Background
Breast cancer is the most common worldwide malignancy in women, accounting for approximately 29% of new cancer cases annually in women in the United States [
1]. Despite considerable advances in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches over the past decades, breast cancer is still the second most common cause of cancer death in women [
1]. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms and gene alterations in breast cancer could lead to more effective control of breast cancer clinically. To date, numerous tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes have been identified in breast cancer and further studies of these gene alterations and functions will assist in revealing the molecular mechanisms of breast cancer initiation and progression [
2].
To this end, human B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6) is a 95 kDa nuclear protein, belonging to the BTB/POZ (BR-C, ttk and bab/Pox virus and Zinc finger) domain family of transcription factors. BCL6 protein has been reported as a master regulator of B lymphocyte development and growth [
3,
4] and altered BCL6 protein expression was implicated in pathogenesis of diverse human hematologic malignancies, especially in the diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common lymphoma in adults [
5‐
7]. Overexpression of BCL6 was frequently shown in DLBCL patients due to a functional mutation in the BCL6 promoter [
5]. BCL6 protein is a potent inhibitor of senescence of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts and BCL6 expression also dramatically extends the replicative lifespan of primary human B cells [
8]. Recently, BCL6 protein was also shown to be highly expressed in various human cancers other than malignancy in the lymphoid system. For example, Kanazawa et al. showed that BCL6 protein was expressed in normal epidermis and epidermal neoplasms, suggesting that expression of BCL6 protein may be associated with differentiation in normal and neoplastic epidermal cells [
9]. Chamdin et al. reported that BCL6 was expressed in neuroblastoma, expression of which was significantly associated to poor survival of the patients [
10]. In the mammary glands, BCL6 protein was expressed in the mammary epithelium in nonpregnant and early pregnancy animals [
11] and overexpression of BCL6 prevented the duct formation and apoptosis in murine mammary epithelium [
11,
12]. However, BCL6 protein was overexpressed in breast cancer tissues, especially in high-grade ductal breast cancer compared to normal mammary gland tissues [
12,
13]. BCL6 expression was able to induce expression of tumor metastasis-related genes in breast cancer cell lines [
14]. These data suggested that BCL6 may possess an oncogenic function in breast cancer development. However, contradicted data did show that BCL6 expression was inversely associated with breast cancer cell lymph node metastasis, but associated with survival of breast cancer patients [
14]. Overall, the role of BCL6 protein in human cancers other than in the lymphoid system remains to be determined. Thus, in this study, we first determined expression of BCL6 protein in breast cancer tissues and cell lines, and then associated BCL6 expression with disease progression and prognosis. After that, we investigated the role of BCL6 expression in regulation of breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and survival
in vitro and in xenografts models. We also explored the underlying molecular events of BCL6 action in breast cancer cells.
Methods
Cell lines and culture
Human breast cancer MCF-7, T47D, SKBR3, MDA-MB-453, MDA-MB-435S, and BT549 cell lines, a human breast non-tumorigenic MCF-10A cell line, and a human mammary epithelial (HMEC) cell line were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured under the ATCC-recommended conditions. All cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2.
Breast tissue specimens
In this study, we collected two different cohorts of human breast tissue specimens, i.e., for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, we recruited 127 patients with breast cancer and 50 patients with breast benign disease who underwent surgical treatment at The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University (Hefei, China) between 2003 and 2006; for qRT-PCR, fresh tissue specimens from 30 breast cancer and 25 breast benign disease patients were prospectively collected between 2010 and 2011 from the same hospital. The fresh tissue specimens were immediately placed in a cryovial after surgery, snap-frozen, and stored in liquid nitrogen until use. Breast cancer patients who had undergone chemotherapy or radiation therapy before surgery were excluded. All breast cancer patients were female and received radical mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy. These 127 breast cancer patients were followed-up for a median 60 months. A protocol to use patient samples was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University and a written informed consent was obtained from each patient.
In situhybridization and immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from 127 breast cancer patients and 50 breast benign disease patients were used to construct tissue microarrays and cut into 4-μm-thick sections. For in situ hybridization, digoxin-labeled antisense oligonucleotide probes for BCL6 cDNA were obtained from Boshide Biotech Co. (Wuhan, China). The probe sequences were 5′-GACAGCTGTATCCAGTTCACCCGCCATGCCAGTGA-3′, 5′-TTCTATAGCATCTTTACAGACCAGTTGAAATGCAA-3′, and 5′-ATCCTGCAGATGGAGCATGTTGTGGACAGTTGCCG -3′.
For immunohistochemical analysis of BCL6 expression in tissue samples, a rabbit anti-BCL6 polyclonal antibody was obtained for Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and used at a dilution of 1:100 according to our previous studies [
15,
16].
Expression of BCL6 mRNA and protein in breast tissue specimens were reviewed and scored by two pathologists (QW and ZSW) using a light microscope (Olympus) using the staining intensity and percentage of tissue staining, i.e., 10% percent or more tumor cells stained were considered as positive, whereas <10% tumor cells stained with any intensity was considered as negative.
