Hip replacement is divided into total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA); it is still controversial whether to choose THA or HA for femoral neck fractures (FNF). The goal of this study was to review relevant studies in order to determine the HA compared to THA for the treatment of FNF.
Patients and methods
Using appropriate keywords, we identified relevant studies using PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Key pertinent sources in the literature were also reviewed, and all articles published through August 2019 were considered for inclusion. For each study, we assessed odds ratios (ORs), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to assess and synthesize outcomes.
Results
We included 19 studies with a total of 413,140 patients in the HA group and 44973 in the THA group. The blood loss, surgery time, and dislocation were all significantly decreased in the HA group than the THA group. The length of hospital, pneumonia, and renal failure were significant increased in the HA group than THA group. There has no significant difference of complication, mortality, reoperation, infection, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarct between the two groups.
Conclusion
HA has favor in decrease blood loss and surgery time. THA has favor in decrease the length of hospital, the incidence of pneumonia and renal failure. For the selection of surgical methods for femoral neck fracture in the elderly, we should consider several aspects, such as the age of the patient, whether there is osteoporosis, the type of femoral neck fracture, the preoperative reduction situation, and the needs of the patient and his family for the postoperative situation.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
HA
Hemiarthroplasty
THA
Total hip arthroplasty
FNF
Femoral neck fractures
ORs
Odds ratios
MD
Mean difference
95% CI
95% confidence interval
Introduction
FNF accounts for about 3.6% of adult fractures, which is one of the more common fractures in the body. FNF is more common in elderly patients, generally refers to the fracture in the part of the femoral head down to the base of the femoral neck. Garden classification is often adopted for FNF in the elderly, type I and type II, because no displacement or displacement of fracture end to a lesser degree, damage degree of fracture is lesser, belongs to the stable fractures. Type III and type IV due to shifting more of fracture end, fracture damage is bigger, belongs to the unstable fractures. The clinical features and fracture healing of the four types has presented in Table 1 [1‐3].
Table 1
The Garden classification of FNF
Garden classification of FNF
Clinical features of the fracture
Fracture healing
Type I
The fracture line does not run through the entire femoral neck, part of the bone is connected, and the broken end of the fracture is not displaced.
There is still a certain blood supply near the broken end, and the fracture is easy to heal.
Type II
Complete fracture with fracture line running through the neck of femur without displacement of the broken end.
Even if the fracture line is in good alignment under the femoral head, the possibility of fracture healing is higher, but the probability of long-term femoral head necrosis is increased.
However, the fracture of the middle or basal part of the femoral neck is easy to heal, the femoral head blood supply is good, and the avascular necrosis of the femoral head is low.
Type III
Partial displacement of fracture, mostly distal upward displacement, or distal lower Angle embedded into the proximal folded end of the section.
It is an unstable fracture, postoperative fracture healing rate is not high.
Type IV
Fracture completely shift, femoral neck appear obvious outward turning up, the hip joint capsule and synovial suffered severe damage, femoral head poor blood supply
Fracture is not easy to heal, easy femoral head necrosis.
FNF in older patients are not stable fractures (Garden III, IV), accompanied with the complications: the serious situation of displacement fracture, the longer time of conservative treatment in bed, pulmonary embolism, falling pneumonia, lower limb thrombosis, bone nonunion, urinary system infection, and so on. At the same time, the conservative treatment of fracture carries the bad counterpoint to the line, high rate of fracture malunion, physical disability, ischemic necrosis of femoral head; so still need hip replacement later. Hip replacement is divided into THA and HA, THA requires replacement of femoral head and acetabulum. Compared with THA, HA only replaces the femoral head, which requires less technical requirements for the surgeon. The advantages of HA including less surgical trauma, less blood loss, and low economic cost; the disadvantages are high incidence of postoperative pain and further wear of untreated acetabular cartilage. Therefore, it is still controversial whether to choose THA or HA for specific patients [4, 5].
Anzeige
The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of all available literature to obtain updated evidence to eradicate the HA versus THA for the treatment of FNF and to provide a basis for the selection of clinical treatment.
Methods
Search strategy
To identify studies pertaining to the clinical results about HA versus THA in the treatment of FNF, we reviewed the Cochrane, Pubmed, Embase databases for relevant articles published through August 2019. We also reviewed the references of all identified articles to identify additional studies. Search terms were as follows: femoral neck fracture, femoral fracture, fracture of the femoral neck, FNF, hemihip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, HA, THA, total hip arthroplasty, total hip replacement, total hip joint replacement. These terms were used in combination with “AND” or “OR”. This literature review was performed independently by two investigators, with a third resolving any disputes as needed.
