Background
Obesity has been identified as a global epidemic with significant public health implications in the twenty-first century [
1]. The prevalence of obesity has more than tripled in the last four decades, with 13% of adults living with obesity and 39% of adults living with overweight [
1]. It is linked to the emergence of a variety of chronic medical illnesses, including diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and certain types of cancer [
1,
2]. The prevalence of obesity varies significantly across and within nations, and this heterogeneity is driven by both individual factors and larger societal and environmental factors [
3]. Because the underlying cause of obesity is multifaceted, determining the direct cause is challenging due to the interactions of various predisposing factors [
4].
Alcohol intake has been examined in different epidemiological studies as a possible risk factor for the development of obesity, in addition to its link with many behavioural and mental health problems [
5]. The results of studies on the association between alcohol consumption and obesity are discordant and inconclusive. While some studies have revealed a positive association [
6‐
9] between alcohol consumption and obesity, other studies have found inverse association [
10‐
12] or no association [
13]. One large population-based study conducted in both Scotland and England examined the associations of alcohol consumption with obesity indicators (body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)) using a seven-day recall method. Results showed a bell-shaped curve for the association between frequency of alcohol consumption (times per month) and obesity indicators [
6]. Another study among the elderly in the UK found that moderate or heavy drinkers (21 or more drinks per week) had higher adiposity levels (waist circumference (WC), WHR, BMI, and percentage-of-body-fat(%BF)) than those who consumed less than one drink per week, irrespective of the type of alcohol and pattern of consumption [
9]. On the other hand, a study on French middle-aged men (50–59 years) using a self-report questionnaire found inverse associations between the frequency of alcohol consumption and obesity indicators independent of total alcohol consumed, with those who consumed alcohol occasionally (1–2 days/week) having higher odds of obesity than those who consumed alcohol more frequently (3–5 days/week) or were daily drinkers [
12]. Another study looked at the effect of alcohol use on abdominal obesity in normal-weight, middle-aged (40–69 years) Korean participants, and the results showed that the frequency of alcohol consumption had no significant association with abdominal obesity in normal-weight adults [
13]. The study also found that male participants who engaged in daily binge drinking (≥ 7 drinks per occasion for males, ≥ 5 drinks per occasion for females) had higher odds of abdominal obesity than less frequent binge drinkers; however, this was not observed among females [
13].
Research on the association between various alcoholic beverages and obesity has shown conflicting results [
9,
14‐
18]. A study of young and middle-aged (20–59 years) Brazilian males indicated that beer and spirit consumption were positively associated with obesity indicators (WC, WHR) but not with wine consumption [
17]. Another study in France, where wine was the most common type of alcoholic beverage consumed, examined the associations between various types of alcoholic beverages and obesity (WHR, BMI). Results showed a significant association between spirit consumption and obesity [
18]. However, no association was observed between beer consumption and obesity [
18]. Another study among senior UK participants (60–79 years) showed that the consumption of beer, wine, spirits, and mixed drinks were all positively associated with BMI, although the greatest effect was seen with beer consumption [
9]. The variability in the evidence of the link between alcohol use and obesity could be attributable to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the methodologies employed, the types of confounders adjusted for, the different alcohol exposure assessments (quantity, frequency, or both), the alcohol intake recall period, and the outcomes of interest (BMI, WC, WHR, %BF, or waist-to-height ratio (WHtR)) studied.
Both alcohol consumption and obesity are considered public health problems in Ireland [
19]. According to the Healthy Ireland Survey 2017, 6 out of 10 adults were affected by either obesity or overweight (23% affected by obesity and 37% affected by overweight) [
19]. Additionally, the proportion of individuals who consumed alcohol was 76%, of whom 39% were considered binge drinkers (≥ 6 standard units of alcohol per occasion) [
19]. To the best of the author’s knowledge, no single study has examined the association between alcohol consumption and obesity in Ireland, despite their high prevalence in the country. The Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) is a standardized tool used internationally to measure harmful alcohol consumption and therefore can provide more comparable and generalisable information on alcohol exposures. It is a modified version of the 10-question AUDIT instrument [
20]. This study will explore the association between harmful alcohol consumption (defined as, AUDIT-C score ≥ 5) [
20] and obesity in the Irish adult population using Healthy Ireland Survey 2017 data.
