Contributions to the literature
-
The paper presents the first systematic review of the effectiveness of continuous quality improvement (CQI) compared to non-CQI approaches on improving the quality, safety and efficiency in any health care sector;
-
It assesses the importance of the health care setting, the CQI model used and key components of the different approaches used on changing clinical process and patient-based outcomes;
-
The review examines the consideration given to socio-economic health inequalities in improving health care through CQI.
Background
Methods
Searches
Study selection
Category | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
---|---|---|
Participants | Teams of health professionals responsible for improving the health of their populations and/or providing patient care in any health care setting | Groups that do not include health professionals or that are conducted in a non-health care/non-public health setting or that only involve students. |
Intervention | CQI that includes (i) use of measurement and data analysis to assess and review the effect of changes; (ii) review and analysis of a process or system used to deliver clinical care to identify sources of variation and areas for improvement; (iii) an iterative procedure within a continuous process; and (iv) a structured process improvement method or problem-solving approach that is used to plan and test changes to the work process. | Interventions targeting the improvement of administrative, management, or other processes not directly related to clinical care. |
Comparison | Current usual practice (non-active control), different CQI strategies, or other non-CQI interventions to manage organizational change. | |
Outcome | Any objective measure of health care professional performance (e.g., adherence to recommended practice or process of care) or patient outcome (e.g., pain, health-related quality of life, function, mortality). | |
Study design | RCTs |
Data extraction and study quality assessment
Data synthesis
Proportion of outcomes in studies showing comparative benefit from CQI | Definition |
---|---|
No outcomes | No outcomes demonstrated a statistically significant difference between interventions in any study. |
Under half of outcomes | Less than half of the outcomes in studies showed a statistically significant benefit from CQI versus its comparator. |
Half of outcomes | Half of the outcomes in studies showed a statistically significant benefit from CQI versus its comparator. |
More than half of outcomes | More than half of the outcomes in studies showed a statistically significant benefit from CQI versus its comparator. |
All outcomes | All outcomes in the studies showed a statistically significant benefit from CQI versus its comparator. |
Results
Study characteristics
Risk of bias
Effectiveness of CQI versus a non-CQI comparator
Sub-group | Number of studies | Number (%) of RCTs reporting a statistically significant difference on different proportions of clinical process outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All outcomes | Over half of outcomes | Half of outcomes | Under half of outcomes | No outcomes | One or more outcomes | ||
All studies | 24 | 4 (16.7%) | 2 (8.3%) | 1 (4.2%) | 4 (16.7%) | 13 (54.2%) | 11 (45.8%) |
Clinical background | |||||||
Primary Care | 13 | 4 (30.8%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (15.4%) | 7 (53.8%) | 6 (46.2%) |
Secondary Care | 9 | 0 (0%) | 1 (11.1%) | 1 (11.1%) | 2 (22.2%) | 5 (55.6%) | 4 (44.4%) |
Tertiary Care | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Social Care | 1 | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) |
Other | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Primary quality improvement model | |||||||
Plan-Do-Study-Act | 11 | 2 (18.2%) | 1 (9.1%) | 1 (9.1%) | 2 (18.2%) | 5 (45.5%) | 6 (54.5%) |
Model for Improvement | 7 | 0 (0%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (14.3%) | 5 (71.4%) | 2 (28.6%) |
Root cause analysis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 6 | 2 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 3 (50.0%) | 3 (50.0%) |
Training type | |||||||
Web-based | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
In person | 14 | 4 (28.6%) | 1 (7.1%) | 1 (7.1%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (57.1%) | 6 (42.9%) |
In person plus | 7 | 0 (0%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (57.1%) | 2 (28.6%) | 5 (71.4%) |
Not described | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Training duration | |||||||
1-3 hours | 4 | 2 (50.0%) | 1 (25.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (25.0%) | 3 (75.0%) |
4-8 hours | 2 | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
9-16 hours | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
>16 hours | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (50.0%) | 2 (50.0%) | 2 (50.0%) |
Not described | 12 | 1 (8.3%) | 1 (8.3%) | 1 (8.3%) | 1 (8.3%) | 8 (66.7%) | 4 (33.3%) |
Meetings | |||||||
Participant leader, implementation discussed | 15 | 3 (20.0%) | 2 (13.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | 2 (13.3%) | 7 (46.7%) | 8 (53.3%) |
Participant leader, unclear implementation discussed | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (33.3%) | 2 (66.7%) | 1 (33.3%) |
Not described | 6 | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 4 (66.7%) | 2 (33.3%) |
Meeting schedule | |||||||
Once a week or more | 3 | 2 (66.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (100.0%) |
Fortnightly | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Monthly | 7 | 1 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (14.3%) | 1 (14.3%) | 4 (57.1%) | 3 (42.9%) |
Quarterly or less frequent | 2 | 0 (0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
Not described | 11 | 1 (9.1%) | 1 (9.1%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (18.2%) | 7 (63.6%) | 4 (36.4%) |
Range of year of publication | |||||||
