Histological analysis was done blindly by two evaluators under light microscope (Eclipse E1000; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Images were captured using Nikon DS-Fi2 digital camera at different magnification powers. H&E slides were scanned using IScan Goreo (Ventana Medical System, Roche, Tucson, AZ) [
29]. Histological assessment was done for, inflammatory response, odontoblasts cell status, cell density, predentin thickness analysis, presence of vacuoles, and condition of the apical part and periapical area. [
28,
30] as follows. The inflammatory response was given grades 1–4, in which grade 1 refers to no or sparse inflammatory cells, grade 2 refers to mild or less than 10 inflammatory cells, grade 3 refers to severe inflammation with abscess or dense infiltration of inflammatory cells that includes more than one third of the pulp space, and grade 4 refers to necrotic pulp [
31,
32]. Odontoblast cells status was also given grades 1–4, in which grade 1 refers to palisade odontoblasts, grade 2 refers to the presence of odontoblast cells, and odontoblast-like cells, grade 3 refers to the presence of odontoblast-like cells only, and grade 4 refers to no cells [
31,
33]. Regarding predentin thickness analysis, the captured images of predentin at 10× magnification for each group were used for measurements. Predentin thickness was measured in pixels by using ImageJ v1.53e software [
31,
34]. All values were calculated from three sites of predentin for each tooth in all groups and we calculated the means and standard deviation. Cell density was evaluated by checking the cells (fibroblasts and undifferentiated mesenchymal cells) density at the central zone of the pulp [
35]. The cell counting was performed and analyzed by ImageJ v1.53e software under 40× magnification power.
Statistical analysis
The mean and standard deviation for the different groups were calculated first. Welch t-test for group-wise comparisons was used. P = 0.05 or less was considered for statistical significance. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and the difference of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.