Plasmid constructions and generation of stable BCL6-expressing cell lines
The coding sequence of human BCL6 transcript variant 1 (GenBank accession #NM−001706) was cloned into a mammalian expression vector pReceiver (GeneCopoeia, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacture’s protocol. After DNA sequence confirmation, this vector was named as pReceiver-BCL6 (BCL6). MCF-7 cells were then stably transfected with pReceiver-BCL6 or the empty pReceiver plasmids (VEC) to establish stable cells, MCF-7-BCL6, with forced expression of BCL6 and their control cells, MCF-7-VEC, respectively.
Transfection of siRNA and miRNA
To knockdown BCL6 expression or manipulate miRNA expression, we choose T47D and MCF-7 cells as a pair of model cell lines for gene transfection. Briefly, cells (1.0 ×10
5 /well) were seeded in 6-well plates and transiently transfected with BCL6 small interfering RNA (siRNA) or control scrambled siRNA duplex (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) or with 2’-O methylated single-stranded miR-339-5p antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) vs. its negative control or miR-339-5p mimics (all from GenePharma) vs. its negative control using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequences of BCL6 siRNA and scrambled control siRNA duplex were listed in Additional file
1: Table S1.
RNA isolation and quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Total cellular RNA was isolated using a Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR was then performed to detect expression of BCL6, GAPDH, miR-339-5p, U6, and common tumor-related genes as described previously [
15,
17,
18]. The sequence of the primers used for qRT-PCR was summarized in Additional file
1: Table S2.
Protein extraction and Western blot
Total cellular protein and western blot analysis were performed according to previous studies [
15,
19]. The antibodies used were as follows: a rabbit anti-BCL6 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies), a mouse anti-cyclinD1 monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies), a rabbit anti-CXCR4 (Bioss, Beijing, China), and a mouse anti-GAPDH monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies).
Assays for cell phenotypic changes
Cell phenotypic changes after gene manipulations included proliferation, soft agar colony formation, cell migration and invasion in MCF-7 and T47D/MDA-MB-453 cells and the corresponding assays were performed as described previously [
15,
17‐
19]. In addition, we performed the cell wound healing assay to analyze tumor cell migration capacity. Briefly, T47D cells were seeded into 6-well plates and transfected with a BCL6 siRNA or NC vector. Upon cells reached totally confluence, scratching was done using a plastic tip. The wounded monolayers were incubated at 37°C in 1640 containing 10% FBS with or without mitomycin C (10 μg/ml, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) to block mitosis. Photos were taken at different periods of time under a microscope and the wound healing after scratched was measured daily.
Flow cytometry assay
Cell apoptosis was assayed using the Annexin V-Apoptosis Detection kit (BestBio, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the experiments were performed using a FACScalibur cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Cell cycle distribution was analyzed using the PI method. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated at least once.
Nude mouse breast cancer cell xenograft assay
All animal work was performed according to the animal care and use regulations of Anhui Medical University with the approved protocol by Biomedical Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University. Briefly, 5 × 106 MCF-7-VEC and MCF-7-BCL6 cells were suspended in 120 μl Matrigel/PBS at a radio of 1:1 (v/v) and then injected into the mammary fat pad of female BALB/c-nu (Slaccas, Hunan, China). The day before injection, one estrogen pellet (17β-estradiol, 0.72 mg/pellet, Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, FL) was implanted into each mouse. Tumor growth was detected by measuring the tumor mass twice a week using a formula = (length x width2)/2. The mice were ultimately sacrificed on Day 27 after implantation. Primary tumors and tumors metastasized to other organs, such as the lung and liver, were collected for further analysis.
Luciferase reporter assay
The 3’UTR region of BCL6 was cloned to the psiCHECK-2 vector, including luciferase reporter gene. BCL6 3’UTR was amplified with primers of 5’-CCAGCCACAAGACCGTCCAT-3′ and 5′-CTCCGCAGGTTTCGCATTT-3′ and then inserted into the XhoI and NotI sites of the psiCHECK-2 vector. A psiCHECK-2 construct containing 3’UTR of BCL6 with a mutated sequence of miR-339-5p was also generated. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. After that, psiCHECK-2-BCL6 3’UTR and psiCHECK-2-mut-BCL6 3’UTR were co-transfected with 20 pmol miRNA-339-5p mimics or its negative control into breast cancer cells using Lipofectamine 2000 as described previously [
15,
17]. Firefly luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity. All experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated twice.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software for Windows (version 13.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between groups were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test for qualitative variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to determine patient relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The statistical differences in survival among subgroups were compared using the log-rank test. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Discussion
In the current study, we first detected BCL6 expression in breast cancer vs. breast benign disease tissue specimens and found that levels of BCL6 mRNA and protein were significant higher in breast cancer tissues than in breast benign disease tissues. Expression of BCL6 protein was associated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis, advanced clinical stages, higher tumor grade and also Ki67 labeling index in breast cancer. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analyses showed the association of BCL6 protein expression with poor overall and relapse-free survivals of patients. After that, we assessed the effects of forced expression or depletion of BCL6 protein on breast cancer cell viability, apoptosis, migration, invasion and gene expression in vitro and in nude mice. We found that expression of BCL6 increased tumor cell viability, migration, invasion, and survival as well as expression of cyclinD1, and CXCR4 in vitro. BCL6 expression also induced formation and growth of xenografts in nude mice. The bioinformatic analysis and luciferase assay showed that BCL6 expression could be directly targeted by miR-339-5p. In conclusion, our current study demonstrated that the reduced miR-339-5p expression [our previous data (ref)] promoted BCL6 expression, which in turn induces cyclinD1 and CXCR4 expression for induction of breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Future studies will investigate whether target of BCL6 expression could be useful as a novel therapeutic strategy for breast cancer.