Following the PICOS (Participants, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes and Study design) principle, the key search terms included (P) patients with FNF; (I) patients were treated by HA or THA; (C/O) the outcomes including complication, blood loss, surgery time, length of hospital, mortality, dislocation, reoperation, infection, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarct, renal failure; (S) RTC, cohort study, or case-control study.
Study selection criteria
Included studies met the following criteria: (1) randomized controlled trials, cohort studies or case-control studies; (2) the research objects are patients with FNF; (3) the treatment of experiment group is HA, the inventions of control groups are THA; (4) English or Chinese language.
Anzeige
Studies were excluded for meeting the following criteria: (1) repeat articles or results; (2) clear data errors; (3) case reports, case-control studies, theoretical research, conference reports, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and other forms of research or comment not designed in a randomized controlled manner; (4) irrelevant outcomes; (5) has no control group.
Two investigators independently determined whether studies met with inclusion criteria, with a third resolving any disputes as needed.
Data extraction and quality assessment
For each included study, two categories of information were extracted: basic information and primary study outcomes. Basic information relevant to this meta-analysis included author names, year of publication, sample size, age, gender, and study design. Primary clinical outcomes relevant to this analysis included: complication, blood loss, surgery time, length of hospital, mortality, dislocation, reoperation, infection, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarct, renal failure. This data extraction was performed independently by two investigators, with a third resolving any disputes as needed.
Statistical analysis
STATA v10.0 (TX, USA) was used for all analyses. Heterogeneity in study results was assessed using chi-squared and I2 tests and appropriate analysis models (fixed-effect or random-effect) were determined. A chi-squared P ≤ 0.05 and an I2 > 50% indicated high heterogeneity and a random-effects model was used in this case. A chi-squared P > 0.05 and an I2 ≤ 50% indicated acceptable heterogeneity and a fixed-effects model were instead used. Continuous variables are given as means ± standard deviations and were compared on the basis of mean difference (MD), while categorical data is given as percentages and compared based on relative risk (RR)/odds ratios (ORs). MD and 95% CI were used to analyze blood loss, surgery time, and length of hospital. The other indexes were analyzed by RR and 95% CI.
Results
Overview of included studies
We reviewed a total of 985 articles identified by our initial keyword search, of which 864 were excluded following title/abstract review. The PRISMA 2009 flow diagram has presented the detailed literature screening process. The PRISMA 2009 checklist has presented the specific framework and content of the article. The remaining 121 articles were subject to a complete full-text assessment, leading to 102 articles being excluded for failing to meet study inclusion criteria. Reasons for exclusion of these studies included theoretical research (11), no clinical outcomes (54), repeated articles (3), case reports (8), and only one group (26). We ultimately identified a total of 19 studies [6‐24] that met with inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis, incorporating 413,140 patients in the HA group and 44,973 in the THA group. Study selection is outlined in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Literature search and selection strategy
×
Table 2 summarizes the basic information for each study, including author names, year of publication, sample, age, gender, and study design. The main age of all included studies was over 58 years old.