Method
Study population
The population in this study comprised those aged 25 years and older who had participated in Wave three of the Healthy Ireland Survey 2017. This survey was part of the Healthy Ireland Framework 2013–2025 that aims to improve overall wellbeing and reduce inequality within the population in Ireland [
21]. Access to the anonymized, secondary data was requested from and permitted by the Irish Social Science Data Archive (ISSDA).
Study sample and sampling strategy
The sample of the parent study was selected using a two-stage probability-based methodology with the aid of An Post Ordnance Survey Ireland geographic data [
21]. The sample was determined based on electronic division clusters (each containing less than 500 addresses) to ensure coverage of a wide geographical area. Stratification by region was performed. A total of 686 clusters were selected. The addresses of those who took part in previous waves of the Healthy Ireland Survey were excluded from the third wave. Within each cluster, 20 addresses were systematically selected, with a random start address and fixed interval skips. One household member was selected randomly by interviewers to take part in this survey. The survey was conducted face-to-face by trained interviewers. Verbal consent was obtained from participants aged 18 years and older, and the parents/guardians of participants under 18 years of age provided written consent before participation in the survey. All interviews were performed at participants’ homes using computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). Physical measurements (weight (kg), height (cm), and waist circumference (cm)) were measured by trained staff
. Out of 12389 eligible addresses preselected to take part in the survey, 7487 households aged 15 and older completed the interview, for an overall response rate of 60.4%. A total of 5868 (78%) participants completed the physical measurement examination [
21]. For the purpose of this study only those aged 25 and older were included in this study.
Study design
This was an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study where both descriptive and analytical data were presented.
Ethical approval
This study was based on secondary data from wave three of the Healthy Ireland Survey 2017. The parent survey was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (RCPI) on September 18, 2014 [
19]. For the current study, a request for exemption from full ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sport Science at University College Dublin on 25/2/2021.
Data collection and study instrument
Out of 134 variables presented in the original Healthy Ireland Survey 2017 dataset, twenty-three variables were included in this study. These data comprised sociodemographic data, health-related data, alcohol-related data, and physical measurement data.
Independent variables
Independent variables included alcohol-related variables, which were obtained via face-to-face interview. In this study, participants were classified into two categories: “drinkers” and “non-drinkers.” Drinkers were defined as those who responded “Yes” to the question “Have you ever consumed an alcoholic beverage in your lifetime?” while non-drinkers were defined as those who responded, “I have never had a drink” or only “I drank a few sips of an alcoholic beverage in the past.” For the alcohol frequency question, "How frequently did you consume alcohol in the last 12 months?" and for those who reported drinking alcohol, alcohol frequency was categorized as "less than three drinks per week" and "three or more drinks per week." Binge drinking was defined as the consumption of six or more standard units per occasion for both sexes. According to the response to the question “During the last 12 months, how often did you consume the equivalent of six standard drinks on one occasion?”, and among those who reported consuming alcohol, binge drinking was categorized as “less than one occasion of binge drinking per week” and “one or more occasions of binge drinking per week”.
The Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption, AUDIT-C, tool was used to screen for harmful alcohol consumption [
20]. Three questions included in the AUDIT-C questionnaire were as follows: “How often did you have a drink containing alcohol in the past year?”, “How many drinks containing alcohol did you have on a typical day when you were drinking in the past year?”, and “How often did you have six or more drinks on one occasion in the past year?” The results of these three questions were given scores of 0–2, 3–4, or 5 or higher. A score of 5 or higher was considered harmful drinking [
14]. For the regression analysis, binary variables of harmful alcohol consumption (score < 5 and score ≥ 5) were created.
Dependent variables
The dependent variables of interest in this study were WC and BMI, which were measured by trained staff as per standard protocol. Waist circumference was considered a continuous variable and was measured in centimetres. BMI is expressed as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). BMI was further categorized into three categories: normal weight (< 25. 0 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (≥ 30.0 kg/m2). For the multivariable logistic regression analysis, a binary variable of BMI (< 25.0 kg/m2 and ≥ 25.0 kg/m2) was created. The WC was used as a continuous variable in the multivariable linear regression analysis.
Sociodemographic and health-related variable
Sociodemographic data (including age, sex, marital status, level of education, employment status, urban or rural residency, having a full medical card, and having a private medical card), and health-related data (including general health condition, long-term illness, smoking status, active transportation, and frequency of fruit consumption) were examined to analyse their associations with obesity indicators. For regression analysis, binary variables were created for sociodemographic and health related variables. Answers that were recorded as “don’t know” or data missing from the original dataset were treated as missing variables and thus excluded from the analysis.
Statistical analysis
For descriptive analysis, the categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages (n/%). Anthropometric measurements (BMI, WC) were presented as means (standard deviations, SDs) and medians (range). BMI is further presented in categories and thus expressed in numbers and percentages.
Univariate analyses were performed to examine the associations between sociodemographic data, health-related data, alcohol-related data, and obesity indicators (BMI, WC). The means of continuous variables were compared using the independent Student’s t test. The assumption of normality, homogeneity of variance, and absence of outliers were satisfied. The difference in percentages between groups was compared using the Pearson chi-square (χ2) test. Variables with a p value less than 0.05 in the univariate analysis were retained and included in the multivariable analysis.
Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to analyse the association between harmful alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C score ≥ 5) and WC while controlling for possible confounders. Four different Models were constructed in this regression analysis; with confounding variables (sociodemographic and health-related variables) with significant p values (p < 0.05) were retained and included in the subsequent Model. Model 1 included all variables, while Model 2 was adjusted for sociodemographic data. Model 3 was adjusted for the statistically significant variables in Model 2, along with health-related data (general health, long-term medical illness, smoking status, active travel, and fruit consumption). The fully adjusted Model (Model 4) included the statistically significant variables in Model 3, along with alcohol-related variables (alcohol frequency and binge drinking). The results are presented as linear regression coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Similarly, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between harmful alcohol consumption and BMI using the different Models described earlier. The results are presented as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. The Windows-based statistical package (SPSS version 24) was used to perform the analysis. Two-tailed tests were used, and a p value of < 0. 05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 6864 participants aged 25 and older, who took part in Wave three of the Healthy Ireland Survey, 2017, were included in this study where female participants accounted for more than half of the study population (55.8%) (Table
1). Participants aged 45 and older accounted for nearly two thirds (63.3%)of the study population. Just over half of the participants (56.3%) were married or in a civil partnership, and nearly two-thirds (60.6%) were living in urban areas. Over a third (36.5%) of the participants had a high education level. More than half of the participants (56.0%) were employed.
Table 1
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants according to obesity indicators {waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI)} based on Healthy Ireland Survey 2017 data
Age (years) |
25–44 | 2517 (36.7%) | 91.7 (13.72) | < 0.001a | 880 (35.1%) | 765 (30.5%) | 865 (34.5%) | < 0.001b |
45 + | 4346 (63.3%) | 97.0 (14.68) | | 903 (20.9%) | 1417 (32.7%) | 2007 (46.4%) | |
Sex |
Male | 3035 (44.2%) | 97.7 (12.68) | < 0.001a | 1217 (31.9%) | 987 (25.8%) | 1616 (42.3%) | < 0.001b |
Female | 3828 (55.8%) | 89.1 (14.18) | | 566 (18.8%) | 1195 (39.6%) | 1257 (41.7%) | |
Marital status |
Single2 | 3000 (43.7%) | 92.9 (15.21) | 0.272a | 826 (27.6%) | 827 (27.6%) | 1341 (44.8%) | < 0.001b |
Married3 | 3864 (56.3%) | 93.3 (13.34) | | 957 (24.9%) | 1355 (35.2%) | 1532 (39.9%) | |
Residency |
Urban | 4147 (60.6%) | 92.7 (14.09) | 0.004a | 1116 (27.0%) | 1340 (32.4%) | 1674 (40.5%) | 0.007b |
Rural | 2717 (39.6%) | 93.8 (14.28) | | 667 (24.6%) | 842 (31.1%) | 1199 (44.3%) | |
Educational status |
