A significant number of patients visit dental clinics because of unusual oral sensations for which no physical cause can be found. Such patients are recognized as having oral somatic delusion (OSD). OSD may be either primary (monosymptomatic) or secondary to another disease, such as depression or cerebral infarction. Although the presenting complaints of patients with primary and secondary OSD are nearly indistinguishable, symptoms in patients with secondary OSD seem to be resistant to treatment compared with those in patients with primary OSD. Moreover, right dominant cerebral blood flow (CBF) has been reported in patients with primary OSD, but the difference in CBF between patients with primary and secondary OSD remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the differences in clinical characteristics and CBF distribution between patients with monosymptomatic OSD (non-depression group) and OSD in conjunction with remitted depression (depression group).
Methods
Participants were 27 patients of a psychosomatic dentistry clinic, all diagnosed with OSD. They were categorized into either the non-depression group (17 patients) or the depression group (10 patients) on the basis of assessments by their personal medical providers. CBF was examined using single-photon emission computed tomography.
Results
There was no difference in clinical presentation between the two groups. A significant right dominant asymmetry in the temporal and posterior cerebral regions was observed in both groups. In the central region, a right dominance was seen in the non-depression group, while a left dominance was seen in the depression group. Moreover, the mean regional CBF values for patients in the depression group were significantly lower in several regions (including bilateral callosomarginal, precentral, angular, temporal, posterior cerebral, pericallosal, lenticular nucleus, thalamus, and hippocampus; and right central and cerebellum) than for patients in the non-depression group.
Conclusion
These results suggest that the temporal and posterior cerebral regions are involved in in the pathophysiology of OSD, regardless of depression history, and that widespread CBF reduction is a characteristic of remitted depression.
Hinweise
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
MW participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. MW, YU, AM, YS, TY, TS, CS, AK, and MT participated in the patients’ treatments and collected data. AT performed and assessed SPECT and helped draft the manuscript. AU and TN participated in study design and coordination and helped draft the manuscript. HM and AT conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Abkürzungen
CBF
Cerebral blood flow
DDST
Delusional disorder, somatic type
mCBF
Mean cerebral blood flow
OSD
Oral somatic delusion
rCBF
Regional cerebral blood flow
ROI
Region of interest
SPECT
Single-photon emission computed tomography
HDS-R
Revised hasegawa dementia scale
99mTc-ECD
Tc-99 m ethylcysteinate dimer
3DSRT
Three-dimensional stereotactic regions of interest template
SDS
Zung self-rating depression scale
Background
A significant number of patients who visit dental clinics report unusual sensations in the oral area (e.g., sticky or slimy saliva, the presence of foreign objects such as sand, bubbles, eggs or metal pieces, and so on), but no corresponding abnormality can be found on physical examination. Such patients are recognized as having oral somatic delusion (OSD), oral paresthesia, or oral cenesthopathy.
Monosymptomatic OSD [1-3] is categorized as a delusional disorder, somatic type (DDST) [4], but it sometimes appears secondary to a psychiatric disorder such as schizophrenia or depression [5,6] or to cerebrovascular disease [7]. Most patients with monosymptomatic OSD first visit a dental clinic because their cenesthopathic symptoms are limited to the oral cavity, convincing them that there is a physical problem in that area. Some patients with OSD are referred to dentists by their psychiatrists because of oral cenesthopathic symptoms that developed while their depression was in remission. Because the chief complaints of patients with primary and secondary OSD are very similar, it is difficult to distinguish between them on the basis of symptoms alone. However, the symptoms of patients with secondary OSD seem to be resistant to treatment compared with those of patients with primary (monosymptomatic) OSD.
Anzeige
Several studies of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in patients with DDST have shown left temporal and left parietal lobe hypoperfusion that normalized as the symptoms improved [8-10]. We also previously reported a case of OSD in which a rightward asymmetry of blood flow in the temporal area disappeared after successful treatment [2]. Furthermore, another of our recent studies demonstrated that the CBF in patients with OSD had a right > left asymmetry in the frontal and temporal regions compared with the CBF of control patients [3]. Thus, a rightward asymmetry, especially in the temporal area, may be associated with the development of cenesthopathy.
In the current study, we hypothesized that the clinical features and the CBF distribution patterns in secondary OSD, especially when it appears in the remitted period of depression, are different from those in primary (monosymptomatic) OSD.
With the aim of clarifying the differences between primary (monosymptomatic) OSD and secondary OSD associated with the remitted period of depression, we investigated the clinical characteristics and the CBF distributions using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
Methods
This study involved 27 patients with OSD who visited the psychosomatic dentistry clinic of Tokyo Medical and Dental University dental hospital in Tokyo, Japan. All of the subjects provided written informed consent. The exclusion criteria were the presence of a delusion or hallucination involving a body part other than the oral region, abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging findings, a low Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS-R) score (<25) to exclude dementia, and the presence of other neurological diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease. Because of previous reports that pain causes changes in the CBF [11-13], subjects with pain in their oral cavity or any other body parts were also excluded.
Anzeige
Based on the results of patient interviews and assessments by their attending doctors (including psychiatrists, family physicians and other medical specialists), the subjects were grouped as follows: non-depression group (no history of psychiatric disorders) and depression group (oral symptoms appeared during a remission period of a major depressive disorder). For the subjects in the depression group, all the subjects’ depressive states were assessed as “remitted” or “very much improved” by their psychiatrists.
The depressive state of each subject was assessed at the time of the first examination using the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). All subjects were right-handed except subject No. 11.
Ethics statement
This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethical Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University (no. 356).
Demographic data
The demographic data for all subjects are listed in Tables 1 and 2. The non-depression group consisted of 17 subjects (15 women, 2 men) with no history of psychiatric disorders; the mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 67.65 ± 10.33 years (range, 50–83 years). The depression group consisted of 10 subjects (7 women, 3 men) who developed OSD during a remission period of depression; the mean ± SD age was 67.60 ± 6.59 years (range, 57–78 years).
Table 1
Profiles of subjects in the non-depression group
No.
age sex
Duration of illness (months)
Complants
Onset opportunities
Antipsychotics beeing taken at time of first examination
Antipsychotics beeing taken at the time of SPECT examination
SPECT imaging was performed with the subjects resting and supine, with eyes closed and in quiet surroundings after injection of a bolus of 600 MBq of Tc-99 m ethylcysteinate dimer (99mTc-ECD) via the right brachial vein.
First, the passage from the heart to the brain was monitored using a rectangular large-field dual-head gamma camera (E.CAM Signature; Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with low-energy high-resolution parallel-hole collimators. Data acquisition consisted of a sequence of 100 frames at a rate of 1 s/frame using a 128 × 128 matrix. Next, SPECT images were obtained using the same gamma camera equipped with fan-beam collimators. The energy window was set at 140 keV ± 15%, and 45 step-and shoot images were obtained throughout 180 degrees of rotation (128 × 128 matrix, 1.72 mm/pixel) with an acquisition time of 30 s/step. All the images were reconstructed using the ordered subset expectation maximization method and were smoothed three-dimensionally using a Butterworth filter. The Chang method was used to correct for gamma ray attenuation.
Data analysis
For the regional CBF (rCBF) quantification, the Patlak plot method [14,15] was applied to the 99mTc-ECD cerebral blood perfusion SPECT images to measure the mean CBF (mCBF) of bilateral cerebral hemispheres. Quantitative flow-mapping images were then obtained from the qualitative cerebral perfusion SPECT images using the Patlak plot graphical analysis and Lassen’s correction [16,17].
