Background
The mainstay of treatment for “incurable” locally-advanced/metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) [
1], however after ~2-3 years the disease becomes castration-resistant (CRPCa). Historically, patients with CRPCa exhibited a median survival of less than ~18 months, although this has improved since the advent of novel chemo- and endocrine therapies [
2]. The anti-mitotic agent docetaxel was the first chemotherapeutic agent to demonstrate a significant survival advantage for patients with CRPCa [
3,
4]. Docetaxel stabilizes microtubules, thereby interrupting microtubule dynamics (including the mitotic spindle) causing mitotic arrest and accumulation of cells in G2/M (due to failure chromosome segregation and cytokinesis) and apoptosis [
5,
6].
Early trials demonstrated an overall median ~2-3 month survival advantage for docetaxel-based therapies over standard treatments for CRPCa [
3,
4], supporting its recommendation as first-line standard of care for CRPCa [
1]. However, only ~50% of patients with CRPCa will respond to docetaxel, and the modest survival advantage is at the cost of significant toxicity [
3,
4]. Recently, docetaxel plus ADT have been found to confer no statistically-significant survival advantage over ADT alone for non-CRPCa (i.e. hormone-naïve disease), despite an improvement in clinical and biochemical progression-free survival [
7].
An understanding of the biology of
de novo and acquired chemo-resistance to docetaxel (and other agents) in PCa with in-parallel biomarker discovery will help to identify patients who will not benefit from treatment prior to exposure, thereby avoiding unnecessary toxicity and guiding more effective therapeutic options. Aided by technological advances such as next generation sequencing which facilitate whole genome and transcriptome analyses, molecular profiling of pre- and post-treatment tumour samples may help to identify the mechanisms of drug action and link specific gene amplifications and mutations or expression changes to clinical chemo-sensitivity or -resistance patterns [
8].
Previously-published transcriptome-wide analyses of docetaxel action and chemo-resistance in PCa have utilised microarrays for assessment of pre- and post-extirpative surgical specimens [
9,
10] and
in vitro cell lines [
3,
11‐
13]. However, these studies are limited by the inherent bias and quantitative nature of microarray data [
14]. We performed
in vivo transcriptome profiling by next generation RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) of pre- and post-treatment transrectal ultrasound (TRUSS)-guided prostatic biopsies from patients with newly-diagnosed locally-advanced/metastatic non-CRPCa treated with docetaxel chemotherapy plus ADT.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first “real time”
in vivo RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis of clinical PCa from pre- and post-treatment TRUSS-guided biopsies of patients treated with docetaxel chemotherapy plus ADT. The limitations of our study include a targeted TRUSS-guided needle-core biopsy strategy that may result in heterogeneous tissue sampling with variable cellularity and small sample numbers due to the high quality RNA required for RNA-Seq (RIN > 6 and total RNA > 500 ng). Despite using fresh-frozen tissue samples, the high sample attrition rate (33%) from analyses prevented more meaningful clinical outcomes, such as treatment response, to be extrapolated from our results. Nonetheless, we clearly demonstrate the feasibility of this
in vivo approach to obtain informative transcriptomic data from small tissue samples pre- and post-treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy. As tissue sample processing and RNA-Seq methodologies are further refined, it may become possible to obtain reliable sequencing information from low input and/or degraded clinical samples [
33].
The transcriptomic landscape of PCa includes gene fusion products as a result genomic rearrangements [
31]. We observed transcripts derived from the commonly-reported
TMPRSS2/ERG gene fusion as well as other inter- and intra-chromosomal gene fusions. Incorporating different samples from our previously-published RNA-Seq dataset from the same study cohort [
20], we observed transcripts arising from the
TMPRSS2/ERG fusion in 28% of all pre-treatment samples. These observations are comparable to the frequency of
TMPRSS2/ERG fusions reported in Caucasian populations [
34] as well as in an Asian cohort analysed by RNA-Seq [
35].
Our analysis of docetaxel plus ADT-driven gene expression changes identified two differentially-regulated genes
ADAM7 and
FAM72B, which were also mis-regulated in a large proportion of prostate tumours from a large cohort of different patients and associated with shorter disease-free survival after treatment. Additionally, we identified enrichment for cell cycle-related genes, including the down-regulation of expression of some positive regulators of cell cycle progression ~4 weeks after the final cycle of docetaxel chemotherapy. Our observations were somewhat reassuring, as docetaxel in combination with ADT
in vivo appears to exhibit an expected mechanism of action on cell cycle progression. Furthermore, we demonstrated that androgen withdrawal did not affect the dose-dependent induction of G2/M by docetaxel
in vitro. Taken together, our data suggest a persistent anti-tumourigenic effect of docetaxel in combination with ADT
in vivo. However the longevity of this response may be limited, as a previous study of docetaxel-treated tumours identified persistent PCa several months after treatment [
36].
Finally, we identify a biomarker panel of 7 genes (
ADAM7,
FAM72B,
BUB1B,
CCNB1,
CCNB2,
TTK and
CDK1), which included a cell cycle-related geneset, that was not only mis-regulated in a significant proportion of treatment-naïve PCa specimens, but also associated with early relapse after treatment. Recently, there has been considerable interest in the use of cell cycle-related genes as biomarkers of disease progression to aid treatment decisions. The cell cycle progression (CCP) test (Prolaris
®, Myriad Genetics) is a prognostic assay based on a 46-gene expression signature that includes cell cycle-related genes, which, in combination with standard clinicopathological parameters, accurately stratifies patients with primary PCa to the risk of PCa-specific disease progression and disease-specific mortality [
37]. Based on our preliminary findings, it is also possible that the CCP test may be useful to determine the risk of disease relapse after cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced PCa.
Our study exemplifies the feasibility of
in vivo RNA-Seq-based tumour molecular profiling from pre- and post-treatment biopsies from chemotherapy-treated patients [
8] for advanced PCa to highlight the mechanisms of drug action and identify putative biomarkers of chemo-sensitivity or –resistance to (such as
ORM1) and/or prognosis (such as
ADAM7 and
FAM72B, and the cell cycle-related genes). Our preliminary findings suggest that a 7 gene signature biomarker panel, which includes cell-cycle related genes, may have prognostic value in treatment-naïve clinical PCa and warrants further investigation. Further similar larger-scale studies with high-quality outcomes data will be required to allow development of a complete oncogenomic personalised approach to patient care for advanced/metastatic PCa, with prognostication and treatment scheduling based on oncogenomic profiles to maximise chemotherapy efficacy [
38].
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the patients recruited to GenTax without whom this work would not have been possible, and staff at the Departments of Urology and Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for help with patient recruitment and clinical care. This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Sanofi-Aventis, as well as research grants from Cancer Research UK (C19198/A15339 to PR and C596/A17196 to HYL), Medical Research Council, Royal College of Surgeons of England, the Wellcome Trust and Academy of Medical Sciences, but these bodies did not have any involvement in the analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or decision regarding publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
HYL had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: HYL, IDP, PR, JS. Acquisition of data: PR, JS, IMS. Analysis and interpretation of data: PR, JS, IMS, AH, GK, HYL. Drafting of the manuscript: PR, JS, IMS, HYL. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: DS, CPP, AH, RMM, IDP, CNR. Statistical analysis: PR, JS, IMS, DS, AH. Obtaining funding: PR, CPP, IDP, HYL. Administrative, technical or material support: JTF, DS, CPP, AH, RMM, IDP. Supervision: DS, CPP, AH, HYL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.