Low/medium | 4357 (63.5%) | 95.0 (14.40) | < 0.001a | 971 (22.4%) | 1371 (31.6%) | 1999 (46.0%) | < 0.001b |
High | 2506 (36.5%) | 90.1 (13.25) | | 812 (32.5%) | 811 (32.5%) | 874 (35.0%) | |
Employment status |
Employed | 3402 (59.0%) | 93.0 (14.08) | < 0.006a | 1703 (26.1%) | 2078 (31.9%) | 2735 (42.0%) | 0.874b |
Unemployed4 | 2361 (41.0%)1 | 95.5 (15.64) | | 1783 (26.1%) | 104 (32.3%) | 138 (42.9%) | |
Full medical card |
Yes | 2855 (41.6%) | 95.3 (15.28) | < 0.001a | 618 (21.7%) | 829 (29.1) | 1400 (49.2%) | < 0.001b |
No | 4009 (58.4%) | 91.7 (13.22) | | 1165 (29.2%) | 1353 (33.9%) | 1473 (36.9%) | |
Private HI5 |
Yes | 3160 (46.0%) | 92.3 (13.6%) | < 0.001a | 875 (27.8%) | 1084 (34.4%) | 1188 (37.8%) | < 0.001b |
No | 3704 (54.0%) | 93.9 (14.6%) | | 908 (24.6%) | 1098 (29.7%) | 1685 (45.7%) | |
The univariate association between sociodemographic variables and obesity indicators (WC and BMI) is presented in Table
1. Most sociodemographic variables analysed showed significant associations with both WC and BMI (
p < 0.05). Mean WC measurements were highest among those aged 45 years and older (97.0 ± 14.68 cm,
p < 0.001), male participants (97.7 ± 12.68 cm,
p < 0.001), participants with low/medium educational attainment (95.0 ± 14.40 cm,
p < 0.001) and those living in rural areas (93.8 ± 14.28 cm,
p < 0.004). Similarly, obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m
2) was more prevalent among participants aged 45 and older (46.4%,
p < 0.001), male participants (42.3%,
p < 0.001), participants with low/medium educational background (46.0%,
p < 0.001).
Table
2 presents the health-related variables, including alcohol consumption, based on obesity indicators. The majority of the participants (80.6%) reported that their health was good /very good, and more than three-quarters of the study population (79.6%) were non-smokers. Alcohol consumption was highly prevalent in this study population, with 8 out of 10 participants consuming alcohol (81.9%). However, most alcohol consumers (76.3%) reported drinking less than three times per week, and approximately one-third of them (32.1%) engaged in binge drinking at least once a week. Of the 5,141 participants who completed the AUDIT-C questionnaire, nearly half (47.7%) were classified as harmful drinkers (AUDIT-C score ≥ 5).
Table 2
Health-related and alcohol-related characteristics of participants according to obesity indicators {waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI)} based on Healthy Ireland Survey 2017 data
General health |
Good/ very good | 5530 (80.6%) | 92.3 (13.48) | < 0.001a | 1548 (28.1%) | 1839 (33.4%) | 2119 (38.5%) | < 0.001b |
Fair/poor | 1330 (19.4%) | 97.3 (16.55) | | 234 (17.6%) | 341 (25.7%) | 753 (56.7%) | |
Long-term illness |
Yes | 2398 (34.9%) | 95.9 (15.41) | < 0.001a | 476 (19.9%) | 717 (30.0%) | 1195 (50.0%) | < 0.001b |
No | 4456 (64.9%) | 91.7 (13.28) | | 1306 (29.4%) | 1464 (33.0%) | 1670 (37.6%) | |
Smoking status |
Yes2 | 1402 (20.4%) | 92.2 (14.23) | 0.015a | 410 (29.4%) | 388 (27.8%) | 598 (42.8%) | < 0.001b |
No | 5461 (79.6%) | 93.4 (14.15) | | 1373 (25.2%) | 1794 (33.0%) | 2274 (41.8%) | |
Active transportation |
Yes3 | 473 (13.5%) | 91.2 (13.74) | 0.574a | 163 (34.5%) | 159 (33.6%) | 151 (31.9%) | 0.012b |
No | 3021 (86.5%) | 91.6 (13.22) | | 853 (28.4%) | 1021 (34.0%) | 1133 (37.7%) | |
Fruit consumption |
≥ 1 time a day | 4442 (64.7%) | 92.0 (13.82) | < 0.001a | 1239 (28.0%) | 1433 (32.4%) | 1755 (39.6%) | < 0.001 b |
< 1 time a day | 2421 (35.3%) | 95.3 (14.58) | | 544 (22.6%) | 749 (31.1%) | 1117 (46.3%) | |
Alcohol consumption |
Yes | 5622 (81.9%) | 93.1 (14.02) | 0.627a | 1500 (26.8%) | 1840 (32.9%) | 2258 (40.3%) | < 0.001b |
No | 1242 (18.1%) | 93.4 (14.94) | | 283 (22.8%) | 342 (27.6%) | 615 (49.6%) | |
Alcohol frequency |
≥ 3 times a week | 862 (23.7%) | 94.3 (14.34) | 0.001a | 226 (26.2%) | 295 (34.3%) | 340 (39.5%) | 0.611b |
< 3 times a week | 2778 (76.3%) | 92.2 (13.46) | | 767 (27.8%) | 949 (34.3%) | 1047 (37.9%) | |
Binge drinking4 |