The rCBF quantification was performed using a three-dimensional stereotactic regions of interest template (3DSRT) program [18,19]. 3DSRT is a fully automated rCBF quantification program that can be used to examine a total of 636 regions of interest (ROIs). These 636 ROIs are categorized into 12 brain segments on the 3DSRT template: callosomarginal, precentral, central, parietal, angular, temporal, posterior cerebral, pericallosal, lenticular nucleus, thalamus, hippocampal, and cerebellar segments. The blood flow to each ROI was quantified in mL/100 g/min.
Anzeige
For the analysis, the rCBF values obtained from the 3DSRT data and mCBF values obtained from the Patlak Plot method were used. As an index of brain perfusion asymmetry, the right to right + left ratio [R/(R + L) ratio] was calculated for the 12 brain segments in each subject.
The R/(R + L) ratio equaled the rCBF values for the target segment on the right side divided by the sum of the rCBF values for the corresponding segments on the right and left sides.
The mean rCBF values and the mean R/(R + L) ratios for each brain segment and the mCBF values for global and for right and left hemispheres were calculated separately for the non-depression and the depression group. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD.
Statistical analysis
PASW 17.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform the Mann–Whitney U test and the Pearson’s χ2 test. All the tests were two-tailed, and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Anzeige
Results
Clinical features of patients in non-depression and depression groups
Tables 1 and 2 show the demographic and clinical data of the OSD patients involved in the present study. No significant differences in age (P = 0.639) or sex (P = 0.239) were observed between the non-depression and the depression groups. In our previous report [3], the subjects were also predominantly female (6 women, 2 men), but the mean ± SD age was 75.9 ± 6.0 years, which is older than the subjects in the present study.
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the chief complaints in both groups were similar: “sticky or slimy saliva”, “foreign body sensation”, “bitter or sour taste”, or “something resembling bubbles, pieces of metal, or plastic”. The duration of illness in the depression group was 27.14 ± 20.52 months (range, 3–81 months), which was longer than that in the non-depression group (22.35 ± 15.18 months; range, 8–56 months). However, the difference was not significant (P = 0.309). Despite the long duration of symptoms, all the subjects continued to socialize. In the depression group, the mean time from onset of depression to onset of OSD varied (6.70 ± 5.76 years; range, 1–18 years), but all of the subjects were in the remission period of depression when the OSD appeared, according to the assessments made by their psychiatrists. In the depression group, the medications that were being taken at the time of the first examination were mainly anxiolytics or hypnotics, and some patients were not taking any antidepressant at all. Regarding the SDS score, the mean score in the non-depression group (43.9 ± 14.4) was somewhat higher than that in the depression group (38.9 ± 7.26), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.245). No apparent difference was observed in any clinical characteristic categories between the non-depression and depression groups.
Difference in rCBF between non-depression and depression groups
Table 3 shows the mean rCBF values for the 24 segments in each of the groups. In the non-depression group, a right dominant asymmetry was observed for many segments, especially the temporal, posterior cerebral, and cerebellum (where significant differences were observed). In the depression group, a significant right dominant asymmetry was observed in the temporal and posterior cerebral. Furthermore, in the depression group, the central region showed a significant left dominant asymmetry. We examined and compared the R/(R + L) ratio in each region for both groups (Figure 1). A right dominant asymmetry was observed in many regions in both the non-depression and depression groups. However, a significant difference between the non-depression and depression groups was observed only for the central region, with a right dominant asymmetry observed in the non-depression group and a left dominant asymmetry observed in the depression group.
