromising anti-tumor activity in mice. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009, 64 (4): 753-61. 10.1007/s00280-008-0924-2.CrossRefPubMed

Buchholz BM, Kaczorowski DJ, Sugimoto R, Yang R, Wang Y, Billiar TR, McCurry KR, Bauer AJ, Nakao A: Hydrogen inhalation ameliorates oxidative stress in transplantation induced intestinal graft injury. Am J Transplant. 2008, 8 (10): 2015-24. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02359.x.CrossRefPubMed

Fu Y, Ito M, Fujita Y, Ito M, Ichihara M, Masuda A, Suzuki Y, Maesawa S, Kajita Y, Hirayama M, Ohsawa I, Ohta S, Ohno K: Molecular hydrogen is protective against 6-hydroxydopamine-induced nigrostriatal degeneration in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett. 2009, 453 (2): 81-5. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.02.016.CrossRefPubMed

Cai J, Kang Z, Liu K, Liu W, Li R, Zhang JH, Luo X, Sun X: Neuroprotective effects of hydrogen saline in neonatal hypoxia-ischemia rat model. Brain Res. 2009, 1256: 129-37.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: A convenient method for determining the concentration of hydrogen in water: use of methylene blue with colloidal platinum
verfasst von: Tomoki Seo
Ryosuke Kurokawa
Bunpei Sato
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2012
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: Medical Gas Research / Ausgabe 1/2012
Elektronische ISSN: 2045-9912
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-9912-2-1

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Hodgkin Lymphom: BrECADD-Regime übertrifft die Erwartungen

05.06.2024 ASCO 2024 Kongressbericht

Das Kombinationsregime BrECADD mit Brentuximab vedotin ermöglichte in der Studie HD21 beim fortgeschrittenen klassischen Hodgkin-Lymphom eine unerwartet hohe progressionsfreie Überlebensrate von 94,3% nach vier Jahren. Gleichzeitig war das Regime besser tolerabel als der bisherige Standard eBEACOPP.

Antikörper-Drug-Konjugat verdoppelt PFS bei Multiplem Myelom

05.06.2024 ASCO 2024 Nachrichten

Zwei Phase-3-Studien deuten auf erhebliche Vorteile des Antikörper-Wirkstoff-Konjugats Belantamab-Mafodotin bei vorbehandelten Personen mit Multiplem Myelom: Im Vergleich mit einer Standard-Tripeltherapie wurde das progressionsfreie Überleben teilweise mehr als verdoppelt.

Neuer TKI gegen CML: Höhere Wirksamkeit, seltener Nebenwirkungen

05.06.2024 Chronische myeloische Leukämie Nachrichten

Der Tyrosinkinasehemmer (TKI) Asciminib ist älteren Vertretern dieser Gruppe bei CML offenbar überlegen: Personen mit frisch diagnostizierter CML entwickelten damit in einer Phase-3-Studie häufiger eine gut molekulare Response, aber seltener ernste Nebenwirkungen.

Hereditäres Angioödem: Tablette könnte Akuttherapie erleichtern

05.06.2024 Hereditäres Angioödem Nachrichten

Medikamente zur Bedarfstherapie bei hereditärem Angioödem sind bisher nur als Injektionen und Infusionen verfügbar. Der Arzneistoff Sebetralstat kann oral verabreicht werden und liefert vielversprechende Daten.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Electronic supplementary material

Competing interests

Authors' contributions

Background

Methods/Design

Preparation of MB-Pt reagent

Preparation of hydrogen-rich water samples

Determination of hydrogen concentrations

Results/Discussion

•Statistical analysis

•Analysis results

1. Linear relation equation

2. Examination of linearity

3. Influence of DO and water temperature on the oxidimetry method

•Discussion

Acknowledgements

Competing interests

Authors' contributions

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Neuroprotective, neurotherapeutic, and neurometabolic effects of carbon monoxide

Evaluating effects of normobaric oxygen therapy in acute stroke with MRI-based predictive models

Are volatile anesthetics neuroprotective or neurotoxic?

Hydrogen-rich water inhibits glucose and α,β -dicarbonyl compound-induced reactive oxygen species production in the SHR.Cg-Lepr cp /NDmcr rat kidney

Effect of carbon monoxide on Mycobacterium tuberculosispathogenesis

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment in autism spectrum disorders

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Hodgkin Lymphom: BrECADD-Regime übertrifft die Erwartungen

Antikörper-Drug-Konjugat verdoppelt PFS bei Multiplem Myelom

Neuer TKI gegen CML: Höhere Wirksamkeit, seltener Nebenwirkungen

Hereditäres Angioödem: Tablette könnte Akuttherapie erleichtern

Update Innere Medizin