Clinically, patients with early stage breast cancer have relatively high survival rates, but most of breast cancer still progress unnoticeably and lead to 30% of patients relapse with a distant metastatic disease [
25]. For past several decades, numbers of biomarkers, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2/neu), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), have been identified and routinely used in clinic to predict prognosis and therapeutic response of the patients [
26,
27]. In the current study, we showed BCL6 as a potential biomarker to predict overall and disease-free survival of breast cancer patients. Indeed, BCL6 protein has been comprehensively accepted to play a role in supporting hematologic cell neoplastic transformation. Overexpression of BCL6 has been observed in 40% of DLBCL [
28], 14% of follicular lymphomas [
29], and 48% of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphomas [
30]. BCL6 expression has also been observed in skin squamous cell carcinoma [
9], neuroblastoma [
10], melanoma [
31], and breast cancer [
12‐
14]. In breast cancer, Logarajah et al. showed that BCL6 protein was expressed in most of histologically high-grade ductal breast carcinoma compared with low-grade tumors [
12]. Bos et al. reported that expression of BCL6 protein was significantly higher in breast cancer than in normal breast tissues [
13]. Another most recent study showed that high expression of BCL6 protein associated with unfavorable clinical outcome of ER-positive and premenopausal breast cancer patients [
32]. Our current data are consistent with these published studies [
12,
13] by confirmed the oncogenic effect of BCL6 in breast cancer, similar to those in hematologic malignancies.
However, Pinto et al. showed that expression of BCL6 protein was significantly down-regulated in metastatic lymph nodes than in the corresponding primary breast cancer [
14]. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown, but led us to studying the effects of BCL6 on breast cancer cell lines. Using gain and loss-of-function approaches, our in vitro data demonstrated that expression of BCL6 did enhance breast cancer cell viability, anchorage-independent growth, migration, and invasion capacity. Concordantly, expression of BCL6 promoted low-invasive MCF-7 cell growth and invasiveness in vivo. These data demonstrated that BCL6 is an oncogene or has oncogenic effects on breast cancer cells. These data were consistent with a previous study showing that BCL6 expression prevented a mammary epithelial cell line to form the ducts and apoptosis [
12]. However, it remains unknown how BCL6 contribute to breast cancer development or progression.
Thus, we then explored the underlying molecular events. CXCR4 has been identified as an important chemokine receptor in regulating cell migration, invasion and metastasis in breast cancer [
23]. CyclinD1 is an essential cell cycle regulator for progression through G1 phase and is a candidate proto-oncogene [
33]. We analyzed expression of CXCR4 and cyclinD1 in BCL6 expressed or knocked down breast cancer cell lines and found that expression of these genes was all up-regulated by BCL6 expression. Moreover, our previous study revealed that expression of BCL6 was regulated by miR-339-5p [
18], but it was unclear whether BCL6 is a direct target gene of miR-339-5p. Our luciferase assay indeed confirmed that BCL6 is the target gene of miR-339-5p. miRNAs are a class of non-protein-coding RNAs and possess an important function in regulation of gene expression [
34]. By regulating their target mRNAs for direct degradation or inhibition of translation, miRNAs play important roles in many biological processes and altered miRNA expression contributes to cancer development and progression [
34]. miR-339-5p has been implicated in regulation of cell proliferation, migration and invasion in different cancers [
18,
35]. Although miR-339-5p may target different genes, BCL6 is definitely one of them. Our current data on manipulating miR-339-5p expression did alter effects of BCL6 on breast cancer cells.
Conclusions
Our current study demonstrated that high expression of BCL6 associated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis, advanced clinical stages, higher tumor grade, and Ki67 labeling index as well as poor prognosis of breast cancer. Manipulation of BCL6 expression using the gain and loss of function approaches affected breast cancer cell viability, apoptosis, migration, invasion and gene expression in vitro and in nude mice. At the gene level, BCL6 induced CXCR4 and cyclinD1 expression and BCL6 is the target gene of miRNA, miR-339-5p. Future studies will further investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms by which BCL6 is overexpressed in breast cancer and BCL6 expression contributes to breast cancer progression. In addition, we will also determine whether BCL6 is a potential biomarker for prediction of breast cancer prognosis or as a therapeutic target for breast cancer patients.
Competing interests
The author’s declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
QW, XL, HY, YHH, SY, XWC, GLZ and XJK performed experiments and summarized the data; WYW, XNW, ZT, PEL, and ZSW designed experiments; XCX and ZSW drafted the manuscript and critically discussed the data and manuscript; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.