Introduction
Moses Maimonides, a 12th-century physician, wrote about asthma: “I conclude that this disorder starts with a common cold, especially in the rainy season…”[
1]. Consistent with this statement, recent prospective studies have detected respiratory viruses in up to 80% of asthma exacerbations of children and adults[
1‐
5]. The severity of the cold in asthmatics within its first two days predicted the subsequent severity of the asthma exacerbation[
6]. The common cold may lead to a transient bronchial hypersensitivity, which is one characteristic of asthma[
7‐
12]. Hypothetically, preventing or alleviating common cold symptoms might reduce the incidence and severity of asthma exacerbations caused by respiratory viruses.
Vitamin C was identified in the early 1900s, in the search for the etiology of scurvy[
13]. After its identification, there was much interest in the effects of vitamin C on diseases unrelated to scurvy, but its role against other diseases is still undetermined. In placebo-controlled trials 1 g/day or more of vitamin C shortened the duration of colds in adults by 8% and in children by 18%[
14‐
17]. The common cold studies did not examine the effect of vitamin C on pulmonary functions, but two trials found a greater effect on lower respiratory symptoms than on upper respiratory symptoms. Elwood et al. found that vitamin C significantly decreased the incidence of “chest colds” (−18%; cough or other chest symptoms) but not of “simple colds” (+1%; runny nose or sneezing)[
18,
19]. Anderson et al. found that vitamin C significantly decreased the incidence of “throat colds” (−21%) but not of “nose colds” (−2%)[
18,
20]. Furthermore, vitamin C prevented pneumonia in three controlled trials with participants under special conditions[
17,
21].
The use of vitamin C for treating asthma dates back to the 1940s. A few physicians reported that vitamin C seemed beneficial for some of their asthma patients, but other physicians found no such improvements in their asthma patients[
22,
23]. A recent meta-analysis of three randomized trials on vitamin C and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction found that vitamin C halved the post-exercise decline of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV
1), which indicates that vitamin C has effects on some phenotypes of asthma[
24].
This study was motivated by the findings that asthma exacerbations are often induced by the common cold, which in turn is alleviated by vitamin C. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence on the possible role of vitamin C administration on common cold-induced asthma.
Results
Three intervention studies that give information on the effect of vitamin C on common cold-induced asthma were identified. A total of 79 people participated in the three trials (Table
1). The three studies are clinically heterogeneous and the outcomes are different. Therefore no pooled effect can be calculated. Instead the studies are analyzed separately. The methodological characteristics of the three studies are described in Table
2.
The study by Anah et al. was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial with parallel groups (N = 41)[
27]. The effect of 1 g/day of vitamin C on participants who had histories of increased asthma attacks during the rainy season in Nigeria was investigated. In all previous cases their attacks were precipitated by respiratory infections, which started with a sore throat and a dry cough. The 14-week trial was carried out during the Nigerian rainy season. The study recorded 35 asthma attacks in the placebo group (n = 19), but only 9 attacks in the vitamin C group (n = 22). Thus, vitamin C decreased the incidence of all asthma exacerbations by 78% (Table
3). The effect appeared even greater on those asthma exacerbations that were classified as severe or moderate, which decreased by 89% (Table
3). Furthermore, Anah et al. reported that there was a recurrence of asthma attacks in the vitamin C group within 8 weeks after vitamin administration was discontinued, though no quantitative data were published.
The study by Schertling et al. was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial conducted in the former East Germany (N = 29)[
30,
31]. The effect of 5 g/day of vitamin C was studied on participants who had a diagnosis of infection-related asthma. Schertling et al. tested bronchial responsiveness to histamine so that hypersensitivity was defined as increase in respiratory tract resistance of 50% for a cumulative exposure to <1 μmol histamine. Vitamin C decreased the proportion of participants who were sensitive to histamine by 52 percentage points (Table
3). The decrease in prevalence was from 91% (21/23) during the placebo phase to 39% (9/23) during the vitamin C phase. The mean symptom scores and PEF values were also reported and, though non-significant, their differences were in favor of vitamin C (Table
3).
