Background
Methods
Paramedics & Out-of-hospital | Ultrasound | Education |
---|---|---|
emergency medical services/ | ultrasound.mp. | Education/ |
emergency medical technicians/ | Ultrasonography/ | Teaching/ |
emergency treatment/ | sonography.mp. | education.mp. |
emergency medicine/ | Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color/ | Simulation Training/ |
ambulances/ | Diagnostic Imaging/ | training.mp. |
air ambulances/ | ultraso$.mp. | educat$.mp. |
retrieval | sonograph$.mp. | teach$.mp. |
HEMS | train$.mp. | |
first aid/ | ||
military medicine/ | ||
prehospital | ||
pre-hospital | ||
paramedic | ||
ambulance | ||
out-of-hospital | ||
out of hospital | ||
ems | ||
emt | ||
emergency services | ||
emergency medical service | ||
emergency technician | ||
emergency practitioner | ||
emergency dispatch | ||
emergency despatch | ||
first responder | ||
public access defibrillation | ||
emergency rescue | ||
emergency resus | ||
emergency triage | ||
advanced life support | ||
community support co-ordinator | ||
community support coordinator | ||
emergency care practitioner | ||
extended care practitioner | ||
physician assistant |
-
Inclusion and exclusion criteriaStudies were eligible for inclusion if they (i) reported on POCUS educational approaches for paramedics and out-of-hospital, and (ii) were published between January 1990 and the 6th of April 2016. This time period was selected because (i) a preliminary review and intimate knowledge of the field suggested there would not be any relevant articles prior to the year 1990, (ii) cost, and (iii) to only include current and modern methods of education. Studies were excluded if they were not written in English, or if they did not include paramedic providers.The data bases were searched by one author (AO). Following the search, duplicates were removed and the titles and abstracts subsequently appraised for eligibility by five independent authors (BM, NR, TSc, CM and BW). The full texts of titles were sourced and reviewed for those studies which were considered potentially relevant. The selection process is described below, see Fig. 1.×
Author, year Country | Participants and Number | Operators & experience with US | Aim | Clinical Conditions | Test Population | Methods |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baldaranov et al. 2015 [20] Germany |
n = 6 Paramedics | US naive | To design and evaluate a dedicated stroke educational program for paramedics including transcranial POCUS. | Stroke | Real patients | Prospective observational study |
Booth et al. 2015 UK [14] |
n = 9 Paramedics | US naive | Assess whether paramedics can be trained to perform & interpret echo | Cardiac arrest | Healthy models | Prospective observational pilot study |
Brooke et al. 2010 UK [37] |
n = 10. Paramedics | Advanced paramedics, US naive | Determine if advanced paramedics can be trained to acquire and interpret quality ultrasound images | Pneumothorax | Pre-recorded video clips | Prospective observational cohort study |
Cappa et al. 2015 Arizona [28] | Not reported | ED nurses and paramedics | Determine if a program to train nurses and paramedics to place USGIV’s in the ED decreases the use of central lines. | Peripheral Intravenous access | Not reported | Combined retrospective and prospective observational study |
Chin et al. 2013 USA [16] |
n = 20 Firefighter paramedics | US naive | Determine if EMTs can be trained using Pre-hospital Assessment with US for Emergencies (PAUSE) protocol | Pneumothorax, pericardial effusion & cardiac standstill | Healthy models | Prospective educational intervention study |
Heegaard et al. 2004 USA [7] |
n = 10. Flight nurses & paramedics | >5 years clinical experience | Develop a training program for air medical clinicians using focused POCUS examinations and assess competencies 1 year later. | FAST in medical & trauma cases | Real patients | Prospective observational study |
Heiner & McArthur 2010 USA [17] |
n = 20. EMTs | US naive | Study ability of EMTs to be trained to recognize presence of fractures using portable POCUS | Long bone fractures | Simulation model on turkey leg bone | Prospective observational study |
Knapp et al. 2012 USA [22] |
n = 90 Paramedics 70 EMT-Ps and 20 EMT-Is | Paramedic and Intermediate EMT providers. US naïve. | Determine whether EMS providers at the EMT-intermediate and EMT Paramedic levels can acquire knowledge and skill to operate portable POCUS and achieve high level of accuracy performing cardiac and FAST exams. | Cardiac and FAST | Live standardised patients | Prospective Cohort Educational Study |
Lahham et al. 2015 USA [21] |
n = 4 Paramedics | US naïve | Determine whether paramedics are capable of obtaining cardiac POCUS images and can use these for adequate clinical decision making, as well as identify cardiac activity in cardiac arrest patients. | Cardiac evaluation | Real patients | Prospective educational intervention study |
Lema et al. 2014 New York [26] |
n = 31 paramedics n = 2 residents | Naïve US-guided intubation experience | Assess whether paramedics and residents could dynamically identify correct ETT placement in a cadaver model using US. | Correct endotracheal tube placement | Cadaver models | Prospective observational study |
Lyon et al. 2012 USA [23] |
