Background
Methods
Research questions
Study design and search strategy
Inclusion criteria
Screening
Data extraction
Data synthesis and analysis
Results
Geographical distribution, year and type of publications
Characteristics | n (%) |
---|---|
Number of reviewed studies
| 78 |
Total no. of individuals included in the studies
| |
Described number of dengue cases | 1,900,499 |
Described number of fatal cases | 8,650 |
Region of publication
| |
Americas | 39 (50) |
Asia | 30 (38.4) |
Europe | 7 (9.0) |
Africa | 2 (2.6) |
Dengue case classification used
| |
WHO 1997 | 64 (82) |
WHO 2009 | 6 (7.7) |
Othera | 8 (10.3) |
Type of study
| |
Descriptive | 60 (76.9) |
Analytical | 12 (15.4) |
Review | 6 (7.7) |
Source of information
| |
Surveillance data | 3 (3.8) |
Articles (for review documents) | 5 (6.5) |
Hospital chart and surveillance | 26 (33.3) |
Hospital charts | 44 (56.4) |
Study setting | |
Hospital based | 43 (55.1) |
Population based | 27 (34.6) |
Other | 8 (10.3) |
Primary outcome
| |
General description of dengue cases | 55 (70.5) |
Specific description of dengue fatal cases | 23 (29.5) |
Described cause of death
| |
Only dengue | 62 (79.5) |
Dengue and other conditions | 16 (20.5) |
Overall study quality
b
| |
Well conducted | 40 (51.3) |
Could be improved | 38 (48.7) |
Dengue and dengue mortality
SDHs described in dengue mortality literature
Characteristics | Presence of information | |
---|---|---|
Yes (%) | No (%) | |
Individual dimension
| ||
Age | 75 (96.2) | 3 (3.8) |
Comorbidities | 30 (38.5) | 48 (61.5) |
Type of infection | 40 (51.3) | 38 (48.7) |
Immunological status | 14 (17.9) | 64 (82.1) |
Sex/Gender | 67 (85.9) | 11 (14.1) |
Ethnicity | 17 (21.8) | 61 (78.2) |
Occupation | 3 (3.8) | 75 (96.2) |
Income | 1 (1.3) | 77 (98.7) |
Education | 3 (3.8) | 75 (96.2) |
Social and environmental dimension
| ||
Political context | 3 (3.8) | 75 (96.2) |
War or Conflict | 78 (100) | |
Poverty | 2 (2.6) | 76 (97.4) |
Social Behavior | 4 (5.1) | 74 (94.9) |
Environmental - Vector Presence | 4 (5.1) | 74 (94.9) |
Virus characteristics | 25 (32.1) | 53 (67.9) |
Health system related
| ||
Specifications about health System | 13 (16.7) | 65 (83.3) |
Access to health care | 6 (7.7) | 72 (92.3) |
Health coverage | 2 (2.6) | 76 (97.4) |
Opportunity for receiving attention | 9 (11.5) | 69 (88.5) |
Quality of attention received | 4 (5.1) | 74 (94.9) |
Length of hospital stay | 10 (12.8) | 68 (87.2) |
Health staff knowledge | 11 (14.1) | 67 (85.9) |
Surveillance | 9 (11.5) | 69 (88.5) |
Individual dimension
Biological components of the individual dimension
Non-biological components of the individual dimension
Social and environmental dimension
Biological components of the environmental dimension
Health systems dimension
Individual dimension | Consideration as determinant for dengue mortality | References | |
---|---|---|---|
SDH | Concepta | Observations | |
Age | Yes | • Age was more often described as a determinant than not. | |
• In children the most affected group were those <15 years old with an emphasis on the group of <5 years old. | |||
• A higher frequency of dengue mortality was reported in adults (mostly in the Americas region) | |||
• Determinant related with immunological status, type of infection and comorbidities. | |||
Comorbidities/ Pre-existing conditions | NC | • Although these conditions might worsen the dengue status, there were not described as directly related to fatal outcomes. | |
• Overlaps of diseases make differential diagnosis difficult and could be considered as independent causes of death. | |||
• The most cited were diabetes, bacterial infections and pregnancy. | |||
Infection type/Immunological status | Yes | • Secondary infections, severe forms and unusual presentations were described as determinants. | |
Sex/Gender | NC | • More dengue cases were described in women, even though the majority of dengue deaths were reported in men. | |
• Statistically significant differences were described between sexes in dengue in severity but not in mortality. | |||
• Gender differences in frequency were related to care-seeking behavior patterns. | |||
Ethnicity | Yes | • A protective role was described for African ancestry/‘Blacks’ and a risk factor for Caucasian/ ‘Whites’. | |
• Described also as determinant related to socioeconomic status and cultural behaviors. | |||
Occupation | No | • Some occupations were listed (mostly in the single case reports) but none was directly linked to fatal outcome. | |
Income | No | • There were no individual reports on the fatal cases’ income. | [92] |
• Although it is related to socioeconomic status, income was not reported as a determinant for dengue mortality. | |||
Education | Yes | • Level of education was described in some cases. | |
• In the content analysis, it was observed that education was described as a determinant for dengue mortality related to knowledge of patients and health staff. |
Social and environmental dimension | Consideration as determinant for dengue mortality | References | |
---|---|---|---|
SDH | Concepta | Observations | |
Poverty | Yes | • Contributes directly to income, education and living conditions. | |
• Represents a barrier for access to health care and thereby contributes to rise in dengue mortality. | |||
Social behavior | Yes | • Absence or delays in care-seeking were described as explaining dengue mortality. | |
• Reflects social and cultural aspects and is related to risk perception and awareness of disease by patients and health staff. | |||
Environmental/vector presence | NC | • Rural residence and geographical barriers were more related to access to health care than to dengue mortality itself. | |
• Vector presence and occurrence of dengue outbreaks were described as a condition that increased the risk of severe forms of dengue. | |||
Virus characteristics | Yes | • Heterogeneous infections and virulence of strains might increase disease severity | |
• Together with type of infection/immunological status, was described as an important determinant. |
Health systems dimension | Consideration as determinant for dengue mortality | References | |
---|---|---|---|
SDH | Concepta | Observations | |
Access to health care | Yes | • Lack of access or presence of barriers to health care and/or supplementary services were often | |
• described in dengue mortality. | |||
Health coverage | NC | • Although health coverage might facilitate the access and health care attention received, it was not specifically described as determinant. | |
Opportunity for receiving attention | Yes | • Limitation in referrals, shock corrections, delayed attention, or early hospital discharge were the most described aspects related to opportunity for attention. | |
Quality of attention received | Yes | • Related as well to health staff knowledge, both technical and scientific quality of attention were described as direct determinants in the cases with wrong praxis. | |
Length of hospital stay | NC | • This item was reported by describing the duration of a hospital stay, but without reporting any association with fatal outcomes. | |
Health staff knowledge | Yes | • Expressed as appropriate management of the disease, thereby decreasing the chance of developing severe forms and dengue mortality. | |
Surveillance | No | • Described as a tool for cases analysis and documentation of outbreaks but not as a determinant. |