Coagulopathy in newborns with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) treated with therapeutic hypothermia: a retrospective case-control study

Coagulopathy is one of the many consequences of compromised oxygen and blood supply to the neonatal liver and bone marrow after perinatal asphyxia [1‐6]. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH), the current standard of care for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) after perinatal asphyxia, is known to slow enzymatic activity involved in the coagulation cascade [7‐15]. Although prior studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of TH have not demonstrated increased incidence of major hemorrhage in cooled versus non-cooled infants [16, 17], most studies report high rates of coagulopathy in this patient population, often requiring transfusion therapy [18].

Transfusion therapy and coagulation monitoring during TH is variable between institutions and practitioners. It is unclear what laboratory abnormalities are predictive of bleeding in the setting of hypothermia. Additionally, it is unclear whether transfusion therapy should target normalization of standard tests of coagulation versus a more conservative approach of initiating replacement only after clinical bleeding is observed. Algorithms to optimize transfusion therapy to prevent clinical bleeding while minimizing exposure to unnecessary blood products are needed.

The aim of this study was to identify the thresholds of International Normalized Ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen (Fib) and platelet (PLT) count that are associated with bleeding in HIE infants undergoing TH. Identified thresholds can guide transfusion therapy in this population at high risk for coagulopathy and clinical bleeding.

A total of 97 infants treated with TH during the study period were evaluated. Sixteen (16.5%) infants died and 5 (5%) required ECMO during TH and were excluded from analysis. Complete bleeding and laboratory data were collected from 76 infants. The BG was comprised of 41 infants that had bleeding observed from one or more sites including intracranial (n = 13), gastrointestinal (n = 19), pulmonary (n = 18), hematuria (n = 11) or profuse umbilical stump bleeding (n = 1). Bleeding events were significant enough to require intervention by the clinical team; ie ventilator settings were escalated in setting of pulmonary hemorrhage, H₂ blockers or proton-pump inhibitors were started for gastrointestinal bleeding, and/or coagulation products were given. However, there were no major life-threatening bleeding events requiring surgical or neurosurgical interventions. There were no differences in the baseline or clinical characteristics between the BG and NBG, except that more infants with severe encephalopathy were in the BG (Table 1). Not surprisingly, more infants in the BG group received blood product transfusions and had a greater number of transfusions compared to the NBG group (p < 0.05) (Table 2).BG had higher initial and max INR, and initial aPTT than the NBG. Moreover, min PLT count and min Fib level were lower in the BG versus NBG (Figure 1). Other parameters did not differ between groups (p > 0.05).

ROC curves are shown in Figure 2. Cutpoints selected from the ROC curves to predict bleeding include min Fib level of 1.54 g/L (71% sensitivity, 68.6% specificity, AUC = 0.695, p = 0.004); min PLT count of 130.5 × 10⁹/L (71% sensitivity, 62.9% specificity, AUC = 0.695, p = 0.004); and max INR of 1.98 (73.2% sensitivity, 54.3% specificity, AUC = 0.666, p = 0.013). The ROC curve for initial aPTT was not significant.

While the safety and efficacy of TH in reducing neurodevelopmental sequelae after asphyxia is well established [16‐18, 20, 21], establishing evidence based guidelines for managing coagulopathy during TH can optimize medical care and contribute to better outcomes. While some prior studies have reported platelet counts and aPTT/PT results during hypothermia [7, 22], this is the first study to systematically evaluate the relationship between laboratory and clinical evidence of coagulopathy in newborns undergoing TH. Although major hemorrhages were not observed, which is consistent with prior randomized trials [22] and recent meta-analyses [18], clinically significant bleeding and associated exposure to transfusion therapy were highly prevalent in these critically-ill newborns. The cutpoints provided in this study provide less arbitrary thresholds for transfusion therapy in response to commonly followed tests of coagulation, addressing an important and frequently encountered comorbidity in newborns with HIE.

Coagulation disturbances after birth asphyxia have multifactorial origin. Alterations in blood and oxygen supply to the liver and bone marrow can negatively impact the synthesis of clotting factors and PLTs respectively [1, 3‐5]. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has also been frequently described following asphyxia in the newborn [2, 6]. Additionally, hypothermia has the potential to impair hemostasis by slowing enzymatic function of the coagulation cascade, impairing thrombin generation, and further triggering DIC [8, 10‐14]. Hypothermia also causes PLT dysfunction by decreasing the levels of thromboxane A2 and platelet surface expression of the glycoprotein Ib-IX complex [9, 23]. Bleeding risk, therefore, remains an important problem for infants with HIE undergoing TH. Assessment of bleeding risk is routinely performed by serial monitoring of aPTT, PT/INR, Fib levels and PLT counts. Interpretation of these tests is limited by inadequate data associating these laboratory values with bleeding in the neonatal population. Additionally, aPTT and PT/INR and Fib levels are routinely performed at 37°C in the laboratory, which may not accurately reflect the in-vivo condition of a patient undergoing TH. aPTT and PT are likely to be more prolonged at 33.5°C, thus bleeding risk may be underestimated if routine norms are considered in samples that are warmed prior to determination. The unclear relationship between laboratory abnormalities and bleeding risk explains why there is no uniformly accepted protocol for management of coagulopathy in HIE amongst practitioners and institutions. As a significant proportion of the NBG received transfusion therapy, it is presumed that this was done in response to laboratory derangements alone based on the discretion of providers. Whether this practice protected these patients from bleeding risk or whether this represents unnecessary exposure to blood products cannot be answered by the current study.

That the incidence of bleeding reported in this study (54%) exceeds the rates from published trials is likely attributable to our conservative definition of bleeding [19], which was selected to encompass bleeding events felt to be of clinical significance and not confined to only major or life-threatening events. These events either required active intervention and/or had risk for independent sequelae, as in the case of intracranial hemorrhage. Variable rates of intracranial hemorrhage (8–39%) have been reported from the randomized cooling trials [24, 25] and it is possible that risk for hemorrhage can be impacted by variable approaches to correcting coagulopathy. Intracranial hemorrhage, which may or may not be associated with clinical symptoms, is important to recognize and serves as a strong counter-argument to transfusion approaches that only treat overt bleeding. Thus, thresholds for acceptable laboratory derangements are needed to direct transfusion therapy in order to ideally prevent bleeding before it occurs.

While significant associations were found between these routinely used tests of coagulation and clinical bleeding, it should be noted that none of the tests exhibited optimal sensitivity and specificity in isolation to predict bleeding. Thus, a battery of tests must be followed in combination to provide an overall assessment of coagulation status. Investigation into other methods to assess coagulation status in this population is warranted. Thromboelastography, a functional assay of global hemostatic status that can be performed under temperature regulated conditions, shows promise [26] and may improve the approach to assessment and treatment of bleeding risk in this population.

This study has limitations. While the definition of significant bleeding used in this study has been proposed and supported by other investigators, qualifying events by an associated 2 g/dL drop in Hb may be questioned as iatrogenic anemia from frequent laboratory monitoring in the NICU is common. However, no bleeding events were classified as significant in this study based on the association with acute anemia alone (i.e. all required acute intervention and/or were identified in a critical organ system such as intracranial hemorrhage). Thus, we feel that only significant bleeding events were included in these analyses. We were unable to address the temporal relation of laboratory assessments, transfusions and bleeding events in this study. In particular, diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage was routinely made from MRI performed after rewarming. Thus we used the approach of evaluating bleeding at any point during cooling/rewarming and its association with laboratory values measured over the course of TH. Due to this approach, we excluded infants who died during hypothermia as they would, by definition, have an incomplete and non-comparable observation period. As these infants were likely to have coagulopathy with more severe multi-system disease, their inclusion could have potentially skewed the data and therefore we proceeded with a more conservative approach to evaluate only complete laboratory and bleeding data from survivors. Our transfusion practice during the study period did not call for active transfusion therapy with increased laboratory surveillance when needed to maintain the goals proposed in this study. We have since adjusted our practice based on these data and plan to evaluate whether management of coagulopathy with these proposed transfusion goals reduces clinical bleeding in babies with HIE undergoing TH.

Clinically significant bleeding is highly prevalent in neonates with HIE undergoing TH. PLT counts <130 × 10⁹/L, Fib level <1.5 g/L and an INR of >2 were associated with increased risk for clinical bleeding in this population. Further study is needed to determine whether transfusion therapy according to these thresholds will reduce the incidence of clinical bleeding in babies with HIE being treated with TH.