Bucca et al. investigated the effect of a single dose 1 g vitamin C on histamine challenge test of common cold patients in a self-controlled study (n = 9)[
25,
26]. A second pair of histamine challenge tests was carried out 6 weeks later after the participants had recovered. When the participants suffered from the common cold, the baseline PC
20 level was 50% lower than after they had recovered (
P = .005), which indicates that the common cold increased bronchial sensitivity to histamine. When the participants suffered from the common cold, vitamin C administration caused a 3.2-fold increase in the geometric mean histamine PC
20 level in the baseline values of 7.8 to 25.1 mg/ml (Table
3). After the participants had recovered from the common cold 6 weeks later, vitamin C increased the PC
20 level by just 1.6 fold.
A comparison between the two study days found that there was a significant interaction between the vitamin C effect and the presence of the common cold (
P = .003), which indicates that the effect of vitamin C on bronchial hypersensitivity was different between the two test days separated by 6 weeks. Furthermore, a linear regression analysis revealed that the difference in the vitamin C effect between the two study days depended significantly on the baseline histamine PC
20 level determined on the common-cold-day (Figure
1). If there are factors causing bias in the self-controlled comparison and if the factors are constant on both study days, they would be removed from the calculation of the adjusted vitamin C effect, i.e., the difference in effect between the two study days. Such potential factors include the placebo effect and tachyphylaxis. The linear regression model indicated there were no differences in the vitamin C effects between the two study days when the baseline histamine PC
20 level was 25 mg/ml on the common-cold-day (Figure
1). However, when the baseline PC
20 level was 2 mg/ml on the common-cold-day, the model predicted that vitamin C administration would increase the histamine PC
20 level 4.7-fold over the corresponding effect after recovery from the cold.
In the study by Bucca et al., there was a significant correlation between the histamine PC
20 levels on the two study days after vitamin C administration (r = 0.81,
P = .008). After vitamin C administration the geometric means of the PC
20 levels on the two days were essentially identical: 25.1 vs. 25.7 mg/ml[
25]. Before vitamin C administration the correlation between the PC
20 levels for the two days was weak (r = 0.66,
P = .054). Linear modeling was used to determine whether the increase in correlation caused by vitamin C administration was statistically significant. Adding the difference between the vitamin C effects for the two study days as a factor to the linear model explaining the baseline PC
20 levels on the common-cold-day by the baseline PC
20 levels after recovery improved the fit of the linear model significantly (
P = .003). Consequently, the closer association between the PC
20 values after vitamin C administration cannot be explained by random variation alone.
Bucca et al. did not use a placebo[
25], and therefore data on the possible role of placebo on the histamine challenge test was assessed from other studies. One study reported that the histamine sensitivity on the placebo day did not differ from the levels on the no-treatment day (95% CI: -22% to +21%)[
33]. Other studies also found no effect of placebo on histamine sensitivity[
7‐
9,
34,
35]. Another potential problem in the Bucca group’s study design was tachyphylaxis, which indicates that a second histamine challenge test carried out too soon after the first test might lead to increased PC
20 values. Although this phenomenon has been reported, in one study the increase in histamine PC
20 value was less than 1.5-fold for the second challenge test carried out at 1 hour after the first test[
36]. Other studies have found small or no tachyphylaxis effects[
35,
37‐
40]. Furthermore, the close reproducibility of the histamine challenge test in the Bucca et al. study is also inconsistent with a substantial tachyphylaxis effect[
25]. Finally, if there is a constant placebo effect or tachyphylaxis that would cause bias, such effects would be eliminated from the calculation of the adjusted vitamin C effect, i.e., the difference in effects between the two study days. Therefore, the strong association between the adjusted vitamin C effect and the baseline histamine PC
20 level is a further argument against the placebo effect and the tachyphylaxis effect (Figure
1). In conclusion, the placebo effect is not an issue and tachyphylaxis does not explain the 3.2-fold increase in the histamine PC
20 level of common cold patients who were administered vitamin C.
Discussion
The three identified studies give relevant information for assessing the potential role of vitamin C on alleviating asthma exacerbations caused by the common cold. The studies differ substantially in their methods, participants, settings and outcomes, yet each of them found a benefit from vitamin C administration.
Anah et al.[
27] recorded the occurrence of asthma exacerbations, whereas Schertling et al.[
30] and Bucca et al.[
25] studied bronchial sensitivity to histamine. The common cold can lead to a transient bronchial hypersensitivity, which is a characteristic feature of asthma[
7‐
12,
25]. Challenge tests with histamine and methacholine have been widely used for the examinations of asthma patients[
41]. Furthermore, reducing the airway hypersensitivity of asthmatics led to a significant reduction in asthma exacerbations, which implies that bronchial hypersensitivity is a clinically important measure of the asthma severity[
42].
