Background
With increasing age, blood vitamin D concentrations decrease due to decreased kidney function, diminished sun exposure, intrinsic skin response to ultraviolet radiation and poor diet [
1]. Vitamin D deficiency contributes to the development of osteoporosis and sarcopenia in older individuals, which increases the risk of fractures and falls and concomitant morbidity and mortality [
2‐
4].
Frailty is a clinical state in which an individual’s vulnerability to developing increased dependency and/or mortality when exposed to a stressor is increased [
5‐
7]. Numerous frailty diagnostic tools have been proposed, with one recent systematic review [
8] identifying 67 various frailty instruments. The Physical Frailty Phenotype [
7], which includes indicators such as shrinking, weakness, poor endurance, slowness, and low physical activity, is a widely used instrument for assessing physical frailty in the research setting. However, the concept of frailty, i.e., general vulnerability to various external stressors, extends far beyond the physical dimension, resulting in a multidimensional conceptualization of frailty based on interactions among various domains, including physical, psychological and social domains [
5,
8‐
10]. Early detection of frailty may present an opportunity to introduce effective management strategies to improve outcomes [
9].
An increasing number of studies investigating the association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and frailty have yielded conflicting information. Although hypovitaminosis D can potentially increase the risk of frailty, not all observational studies have confirmed this relationship [
11,
12]. Evidence from several cross-sectional studies supports a U-shaped [
13] or linear inverse association between 25OHD levels and frailty [
14,
15]. However, findings from longitudinal studies on the association between 25OHD levels and the development of frailty are inconsistent. Several studies have indicated that low vitamin D levels are significantly associated with frailty syndrome in the elderly, whereas others have found no association [
16‐
19]. When the results were combined in a meta-analysis [
12] published in 2016, the lowest 25OHD levels were associated with a 27% increase in the risk of frailty compared to the highest levels of 25OHD. However, the findings of the previous meta-analysis may be over- or underestimated due to variation in the 25OHD cutoff values used to define low and high 25OHD level categories as well as variation in the units used to measure serum levels of 25OHD.
Furthermore, the exact relationships, including whether a dose-response pattern exists, are currently unclear. Defining which levels of 25OHD are strongly associated with frailty syndrome is important for shaping elderly health recommendations about vitamin D supplementation considering the optimal serum 25OHD concentration. Furthermore, a recent prospective cohort study [
20] in community-dwelling older women with a mean follow-up of 8.5 years did not identify a significant association between deficient (10–19 ng/mL) or insufficient (20–29.9 ng/mL) vitamin levels and incident frailty when compared to sufficient levels (≥30 ng/mL). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis of published cross-sectional and prospective cohort studies to further clarify the association between vitamin D and the risk of frailty.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first dose-response quantitative systematic review of observational studies investing the effect of serum 25OHD levels on the risk of frailty using data from both cross-sectional and prospective cohort studies. This meta-analysis of data from more than 20,000 study participants demonstrates a statistically significant inverse association between serum 25OHD levels and the risk of frailty, and this finding was consistent across subgroups. A 25-nmol/L increase in 25OHD levels was associated with an 11% decrease in the incidence of frailty in prospective cohort studies and a 12% decrease in the risk of frailty in the cross-sectional studies. A statistically linear relationship between serum 25OHD levels and the risk of frailty was also found, even after adjustments for other known risk factors.
We estimated a protective effect of a 25-nmol/L increase in 25OHD levels against frailty because this number is the difference between the upper limit of vitamin D deficiency, defined by most experts as a 25OHD level less than 50 nmol/L, and the lower limit of sufficient vitamin D levels above 75 nmol/L. Additionally, a daily intake of at least 1000 IU (25 μg/d; 1 μg = 40 IU) of vitamin D3 appears to be required to elevate vitamin D concentrations by 25 nmol/L, which would ensure that no less than 50% of the population has the recommended 25OHD level of at least 75 nmol/L [
3,
18]. Several studies indicated increases in serum 25OHD levels of only ~ 7–10 nmol/L per 400 IU of daily vitamin D supplementation [
29,
30]. Recently, a study reported that the extent of the 25OHD increase upon vitamin D supplementation depended on 25OHD baseline levels, age, and body weight [
31]. Hence, a new guideline for the dosing requirement for vitamin supplementation in frail elderly persons, based on initial vitamin D levels, should be established after further investigation.
A previous meta-analysis [
12] of seven prospective cohorts reported an inverse association between vitamin D deficiency and frailty. However, only data in the highest compared with the lowest categories of 25OHD were used rather than the use of all categories. This dose response meta-analysis allowed us to evaluate risk across the entire spectrum of observed 25OHD levels. We observed an inverse linear association between 25OHD levels and the risk of frailty among the elderly population, suggesting that any incremental increase in serum 25OHD level was associated with a decreased risk of frailty. However, because serum 25OHD concentrations in the current data for the frailty study range from 12.5 to 95 nmol/L, we have not been able to investigate the dose-response relationship between higher levels of 25OHD, i.e., > 95 nmol/L and risk of frailty. It is too early to determine whether there is a specific cutoff level of serum 25OHD that increases or reduces the risk of developing frailty syndrome because a limited number of studies used serum 25OHD levels as a categorical variable and provided RR data for each category and because of the variation in the definition of frailty. Thus, the results of this analysis should be interpreted cautiously. We cannot rule out the possibility that the serum 25OHD level has a threshold rather than dose-response effect on the risk of frailty.