n = 8 (4 critical care flight paramedics & 4 critical care nurses) | Two with previous limited US exposure, none with experience with clinical US | Determine if pre-hospital critical care providers can be trained to determine presence/absence of the sliding lung sign on POCUS. | Pneumothorax | Cadaver models | Blinded RCT |
Press et al. 2013 USA [24] |
n = 33 Helicopter paramedics and flight nurses | Majority had no US experience. | Effectiveness of an EFAST training program | FAST | Both simulated patients (with pathology) and real patients | Prospective observational cohort study |
Quick et al. 2016 USA [8] |
n = 26 flight crew members (flight nurses and paramedics) | In HEMS helicopter with flight crew. US training prior to study commencing. | To evaluate the ability of non-physician aeromedical providers to identify pneumothorax in-flight. | Pneumothorax | Initial training: Healthy models and swine animal models. Study: Real patients | Prospective observational study |
Roline et al. 2013 USA [27] | Flight Crew
n = not reported | In HEMS helicopter with flight crew | Evaluate feasibility of bedside thoracic US in helicopter environment | Pneumothorax | Healthy model in training. Real non-pregnant patients transported by HEMS | Prospective pilot study |
Unleur et al. 2011 Turkey [18] |
n = 4. Paramedics | Senior paramedics working in ED triage. US naive | Accuracy of paramedic performed FAST in ED after trauma | FAST | Real patients | Prospective observational study |
Walcher et al. 2010 Germany |
n = 9. 5 ED doctors & 4 paramedics (403 participants total trained from 2003 to 06) | US naive. US training day then performed on scene. | Evaluate effectiveness of new training course for prehospital FAST (P-FAST) | FAST in trauma patients | Healthy models, models with positive FAST (ascites or peritoneal dialysis), and real patients | Prospective, multi-centre study |
West et al. 2014 USA [19] |
n = 9 paramedics (10 enrolled but one pulled out on examination day) | Paramedics with field experience but US naïve | Evaluate the accuracy andtime taken to perform multiple FAST exams in a simulated MCI setting. | FAST in trauma patients during MCI | Healthy models and models with positive FAST (peritoneal dialysis patients) | Single-blinded RCT |
Vitto et al. 2015 USA [25] |
n = 15 flight nurses and paramedics | . US naïve | Evaluate the ability of flight nurses and paramedics to learn and retain U/S for use during flight and ground transport. | Not Reported | Healthy models and US simulations using US simulator | Prospective observational cohort study |
Study | Education Method | Educational Focus | Duration | Education details | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baldaranov et al. \2015 [20] | Didactic (online) + practical | Application & interpretation | 2-months | A course of 2-months. Web based curricula designed in two parts: (1) theoretical and (2) real life training under neurological supervision. | Study is ongoing. |
Booth et al. 2015 [14] | Didactic & practical | Application, knowledge & interpretation | 2 h of lectures & 4 h of practical and simulation | Paramedics were trained to under-take two attempts at a subxiphoid and parasternal long axis view and to assess images for the following: movement, function, rhythm, fluid and chambers. This systematic approach focused on evaluating the presence and quality of cardiac movement, and to detect conditions amenable to therapeutic intervention. To simulate actual OHCA, some scanning was performed on the floor. Participants completed a pre-course and post-course questionnaire. | 88% obtained successful views during timed 10s pulse check Theoretical knowledge improved (54% pre-course to 89% post course) |
Brooke et al. 2011 | Didactic & practical | Application, knowledge & interpretation | 2-day education & training program | Participants reviewed the pathophysiology and management of patients with pneumothorax before learning to differentiate the normal and abnormal sonographic appearance of the lungs. Lung US was taught in a systematic manner. Following the program, the participants were assessed by (1) the ability to detect the presence or absence of a pneumothorax using 30 prerecorded lung US video clip images and (2) an OSCE. | All paramedics passed examination with standard judged to be equivalent to that expected of candidates in thoracic module of College of Emergency Medicine level 2 US program. |
Cappa et al. 2015 [28] | Not Reported | Not Reported | Not Reported | Not Reported | A non-statistically significant decrease (9.2%) in the use of central lines in the ED following implementation of paramedic and nursing-led ultrasound program. |
Chin et al. 2013 [16] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 1 h lecture & 1 h practical | Paramedics received training on the basics of ultrasonography, the PAUSE protocol, image acquisition, and basic image interpretation, followed by a 1-h hands-on session. An Emergency Physician trained in bedside US demonstrated the following views on a human model: a thoracic view of the pleural interface of the lung, a subxiphoid cardiac view, and a parasternal long cardiac view. Participants were then assessed by (1) image recognition and (2) the ability to acquire an adequate view of the left and right pleural interfaces and one view of the heart without assistance. | Average score 9.1/10 on image recognition test 6 paramedics were unable to identify cardiac standstill. 100% of images acquired by paramedics were satisfactory to evaluate PTX 55% of paramedics obtained satisfactory cardiac views |
Heegaard et al. 2004 [7] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 7 h training program followed by 8 h of hands-on supervised training in ED | Introduction to US, physics and the use of US within air medical practice. This was followed by information on echocardiography, abdominal US, pelvic and obstetrical US, and the FAST examination with a demonstration. The 3-h practical session involved individual instruction before each clinician performed a further 8-h in an ED on emergency patients. In addition, learning resources were made available via a website. At the end of 6 weeks a final training session was provided and skills were assessed. This included (1) a written test and (2) a practical imaging test. These same tests were administered 1 year from the initiation of the program. | US for pericardial effusion: sensitivity & specificity 100% (1/86 cases positive), no false negative or false positive cardiac US Abdominal trauma cases: sensitivity 60%, and specificity 93%. Immediately post-course questionnaire score of 82% vs. percentage when administered 1 year later - 71% |
Heiner & McArthur 2010 [17] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 2- min orientation/training | Participants received a 2-min standardized orientation and training session ensuring familiarization with examination of the semi-opaque fracture model. They then sonographically evaluated the 5 completely opaque models. | Sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 95.0% across 5 different fracture patterns. |
Knapp et al. 2012 [22] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 1 h online home based study program followed by 4 h training program | A four- hour training program that consisted of a didactic lecture, practice scanning, and testing scenarios. All participants underwent a pre- and post-training written test. The final testing scenarios included one normal and abnormal cardiac, and one normal and abnormal FAST. All scenarios were performed on live standardized patients and graded in an OSCE format. | Average score on the pre and post-test was 73% and 95% respectively (p < 0.0001). EMS providers (n = 90) scored on average 98.9 points out of 100 on the OSCE testing stations. EMT-Ps (n = 70) scored, on average 98.9 points out of 100 on the OSCE stations. Average score for EMT-Is (n = 20) was 99.1 points out of 100 on the OSCE stations. |
Lahham et al. 2015 [21] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 3-h session on POCUS that included didactics, hands-on training and a final test. | A three-hour session on POCUS including didactics, hands-on training and a final test was conducted. Participants then used POCUS in a clinical setting during dispatch calls and saved scans related to: chest pain, dyspnea, loss of consciousness, trauma, or cardiac arrest. The scans were later evaluated by two independent ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physicians. | Paramedics were able to obtain adequate scans 89% of the time. Two scans were considered of inadequate diagnostic quality. Two cardiac arrest studies were reported and paramedics correctly identified both of these cases as cardiac standstill. |
Lema et al. 2014 [26] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 10 min lecture and hands-on session | Subjects intubated four cadavers without POCUS guidance and were assessed for correct tube placement by an emergency physician. All participants then underwent a 10-min lecture and hands-on session about POCUS identification of tracheal versus esophageal tube placement. Participants then intubated four cadavers using POCUS guidance and were assessed for correct tube placement. | Correct tube placement improved from 87.1% (n = 132) without POCUS to 95.3% (n = 128) with POCUS guidance (p = 0.018). |
Lyon et al. 2012 [23] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 25 min instructional session | A cadaver was used as a model for demonstrating the presence or absence of the SLS. A total of 6 intubations, yielding a total of 48 trials, were performed. With bag valve ventilation and endotracheal intubation, the pleural movements of the cadaver result in the appearance of the SLS. When intubated in the esophagus, bag valve ventilation results in no pleural movement and, thus, no SLS. The cadavers were randomly intubated, using a random number generator, in the trachea or in the esophagus. The presence or absence of the SLS was confirmed before each trial by the investigators. | Correct identification in 46 out of 48 trials. At the 9-month follow up the presence of absence of SLS was identified in 56/56 trials resulting in sensitivity and specificity of 100%. |
Press et al. 2013 [24] | Didactic & practical | Application, knowledge & interpretation | 2 h lectures & hands-on training followed by real patient training over 6 weeks | Baseline knowledge was ascertained via a pre-test before a 2-h lecture. In an instructor-participant ratio of 1:4 participants completed a FAST on different models. The second stage of training occurred over a 6-week period. APPs in groups of two attended a 4-h practical session with one of three emergency ultra-sonographers. APPs performed a minimum of four EFAST with supervised instruction on real patients. Six Web-based educational modules, 10–20 min in length progressively covered the techniques of EFAST scanning. Three weeks into the second phase of training, APPs practiced EFAST on trauma patients in flight. Finally, APPs attended a 1-h classroom lecture reviewing EFAST techniques and imaging. The pre-training test was re-administered and an OSCE was administered immediately after the post-training test. | Mean score for online module pretest was 43% (0 of 33 passed). Mean score post-test 78% (28 of 33 passed) 79% passed OSCE first attempt |
Quick et al. 2016 [8] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | Single series of lectures followed by real time US examinations. | Training consisted of didactic series of lectures, followed by real-time US examinations of the thorax on healthy human volunteers. Live animal models; (swine) were also utilised to visualise both normal and abnormal thoracic US findings. | Pre-hospital sensitivity of 68% and specificity 96% compared to sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 98% in emergency department of same patients. Aeromedical accuracy 91% vs surgeon 98% in the diagnosis of pneumothoraces. |
Roline et al. 2013 [27] | Didactic (online) & practical | Application & interpretation | 15 min online lecture + 60 min hands-on training | Care providers reviewed a standardized 15-min lecture online, which incorporated a review of thoracic ultrasound followed by a 60-min hands-on training session on healthy models during flight in the supine position. Participants evaluated the presence or absence of the sliding lung sign and recorded 6-s video clips of each side of the chest during that time. | 58% of patients had thoracic US. Substantial agreement (kappa = 0.67) between helicopter operator and expert reviewer who looked at images later. Reviewer rated 54% of the images taken as ‘good’ quality. |
Ulneur et al. 2011 [18] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 4 h didactic training + 4 h hands-on training | Training was provided by a radiologist to conduct a FAST assessment. Results were recorded as positive/negative for free fluid in each case. Following training, 127 patients were evaluated by the paramedics. Patients then underwent abdominal US by radiology specialists who were blind to the study protocol but not to the clinical status of the patients. Computerized abdominal tomography (CAT) was ordered as desired by general surgeon consultants and evaluated by radiologists who were blind to the study. The gold standard for the presence of free fluid was the official radiologist reports of USG and CAT. | Paramedic performed FAST: sensitivity 84.62%, specificity 97.37% |
West et al. 2014 [19] | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 4-h course involving both lecture and hands-on training | Training consisted of a 4-h course taught by a certified ultra-sonographer and board certified emergency physician. The course involved both lecture and hands on portions with access and training on both control and positives. After the training course a 2-week waiting period was allowed to lapse prior to simulation testing. | False-positive rate of 59% significantly higher than the false-negative rate of 41% (p < 0.01). Overall sensitivity of FAST scan in MCI was 67% and specificity of 56%. Average 121.8 s per exam. |
Walcher et al. 2010 | Didactic & practical | Application & interpretation | 1-day course | Participants were introduced to the concepts of US and FAST in trauma. During three practical sessions, participants performed FAST under the supervision of experienced clinical instructors with a ratio of 1:2. Each participant performed up to 30 ultrasound procedures. Initially, participants performed the standardised procedure of FAST on both healthy volunteers and patient volunteers. Participants then learnt how to perform the ultrasound procedure under difficult circumstances. Finally, real-time scenarios of healthy or patient volunteers found in critical situations following an accident were presented. During the study period of 12 months, FAST investigations were performed on-scene and later evaluated for time and accuracy. The accuracy of the findings were verified using FAST and CT scanning in the emergency department as the gold standard. | Results from the 9 participants (C-group) compared with results from 2 other groups: P-group (10 trauma surgeons trained in FAST with <3 years experience) & I-group (9 ED flight physicians using US occasionally but not formally trained) After training C-group achieved 100% accuracy (in 39 procedures) No significant difference between C group vs P group or I group |
Vitto et al. 2015 [25] | Didactic (including online component) + practical | Knowledge & application | 6 h US training course over 4 month period | Participants completed a pre-test followed by a 90-min didactic lecture and 90-min hands on simulation session. Following this they were given 24/7 access to the POCUS. Four months following initial training the participants completed another 90-min didactic lecture and 90-min hands on simulation before completing a post-test questionnaire and survey. | Pretest and post test scores were 78% and 85% respectively. |