2010–2020 | 16 | 3 (18.8%) | 1 (6.3%) | 1 (6.3%) | 2 (12.5%) | 9 (56.3%) | 7 (43.7%) |
2000–2009 | 6 | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 3 (50.0%) | 3 (50.0%) |
1990–1999 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
Subgroup | Number of studies | Number (%) of RCTs reporting a statistically significant difference on different proportions of patient outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All outcomes | Over half of outcomes | Half of outcomes | Under half of outcomes | No outcomes | One or more outcomes | ||
All studies | 17 | 0 (0%) | 2 (11.8%) | 1 (5.9%) | 3 (17.6%) | 11 (64.7%) | 6 (35.3%) |
Clinical background | |||||||
Primary Care | 6 | 0 (0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (66.7%) | 2 (33.3%) |
Secondary Care | 7 | 0 (0%) | 1 (14.3%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (28.6%) | 4 (57.1%) | 3 (42.9%) |
Tertiary Care | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Social Care | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
Other | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Primary quality improvement model | |||||||
Plan-Do-Study-Act | 9 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (11.1%) | 2 (22.2%) | 6 (66.7%) | 3 (33.3%) |
Model for Improvement | 5 | 0 (0%) | 2 (40.0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (60.0%) | 2 (40.0%) |
Root cause analysis | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) |
Other | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Training type | |||||||
Web-based | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) |
In person | 7 | 0 (0%) | 2 (28.6%) | 1 (14.3%) | 1 (14.3%) | 3 (42.9%) | 4 (57.1%) |
In person plus | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (20.0%) | 4 (80.0%) | 1 (20.0%) |
Not described | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Training duration | |||||||
1–3 hours | 3 | 0 (0%) | 1 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (66.7%) | 1 (33.3%) |
4–8 hours | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9–16 hours | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) |
>16 hours | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
Not described | 12 | 0 (0%) | 1 (8.3%) | 1 (8.3%) | 2 (16.7%) | 8 (66.7%) | 4 (33.3%) |
Meetings | |||||||
Participant leader, implementation discussed | 10 | 0 (0%) | 1 (10.0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (10.0%) | 8 (80.0%) | 2 (20.0%) |
Participant leader, unclear implementation discussed | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (25.0%) | 3 (75.0%) | 1 (25.0%) |
Not described | 3 | 1 (33.3%) | 1 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (33.3%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (100.0%) |
Meeting schedule | |||||||
Once a week or more | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fortnightly | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Monthly | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (28.6%) | 5 (71.4%) | 2 (28.6%) |
Quarterly or less frequent | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Not described | 7 | 0 (0%) | 2 (28.6%) | 1 (14.3%) | 1 (14.3%) | 3 (42.9%) | 4 (57.1%) |
Range of year of publication | |||||||
2010–2020 | 11 | 0 (0%) | 1 (9.1%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (18.2%) | 8 (72.7%) | 3 (27.3%) |
2000–2009 | 5 | 0 (0%) | 1 (20.0%) | 1 (20.0%) | 1 (20.0%) | 2 (40.0%) | 3 (60.0%) |
1990–1999 | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Subgroup | Number of studies | Number (%) of RCTs reporting a statistically significant difference on different proportions of other outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All outcomes | Over half of outcomes | Half of outcomes | Under half of outcomes | No outcomes | One or more outcomes | ||
All studies | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Clinical background | |||||||
Primary Care | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Secondary Care | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Tertiary Care | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Social Care | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Primary quality improvement model | |||||||
Plan-Do-Study-Act | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Model for Improvement | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Root cause analysis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Training type | |||||||
Web-based | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
In person | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
In person plus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not described | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Training duration | |||||||
1–3 hours | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4–8 hours | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9–16 hours | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
>16 hours | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Not described | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Meetings | |||||||
Participant leader, implementation discussed | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Participant leader, unclear implementation discussed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not described | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Meeting schedule | |||||||
Once a week or more | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fortnightly | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Monthly | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Quarterly or less frequent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not described | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
Range of year of publication | |||||||
2010–2020 | 2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
2000–2009 | 1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0%) |
1990–1999 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |