Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and systemic autoimmune disease that affects mainly the peripheral joints. Synovitis with infiltration of inflammatory cells, synoviocyte proliferation, and accelerated angiogenesis triggers the formation of destructive pannus tissue and osteoclast activation that lead to erosion of cartilage and bone with progressive loss of joint function [
1]. From a molecular point of view, the severity and prognosis of RA are dependent on the balance between inflammatory or destructive pathways and homeostatic or repair pathways [
2,
3]. Molecular signaling pathways, essential for tissue development and growth, such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), are likely to play a role in tissue homeostasis and repair [
4]. However, inappropriate or exaggerated activation of such pathways may also lead to pathology [
5‐
8].
BMPs are members of the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily, a group of structurally related growth and differentiation factors. Their pleiotropic effects on different cell types steer many pre- and postnatal processes, such as cell differentiation, proliferation, adhesion, motility, and apoptosis [
9‐
11]. BMPs were originally discovered as proteins that ectopically induce cartilage and bone formation
in vivo [
12] and are important during the embryonic development of articular joints [
13‐
16]. Almost 30 BMPs are described and classified into several subgroups according to their structural similarities [
17]. Binding of a dimeric BMP ligand to type I and type II BMP receptors typically activates a downstream signaling cascade involving either SMAD family member (SMAD) molecules or mitogen-activated protein kinases. In the classical and most extensively studied pathway, the receptor-ligand complex will phosphorylate the intracellular receptor-SMAD1 and -SMAD5 molecules. These will form a complex with common SMAD4, which translocates to the nucleus, binds to DNA, and directs the transcription of BMP target genes. BMP signaling is regulated at different levels: by ligand diversity, by secreted extracellular BMP antagonists, by inhibitory SMADs, and by nuclear corepressors and coactivators [
18,
19].
Different BMPs have been demonstrated in the synovium of RA patients [
20‐
22] but their function and their target cells are not yet clear. BMPs have a chondroprotective role in different animal models of RA [
23]. In the present study, we investigated the activation of BMP signaling and expression patterns of different BMP ligands and antagonists in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). CIA is a well-established mouse model of RA, which develops in susceptible mouse strains following immunization with heterologeous type II collagen (CII) emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) and shares both immunological and pathological features with human RA [
24]. Our data highlight the relevance of BMP signaling in the joint and provide a basis for further studies on the role of specific BMPs in RA.
Materials and methods
Animal studies
Eight-week-old male DBA/1J mice were purchased from Janvier Laboratories (Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France). All experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium). For induction of arthritis, chicken sternal cartilage CII (Sigma-Aldrich, Bornem, Belgium) was dissolved at 2 mg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)/0.1 M acetic acid, stirred overnight (O/N) at 6°C, and emulsified with an equal volume of CFA (1 mg/mL) (Sigma-Aldrich). One hundred microliters of the emulsion (0.1 mg of CII) was injected intradermally at the base of the tail. At day 21 after immunization, mice received an intraperitoneal booster injection of 100 μL of CII (2 mg/mL). At day 25, the onset of arthritis was synchronized by an intraperitoneal injection of 100 μL of lipopolysaccharide (500 μg/mL in PBS) (Sigma-Aldrich) [
25]. Mice were sacrificed at different time points (day 0, 20, 27, 33, 40, and 47 after immunization) for immunohistochemistry and protein and RNA expression assays. In additional experiments, mice were injected daily with 100 μL of soluble tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) receptor etanercept/PBS (250 μg/mL) (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) intraperitoneally (or PBS alone as negative control) from day 29 onwards. The severity score was determined daily according to the scoring system of Backlund and colleagues [
26]. Mice were sacrificed at day 35.
At each time point and at the end of the TNFα blocking experiment, synovium and cartilage samples were dissected, separated, and used for RNA extraction. RNA was isolated using a Nucleospin RNAII kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and reverse-transcribed using a Revert-Aid H Minus First strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For quantitative analysis, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in duplicate using the Rotor-gene 6000 detection system (Corbett Research, Westburg, Leusden, The Netherlands). Gene expression of mouse
BMP2,
BMP4,
BMP6,
BMP7, growth and differentiation factor-5(
GDF5), Noggin (
NOG), and
TNFα were studied using assay-on-demand primer/probe sets (Applied Biosystems, Lennik, Belgium). Expression was normalized to mouse housekeeping gene
GAPDH (glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) using the comparative threshold method [
27]. In kinetic experiments, data were further normalized to baseline levels.