Table 2
The basic characteristics description of included studies
In total, 11 studies were included, containing 38,129 patients in the HA group and 11,633 patients in the THA group. Based on a chi-squared P = 0.000 < 0.05 and an I2 = 73.3% > 50%, a random-effects model was chosen to assess complication. The incidence of complication has no significant difference between the two groups (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00 ~ 1.39). The results were presented in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2
Forest plot for the complication
×
Blood loss
In total, 5 studies were included, containing 254 patients in the HA group and 251 patients in the THA group. Based on a chi-squared P = 0.002 < 0.05 and an I2 = 76.7% > 50%, a random-effects model was chosen to assess blood loss. The blood loss was significant lower in the HA group than the THA group (WMD, −45.63; 95% CI, −74.50 ~ −16.76). The results were presented in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3
Forest plot for the blood loss
×
Anzeige
Surgery time
In total, 10 studies were included, containing 32,731 patients in the HA group and 6731 patients in the THA group. Based on a chi-squared P = 0.000 < 0.05 and an I2 = 99.9% > 50%, a random-effects model was chosen to assess surgery time. The surgery time was significantly decreased in the HA group than THA group (WMD, −12.28; 95% CI, −13.07 ~ −11.49). The results were presented in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4
Forest plot for the surgery time
×
Length of hospital
In total, 7 studies were included, containing 66,099 patients in the HA group and 16,351 patients in the THA group. Based on a chi-squared P = 0.000 < 0.05 and an I2 = 100.0% > 50%, a random-effects model was chosen to assess the length of hospital. The length of hospital was significantly longer in the HA group than the THA group (WMD, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.20 ~ 0.74). The results were presented in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5
Forest plot for the length of hospital
×
Mortality
In total, 10 studies were included, containing 35,242 patients in the HA group and 11,005 patients in the THA group. Based on a chi-squared P = 0.000 < 0.05 and an I2 = 87.2% > 50%, a random-effects model was chosen to assess mortality. The mortality has no significant difference between the two groups (RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.79 ~ 3.29). The results were presented in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6
Forest plot for the mortality
×
The other indexes
The incidence of reoperation (RR, 1.319; 95% CI, 0.710 ~ 2.448), infection (RR, 1.037; 95% CI, 0.760 ~ 1.416), pulmonary embolism (RR, 1.160, 95% CI, 0.803 ~ 1.676), myocardial infarct (RR, 1.459; 95% CI, 0.988 ~ 2.156) has no significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of dislocation was significant decrease in the HA group than the THA group (RR, 0.536; 95% CI, 0.502 ~ 0.573). The incidence of pneumonia (RR, 1.511; 95% CI, 1.275 ~ 1.791) and renal failure (RR, 1.493; 95% CI, 1.188 ~ 1.876) were significantly higher in the HA group than the THA group. All the above results were presented in Table 3.
Table 3
The results of meta-analysis
Index
N (case/control)
RR (95% CI)
P*
I2
P#
P value
Begg’s
Egger’s
Dislocation
374242/33026
0.536 (0.502, 0.573)
0.098
35.5%
0.000
0.951
0.032
Reoperation
378085/34168
1.319 (0.710, 2.448)
0.000
91.9%
0.381
0.602
0.257
Infection
341683/42513
1.037 (0.760, 1.416)
0.000
82.4%
0.819
0.283
0.113
Pneumonia
32621/6546
1.511 (1.275, 1.791)
0.415
2.3%
0.000
0.754
0.457
Pulmonary embolism
33241/6877
1.160 (0.803, 1.676)
0.394
4.6%
0.429
0.386
0.154
Myocardial infarct
32458/6458
1.459 (0.988, 2.156)
0.740
0.0%
0.058
0.368
0.150
Renal/kidney failure
32441/6435
1.493 (1.188, 1.876)
0.730
0.0%
0.001
0.133
0.173
*P value of heterogeneity chi-squared
#P value of pooled statistic
Anzeige
Quality and bias assessment
An assessment of study quality and risk of bias was performed using multiple complementary methods including funnel plots, Begg’s and Mazumdar’s rank test, and Egger’s test. There was clear symmetry in the log RR funnel plot for dislocation for these studies, suggesting a low publication bias risk (Fig. 7). The results of Begg’s and Mazumdar’s rank test (Z = 1.25, p = 0.210) and Egger’s test (P = 0.072) both suggested that there was not any significant risk of bias among study results.
Fig. 7
Funnel plot analysis of included studies
×
Discussion
FNF mostly occurs in middle-aged and elderly people and is associated with decreased bone quality due to osteoporosis. Fractures can occur when a mild twisting force is experienced, most often as a result of a fall while walking or slipping. When falling, as a result of the body torsion, indirect transmission of violence resulting in FNF. FNF are less common in adolescents, and when they do occur, they often require significant violence and are often unstable. The two main treatments for FNF are internal fixation and joint replacement. The physical characteristics of the elderly are relatively low-stress response ability to trauma, relatively weak immune suppression, and defense function. Fracture healing in the elderly is relatively slow, and most of the elderly combined with cardiopulmonary and brain diseases. Therefore, elderly patients who are bedridden for a long time are more likely to suffer from serious complications, such as some diseases such as urinary tract infection, lung inflammation, and bedsore. Elderly patients are in bed for a long time, and due to the factors of fracture, the disease existing before the fracture is more prone to relapse, leading to a high disability rate and mortality rate.