Table 3
Mean rCBF values for 24 segments in the non-depression and depression groups
Right hemisphere
Left hemisphere
P value
non-depression group
callosomarginal
43.9 ± 3.82
43.56 ± 4.19
0.156
precentral
46.41 ± 4.18
45.44 ± 4.62
0.114
central
44.61 ± 3.54
43.98 ± 3.99
0.198
parietal
44.28 ± 4.03
42.94 ± 4.07
0.056
angular
46.92 ± 4.96
45.54 ± 3.90
0.097
temporal
43.74 ± 3.34
41.99 ± 3.44
0.012*
posteriorcerebral
48.34 ± 3.85
47.41 ± 3.87
0.042*
pericallosal
46.74 ± 4.16
46.43 ± 4.52
0.115
lenticular nucleus
50.13 ± 4.58
49.39 ± 4.54
0.260
thalamus
46.94 ± 5.33
46.15 ± 4.66
0.218
hippocampus
37.74 ± 4.02
37.81 ± 4.31
0.876
cerebellum
55.67 ± 5.61
54.42 ± 6.34
0.018*
depression group
callosomarginal
39.19 ± 4.33
39.28 ± 4.40
0.564
precentral
41.78 ± 5.22
41.12 ± 4.39
0.344
central
40.71 ± 4.42
41.55 ± 4.03
0.030*
parietal
39.84 ± 5.14
39.27 ± 4.49
0.366
angular
40.71 ± 4.30
40.56 ± 4.61
0.887
temporal
38.26 ± 3.30
36.96 ± 2.83
0.027*
posteriorcerebral
44.50 ± 3.71
43.80 ± 3.46
0.016*
pericallosal
42.14 ± 4.68
41.93 ± 4.30
0.355
lenticular nucleus
45.00 ± 3.12
44.63 ± 2.74
0.229
thalamus
41.03 ± 4.35
39.58 ± 4.39
0.186
hippocampus
33.82 ± 2.51
33.56 ± 2.43
0.662
cerebellum
51.11 ± 4.21
50.35 ± 4.72
0.142
*; P < 0.05.
In the non-depression group, significant right dominant asymmetries were observed in the temporal, posterior cerebral, and cerebellum. In the depression group, a significant left dominant asymmetry was observed in the central, and significant right dominant asymmetries were observed in the temporal and posterior cerebral.
Figure 1
Mean R/(R + L) ratio for each segment. A significant difference was observed in the central: a right dominant asymmetry was observed in the non-depression group, and a left dominant asymmetry was observed in the depression group.
×
Figure 2 shows the difference in the mean rCBF values between the non-depression and depression groups. Analysis of each segment revealed that the mean rCBF values in the depression group were significantly lower than those of the non-depression group in the bilateral callosomarginal and precentral; right central; bilateral angular, temporal, posterior cerebral, pericallosal, lenticular nucleus, thalamus, and hippocampus; and right cerebellum. Moreover, because the rCBF patterns in both groups were similar, these reductions were not partial but were total and even. To confirm these global CBF reductions in the depression group, the mCBF values measured by the Patlak Plot method also compared the two groups. The mCBF values in the depression group were significantly lower in the global (P = 0.0045) and the right (P = 0.0014) and left (P = 0.0011) hemispheres than those in the non-depression group (Figure 3).
Figure 2
Mean regional cerebral blood flow values for 24 segments in each group. The mean rCBF values in the depression group were significantly lower in all segments except the left central, bilateral parietal, and cerebellum, compared with the values in the non-depression group.
Figure 3
Mean regional cerebral blood flow values for global and the left and right hemispheres. All the mCBF values in the depression group were significantly lower than those in the non-depression group.
×
×
Anzeige
Effects of medications on mCBF values
As listed in Table 1, 15/17 patients in the non-depression group and 10/10 patients in the depression group were taking psychotropics (antipsychotics, antidepressants, or anxiolytics) or hypnotics at the time of SPECT examination. Since the doses and types of medications vary widely, this factor is difficult to standardize. We concentrated on the use of antidepressants, which were taken by the largest number of subjects, and standardized the data using an imipramine equivalent [20] (Table 4). No significant difference in the imipramine equivalent dose was observed between the non-depression and depression groups (P = 0.155). The number of patients taking antidepressants was 8/17 in the non-depression group and 8/10 in the depression group. Focusing on only the patients who were taking antidepressants, the mCBF value in the depression group was significantly lower than that in the non-depression group (8 patients in each group; global P = 0.050; left hemisphere P = 0.038, right hemisphere P = 0.021), with no significant difference in the imipramine equivalent doses (P = 0.959). Within the non-depression group, the mCBF value in the 8 patients taking antidepressants was slightly lower than that in the 9 patients who were not taking antidepressants, although the difference was not significant (global P = 0.167; left hemisphere P = 0.236; right hemisphere P = 0.321).
Table 4
Mean cerebral blood flow (mCBF) values and mean imipramine equivalent doses
Mean of imipramine equivalent dose
mCBF values
Whole brain
Left hemisphere
Right hemisphere
non-depression group
total (n = 17)
38.53 ± 65.57
43.15 ± 2.85
43.31 ± 2.78
43.45 ± 2.46
taken antidepressants
(n = 8)
81.88 ± 75.97
42.43 ± 3.59
42.60 ± 3.51
42.91 ± 3.19
no antidepressants (n = 9)
0
43.79 ± 2.00
43.93 ± 1.93
43.93 ± 1.64
depression group
total (n = 10)
58.50 ± 51.91
39.10 ± 2.89
39.03 ± 2.82
39.02 ± 3.10
taken antidepressants (n = 8)
73.13 ± 47.35
38.71 ± 3.03
38.70 ± 2.91
38.44 ± 3.21
no antidepressants (n = 2)
0
40.65 ± 2.19
40.35 ± 2.76
41.35 ± 0.78
No difference in the imipramine equivalent doses was observed between the non-depression and depression groups. No difference in the mCBF values was observed between subjects taking and not taking antidepressants. However, focusing on only the patients who took antidepressants, the mCBF value in the depression group was significantly lower than that in the non-depression group.
Discussion
The present study had two principal findings. First, no apparent clinical symptomatic difference was observed between the pure and depression groups, and a right dominant asymmetry was observed in the temporal and posterior cerebral in both groups. On the other hand, in the central, a significant difference was observed between both groups: a left dominant asymmetry was observed in the depression group, while a right dominant asymmetry was observed in the pure group.
Second, the mean rCBF values in the depression group were significantly lower than those in the pure group in many regions. Moreover, in the depression group, the mean mCBF values in the global, and the right and left hemispheres were also significantly lower than those in the pure group.
Right dominant asymmetry in OSD
A right dominant asymmetry was observed in the non-depression group, but the asymmetry was not as prominent as that in our previous report [3]. The reason for this difference might have been the different characteristics and number of subjects in the two studies. Because the results of our previous study suggested that OSD has various subtypes, patients with cenesthopathic symptoms in other body parts or who were experiencing pain were excluded from the present study. Such careful screening to select more homogeneous OSD might have contributed to the difference in the results between the present study and our previous study. The difference in the mean age might also have contributed to the difference in the degree of asymmetry. However, a significant right dominant asymmetry in the temporal region was common to both the present and our previous studies. Our previous case report [2] showed a right dominant asymmetry in the temporal region that became less marked after an improvement in the symptoms of OSD. Therefore, the temporal region might play an important role in the pathophysiology of OSD. Moreover, since the right dominant asymmetry in the temporal region was found in not only the non-depression group but also in the depression group, the temporal region might be involved in the pathophysiology of OSD regardless of the history of depression. On the other hand, no previous report about the right dominant asymmetry in the posterior cerebral was found. Based on the results of this study, the posterior cerebral as well as the temporal region might be involved in the pathophysiology of OSD; however, further studies are necessary to confirm this theory.
In the central, a significant difference was observed between the non-depression and depression groups: right dominance was observed in the non-depression group, while left dominance was observed in the depression group. This result suggests that the central region, including the central sulcus, which is well known as a somatosensory and motor area, is involved in the pathophysiology of OSD. Further investigations are expected.
Global reduction in CBF in the depression group
Mean rCBF values of the depression group were significantly lower than those of the non-depression group in several regions, and the mCBF values were also significantly lower in the global and the right and left hemispheres.
Whether the non-depression group or the depression group showed abnormal perfusion is unknown, since they were not compared with non-OSD controls. However, in our previous study [3], the absolute CBF values in subjects with OSD (8 cases) were somewhat higher than those of subjects without OSD (8 cases), although the difference was not significant. Therefore, a global CBF decrease in the depression group may be a more likely explanation for the differences than a CBF increase in the non-depression group.
The reasons for these CBF reductions should be carefully examined from several aspects.
Effects of medications on mCBF values
The first reason that should be considered is the effect of medications. Some medications, including antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and hypnotics, reportedly decrease or increase the CBF [21-23]. However, the results in this study suggest that the effect of medications is not sufficient to explain the CBF reduction observed in widespread regions in the depression group, even when the data is partially corrected for medication use.
Effects of depression itself on the mCBF values
Another reason that should be considered is the effect of depression itself. The theory that CBF may be widely decreased by of comorbid depression is fascinating. There are many previous studies of CBF in depressive patients. Some reported a total reduction [24-26], which is similar to the results of the present study, but others reported regional reductions in the frontal, temporal, or parietal regions [27-29]. Because of such varied and inconsistent results, CBF changes in depression are still unclear. On the other hand, remitted depression has also been studied with regard to several factors including CBF, and various differences between subjects with and without depression have been found, even though the subjects with depression were assessed as being clinically remitted [30-32].
In the present study, the subjects in the depression group were assessed as having improved or remitted depression based on referral letters from their psychiatrists rather than on rigorous standards of remission in depression [33,34]. However, the small doses of medication that were being taken and the relatively low SDS scores suggest that subjects in the depression group would likely be categorized as having strictly defined remitted depression.
Taken together, the widespread reduction in CBF observed in the depression group in the present study might reflect the vulnerability of subjects with remitted or almost-remitted depression.
There were three limitations of the present study. The first was that almost all subjects were taking medications at the time of SPECT examination. No significant difference was found in the imipramine equivalent doses; however, other medications (such as antipsychotics, anxiolytics, or hypnotics) and their interactions could affect the CBF. The second limitation was that the depressive states of subjects were not assessed by rigorous standards of remission in depression. The third limitation was the small number of subjects, especially in the depression group. To examine statistical significance with adequate dependability, more studies with a larger number of subjects are necessary.
Regardless of the careful screening to select more homogeneous OSD, subjects of this study still exhibited a range of clinical characteristics and CBF distribution patterns. Further studies using more subjects from many different clinical aspects are needed to clarify the diversity and pathophysiology of OSD.
Conclusions
In conclusion, in the present study, no clinical symptomatic difference was observed, and a significant right dominant asymmetry in the temporal and posterior cerebral regions was found in subjects both with monosymptomatic (primary) OSD and with OSD associated with remitted depression. Moreover, CBF in the depression group was significantly decreased in widespread regions, compared with that in the non-depression group. This phenomenon might reflect medication use, but it is more likely that widespread CBF reduction is a characteristic of remitted depression.
To clarify the pathophysiology of OSD, further studies using more subjects and details are needed.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-aid for Science Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 24593141).
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
MW participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. MW, YU, AM, YS, TY, TS, CS, AK, and MT participated in the patients’ treatments and collected data. AT performed and assessed SPECT and helped draft the manuscript. AU and TN participated in study design and coordination and helped draft the manuscript. HM and AT conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.
Die Kombination aus Medikamenten und Psychotherapie gilt als effektivster Ansatz bei Depressionen. Das ist bei betagten Menschen nicht anders, trotz Besonderheiten.
Um Menschen nach der Flucht aus einem Krisengebiet bestmöglich medizinisch betreuen zu können, ist es gut zu wissen, welche Erkrankungen im jeweiligen Herkunftsland häufig sind. Dabei hilft eine Internetseite der CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