≥ 1 time a week | 1040 (32.1%) | 96.8 (14.06) | < 0.001a | 213 (20.3%) | 371 (35.9%) | 448 (43.4%) | < 0.001 b |
< 1 time a week | 2199 (67.9%) | 91.8 (13.21) | | 641 (29.3%) | 777 (35.5%) | 770 (35.2%) | |
AUDIT-C5 |
Score < 5 | 2688 (52.3%) | 91.0 (14.02) | < 0.001b | 808 (30.1%) | 821 (30.6%) | 1053 (39.3%) | < 0.001 b |
Score ≥ 5 | 2453 (47.7%) | 94.6 (13.65) | | 595 (24.4%) | 885 (36.3%) | 957 (39.3%) | |
The univariate analysis of the associations between health-related variables and obesity indicators (BMI, WC) are presented in Table
2. The results clearly demonstrate significant associations between most of the health-related variables and obesity indicators. The mean WC was highest among participants with a fair/poor general health condition (97.3 ± 16.55 cm,
p < 0.001), participants with long-term illness (95.9 ± 15.41 cm,
p < 0.001) and non-smokers (93.4 ± 14.15 cm,
p = 0.015). Among those with fair/poor general health, obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m
2) was reported in over half of the participants (56.7%,
p < 0.001).
When addressing alcohol consumption, there was no significant difference in mean WC between drinkers and non-drinkers. However, those who drank more frequently (≥ 3 times per week) had a higher mean WC (94.3 ± 14.34 cm,
P < 0.001) than those who drank less frequently, (Table
2). Participants who engaged in binge drinking one or more times per week were more likely to have a higher mean WC (96.8 ± 14.06 cm,
p < 0.001) than those who engaged in binge drinking less frequently. Participants with harmful drinking patterns (AUDIT-C score ≥ 5) had the highest mean WC (94.6 ± 13.65 cm,
p < 0.001) compared to participants with nonharmful drinking patterns.
Regarding BMI, the majority of alcohol consumers were living with overweight, or obesity (32.9 and 40.3%, respectively,
p < 0.001) Table
2. No significant association between the frequency of alcohol intake and BMI was found. However, obesity was reported in slightly more than one-third of those who engaged in binge drinking one or more times per week (43.4%,
p < 0.001). Majority of participants who scored 5 or higher on the AUDIT-C questionnaire affected with overweight and obesity (36.3%% and 39.3%%, respectively,
p < 0.001).
Table
3 shows the multivariable linear regression analysis results, highlighting the association between harmful alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C score ≥ 5) and WC after controlling for sociodemographic variables (age, sex, marital status, level of education, employment status, urban or rural residency, having a full medical card, and having a private medical card), health-related variables (general health, long-term illness, smoking status, active transportation, and frequency of fruit consumption), and other alcohol related variables( frequency of alcohol consumption and binge drinking). After adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related variables in Model 3, harmful alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C score ≥ 5) was positively associated with WC (β = 1.93, 95% CI: 0.87, 2.98,
p = 0.001). In the fully adjusted Model 4 and after controlling for other alcohol-related variables (alcohol frequency and binge drinking), harmful drinking continued to be significantly associated with WC (β = 1.72, 95% CI: -0.25, 3.19,
p = 0.022). On the other hand, after controlling for sociodemographic, health-related, and other alcohol-related variables, binge drinking was found to be significantly associated with WC, with those who engaged in binge drinking once or more per week having a WC 2.14 times higher than those who engaged in binge drinking less than once per week., (β = 1.71, 95% CI 0.50, 2.91,
p = 0.006). There was an inverse association between the frequency of alcohol consumption and mean WC, as participants with frequent alcohol consumption had a lower mean WC than those with less frequent alcohol consumption; however, the association was not statistically significant.