Our results suggest that high 25OHD levels are associated with a lower risk of frailty in elderly people. Conversely, frailty itself may contribute to lower 25OHD by reducing the levels of outdoor activity and sunlight exposure. Elderly individuals with frailty are at a high risk of developing vitamin D deficiency due to decreased dietary intake, less sun exposure, and a decreased capacity to produce sufficient amounts of calcitriol due to an age-related decline in hydroxylation by the kidney [
1]. The causality of the association between low vitamin D levels and the frailty syndrome has not been completely elucidated. Nevertheless, there are several potential biological mechanisms that could explain the inverse association between vitamin D and frailty.
Considerable overlap exists between sarcopenia and frailty, especially in terms of the physical aspects of the frailty phenotype: low grip strength, gait speed and muscle mass [
32]. While the underlying mechanisms and pathophysiology of sarcopenia remain to be clarified, inadequate nutritional intake in older individuals may contribute to the multifactorial pathogenesis of sarcopenia [
33]. In particular, vitamin D, one of the most popular micronutrients, was reported to play important roles in muscle differentiation, stimulation of calcium and phosphorus transport and muscle contraction [
34]. A muscle biopsy study revealed atrophy of type II muscle fibers in subjects with profound vitamin D deficiency [
35]. During sudden movement, the fast and strong type II muscle fibers are the first to be recruited to avoid falling [
36]. A meta-analysis observed that daily vitamin D doses in the range of 700 to 1000 IU or achieving serum concentrations between 60 and 95 nmol/L reduced the risk of falling by 19% in older individuals [
3]. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25OHD) can act on muscle fibers by binding to its nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR) and thereby increasing the de novo synthesis of protein, which regulates muscle strength [
36]. VDR number decreases with aging in several organs involved in calcium metabolism, and 1alpha-hydroxylase activity decreases mainly due to a decrease in renal function, reducing vitamin D activation [
1]. An age-related decline in VDR expression is supported by studies in rats in which VDR expression declined with advancing age in both the intestine and bone [
37,
38]. When 25OHD levels are low, active metabolite 1,25OHD levels and calcium absorption decrease [
39]. This reduced serum calcium led to an increase in parathyroid hormone levels to stimulate 1,25OHD production, resulting in an increased risk of bone turnover and bone loss [
39,
40]. Consequently, a decline in muscle function and strength caused by vitamin D could explain slowness, low physical activity and weakness.
The last pathway through which low vitamin D may affect frailty is related to its hypothesized anti-inflammatory properties [
41]. Several studies [
16,
17,
29] have demonstrated a heightened inflammatory state among frail older adults marked by high serum levels of inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines and acute phase proteins, supporting the existence of a dysregulated immune system in frailty. An increased susceptibility to infection and risk of autoimmune disease has been shown in 25OHD deficiency. Illness may be the beginning of a vicious cycle between 25OHD deficiency and frailty [
5]. Individuals with illness tend to exhibit poor nutritional status, go outside less frequently and experience less sun exposure, which are underlying causes of low serum 25OHD concentrations [
5,
6,
10,
33]. A recent study suggested that 1,25OHD may be an important regulator of the inflammatory response during bacterial infection [
42]. Active vitamin D metabolites can downregulate inflammatory markers via the nuclear VDR expressed in antigen-presenting cells, and vitamin D deficiency may result in increased pro-inflammatory cytokines that impact muscle strength and performance [
43,
44].
The findings of our study should be interpreted within its limitations. The included studies have no data regarding vitamin D supplementations evaluated through food frequency questionnaires or self-administered questionnaires, which could affect serum 25OHD concentrations; therefore, the present study may under- or overestimate our results. The definitions for frailty used in the included studies were different (i.e., Fried phenotype, modified phenotype, nine frailty indications, and frailty index), thus affecting our pooled analysis, although subgroup analysis was performed according to definitions of frailty. Because several eligible studies did not provide sufficient information for a dose-response analysis of 25OHD levels, the number of participants, cases, and logarithms of RRs and corresponding standard errors, we excluded the potential related studies [
19,
45‐
49], which may introduce a potential selection bias in our analysis. Unlike those observed for prospective cohort studies, the results from cross-sectional studies were somewhat heterogeneous but consistently pointed to an inverse relationship despite the observation that the strength of the association differed substantially across studies. Additionally, publication bias seems to have occurred for cross-sectional but not for prospective cohort studies in the literature, which may contribute to the stronger inverse association observed among the former. Our meta-analysis only included studies published in English and did not search for unpublished studies that might contribute to the asymmetrical funnel plot. When we explored the influence of a potential publication bias trim-and-fill method, our findings revealed no significant association of 25OHD with frailty among the cross-sectional studies. However, detection and adjustment of publication bias is difficult and somewhat controversial when only a small number of trials is available [
50]. The funnel plot suggests the presence of three negative, outlying studies that were not balanced by positive studies. Additional investigations including a reference review did not reveal any further peer-reviewed studies for inclusion. Although this may represent publication bias, it may also reflect a truly significant inverse relationship between vitamin D status and frailty.