Protein extraction and Western blot analysis of whole knees
At each time point, three sets of three pooled knees were used for protein extraction. Whole knees were weighed and homogenized (CAT homogenizer X120; CAT Ingenieurbüro M. Zipperer GmbH, Staufen, Germany) in 1 mL of cell extraction buffer (Biosource Europe, Nivelles, Belgium) supplemented with 5% Proteinase Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 mM PMSF (phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) (Sigma-Aldrich). Protein extracts were normalized to wet weight in an appropriate volume of cell extraction buffer. Samples were analyzed under reduced conditions (0.1 M DTT [1,4-dithiothreitol]). Samples were boiled for 5 minutes at 95°C, chilled on ice, and loaded onto a 4% to 12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Electrophoresis was carried out into a commercially available running buffer (NuPage MES SDS Running buffer; Invitrogen Corporation) at 130 V for 10 minutes in the beginning, followed by 25 minutes at 200 V. Proteins were transferred on a prewet PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) membrane (Millipore S.A./N.V., Brussels, Belgium) for 70 minutes at 30 V in a transfer buffer containing 0.4 M glycine, 0.5 M Tris base, 0.01 M SDS, and 200 mL/L methanol. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked in Tris-buffered saline/0.1% Tween (TBST) (wash buffer) with 5% milkpowder (BlottoA) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 hour at room temperature (RT). Blots were then probed O/N at 4°C with polyclonal antibody against phosphorylated SMAD1/5 (P-SMAD1/5) or SMAD5 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) (1:1,000 in TBST/5% bovine serum albumin [BSA]) and thereafter incubated with an appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) at a dilution of 1:5,000 in TBST/5% milkpowder for 1 hour at RT. For detection, a chemiluminescent substrate (Western Lightning; PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was applied on the membrane. Blots were visualized using an LAS-3000 mini CCD (charge-coupled device) camera using an exposure time of 15 minutes. Densitometry measurements were done using digital image densitometry analysis (ImageJ; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). As positive controls, mouse mesenchymal progenitor C2C12 cells were stimulated with recombinant BMP2 (300 ng/mL for 30 minutes). As negative controls, blots were incubated with secondary antibody alone (data not shown).
Immunohistochemistry
Knees and ankles were dissected, formaldehyde/PBS-fixed O/N, decalcified with Decal (3 days at RT) (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) or EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) (0.5 M in PBS, pH 7.5) (10 changes at 4°C), and embedded in paraffin. For immunohistochemistry, paraffin sections (5 μm thick) were deparaffinized with Histo-Clear (National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA, USA) and methanol. For antigen retrieval, sections were incubated 2 hours at RT in 0.1 M sodium citrate/0.1 M citric acid. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched by incubating the slides for 10 minutes in 3% H2O2 in water (BMP7 and P-SMAD1/5) or 3% H2O2 in methanol (BMP2). Sections were washed three times in PBS/0.1% Triton (BMP7 and P-SMAD1/5) or in TBST (wash buffer) (BMP2) and blocked 30 minutes at RT in 20% donkey serum (BMP7, BMP2) or 20% goat serum (P-SMAD1/5) in wash buffer and were incubated O/N at 4°C with primary antibody at a final concentration of 10 μg/mL chicken anti-BMP7 (Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA), 2 μg/mL goat anti-BMP2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), 1:50 dilution of rabbit anti-P-SMAD1/5 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) or with isotype control (chicken, goat, and rabbit IgG) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) or serum (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) at an appropriate concentration in wash buffer. Sections were then washed three times with wash buffer and incubated for 30 minutes at RT with secondary antibody. For BMP7 immunostaining, the secondary antibody was an HRP-conjugated anti-chicken (Jackson ImmunoResearch Europe Ltd, Newmarket, Suffolk, UK) diluted 1:100. For BMP2 immunostaining, a biotinylated donkey anti-goat at 1:400 dilution was used, followed by streptavidin anti-HRP (LSAB kit) (Dako) (30 minutes at RT). For P-SMAD1/5 immunostaining, an ABC kit (Vecta stain rabbit IgG [Vector laboratories Ltd., Peterborough, UK]) was used for signal amplification. Liquid DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) substrate chromogen system (Dako) was used as a peroxidase substrate. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Adjacent sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). GDF5 immunohistochemistry was not performed on these samples as we found that different commercially available antibodies showed a lack of specificity.
Statistical analysis
Where appropriate (n > 3), results were analyzed with SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with the unpaired non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Statistically significant differences were defined as P values of less than 0.05.