Table 3
Multivariable linear regression analysis of the association of alcohol intake, sociodemographic, and health related factors with waist circumference (cm) based on Healthy Ireland Survey 2017 data
AUDIT-C1 score |
Score < 5 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | |
Score ≥ 5 | 2.89 (1.25, 4.53) | 0.001 | 1.34 (0.47, 2.20) | 0.002 | 1.93 (0.87, 2.98) | 0.001 | 1.72 (0.25, 3.19) | 0.022 |
Age group (years) |
< 45 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | |
45 and older | 4.92 (3.2, 6.22) | < 0.001 | 4.78 (3.92, 5.63) | < 0.001 | 4.06 (3.04, 5.08) | < 0.001 | 5.04 (3.92, 6.16) | < 0.001 |
Sex |
Female | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | |
Male | 8.12 (6.80, 9.44) | < 0.001 | 8.06 (7.21, 8.92) | < 0.001 | 8.31 (7.27, 9.36) | < 0.001 | 8.02 (6.88, 9.16) | < 0.001 |
Marital status |
Single2 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | | | | |
Married3 | 1.28 (0.00, 2.56) | 0.050 | 0.82(-0.01, 1.65) | 0.054 | | | | |
Educational status |
Low/medium | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | |
High | -1.45(-2.82, -0.08) | 0.039 | -2.39(-3.30, -1.48) | < 0.001 | -1.70(-2.74, -0.65) | 0.001 | -2.43(-3.57, -1.30) | < 0.001 |
Urban/rural residency |
Rural | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | |
Urban | -0.56(-1.85, 0.73) | 0.394 | -0.86(-1.68, -0.03) | 0.042 | -1.09(-2.11, -0.08) | 0.035 | -0.32 (1.44, 0.79) | 0.569 |
Employment status |
Unemployed4 | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | | | | |
Employed | 1.87 (2.91, 0.84) | < 0.001 | -0.02(-1.93, 1.89) | 0.986 | | | | |
Full medical card |
No | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | | |
Yes | 1.94 (0.10, 3.79) | 0.039 | 2.38 (1.40, 3.37) | < 0.001 | 1.20(-0.15, 2.54) | 0.081 | | |
Private HI5 |
No | 0.00 | | 0.00 | | | | | |
Yes | 0.48(-0.95, 1.90) | 0.512 | 0.02(-0.92, 0.96) | 0.964 | | | | |
General health |
Good/ very good | 0.00 | | | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | |
Fair/Bad | 2.38(-0.29, 5.06) | 0.081 | | | 3.23 (1.17, 5.28) | 0.001 | 2.18 (0.55, 3.81) | 0.009 |
Past medical history |
No | 0.00 | | | | 0.00 | | | |
Yes | 0.94(-0.72, 2.60) | 0.266 | | | 0.66(- 0.62, 1.95) | 0.311 | | |
Smoking status |
No | 0.00 | | | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | |
Yes6 | -1.77(-3.24, -0.30) | 0.018 | | | -2.16(-3.37, -0.94) | 0.001 | -2.47(-3.73, -1.22) | < 0.001 |
Active transportation |
No | 0.00 | | | | 0.00 | | | |
Yes7 | 0.00(-1.74, 1.74) | 0.999 | | | -0.75(-2.16, 0.67) | 0.301 | | |
Fruit consumption |
< 1 time a day | 0.00 | | | | 0.00 | | 0.00 | |
≥ 1 time a day | 1.14(-0.14, 2.43) | 0.820 | | | 1.68 (0.62, 2.74) | 0.002 | 1.00(-0.12, 2.12) | 0.079 |
Alcohol consumption |
< 3 times a week | 0.00 | | | | | | 0.00 | |
≥ 3 times a week | -1.08(-2.63, 0.47) | 0.171 | | | | | -0.41(-1.69,0.87) | 0.533 |
Binge drinking8 |
< 1 time a week | 0.00 | | | | | | 0.00 | |
≥ 1 time per week | 1.18 (-0.21, 2.57) | 0.096 | | | | | 1.71 (0.50, 2.91) | 0.006 |
Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between harmful alcohol intake (AUDIT-C score ≥ 5) and overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m
2), controlling for sociodemographic, health-related, and other alcohol-related variables, Table
4. After adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related variables in Model 3, harmful alcohol consumption (AUDIT-C score ≥ 5) was associated with a 24% increase in the risk of obesity/overweight compared to nonharmful alcohol consumption (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.49,
p = 0.018). Further controlling for other alcohol-related variables (Model 4), harmful alcohol drinking continued to be significantly associated with overweight/obesity (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.96,
p = 0.009). When examining the frequency of alcohol consumption and after controlling for sociodemographic, health-related, and other alcohol-related variables, frequent alcohol consumption (≥ 3 times a week) was inversely associated with overweight/obesity (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.78,
p < 0.001). No significant association was found between binge drinking and overweight/obesity in Model 4.
Table 4
Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis of the association of alcohol-related variables, sociodemographic variables, and health-related variables with overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) based on Healthy Ireland Survey 2017 data
AUDIT-C1 score |
Score < 5 | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | |
Score 5 + | 1.49 (1.12, 1.99) | 0.007 | 1.21 (1.05,1.38) | 0.009 | 1.24 (1.04,1.49) | 0.018 | 1.47 (1.10, 1.96) | 0.009 |
Age class (year) |
< 45 | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | |
45 and older | 2.43 (1.89, 3.12) | < 0.001 | 1.89 (1.65, 2.16) | < 0.001 | 1.98 (1.66, 2.37) | < 0.001 | 2.52 (1.97, 3.23) | < 0.001 |
Sex |
Female | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | |
Male | 1.80 (1.42, 2.28) | < 0.001 | 1.90 (1.65, 2.19) | < 0.001 | 2.07 (1.72, 2.48) | < 0.001 | 1.84 (1.46, 2.32) | < 0.001 |
Marital status |
Single2 | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | |
Married3 | 1.38 (1.09, 1.74) | 0.007 | 1.26 (1.10, 1.44) | 0.001 | 1.33 (1.12,1.58) | 0.001 | 1.41 (1.13, 1.78) | 0.003 |
Educational status |
Low/medium | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | |
High | 0.88 (0.68, 1.13) | 0.308 | 0.78 (0.67, 0.90) | 0.001 | 0.82 (0.68, 0.97) | 0.025 | 0.93 (0.73,1.18) | 0.543 |
Residency |
Rural | 1 | | 1 | | | | | |
Urban | 0.99 (0.78, 1.26) | 0.948 | 0.96 (0.84, 1.10) | 0.595 | | | | |
Employment status |
Unemployed4 | 1 | | 1 | | | | | |
Employed | 1.68 (1.20, 2.34) | 0.002 | 1.13 (0.83, 1.56) | 0.436 | | | | |
Full medical card |
No | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | |
Yes | 1.56 (1.09, 2.22) | 0.015 | 1.28 (1.09, 1.51) | 0.002 | 1.30 (1.04, 1.65) | 0.029 | 1.47 (1.04, 2.07) | 0.029 |
Private HI5 |
No | 1 | | 1 | | | | | |
Yes | 1.27 (0.98, 1.65) | 0.069 | 0.98 (0.85, 1.14) | 0.827 | | | | |
General health |
Good/very good | 1 | | | | 1 | | 1 | |
Fair/poor | 1.79 (1.04,3.09) | 0.037 | | | 1.51 (1.03, 2.21) | 0.034 | 1.96 (1.16, 3.32) | 0.013 |
Long term illness |
No | 1 | | | | 1 | | | |
Yes | 1.22 (0.88, 1.69) | 0.230 | | | 1.07 (0.85, 1.34) | 0.583 | | |
Smoking status |
No | 1 | | | | 1 | | 1 | |
Yes6 | 0.85 (0.65, 1.12) | 0.854 | | | 0.81 (0.66, 0.99) | 0.045 | 0.84 (0.65, 1.09) | 0.194 |
Active transportation |
No | 1 | | | | 1 | | 1 | |
Yes7 | 0.92 (0.67, 1.26) | 0.591 | | | 0.74 (0.58, 0.93) | 0.011 | 0.90 (0.66, 1.23) | 0.491 |
Fruit consumption |
< 1 time a day | 1 | | | | 1 | | | |
≥ 1 time a day | 0.88 (0.69, 1.12) | 0.294 | | | 0.85 (0.71, 1.03) | 0.092 | | |
Alcohol consumption |
< 3 times a week | 1 | | | | | | 1 | |
≥ 3 times a week | 0.57 (0.42, 0.76) | < 0.001 | | | | | 0.59 (0.44, 0.78) | < 0.001 |
Binge drinking8 |
< 1 time a week | 1 | | | | | | 1 | |
≥ 1 time a week | 1.15 (0.88,1.50) | 0.294 | | | | | 1.15 (0.88, 1.50) | 0.306 |
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.