Currently, there are many surgical methods to treat FNF, but generally speaking, it is generally agreed that the better method is artificial joint replacement. Currently, HA and THA are widely used, and both advantages and disadvantages exist in clinical practice. Hip replacement can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative joint pain in patients, and because of the patient’s early weight-bearing walking, it is very important to maintain the muscle strength of the affected limb and restore good overall health. The advantages and disadvantages were discussed in the following aspects.
Firstly, it is about the risk of operation. Compared with HA, THA has many disadvantages, such as complex, large trauma, long operation time, and more intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. The advantages of HA include less trauma, short operation duration, small blood loss, simple operation compared with total hip, and high surgical safety compared with THA. However, with the development of all aspects of science and technology, the surgical risk of THA is becoming less and less, because the differences between the two surgical methods in many aspects become smaller. However, the surgical risk of THA is still high in the treatment of elderly patients with medical complications. In our study, we found that the blood loss (WMD, −45.63; 95% CI, −74.50 ~ −16.76), surgery time (WMD, −12.28; 95% CI, −13.07 ~ −11.49) were all significant decreased in the HA group than the THA group. However, the length of hospital was significantly longer in the HA group than the THA group (WMD, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.20 ~ 0.74). The mortality has no significant difference between the two groups (RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.79 ~ 3.29).
Anzeige
Secondly, it is about the reoperation. The rate of reoperation is also an important factor affecting the choice of hip arthroplasty. Dislocation of prosthesis, wear of acetabular cartilage, and sterility of artificial prosthesis are the main causes of reoperation. After a hip replacement, the joint is removed and replaced with a new one. The procedure is relatively complex and technically demanding. This operation is definitely not a simple “old for new” process. It also takes into account the differences in surgical approaches used by surgeons during the first operation, the changes in anatomy and surrounding soft tissue, and the bone defects caused by the first artificial prosthesis. Therefore, for patients, it is necessary to give them good satisfaction and reduce the probability of reoperation. In our study, we found that the incidence of reoperation (RR, 1.319; 95% CI, 0.710 ~ 2.448) has no significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of dislocation was significant decrease in the HA group than THA group (RR, 0.536; 95% CI, 0.502 ~ 0.573).
Third, it is about the complications. The elderly, as a group with a high incidence of FNF, account for about 46 percent of fractures in the elderly (4%). Elderly people suffer from many basic diseases, weakened constitution, decreased organ function, and surgical trauma, so the postoperative recovery is slow and the postoperative bed rest time is long. If the risk of postoperative complications increases, it will have a certain impact on the efficacy and prognosis of the operation. The incidence of complication has no significant difference between the two groups (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00 ~ 1.39). The infection (RR, 1.037; 95% CI: 0.760 ~ 1.416), pulmonary embolism (RR, 1.160; 95% CI, 0.803 ~ 1.676), myocardial infarct (RR, 1.459; 95% CI, 0.988 ~ 2.156) has no significant difference between the two groups. The incidence of pneumonia (RR, 1.511; 95% CI, 1.275 ~ 1.791) and renal failure (RR, 1.493; 95% CI, 1.188 ~ 1.876) were significantly higher in the HA group than the THA group.
However, there are certain limitations to the present analysis, which are as follows: (1) the limited number of included studies; (2) individual studies had variations in exclusion/inclusion criteria; (3) surgical skills varied between studies; (4) the severity of FNF in patients varied between studies; (5) the background diseases of patients were various between studies; (6) some studies were not high-quality; (7) pooled data were analyzed, as individual patient data was not available, precluding more in-depth analyses.
Conclusion
In a word, we found that HA has favor in decrease blood loss and surgery time and THA has favor in decrease the length of hospital, the incidence of pneumonia and renal failure. For the selection of surgical methods for femoral neck fracture in the elderly, we should consider several aspects, such as the age of the patient, whether there is osteoporosis, the type of femoral neck fracture, the preoperative reduction situation, and the needs of the patient and his family for the postoperative situation.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.
Der Einsatz von Operationsrobotern für den Einbau von Totalendoprothesen des Kniegelenks hat die Präzision der Eingriffe erhöht. Für die postoperative Zufriedenheit der Patienten scheint das aber unerheblich zu sein, wie eine Studie zeigt.
Mit dem Hebelzeichen-Test lässt sich offenbar recht zuverlässig feststellen, ob ein vorderes Kreuzband gerissen ist. In einer Metaanalyse war die Vorhersagekraft vor allem bei positivem Testergebnis hoch.
Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.
Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.