Discussion
In the present study, we demonstrated a dynamic activation of the BMP signaling pathway, as detected by P-SMADs, in a mouse model of RA, CIA. The activation pattern is dependent on the stage of disease, starting, in the initial phase, at the synovial lining layer, gradually shifting toward the subintimal region and eventually, in the destructive phase, persisting in pannus tissue. Moreover, similar dynamic expression levels were shown for different BMP ligands in CIA. A more extensive study of BMP2 and BMP7, different BMP subfamily members, revealed for both BMPs a distinct and dynamic pattern. In contrast to BMP2, which is restricted mainly to the synovial lining layer and articular cartilage, BMP7 resembles the P-SMAD1/5 positivity pattern very closely (Figure
1). Upon TNF blockade, the expression of BMP7 was increased in the articular cartilage of affected joints, whereas in the synovium the expression levels of BMP2, BMP7, and GDF5 were unchanged, suggesting that at least part of the regulation of BMP expression is TNF-independent. This suggests that, although some BMPs are upregulated under inflammatory conditions, other autocrine and paracrine mechanisms may be important and may sustain BMP expression during the arthritic disease process [
3,
28]. In addition, the upregulation of BMP7 seen after anti-TNF treatment, which has an inhibitory effect on cartilage and bone destruction, supports an anabolic effect of TNF blockage. Until now, this association was shown with the Wnt pathway in arthritic mice, in which inhibition of TNF decreased the expression of Dickkopf, a Wnt antagonist, known for its neutralizing effect on anabolic mechanisms while supporting catabolic pathways of joint destruction [
29], and with melanoma inhibitory activity in RA patients, a chondrocyte-specific molecule with anabolic characteristics, which has a decreased expression under pro-inflammatory cytokine conditions [
30].
Results of earlier studies on BMP expression in RA already speculated on a potential role for BMPs in RA. Our group showed an increased expression of BMP2 and BMP6 in the synovium of RA patients and illustrated their association with apoptosis of synoviocytes [
20]. BMP4 and BMP5, however, are reduced in the synovium of RA patients as compared with healthy patients [
21]. BMP7 has been demonstrated in the synovial fluid of RA patients and levels are correlated with severity of disease [
31]. Marinova-Mutafchieva and colleagues [
22] observed BMP type Ia (activin-like receptor kinase-3) receptor-positive mesenchymal cells in the synovium of RA patients, and recently we described different BMP target cells, including mostly fibroblast-like synoviocytes and the vascular-perivascular niche, in synovial biopsies of RA patients [
28]. An effective treatment of arthritis resulted in an overall reduction of active BMP signaling. However, the pathway remained active and the relative number of P-SMAD1/5-positive cells did not change, suggesting that indeed part of BMP regulation is inflammation-independent.
Animal models of arthritis are increasingly used to address the role of BMPs in disease pathogenesis. Our group previously studied the role of BMP signaling in joint homeostasis and repair by modulating the BMP signaling pathway in different mouse models of chronic arthritis [
23].
NOG haploinsufficiency provided protection for articular cartilage against destruction in methylated BSA-induced arthritis and delayed the progression from cartilage to bone formation in a mouse model of spontaneous ankylosing enthesitis [
23] by enhancing BMP signaling. Blaney Davidson and colleagues [
32] showed that BMP2 is associated with cartilage protection, chondrogenesis, and osteophyte formation in an animal model of osteoarthritis, and Badlani and colleagues [
33] demonstrated that BMP7 protected the articular cartilage in a rabbit model of osteoarthritis, confirming the
in vitro pro-anabolic and anti-catabolic properties of BMP7 as proposed by Chubinskaya and colleagues [
34] and Fan and colleagues [
35]. Overexpression of
NOG rendered the cartilage more vulnerable in two mouse models of destructive arthritis (methylated BSA and CIA) [
23] and inhibited the onset and progression of remodeling arthritis [
8].
In contrast, in these overexpression or genetic models, we have not seen detectable differences in synovitis [
23]. Recently, Bobacz and colleagues [
36] demonstrated a differential expression of GDF5 and BMP7 in articular cartilage and synovium of h
TNFtg mice. They found an increased expression of BMP7 and GDF5 in the synovium of h
TNFtg mice along with a decrease of both genes in articular cartilage. Based on their
in vitro data, they concluded that a decrease in the cartilage could compromise cartilage repair while an increase of BMP7 and GDF5 in the synovium might contribute to synovial hypertrophy. However, Steenvoorden and colleagues [
37] showed that transforming growth factor-beta induced an epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like phenomenon, which apparently precedes synovial hypertrophy, and which can be inhibited
in vitro by adding BMP7. Contrasting data also exist on the function of BMP7 in other disease models. In inflammatory bowel disease [
38] and acute renal failure [
39], BMP7 treatment reduces the severity of the pathogenesis and favors healing. BMP7 inhibits tumor growth in some forms of cancer [
40]. In contrast, BMP7 can promote cell invasion and tumor growth [
41] and directs cancer to metastasis [
42,
43] or exerts malignant fibrinogenic effects [
44].
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
MD performed and analyzed the experiments. RJUL and FPL participated in the design and coordination of the study, helped to draft the manuscript, and gave their final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.