Two of the identified studies[
27,
30] were randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials. Both studies used patients who suffered from infection-related asthma. Anah et al. found that vitamin C decreased the occurrence of respiratory infection-induced asthma attacks by 78%[
27]. Schertling et al. found that vitamin C decreased the proportion of asthma patients who suffered from bronchial hypersensitivity to histamine by 58 percentage points[
30]. In the Schertling group’s study, vitamin C did not influence asthma symptoms or PEF values. However, the number of participants in that study was small and therefore the study had insufficient statistical power to test the effect on these outcomes. The Anah et al. study was carried out in Nigeria in the 1970s, and Schertling et al. study was carried out in former East Germany in the 1980s. Thus, those findings cannot be directly extrapolated to Western countries in the 2010s. Nevertheless, these two trials were methodologically strong. The highly significant effects caused by vitamin C administration indicate a genuine biological effect on the lungs of some people who suffer from common cold-induced asthma exacerbations.
Bucca et al. found that vitamin C administration caused a 3.2-fold increase in histamine PC
20 levels of common cold patients, which indicates that vitamin C decreased bronchial hypersensitivity caused by the common cold[
25]. The effect of vitamin C was significantly smaller after the participants had recovered from the colds. Furthermore, on the two vitamin C test days, which were separated by 6 weeks, histamine PC
20 levels correlated significantly after vitamin C was administered, but did not do so before its administration. This indicates that vitamin C administration was associated with a kind of normalization of bronchial sensitivity. The study by Bucca and colleagues is methodologically weaker than the two other studies, but analyzing the two study days gives much strength compared with measuring participants only on the common-cold-day. In any case, placebo effect and tachyphylaxis do not readily explain the effect of vitamin C found in the participants when they were suffering from the common cold.
Publication bias might be a problem in the case where a few studies have been published. However, publication bias cannot reasonably explain the remarkably small
P-values found in each of the three studies reviewed here. Furthermore, publication bias cannot explain findings that are not published in the original study reports. Therefore, publication bias cannot explain the association between the PC
20 level on the common-cold day and the adjusted vitamin C effect (Figure
1). This systematic review was done by one person and one person might have a higher error rate in the extraction of data than a group. However, only three studies are included and the extracted data were several times compared against the original study reports. It is unlikely that errors would have remained. Furthermore, to increase transparency in this systematic review, the extracted data and the calculations are described in Additional files
2 and
3.
Asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome, an “umbrella concept,” that comprises a collection of different phenotypes with different underlying pathophysiologies, rather than a single disease[
43,
44]. A previous meta-analysis found that vitamin C may alleviate exercise-induced bronchoconstriction[
24] and the current study revealed that vitamin C may alleviate common cold-induced asthma exacerbations. It is noteworthy that both of these conditions involve short-term stress, caused either by physical exertion or by an infectious disease. Given the diverse asthma phenotypes that exist, it is relevant to consider whether vitamin C might influence other asthma phenotypes.
In a four-month study of British asthmatics who regularly used inhaled corticosteroids, Fogarty et al. found no effect of 1 g/day vitamin C on the FEV
1 level, on bronchial sensitivity to methacholine, or on asthma symptoms[
45]. However, those authors found that the need for inhaled corticosteroids was slightly lower in the vitamin C group[
46]. The Fogarty et al. study indicates that regular vitamin C administration is not substantially beneficial for patients with persistent asthma without acute problems. However, their study does not conflict with the possibility that vitamin C may be beneficial for pulmonary functions of some asthmatics under certain forms of acute stress, such as people who endure heavy physical activity or suffer from a viral respiratory tract infection.
Evidently, more research on the role of vitamin C on common cold-induced asthma is needed. On the other hand, vitamin C costs only a few pennies per gram and it is safe in gram doses[
16,
17,
47]. Given the strong evidence that shows that vitamin C alleviates common cold symptoms[
14‐
17], and the findings of this systematic review, it may be reasonable for asthmatic patients to test vitamin C on an individual basis when they have exacerbations of asthma caused by respiratory infections.
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests.